Match Reports RSS Feed


Bradford City
All the latest news, views, match reports and pictures from Valley Parade

Ten-man Bantams grind out priceless result that restores self-belief


City 1 Hereford 0

It’s the oldest argument in the book. Would you prefer to be royally entertained on the edge of the seat every week or be content just watching a winning team?

Ideally, it would be a case of both. But anyone who says the first is a liar.

City have served up some exciting stuff already this season. Witness the belting clash against Crewe a fortnight ago – an absolute treat for any neutral.

But losing teams aren’t going to get clapped off so enthusiastically every time by the fans.

All that really matters, as gauged by Stuart McCall’s reaction from Saturday’s hard-fought victory, is getting the right result.

Back-to-back defeats is hardly the cue for free-fall but given the way last season slid away so unexpectedly from a position of strength in the spring, City fans are understandably twitchy.

Another setback against Hereford, no matter how well City might have played, and a few alarm bells would have begun to clang.

In football terms, Saturday may have been a pale imitation of the previous home game but the final scoreline was priceless for all concerned.

McCall certainly knew it once his side had survived a tricky final ten minutes after Lee Bullock was sent packing. “That was a big, big win for us,” said the City boss. “If we’d dropped a couple more points after being 1-0 up, the belief would have started dripping out of the supporters.

“We always aim to go out and try to score lots of goals and be positive but the bottom line was three points to keep us cracking on.

“We created far, far more chances against Crewe and came away with nothing but when you’re not winning games the pressure can build each week.”

Hereford, let’s face it, were strictly average despite a five-match unbeaten run against all the top sides. But City’s inability to dig up a second goal, despite their control on proceedings, kept the visitors interested.

And given the worrying tendency to let late leads slip, there were plenty of anxious faces before referee Colin Webster’s whistle ensured the agony was over.

That was the only time Webster endeared himself to the Valley Parade faithful. He won few friends – except for Hereford’s Kenny Lunt – by giving Bullock his marching orders.

The improving midfielder had enjoyed the freedom of the park for most of the afternoon, with Hereford allowing him space and time to spray the ball around.

But Bullock already had one black mark to his name for an instinctive handball after 15 minutes. He tried to “Maradona” Steve Williams’ header past keeper Adam Bartlett and Webster was having none of it.

It seemed a harsh card at the time, though Bullock had no complaints afterwards, but the real bone of contention was the follow-up booking for his challenge on Lunt in the centre circle.

It was a bog-standard foul but nothing more, and nobody thought much about it. That was until Lunt carried on his protests in front of the referee, who then checked back and reached for his pocket.

In terms of punishment for Bullock, the second yellow means nothing. He was already sitting out next week’s trip to Macclesfield after his first offence triggered an automatic one-game ban for reaching five bookings for the season.

But it left City with an uncomfortable finale of a game they should have put to bed long before.

A team brighter than Hereford might have made them pay. Instead, despite the odd squeak or two, City saw it through for their first win and clean sheet in October.

Any fears of a hangover from successive losses had been dispelled by their bright approach to the first half.

The pitch wasn’t easy after the heavy rain and play was often very narrow, with only Scott Neilson really using the flanks to the full extent. But City moved the ball about briskly, with the recalled Chris Brandon an effective go-between from the midfield to attack.

Hereford, clearly interested in a point, succeeded in keeping City at arm’s length. Most of the home shots were limited to outside the box, and while James Hanson was once again dominating every header, the second ball rarely fell to a claret shirt.

Brandon, Gareth Evans and, inevitably, Michael Flynn all had pot-shots but the closest City came to anything was a concerted shout for handball against Ryan Green that was waved away.

They needed something to break in their favour – and it did four minutes before the break.

Brandon’s corner, City’s fifth of the half, came to Flynn, who smacked it hard and low against Bartlett’s right upright. For once, the ball bounced kindly for the Bantams as the rebound fell right into the path of Evans to dig out from under his feet and roll home from six yards.

A scrappy goal but a crucial one and no more than City’s control had warranted.

The second period began in the same manner. Brandon forced an early save and then Evans should have done better after Bullock had picked him out in plenty of space.

Simon Eastwood, enjoying a much easier ride than at Dagenham, had only one split-second of discomfort when Bullock sliced an intended clearance towards his own goal. Twice City had the ball in the Hereford net. Twice, to the derision of the crowd, the offside flag went up.

Both calls may have been correct but did the assistant really need to take so long to raise his arm?

Evans, Flynn and substitute James O’Brien had further chances before Hanson missed the best of them from Jon Bateson’s inviting cross. His header was well tipped over by Bartlett but a yard either side of the keeper and it was a sure-fire goal.

McCall felt Hereford’s heads were ready to drop with a second strike. Instead, as he put it, they were galvanised by City’s failure to find that decisive blow.

The visitors threw caution to the wind as John Trewick threw on two fresh strikers to replace the anonymous front pair.

Gambia international Ed Sonko was a particularly lively addition and it needed a well-timed block from Steve Williams to keep one raid in check.

Bullock’s departure livened things up, especially when Hereford left back Ryan Valentine – also walking a yellow-card tightrope – escaped similar censor for crashing into Flynn.

Valley Parade held its breath as Mark Marshall’s fizzing cross was only partially parried by Eastwood but Luke O’Brien was on to the loose ball before Sonko and three faith-restoring points were secure.


Your Say YourBradford

spleen ventor, Bradford says...
7:34am Mon 26 Oct 09

I did pose the question after the Crewe game, which would you prefer...a highly entertaining narrow defeat...or a dour 1-0 win and 3 points?...This certainly fell into the latter, but as McCall says this was a big win and keeps us nicely placed just behind the play off places. We played some decent stuff at times, but were left hanging on again against very average opposition, although this was not helped by yet more cretinous officials.
Anyway, looking at the upcoming fixtures we should every reason to be optimistic and in a month or so we could find ourselves in a very handy position.

tyker, midland road says...
8:03am Mon 26 Oct 09

1.0 wins every time:another 20 or so in the rest of the season will see us in the thick of the promotion tussle.


shaun from richmond, richmond says...
8:14am Mon 26 Oct 09

Keep the Postal strike going!!!!

This will keep McCall away from his DVDs.........and as a result no preparation.........
.which equals.......VICTORY
!!

I hope all City fans had like me 1-0 Evans first scorer!!!!

Just think if we dont have the meddling McCall involved in all our games we would be TOP OF THE LEAGUE!!
KEEP McCALL away from any DVDs for the next 6 months!


KnightMcCall, East Morton says...
9:54am Mon 26 Oct 09

shaun from richmond wrote:
Keep the Postal strike going!!!! This will keep McCall away from his DVDs.........and as a result no preparation......... .which equals.......VICTORY !! I hope all City fans had like me 1-0 Evans first scorer!!!! Just think if we dont have the meddling McCall involved in all our games we would be TOP OF THE LEAGUE!! KEEP McCALL away from any DVDs for the next 6 months!
So when we lose it is because of McCall and when we win it is despite McCall.

you really are a cretin.

macca1969, settle says...
10:05am Mon 26 Oct 09

shaun from richmond wrote:
Keep the Postal strike going!!!! This will keep McCall away from his DVDs.........and as a result no preparation......... .which equals.......VICTORY !! I hope all City fans had like me 1-0 Evans first scorer!!!! Just think if we dont have the meddling McCall involved in all our games we would be TOP OF THE LEAGUE!! KEEP McCALL away from any DVDs for the next 6 months!
Talking cr#p again shaun.I think you must have banged your head when being tupped by a frisky ram.City have played some very good, entertaining stuff this season with a relatively young entertaining side,this is down to McCall not anyone else,he has to watch DVDS of the opposition as all our rivals play at the same time as us or is your brain really that small you can't work that one out.McCall lost his way last season but i for one am enjoying the entertaining football this season and the work and endeavour the team puts in week in and week out.I am also excited about the long term prospects of this team more so than i have in a long time under countless managers sinse Jagger,so give it a rest you pratt and get behind the team.

macca1969, settle says...
10:07am Mon 26 Oct 09

shaun from richmond wrote:
Keep the Postal strike going!!!! This will keep McCall away from his DVDs.........and as a result no preparation......... .which equals.......VICTORY !! I hope all City fans had like me 1-0 Evans first scorer!!!! Just think if we dont have the meddling McCall involved in all our games we would be TOP OF THE LEAGUE!! KEEP McCALL away from any DVDs for the next 6 months!
Talking cr#p again shaun.I think you must have banged your head when being tupped by a frisky ram.City have played some very good, entertaining stuff this season with a relatively young entertaining side,this is down to McCall not anyone else,he has to watch DVDS of the opposition as all our rivals play at the same time as us or is your brain really that small you can't work that one out.McCall lost his way last season but i for one am enjoying the entertaining football this season and the work and endeavour the team puts in week in and week out.I am also excited about the long term prospects of this team more so than i have in a long time under countless managers sinse Jagger,so give it a rest you pratt and get behind the team.

macca1969, settle says...
10:07am Mon 26 Oct 09

shaun from richmond wrote:
Keep the Postal strike going!!!! This will keep McCall away from his DVDs.........and as a result no preparation......... .which equals.......VICTORY !! I hope all City fans had like me 1-0 Evans first scorer!!!! Just think if we dont have the meddling McCall involved in all our games we would be TOP OF THE LEAGUE!! KEEP McCALL away from any DVDs for the next 6 months!
Talking cr#p again shaun.I think you must have banged your head when being tupped by a frisky ram.City have played some very good, entertaining stuff this season with a relatively young entertaining side,this is down to McCall not anyone else,he has to watch DVDS of the opposition as all our rivals play at the same time as us or is your brain really that small you can't work that one out.McCall lost his way last season but i for one am enjoying the entertaining football this season and the work and endeavour the team puts in week in and week out.I am also excited about the long term prospects of this team more so than i have in a long time under countless managers sinse Jagger,so give it a rest you pratt and get behind the team.

macca1969, settle says...
10:11am Mon 26 Oct 09

Don't know why its in 3 times but i meant every word Shaun BAA BAA BAA

pudsey.bantam, pudsey says...
1:21pm Mon 26 Oct 09

I read a post on Boy from Brazil, that the Hereford fans were heavy handed by the City stewards,this will not give city a very good name for away fans for future games......also the fans on the coach were attacked by a gang of youths.....who were later seen running in to the grounds of a mosque in manningham lane.......were these outsiders and not City fans???

waynus71, BD6 says...
8:05pm Mon 26 Oct 09

I want to start with an apology to 'valleyofshame'. I read a post from you, misinterpreted it and posted a reactive reply. I was wrong and as such, I offer you the olive branch. I am genuinely sorry for my outburst.

Turning now to the game, I think we were well worth the 3 points. Hereford have been playing well of late and haven't conceded many goals. Seeing how they set up and played, it isn't hard to see why. They defended very well and we had to take pot shots from outside the area. With very little width on the left and Neilson struggling to beat his man, chances from crosses were always going to be at a premium.

I didn't see Bully's hand-ball, as there was a steel support in my line of sight. I thought the 2nd booking was a very poor decision, but having seen it again on TV, it does look a booking. However, what really irks me is the inconsistency. Their left-back should also have got his marching orders, but the referee just sent him away. It is this element of refereeing that really frustrates football fans.

I saw the stewards being 'heavy handed' towards the Hereford fans. I didn't see what had happened, but a few stewards waded into a couple of fans and demanded they leave. The lads refused and so the stewards dragged them out and basically pushed them out of the ground.

I was almost involved in some unpleasantries myself. Behind me was one of the most annoying 'fans' I have ever had the displeasure of sitting near. He barracked Hanson all the way through the game and when he had a decent effort and the Bradford End started singing his name, the guy shouted, 'and he should f#ck off back to the co-op'. I couldn't believe it. It was like this all the game. Hanson wasn't the only one that came in for criticism either.

I have also read someone else's comments regarding Williams' stance on putting the ball into touch. Personally, unless he can comfortably control the ball, find a man and make the pass, I would rather he didn't mess and instead go for the safe option by putting the ball out. We have seen Clarke trying to pass his way out of trouble and look at the trouble he has put us under.

Finally, Eastwood came and made some good saves/clearances. It looked like the extra coaching had worked, as he came off his line and was clearly more positive. However, he still manged to make two clangers, which luckily, went unpunished.

As for the rest of the team, I thought they played well and we were unlucky not to score more. In relation to the two goals disallowed, the flag went up very early for the first one and I knew it wasn't a goal way before most in the ground. The linesman was slower to react to the 2nd one and I thought it was going to stand, until the flag was eventually raised.

Bring on Macclesfield.

lonniejockstrap, Bradford says...
8:43pm Mon 26 Oct 09

waynus71 wrote:
I want to start with an apology to 'valleyofshame'. I read a post from you, misinterpreted it and posted a reactive reply. I was wrong and as such, I offer you the olive branch. I am genuinely sorry for my outburst. Turning now to the game, I think we were well worth the 3 points. Hereford have been playing well of late and haven't conceded many goals. Seeing how they set up and played, it isn't hard to see why. They defended very well and we had to take pot shots from outside the area. With very little width on the left and Neilson struggling to beat his man, chances from crosses were always going to be at a premium. I didn't see Bully's hand-ball, as there was a steel support in my line of sight. I thought the 2nd booking was a very poor decision, but having seen it again on TV, it does look a booking. However, what really irks me is the inconsistency. Their left-back should also have got his marching orders, but the referee just sent him away. It is this element of refereeing that really frustrates football fans. I saw the stewards being 'heavy handed' towards the Hereford fans. I didn't see what had happened, but a few stewards waded into a couple of fans and demanded they leave. The lads refused and so the stewards dragged them out and basically pushed them out of the ground. I was almost involved in some unpleasantries myself. Behind me was one of the most annoying 'fans' I have ever had the displeasure of sitting near. He barracked Hanson all the way through the game and when he had a decent effort and the Bradford End started singing his name, the guy shouted, 'and he should f#ck off back to the co-op'. I couldn't believe it. It was like this all the game. Hanson wasn't the only one that came in for criticism either. I have also read someone else's comments regarding Williams' stance on putting the ball into touch. Personally, unless he can comfortably control the ball, find a man and make the pass, I would rather he didn't mess and instead go for the safe option by putting the ball out. We have seen Clarke trying to pass his way out of trouble and look at the trouble he has put us under. Finally, Eastwood came and made some good saves/clearances. It looked like the extra coaching had worked, as he came off his line and was clearly more positive. However, he still manged to make two clangers, which luckily, went unpunished. As for the rest of the team, I thought they played well and we were unlucky not to score more. In relation to the two goals disallowed, the flag went up very early for the first one and I knew it wasn't a goal way before most in the ground. The linesman was slower to react to the 2nd one and I thought it was going to stand, until the flag was eventually raised. Bring on Macclesfield.
Good to see you acknowledging the benefit of having our goalkeeper being coached by a 'goalkeeper' as opposed to Wetherall waynus.

valleyofshame, Bfd says...
8:47pm Mon 26 Oct 09

waynus71 wrote:
I want to start with an apology to 'valleyofshame'. I read a post from you, misinterpreted it and posted a reactive reply. I was wrong and as such, I offer you the olive branch. I am genuinely sorry for my outburst. Turning now to the game, I think we were well worth the 3 points. Hereford have been playing well of late and haven't conceded many goals. Seeing how they set up and played, it isn't hard to see why. They defended very well and we had to take pot shots from outside the area. With very little width on the left and Neilson struggling to beat his man, chances from crosses were always going to be at a premium. I didn't see Bully's hand-ball, as there was a steel support in my line of sight. I thought the 2nd booking was a very poor decision, but having seen it again on TV, it does look a booking. However, what really irks me is the inconsistency. Their left-back should also have got his marching orders, but the referee just sent him away. It is this element of refereeing that really frustrates football fans. I saw the stewards being 'heavy handed' towards the Hereford fans. I didn't see what had happened, but a few stewards waded into a couple of fans and demanded they leave. The lads refused and so the stewards dragged them out and basically pushed them out of the ground. I was almost involved in some unpleasantries myself. Behind me was one of the most annoying 'fans' I have ever had the displeasure of sitting near. He barracked Hanson all the way through the game and when he had a decent effort and the Bradford End started singing his name, the guy shouted, 'and he should f#ck off back to the co-op'. I couldn't believe it. It was like this all the game. Hanson wasn't the only one that came in for criticism either. I have also read someone else's comments regarding Williams' stance on putting the ball into touch. Personally, unless he can comfortably control the ball, find a man and make the pass, I would rather he didn't mess and instead go for the safe option by putting the ball out. We have seen Clarke trying to pass his way out of trouble and look at the trouble he has put us under. Finally, Eastwood came and made some good saves/clearances. It looked like the extra coaching had worked, as he came off his line and was clearly more positive. However, he still manged to make two clangers, which luckily, went unpunished. As for the rest of the team, I thought they played well and we were unlucky not to score more. In relation to the two goals disallowed, the flag went up very early for the first one and I knew it wasn't a goal way before most in the ground. The linesman was slower to react to the 2nd one and I thought it was going to stand, until the flag was eventually raised. Bring on Macclesfield.
Thank you. Accepted. Matter now closed.

Farsley XI, Farsley says...
10:21pm Mon 26 Oct 09

I have missed the comments from Waynus, sad to hear you were sat with some fool in the stand, it’s annoying when the players are doing well and giving 100% and someone berates their efforts; however he has paid his money and is entitled to his opinion. Where have we heard that line before? Trust me I am not having a go, but this is how some of the posters come across at times (again this is not directed at Waynus). To be fair some of the negative posters have shown signs of optimism. One thing no one has picked up on is how we got into a negative team, this is one problem area we struggled with last season, we could never do well against a defending team hopping to get a break and score the odd goal, have we turned a corner?

valleyofshame, Bfd says...
8:16am Tue 27 Oct 09

Farsley XI wrote:
I have missed the comments from Waynus, sad to hear you were sat with some fool in the stand, it’s annoying when the players are doing well and giving 100% and someone berates their efforts; however he has paid his money and is entitled to his opinion. Where have we heard that line before? Trust me I am not having a go, but this is how some of the posters come across at times (again this is not directed at Waynus). To be fair some of the negative posters have shown signs of optimism. One thing no one has picked up on is how we got into a negative team, this is one problem area we struggled with last season, we could never do well against a defending team hopping to get a break and score the odd goal, have we turned a corner?
Personally, I think it is all to do with opinion.
Some think that I may be negative, by highlighting certain things that I think are not going well or some people might think we are experts because we would do something different to McCall.
Even though I thought Saturday's performance was quite promising, I could pick certain faults with certain area's, but I understand this would be seen as anti-McCall or very negative and that is why I think you will find people seem to mention more after a dissapointing loss or run of results.
As for giving players stick at theh game then I am totally against that, it sends the wrong message out.

KnightMcCall, East Morton says...
5:53pm Tue 27 Oct 09

waynus71 wrote:
I want to start with an apology to 'valleyofshame'. I read a post from you, misinterpreted it and posted a reactive reply. I was wrong and as such, I offer you the olive branch. I am genuinely sorry for my outburst. Turning now to the game, I think we were well worth the 3 points. Hereford have been playing well of late and haven't conceded many goals. Seeing how they set up and played, it isn't hard to see why. They defended very well and we had to take pot shots from outside the area. With very little width on the left and Neilson struggling to beat his man, chances from crosses were always going to be at a premium. I didn't see Bully's hand-ball, as there was a steel support in my line of sight. I thought the 2nd booking was a very poor decision, but having seen it again on TV, it does look a booking. However, what really irks me is the inconsistency. Their left-back should also have got his marching orders, but the referee just sent him away. It is this element of refereeing that really frustrates football fans. I saw the stewards being 'heavy handed' towards the Hereford fans. I didn't see what had happened, but a few stewards waded into a couple of fans and demanded they leave. The lads refused and so the stewards dragged them out and basically pushed them out of the ground. I was almost involved in some unpleasantries myself. Behind me was one of the most annoying 'fans' I have ever had the displeasure of sitting near. He barracked Hanson all the way through the game and when he had a decent effort and the Bradford End started singing his name, the guy shouted, 'and he should f#ck off back to the co-op'. I couldn't believe it. It was like this all the game. Hanson wasn't the only one that came in for criticism either. I have also read someone else's comments regarding Williams' stance on putting the ball into touch. Personally, unless he can comfortably control the ball, find a man and make the pass, I would rather he didn't mess and instead go for the safe option by putting the ball out. We have seen Clarke trying to pass his way out of trouble and look at the trouble he has put us under. Finally, Eastwood came and made some good saves/clearances. It looked like the extra coaching had worked, as he came off his line and was clearly more positive. However, he still manged to make two clangers, which luckily, went unpunished. As for the rest of the team, I thought they played well and we were unlucky not to score more. In relation to the two goals disallowed, the flag went up very early for the first one and I knew it wasn't a goal way before most in the ground. The linesman was slower to react to the 2nd one and I thought it was going to stand, until the flag was eventually raised. Bring on Macclesfield.
Agree with every word.

As for people voicing their "opinions" at games i.e. slagging off Hanson, It really winds me up. I usually lose it completely at football matches but my anger/displeasure is never directed at City players. If someone behind you was slagging off a City player then they need shooting; the fans a part of the team and it is our job to support and encourage. If fans can't be supportive then they don't deserve a winning team and can go elsewhere.

Comments are closed on this article.

Hereford V City 7-1.jpg Action from City's game with Hereford.

City players flock around goalscorer Gareth Evans, far right, after his 41st-minute strike

Gareth Evans battles with the Hereford defence




Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »