Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
|
|
All the latest news, views, match reports and pictures from Valley Parade |
6:30am Monday 14th December 2009 in
City 2 Rotherham 4
Four wins from the last five games at Valley Parade is a record that any manager can be proud of.
Stuart McCall would kill for a run like that.
Ronnie Moore sure enjoys coming to City and he certainly milked it on Saturday after Rotherham emerged on top after a helter-skelter Yorkshire derby.
Though his claim that the Millers were the best side by a mile was laughable.
McCall had called it right when he predicted a no-holds-barred collision and it made for gripping entertainment for the fans.
His side played their part, especially in a second-half showing that was light years away from the dismal display in the previous home game.
But in the cold light of day, the City boss was left to reflect on another Valley Parade setback against a side that he would love to be challenging with in the promotion mix.
Instead of cutting the margin to the division’s pace-setters, City have now slipped below halfway for the first time since the end of August.
McCall always insists that he ignores the table. It’s the gap to the last play-off spot – currently standing at four points – that matters.
But as he swallowed Saturday’s disappointment, there was a defensive nature in his comments. With all this talk about decisive December, it’s so far played two lost two against teams above them.
Post-Rochdale, though, there were few positives to cling to. This time, City’s spirited performance was full of them.
If only the same could be said of referee Lee Probert.
It’s not the first time that a Premier League official has swaggered into town and played the big man. Not one of the crucial calls – or non-calls – went with the home team.
Adam Le Fondre, the division’s top gun, was bottled up well by a defence shorn of hamstring victim Steve Williams. And the casualty list added another name 20 minutes in when Michael Boulding’s ankle gave in following a whack from Pablo Mills – one of two crunching fouls from the centre half that earned no card.
Rotherham only got one booking all game, for striker Drewe Broughton’s elbow on Matt Clarke. That was only nine minutes in and he’d already done the same to stand-in central defender Simon Ramsden.
On the stroke of half-time, the pair went up for another high ball in front of the away dug-out and Ramsden fell flat on the ground. Chaos ensued, with Moore sticking his oar in and accusing the City defender of cheating, but no action was taken.
You knew then that Broughton was bound to score before the end.
In another world, his tap-in to put the seal on Rotherham’s first win in five would not have counted. The flag would have been raised against provider Le Fondre, who appeared to be standing a couple of yards beyond the last man.
Then again, maybe Probert would have also pulled back the wonder strike that blew away City’s rising belief and self-confidence ten minutes earlier.
Gary Roberts did a fitting Maynor Figueroa impression with his free-kick from just over the halfway line. Maybe, as Alan Hansen said about Stoke on Match of the Day, City should have stood someone in front of the ball to slow play down.
It was, though, a stunning piece of skill and judgement and any blame on Simon Eastwood for being caught off his line is harsh.
But let’s not gloss over the fact that the free-kick was taken in the wrong place. Officials are usually picky over the ball being kicked from the exact blade of grass, yet Probert allowed Roberts to bring the ball far more central after Matt Clarke had fouled Broughton just inside the touchline.
Little things can make a huge difference.
Rotherham had been the better side for the first 45 minutes without a doubt.
They started much the brighter and only Eastwood’s body prevented Nicky Law making it a hat-trick of old boys to score on their comeback following Steve Schumacher and Michael Symes.
The Millers clocked up five corners in the first 15 minutes before City grabbed the lead against the run of play.
Simon Whaley’s free-kick pinged up off the wall and span awkwardly in the box, with Boulding creating enough space for City’s star man Lee Bullock to toe-poke his first goal since Easter.
But Rotherham were quickly back in it and ahead themselves by half-time.
Kevin Ellison, as much a hate figure in these parts as his manager, got both goals to add salt to the wound.
The first followed a fine save from Eastwood, who kept out Broughton’s free header, only to see Ellison latch on to the rebound.
Then the winger was played in by Le Fondre to slide a calculated shot through the keeper’s legs.
Ramsden’s rumpus with Broughton raised temperatures before the whistle. And the noise threatened to go through the roof when Michael Flynn seized on some comical attempts to clear and fired City level just 13 seconds after the restart.
There was no room to breathe now as both sides tore at each other looking for that decisive blow. Ian Sharps, a rock at the heart of Rotherham’s defence, somehow missed a free header when City’s offside trap sprung a leak at a Law free-kick. Then Flynn hacked off the line from substitute Danny Harrison.
The action was just as frenetic at the other end, where Andy Warrington was producing another Valley Parade wonder show.
He was brilliant here in April and performed similar heroics to deny goal-bound efforts from Bullock, Chris Brandon and James O’Brien.
Bullock, a trainee at York when silver-haired Warrington was their stopper, nearly ended up with a barnet the same colour as he watched his old team-mate with growing disbelief.
But that was nothing compared with City’s stunned reaction to the Roberts free-kick – or, more pertinently, the fact that Probert let it stand. Throw in the “offside” fourth and it’s fair to say the Gloucestershire official will not be welcome back in a hurry.
“Some of his decisions baffled me,” said a diplomatic McCall, eyes rolling. “But all I can concern myself with is our performance and the second half was excellent. We asked them at half-time to raise it and have a real go and I thought they did that. You couldn’t ask for any more.”
Comments(20)
MuirheadsAfro
says...
8:27am Mon 14 Dec 09
spleen ventor
says...
9:18am Mon 14 Dec 09
MuirheadsAfro wrote:You're as blind as McCall if you think we don't need a new keeper.
Aye that free kick was totally Eastwood's fault. No blame whatsoever can lie on any of the outfield players who failed to stand over the free kick... My tea at half time was cold, I blame Eastwood. My dinner wasn't ready when I got home, I don't blame the wife, it was all Eastwood's fault...etc etc
MuirheadsAfro
says...
10:39am Mon 14 Dec 09
bilty
says...
11:27am Mon 14 Dec 09
waynus71
says...
11:33am Mon 14 Dec 09
MuirheadsAfro wrote:Get off your high horse fella. There are countless examples of when Eastwood has made a clanger. Yes, his shot-stopping is top drawer, but that isn't all a keeper needs to make it. His positional sense is woeful and he rarely ventures off his line. Ironic that the only time he moved off it, he got beaten by a wonder strike!
Yes you're right, he made no crucial saves against Rochdale. *rolls eyes* If not for Eastwood we would have conceded at least 7 against Rochdale, but hey we all need a scapegoat and if/when Eastwood returns to Town I'm sure you'll find another... p.s. security code: most-city-fans-are-o nly-happy-when-we're -losing...
shaun from richmond
says...
11:45am Mon 14 Dec 09
spleen ventor wrote:AND McCALL IS A GARBAGE COACH!!
This game told us nothing we didn't already know.... A) We need a new keeper URGENTLY! B) Premier League officials are complete CRETINS! Rant over.
spleen ventor
says...
11:48am Mon 14 Dec 09
giveover
says...
12:35pm Mon 14 Dec 09
waynus71 wrote:Aynus where were you?
MuirheadsAfro wrote: Yes you're right, he made no crucial saves against Rochdale. *rolls eyes* If not for Eastwood we would have conceded at least 7 against Rochdale, but hey we all need a scapegoat and if/when Eastwood returns to Town I'm sure you'll find another... p.s. security code: most-city-fans-are-o nly-happy-when-we're -losing...Get off your high horse fella. There are countless examples of when Eastwood has made a clanger. Yes, his shot-stopping is top drawer, but that isn't all a keeper needs to make it. His positional sense is woeful and he rarely ventures off his line. Ironic that the only time he moved off it, he got beaten by a wonder strike! If you can't see it, maybe you need to go to Specsavers? ....and take Eastwood with you! Security words - 'link-lose'. Does this refer to our weak 'link' causing us to lose'?
MuirheadsAfro
says...
12:50pm Mon 14 Dec 09
seasidebantam
says...
1:02pm Mon 14 Dec 09
nhenryv
says...
1:05pm Mon 14 Dec 09
bantam82
says...
1:13pm Mon 14 Dec 09
nhenryv
says...
1:32pm Mon 14 Dec 09
waynus71
says...
1:45pm Mon 14 Dec 09
spleen ventor
says...
2:37pm Mon 14 Dec 09
MuirheadsAfro wrote:Barnet (A)..caught in no mans land from looping header (2pts).
spleen vector - Please do point out the EXACT games and incidents where Eastwood has DIRECTLY cost us points?
shaun from richmond
says...
2:48pm Mon 14 Dec 09
waynus71 wrote:On and on and on..............
For what it's worth, here are my own observations from the game. Ellison is a quality player and given chance to hurt you, he will. Their first goal was scored by Ellison having reacted faster than Bateson. Their centre forward, the guy who liked using his elbows, won the header against Ramsden and Eastwood could do no more than push the ball straight back out. One point though, where had Clarke gone? The ball was on their right-hand side and there was about 6/7 players all clumped together. Clarke came out from being central to try to close down the guy with the ball, he failed to stop the cross and they scored. Should he have stayed central? I can't really find a fault with their 2nd goal. As I said above, Ellison is a quality player and given space, will hurt you. I understand someone said we should have kicked him about, but given we were getting yellow cards for innocuous fouls, we would surely have picked up a red for a late goal-saving challenge. The 3rd goal was just brilliant. No, it wasn't taken from the correct spot (it was a few yards further central but further back). As someone posted on another story, someone should have stood over the ball, but would he then have been booked for preventing a quickly taken freekick? Given the decisions this referee gave against us, I fear he would have done. That said, no keeper should be beaten from that distance. Isn't it ironic that McCall blamed the referee for allowing the kick to be taken from the wrong spot, whereas Sorensen was blamed by his manager for being poorly positioned! Even the BBC punditry had a laugh at McCall on the Football League show. F#cking Claridge & Rosenior laughing at him on National TV. Can it get any worse? Their 4th goal was off-side, so nothing else to add to that. I would like to know how the referee can justify his performance. One player lead with his elbow THREE TIMES. He booked him for one, yet he wasn't sent off for the others. They were tripping our players all the time, we were getting freekicks, but he wouldn't show them any cards. As soon as we made a late tackle, trip etc, he couldn't wait to book us. How can he justify that? Some of their tackles/behaviour deserved more than a yellow, but somehow got off with warnings or just a yellow. Unbelieveable! Overall, I didn't think we deserved to lose and a point would have been fair. Their keeper made some top saves and probably saved them from conceding 5 goals, so all in all, it wasn't has bad a result as some are making out. On another day, we would have had a draw or even better, all three points. If this is near the end of the road for McCall, may I suggest we go for McIlroy. He has done the business before, winning the Conference twice with Macclesfield, before getting them into Division 2 (League 1). He then got promoted to the Football League with Morecambe, where they are now in the play-offs and have just hammered Bournemouth. Surely we could tempt him to a bigger job and better long-term prospects at City. Would compensation be that high? I wouldn't have thought he would be on high wages, that is if he even has a contract at the end of the season.
shaun from richmond
says...
2:52pm Mon 14 Dec 09
spleen ventor wrote:VERY GOOD......Now heres a test for you!
MuirheadsAfro wrote: spleen vector - Please do point out the EXACT games and incidents where Eastwood has DIRECTLY cost us points?Barnet (A)..caught in no mans land from looping header (2pts). Northampton (A)..Indecision at free late free kick allowing forward to get to the ball first and head in (2pts). Dagenham (A)..went walk about for both goals losing the ball, we'll be conservative here and say he only cost us a draw (1pt). Macclesfield (A)..eaqually at fault for first goal, no call again indecision allowing forward to head over him for an easy goal (2pts). Rochdale (H)..dived over a ball a nine year old would have saved, but opposition were well worth their win and would have beat us anyway (0pts). Rotherham (H)...second goal, done through his legs at his near post, 3rd goal, chipped from half way line (1pt). I make that 8 points dropped due to keeper errors (and I think I'm being conservative!), 8 points that would have put us fifth in the table and only 2 points behind the automatic places.
giveover
says...
6:26pm Mon 14 Dec 09
denis court
says...
8:21pm Mon 14 Dec 09
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Bradford and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Bradford and surrounding areas now
Search Now »
Homes for sale and to let in Bradford and surrounding areas.
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Bradford and surrounding areas
Search Now »
spleen ventor says...
7:40am Mon 14 Dec 09
A) We need a new keeper URGENTLY!
B) Premier League officials are complete
CRETINS!
Rant over.