Match Reports RSS Feed


Bradford City
All the latest news, views, match reports and pictures from Valley Parade

Moore of the same as Rotherham bag maximum


City 2 Rotherham 4

Four wins from the last five games at Valley Parade is a record that any manager can be proud of.

Stuart McCall would kill for a run like that.

Ronnie Moore sure enjoys coming to City and he certainly milked it on Saturday after Rotherham emerged on top after a helter-skelter Yorkshire derby.

Though his claim that the Millers were the best side by a mile was laughable.

McCall had called it right when he predicted a no-holds-barred collision and it made for gripping entertainment for the fans.

His side played their part, especially in a second-half showing that was light years away from the dismal display in the previous home game.

But in the cold light of day, the City boss was left to reflect on another Valley Parade setback against a side that he would love to be challenging with in the promotion mix.

Instead of cutting the margin to the division’s pace-setters, City have now slipped below halfway for the first time since the end of August.

McCall always insists that he ignores the table. It’s the gap to the last play-off spot – currently standing at four points – that matters.

But as he swallowed Saturday’s disappointment, there was a defensive nature in his comments. With all this talk about decisive December, it’s so far played two lost two against teams above them.

Post-Rochdale, though, there were few positives to cling to. This time, City’s spirited performance was full of them.

If only the same could be said of referee Lee Probert.

It’s not the first time that a Premier League official has swaggered into town and played the big man. Not one of the crucial calls – or non-calls – went with the home team.

Adam Le Fondre, the division’s top gun, was bottled up well by a defence shorn of hamstring victim Steve Williams. And the casualty list added another name 20 minutes in when Michael Boulding’s ankle gave in following a whack from Pablo Mills – one of two crunching fouls from the centre half that earned no card.

Rotherham only got one booking all game, for striker Drewe Broughton’s elbow on Matt Clarke. That was only nine minutes in and he’d already done the same to stand-in central defender Simon Ramsden.

On the stroke of half-time, the pair went up for another high ball in front of the away dug-out and Ramsden fell flat on the ground. Chaos ensued, with Moore sticking his oar in and accusing the City defender of cheating, but no action was taken.

You knew then that Broughton was bound to score before the end.

In another world, his tap-in to put the seal on Rotherham’s first win in five would not have counted. The flag would have been raised against provider Le Fondre, who appeared to be standing a couple of yards beyond the last man.

Then again, maybe Probert would have also pulled back the wonder strike that blew away City’s rising belief and self-confidence ten minutes earlier.

Gary Roberts did a fitting Maynor Figueroa impression with his free-kick from just over the halfway line. Maybe, as Alan Hansen said about Stoke on Match of the Day, City should have stood someone in front of the ball to slow play down.

It was, though, a stunning piece of skill and judgement and any blame on Simon Eastwood for being caught off his line is harsh.

But let’s not gloss over the fact that the free-kick was taken in the wrong place. Officials are usually picky over the ball being kicked from the exact blade of grass, yet Probert allowed Roberts to bring the ball far more central after Matt Clarke had fouled Broughton just inside the touchline.

Little things can make a huge difference.

Rotherham had been the better side for the first 45 minutes without a doubt.

They started much the brighter and only Eastwood’s body prevented Nicky Law making it a hat-trick of old boys to score on their comeback following Steve Schumacher and Michael Symes.

The Millers clocked up five corners in the first 15 minutes before City grabbed the lead against the run of play.

Simon Whaley’s free-kick pinged up off the wall and span awkwardly in the box, with Boulding creating enough space for City’s star man Lee Bullock to toe-poke his first goal since Easter.

But Rotherham were quickly back in it and ahead themselves by half-time.

Kevin Ellison, as much a hate figure in these parts as his manager, got both goals to add salt to the wound.

The first followed a fine save from Eastwood, who kept out Broughton’s free header, only to see Ellison latch on to the rebound.

Then the winger was played in by Le Fondre to slide a calculated shot through the keeper’s legs.

Ramsden’s rumpus with Broughton raised temperatures before the whistle. And the noise threatened to go through the roof when Michael Flynn seized on some comical attempts to clear and fired City level just 13 seconds after the restart.

There was no room to breathe now as both sides tore at each other looking for that decisive blow. Ian Sharps, a rock at the heart of Rotherham’s defence, somehow missed a free header when City’s offside trap sprung a leak at a Law free-kick. Then Flynn hacked off the line from substitute Danny Harrison.

The action was just as frenetic at the other end, where Andy Warrington was producing another Valley Parade wonder show.

He was brilliant here in April and performed similar heroics to deny goal-bound efforts from Bullock, Chris Brandon and James O’Brien.

Bullock, a trainee at York when silver-haired Warrington was their stopper, nearly ended up with a barnet the same colour as he watched his old team-mate with growing disbelief.

But that was nothing compared with City’s stunned reaction to the Roberts free-kick – or, more pertinently, the fact that Probert let it stand. Throw in the “offside” fourth and it’s fair to say the Gloucestershire official will not be welcome back in a hurry.

“Some of his decisions baffled me,” said a diplomatic McCall, eyes rolling. “But all I can concern myself with is our performance and the second half was excellent. We asked them at half-time to raise it and have a real go and I thought they did that. You couldn’t ask for any more.”

Comments(20)

spleen ventor says...
7:40am Mon 14 Dec 09

This game told us nothing we didn't already know....
A) We need a new keeper URGENTLY!
B) Premier League officials are complete
CRETINS!
Rant over.

MuirheadsAfro says...
8:27am Mon 14 Dec 09

Aye that free kick was totally Eastwood's fault. No blame whatsoever can lie on any of the outfield players who failed to stand over the free kick...
My tea at half time was cold, I blame Eastwood. My dinner wasn't ready when I got home, I don't blame the wife, it was all Eastwood's fault...etc etc

spleen ventor says...
9:18am Mon 14 Dec 09

MuirheadsAfro wrote:
Aye that free kick was totally Eastwood's fault. No blame whatsoever can lie on any of the outfield players who failed to stand over the free kick... My tea at half time was cold, I blame Eastwood. My dinner wasn't ready when I got home, I don't blame the wife, it was all Eastwood's fault...etc etc
You're as blind as McCall if you think we don't need a new keeper.
In the last two home games he's dived over one a nine year old would have saved (crucial 1st goal against Rochdale), been done through his legs on the near post and been chipped from the half way line!
I rest my case.
p.s security code: girl-loan...lol!

MuirheadsAfro says...
10:39am Mon 14 Dec 09

Yes you're right, he made no crucial saves against Rochdale. *rolls eyes* If not for Eastwood we would have conceded at least 7 against Rochdale, but hey we all need a scapegoat and if/when Eastwood returns to Town I'm sure you'll find another...
p.s. security code: most-city-fans-are-o
nly-happy-when-we're
-losing...

bilty says...
11:27am Mon 14 Dec 09

Stuart said about the second half performance that "he could not have asked for more,and we got at ,em".
Wel,I,m afraid he CAN,and should DEMAND more from now on-and it,s so,so simple-TELL THEM TO DO IT FROM THE BLOODY KICK OFF ---"equalise before they score!!"

waynus71 says...
11:33am Mon 14 Dec 09

MuirheadsAfro wrote:
Yes you're right, he made no crucial saves against Rochdale. *rolls eyes* If not for Eastwood we would have conceded at least 7 against Rochdale, but hey we all need a scapegoat and if/when Eastwood returns to Town I'm sure you'll find another... p.s. security code: most-city-fans-are-o nly-happy-when-we're -losing...
Get off your high horse fella. There are countless examples of when Eastwood has made a clanger. Yes, his shot-stopping is top drawer, but that isn't all a keeper needs to make it. His positional sense is woeful and he rarely ventures off his line. Ironic that the only time he moved off it, he got beaten by a wonder strike!

If you can't see it, maybe you need to go to Specsavers? ....and take Eastwood with you!

Security words - 'link-lose'. Does this refer to our weak 'link' causing us to lose'?

shaun from richmond says...
11:45am Mon 14 Dec 09

spleen ventor wrote:
This game told us nothing we didn't already know.... A) We need a new keeper URGENTLY! B) Premier League officials are complete CRETINS! Rant over.
AND McCALL IS A GARBAGE COACH!!

spleen ventor says...
11:48am Mon 14 Dec 09

Thanks waynus, I don't often agree with you (lol). The points Eastwood has cost us so far would have seen us comfortably in the play off places and pushing for an automatic spot, I said at the start of the season the position would cost us and so it's proving.

giveover says...
12:35pm Mon 14 Dec 09

waynus71 wrote:
MuirheadsAfro wrote: Yes you're right, he made no crucial saves against Rochdale. *rolls eyes* If not for Eastwood we would have conceded at least 7 against Rochdale, but hey we all need a scapegoat and if/when Eastwood returns to Town I'm sure you'll find another... p.s. security code: most-city-fans-are-o nly-happy-when-we're -losing...
Get off your high horse fella. There are countless examples of when Eastwood has made a clanger. Yes, his shot-stopping is top drawer, but that isn't all a keeper needs to make it. His positional sense is woeful and he rarely ventures off his line. Ironic that the only time he moved off it, he got beaten by a wonder strike! If you can't see it, maybe you need to go to Specsavers? ....and take Eastwood with you! Security words - 'link-lose'. Does this refer to our weak 'link' causing us to lose'?
Aynus where were you?

MuirheadsAfro says...
12:50pm Mon 14 Dec 09

spleen vector - Please do point out the EXACT games and incidents where Eastwood has DIRECTLY cost us points?

seasidebantam says...
1:02pm Mon 14 Dec 09

it's no good blaming eastwood it has to get pass ten men before him the blame lies with mcall and jacobs and i think to be perfectly honest i think both of them and the chairman will be happy with a mid table finish then mcall cwill leave the club saying he did his best with what was available roll on next year and when the job is advertised i hope a certain manager from rochdale fancies a bigger club.
merry xmas to all us poor suffering city fans.

nhenryv says...
1:05pm Mon 14 Dec 09

The excuses that football fans come up with... the goalie is costing us promotion; the ref was bribed/ blind;the crowd din't get behind the team; the weather worked agaisnt us;
WAKE UP!!
SM has had long enough. He must go NOW for us to stand any chance of saving this season. This form will affect season ticket sales which are likely now to drop below 10k. Sane fans are hurt and disillusioned. SM cannot manage; move him upstairs, do something, anything. Look at Sheffield Wednesday: decisive action. We need a change!!!

bantam82 says...
1:13pm Mon 14 Dec 09

What worry's me is the amount of 'clear cut' chances these clubs are creating against us. It seems after we concede that the heads drop and we seem to lose all shape and people cut us open for fun.
Eastwood should have done better with a couple of the goals that squeezed under him....however why were the opposition allowed to get into such good positions with so much time and space to 'pick a spot' whereas we don't seem to be able to pick a way through the opposition defence.
Perhaps we need a change of tactics, perhaps rest big James and use Brandon as a support striker with Boulding as the focal point. This would stop us having the easy option of hoofing the ball up to Hanson every time we get possession. Get the ball on the deck and try to play football.
On a plus point, it was nice to see City come out fighting after half time for once! Normally they come out and look like a side with no energy whatsoever!! (perhaps they've changed the half time drinks!!)

nhenryv says...
1:32pm Mon 14 Dec 09

I've come to the conclusion over 2 years plus that McCalls ONLY tactic is HOOF!! Boulding is a lightweight, easily intimidated and knocked off the ball. Hanson is fine but overused as a target. Its not exactly difficult to play against, is it? You are right about the defence; even O'Brien is now frequently caught out of position and defenders run through us like a knife thru butter. But is the refs fault, isn't it? After all, he allows the goals to stand against us. Outrageous!

waynus71 says...
1:45pm Mon 14 Dec 09

For what it's worth, here are my own observations from the game. Ellison is a quality player and given chance to hurt you, he will. Their first goal was scored by Ellison having reacted faster than Bateson. Their centre forward, the guy who liked using his elbows, won the header against Ramsden and Eastwood could do no more than push the ball straight back out. One point though, where had Clarke gone? The ball was on their right-hand side and there was about 6/7 players all clumped together. Clarke came out from being central to try to close down the guy with the ball, he failed to stop the cross and they scored. Should he have stayed central?

I can't really find a fault with their 2nd goal. As I said above, Ellison is a quality player and given space, will hurt you. I understand someone said we should have kicked him about, but given we were getting yellow cards for innocuous fouls, we would surely have picked up a red for a late goal-saving challenge.

The 3rd goal was just brilliant. No, it wasn't taken from the correct spot (it was a few yards further central but further back). As someone posted on another story, someone should have stood over the ball, but would he then have been booked for preventing a quickly taken freekick? Given the decisions this referee gave against us, I fear he would have done. That said, no keeper should be beaten from that distance. Isn't it ironic that McCall blamed the referee for allowing the kick to be taken from the wrong spot, whereas Sorensen was blamed by his manager for being poorly positioned! Even the BBC punditry had a laugh at McCall on the Football League show. F#cking Claridge & Rosenior laughing at him on National TV. Can it get any worse?

Their 4th goal was off-side, so nothing else to add to that.

I would like to know how the referee can justify his performance. One player lead with his elbow THREE TIMES. He booked him for one, yet he wasn't sent off for the others. They were tripping our players all the time, we were getting freekicks, but he wouldn't show them any cards. As soon as we made a late tackle, trip etc, he couldn't wait to book us. How can he justify that? Some of their tackles/behaviour deserved more than a yellow, but somehow got off with warnings or just a yellow. Unbelieveable!

Overall, I didn't think we deserved to lose and a point would have been fair. Their keeper made some top saves and probably saved them from conceding 5 goals, so all in all, it wasn't has bad a result as some are making out. On another day, we would have had a draw or even better, all three points.

If this is near the end of the road for McCall, may I suggest we go for McIlroy. He has done the business before, winning the Conference twice with Macclesfield, before getting them into Division 2 (League 1). He then got promoted to the Football League with Morecambe, where they are now in the play-offs and have just hammered Bournemouth. Surely we could tempt him to a bigger job and better long-term prospects at City. Would compensation be that high? I wouldn't have thought he would be on high wages, that is if he even has a contract at the end of the season.

spleen ventor says...
2:37pm Mon 14 Dec 09

MuirheadsAfro wrote:
spleen vector - Please do point out the EXACT games and incidents where Eastwood has DIRECTLY cost us points?
Barnet (A)..caught in no mans land from looping header (2pts).
Northampton (A)..Indecision at free late free kick allowing forward to get to the ball first and head in (2pts).
Dagenham (A)..went walk about for both goals losing the ball, we'll be conservative here and say he only cost us a draw (1pt).
Macclesfield (A)..eaqually at fault for first goal, no call again indecision allowing forward to head over him for an easy goal (2pts).
Rochdale (H)..dived over a ball a nine year old would have saved, but opposition were well worth their win and would have beat us anyway (0pts).
Rotherham (H)...second goal, done through his legs at his near post, 3rd goal, chipped from half way line (1pt).
I make that 8 points dropped due to keeper errors (and I think I'm being conservative!), 8 points that would have put us fifth in the table and only 2 points behind the automatic places.

shaun from richmond says...
2:48pm Mon 14 Dec 09

waynus71 wrote:
For what it's worth, here are my own observations from the game. Ellison is a quality player and given chance to hurt you, he will. Their first goal was scored by Ellison having reacted faster than Bateson. Their centre forward, the guy who liked using his elbows, won the header against Ramsden and Eastwood could do no more than push the ball straight back out. One point though, where had Clarke gone? The ball was on their right-hand side and there was about 6/7 players all clumped together. Clarke came out from being central to try to close down the guy with the ball, he failed to stop the cross and they scored. Should he have stayed central? I can't really find a fault with their 2nd goal. As I said above, Ellison is a quality player and given space, will hurt you. I understand someone said we should have kicked him about, but given we were getting yellow cards for innocuous fouls, we would surely have picked up a red for a late goal-saving challenge. The 3rd goal was just brilliant. No, it wasn't taken from the correct spot (it was a few yards further central but further back). As someone posted on another story, someone should have stood over the ball, but would he then have been booked for preventing a quickly taken freekick? Given the decisions this referee gave against us, I fear he would have done. That said, no keeper should be beaten from that distance. Isn't it ironic that McCall blamed the referee for allowing the kick to be taken from the wrong spot, whereas Sorensen was blamed by his manager for being poorly positioned! Even the BBC punditry had a laugh at McCall on the Football League show. F#cking Claridge & Rosenior laughing at him on National TV. Can it get any worse? Their 4th goal was off-side, so nothing else to add to that. I would like to know how the referee can justify his performance. One player lead with his elbow THREE TIMES. He booked him for one, yet he wasn't sent off for the others. They were tripping our players all the time, we were getting freekicks, but he wouldn't show them any cards. As soon as we made a late tackle, trip etc, he couldn't wait to book us. How can he justify that? Some of their tackles/behaviour deserved more than a yellow, but somehow got off with warnings or just a yellow. Unbelieveable! Overall, I didn't think we deserved to lose and a point would have been fair. Their keeper made some top saves and probably saved them from conceding 5 goals, so all in all, it wasn't has bad a result as some are making out. On another day, we would have had a draw or even better, all three points. If this is near the end of the road for McCall, may I suggest we go for McIlroy. He has done the business before, winning the Conference twice with Macclesfield, before getting them into Division 2 (League 1). He then got promoted to the Football League with Morecambe, where they are now in the play-offs and have just hammered Bournemouth. Surely we could tempt him to a bigger job and better long-term prospects at City. Would compensation be that high? I wouldn't have thought he would be on high wages, that is if he even has a contract at the end of the season.
On and on and on..............

shaun from richmond says...
2:52pm Mon 14 Dec 09

spleen ventor wrote:
MuirheadsAfro wrote: spleen vector - Please do point out the EXACT games and incidents where Eastwood has DIRECTLY cost us points?
Barnet (A)..caught in no mans land from looping header (2pts). Northampton (A)..Indecision at free late free kick allowing forward to get to the ball first and head in (2pts). Dagenham (A)..went walk about for both goals losing the ball, we'll be conservative here and say he only cost us a draw (1pt). Macclesfield (A)..eaqually at fault for first goal, no call again indecision allowing forward to head over him for an easy goal (2pts). Rochdale (H)..dived over a ball a nine year old would have saved, but opposition were well worth their win and would have beat us anyway (0pts). Rotherham (H)...second goal, done through his legs at his near post, 3rd goal, chipped from half way line (1pt). I make that 8 points dropped due to keeper errors (and I think I'm being conservative!), 8 points that would have put us fifth in the table and only 2 points behind the automatic places.
VERY GOOD......Now heres a test for you!
Name all the games and decisions McCall dreamnt up.....that cost us points??
I feel a WAYNUS reply size coming up!!
McCall OUT!!!!!!! For Christmas...PLEASE!!

giveover says...
6:26pm Mon 14 Dec 09

Brian Laws is doing nowt,could be worth a try.

denis court says...
8:21pm Mon 14 Dec 09

Surely their man led with his arm, not his elbow and unless city players are a foot smaller than him, his arm would have struck them on their chest (if it even did on the third occaision) Did any of the city players have facial inuries as a result of the elbows being smashed into their faces? One city player on their site seems to be holding his forehead


Action from Bradford City's game with Rotherham. Gareth Evans at full stretch

Michael Flynn punches the air in delight after making it 2-2 a minute into the second half

Gareth Evans at full stretch



Most popular


Get Adobe Flash player

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses