- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@Bradford_TandA
All the latest news and views from the T&A
@tandasport
All the latest sport from the T&A
@TandABusiness
Latest business headlines from the T&A
- Find us on Facebook
The Telegraph & Argus
Like us on Facebook
McCall signs new deal with Bantams (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
McCall signs new deal with Bantams
7:00am Friday 20th February 2009 in Bantams
Exclusive By Simon Parker, Bradford City Reporter
Stuart McCall extended his contract with City yesterday and said he hoped the club would be in the Championship by the end of his new deal
Stuart McCall today put pen to paper on a new City deal and declared: All my managerial ambition lies here.
McCall wants to climb the divisions with the club he has served as player and now boss.
He signed on for another two years – and then set that as a realistic deadline to bring Championship football back to Valley Parade.
McCall said: “I know Julian Rhodes talked earlier in the season about back-to-back promotions. For me, by the end of the contract I’ll have been here four years and I would hope we can reach the Championship by then.
“I want to manage in the Championship but I’d rather do it here in a couple of seasons than somewhere else now. I’m showing loyalty because I want to be here.
I can see myself being here for the long-run, taking us where we all want to go. People know what I feel for Bradford City and I wouldn’t ever think of using this as a stepping stone
Stuart McCall
“If we got promoted and other teams came in, I wouldn’t be looking to go. I don’t want to go.
“Obviously if things don’t go right, I could find myself somewhere else one day. But my managerial ambitions lie with this club. I can see myself being here for the long-run, taking us where we all want to go.
“People know what I feel for Bradford City and I wouldn’t ever think of using this as a stepping stone. I’m also fortunate to have the two chairmen and people I work with and we’ve all got the same belief and feeling for the club.”
McCall’s present contract was due to run out at the end of June. But with a large number of players’ deals up at the same time, sorting out his future now will remove uncertainty with squad negotiations and allow him to plan ahead.
He added: “It’s nice to get it done and shows loyalty from both parties. I was happy to leave it until the summer but it makes sense if the two chairmen are happy to do it now and I’m pleased they’ve acknowledged what I’m doing.
“We haven’t got a crystal ball. We don’t know what’s going to happen in the summer as in which division we will be in.
“But it gives me a chance to plan ahead. There are 15 games left, maybe more, and we’re all focused on what we want to achieve.
“Either way, if we’re successful or not, I know I’ll be focusing on next season.
“Management can be frustrating at times but it’s beneficial for the club to hopefully have that stability and be able to look forward.”
Joint-chairman Lawn said: “Year on year we’ve certainly progressed and you can see that on the pitch with the way we’re playing.
“We decided weeks ago that we were all happy for Stuart to continue. But with Gillingham, Wycombe and Darlington to focus on it wasn’t fair to put him under pressure about this so we decided to talk about it straight afterwards and we’re delighted it’s now done.
“Like myself and Julian, Stuart is a fan as well as being the manager which can make it very difficult if we’re on a bad run. We do feel the pain just as much as the fans, if not more.
“Stuart wanted to carry on but I can understand him talking to his family first. They feel it a lot more, seeing the angst and pain you go through when it’s not going well.
“He wanted to make sure they were happy first and it was right to do that.”
McCall had a meeting with the players yesterday to pick over the results during the second third of the season.
He added: “You look at the back-to-back 0-0s with Chester and Shrewsbury. If we’d taken the wins out of them that we should have done, we’d be sat top of the table now.
“We’ve just drawn a couple too many at home but we’re in a decent position and I feel very happy with the squad we’ve got.”
Comments(48)
getrogered,Gold Coast,OZ
says...
7:18am Fri 20 Feb 09
Reckless
says...
7:42am Fri 20 Feb 09
I'll keep doing the lottery, when the big one comes in I'll fly the team out to play a friendly against Adelaide Utd.
UP THE BANTAMS
MuirheadsAfro
says...
8:19am Fri 20 Feb 09
ns Stu, you're doing a great job. r3DBOok will be happy :-)
J4CKO
says...
8:45am Fri 20 Feb 09
password very-sign, very apt
Freddy
says...
8:48am Fri 20 Feb 09
Our shrewed joint Chairmen, have just repeated that great signing again.
Congratulations to everyone concerned, and in particular to Stuart McCall. This is the best deal he will ever negotiate.
fatbloke
says...
9:17am Fri 20 Feb 09
I have said it before and again I actually enjoy and luck forward to games these days unlike the seasons prior to the last 2, it was a drag going to games. Long may it continue.
security word like-plus.
Carl Smith
says...
9:37am Fri 20 Feb 09
Waynus
says...
9:46am Fri 20 Feb 09
If we are going for continuity and showing loyalty to all parties, where are the contract offers for McCall's backroom? Is there something we don't know?
Should I be surprised that McCall didn't refer to next season as "But it gives US a chance to plan ahead" and "Either way, if we’re successful or not, I know WE'LL be focusing on next season"? Am I reading too much into this as we have heard nothing about contracts for the backroom staff?
tyker
says...
9:47am Fri 20 Feb 09
Skippy will no doubt tell you he should be out anyway so what does it matter what we all think.
personally i would like to see SM have someone with vast experience aside him but I have said that all along and, before you all yell, yes I accept that this season is beginning to go well which has to be down to more than just the manager.
Waynus
says...
9:47am Fri 20 Feb 09
Waynus
says...
9:52am Fri 20 Feb 09
Waynus wrote:Ah there it is. But why did it take nearly an hour to be added?
Where's my post from this morning?
Lancashire Branch
says...
10:05am Fri 20 Feb 09
Bring on the good times.
SkiptonPaul
says...
10:43am Fri 20 Feb 09
fatbloke
says...
10:53am Fri 20 Feb 09
Its down to McCall to agree contracts with backroom staff not the chairmen, they obviously provide the budget though.
People quizzing why Jacobs et al not been offered one yet just confirms some people on here a clueless!
Meat Pie
says...
11:02am Fri 20 Feb 09
Waynus
says...
11:19am Fri 20 Feb 09
fatbloke wrote:Fatbloke, no I'm not clueless. I think you may be missing my point. McCall was approached several weeks ago regarding this new deal and he indicated he would like to continue. He even said so on these very pages, but announced he was too busy at the moment to discuss.
exactly SkiptonPaul..... Its down to McCall to agree contracts with backroom staff not the chairmen, they obviously provide the budget though. People quizzing why Jacobs et al not been offered one yet just confirms some people on here a clueless!
Do you not think that as part of that discussion, he will have been asked for his thoughts on the coaching staff and whether he would be looking to keep them on or not? Of course it is Mccall's decision as to who works alongside him. My point is that he will have been asked for his view before today. He has known for a few weeks that he would be signing that contract and in the meantime, I am sure he will have given plenty of thought about the position of his backroom. Does he only speak to the Chairmen once a month? No, he doesn't so I'm sure they know whether McCall will be wanting them to stay or not!
fatbloke
says...
11:29am Fri 20 Feb 09
but if you ask nicley they might announce all the new contracts in one day..
He has obviously been spending time discussing his own new contract, can't imagine during the discussion they would have discussed a new one for Jacobs, whats the point till McGod is confirmed as manager for another 2 yrs?
I think Evans must be on his way out then as they haven't announced a new contract for him!!
tyker
says...
11:47am Fri 20 Feb 09
There are only a few players on contracts beyond the end of this season and , of those, most are or have been injured.
why changes: if the team does not go up it means the current squad are not good enough and getting a year older: if we do go up does anyone realistically think this team one year on can do the business at a higher level.
Look at Wycombe: by and large the team is several years younger on average than ours:they are signing young players for the future with another couple recently coming out of non league.
I know which scenario I would rather have going into next season: the choice is one which is bonding together from a young age or one that has had to be ripped apart in order to start again.
However, although I have been critical, like Waynus, Of SM and some of his comments and decision making the signing is a good one for the club and the manager himself.
yorky
says...
12:52pm Fri 20 Feb 09
!
CTID.
Old Perculiar
says...
12:53pm Fri 20 Feb 09
McCall is the best manager we've had in a long time, and long may he reign as our manager.
security word
"loan-grey"
What ? Andy Gray ? Ex City striker, went to Burnley ?? good idea,,,,,
Waynus
says...
1:03pm Fri 20 Feb 09
fatbloke wrote:No need for sarcasm.
think your looking to deep!! manager signs and in due course he will re-sign who he likes.. but if you ask nicley they might announce all the new contracts in one day.. He has obviously been spending time discussing his own new contract, can't imagine during the discussion they would have discussed a new one for Jacobs, whats the point till McGod is confirmed as manager for another 2 yrs? I think Evans must be on his way out then as they haven't announced a new contract for him!!
I will repeat again, McCall verbally agreed a few weeks back to sign a contract for another couple of years. This announcement is because he has actually signed the deal, however, it had already been agreed. My point being that in those few weeks, has Mccall not indicated that he would like his backroom staff to stay and asked the Chairmen to make it happen?
I may have read to much into it and I did end my original post with that exact suggestion, "Am I reading too much into this?"
A simple 'yes you are' would have sufficed instead of calling me clueless and posting a sarcastic riposte.
bilty
says...
1:09pm Fri 20 Feb 09
John talks a lot of sense on the Radio,and Terry was a decent Mananger,who knows the lower leagues inside out,and BOTH know the local scene
bilty
says...
1:14pm Fri 20 Feb 09
fatbloke
says...
1:16pm Fri 20 Feb 09
I think he commented not so long back also that he spends a lot of time taking his son to and from Manchester.
Maybe I mis understood Waynus and yes I do think you were looking to deep. Even if Jakes has been offered and agreed verbally my point was there is no rush to announce it, unlike McGod.
I hear Daley out for the season!
Prisoner Cell Block A
says...
1:31pm Fri 20 Feb 09
phil.g
says...
1:37pm Fri 20 Feb 09
TheCoach
says...
2:14pm Fri 20 Feb 09
Old Perculiar wrote:Nope!!!! Ex everton & scotland forward and tv pundit probably,, mind you, could do a job at this level!!
Brilliant news ! McCall is the best manager we've had in a long time, and long may he reign as our manager. security word "loan-grey" What ? Andy Gray ? Ex City striker, went to Burnley ?? good idea,,,,,
Well done Stuart, lets hope by the time you sign your next contract we'll be back playing championship football!!!!
Waynus
says...
4:41pm Fri 20 Feb 09
fatbloke wrote:I wondered when we would be informed of the results from the scan. If this news is true (and I am not doubting you), it is devastating news. Although Daley hasn't been as good as some claim him to be, he is still a potential match winner. Just missing him from the starting line-up will give other teams a boost.
John Hendrie is working in some sort of role as a sports consultant and apparentley has no intention in any manager/coaches role. I think he commented not so long back also that he spends a lot of time taking his son to and from Manchester. Maybe I mis understood Waynus and yes I do think you were looking to deep. Even if Jakes has been offered and agreed verbally my point was there is no rush to announce it, unlike McGod. I hear Daley out for the season!
I was hoping he would be out for no more than 4-6 weeks, but this news could be the difference between getting that 3rd place and not. It should give Jones, Colbeck and hopefully Brandon more impetus to get things right.
Prisoner Cell Block A
says...
5:41pm Fri 20 Feb 09
bcfc idle supporters
says...
5:43pm Fri 20 Feb 09
phil.g wrote:agree with you phil, but i wouldnt stop at congradulating mccall.
nice one..good news.dont know about anyone else but i am enjoying going to watch city this season.even more so with stewart on the touchline...
lawn and Rhodes have played a massive part aswell over the last 2 years both on and off the field. and if they can get our ground back from that tosser at flamingo land. then the biggest part of our problem will be over. all that would be left to achieve is a promotion or two.
password tear-text no tears here.
Prisoner Cell Block A
says...
6:01pm Fri 20 Feb 09
Well said that man.
JM, Skipton
says...
6:06pm Fri 20 Feb 09
Waynus wrote:You are such an idiot Waynus. you don't just look at the glass as half empty, you go around the room emptying other peoples' in an attempt to make everyone feel as miserable as you.
fatbloke wrote: exactly SkiptonPaul..... Its down to McCall to agree contracts with backroom staff not the chairmen, they obviously provide the budget though. People quizzing why Jacobs et al not been offered one yet just confirms some people on here a clueless!Fatbloke, no I'm not clueless. I think you may be missing my point. McCall was approached several weeks ago regarding this new deal and he indicated he would like to continue. He even said so on these very pages, but announced he was too busy at the moment to discuss. Do you not think that as part of that discussion, he will have been asked for his thoughts on the coaching staff and whether he would be looking to keep them on or not? Of course it is Mccall's decision as to who works alongside him. My point is that he will have been asked for his view before today. He has known for a few weeks that he would be signing that contract and in the meantime, I am sure he will have given plenty of thought about the position of his backroom. Does he only speak to the Chairmen once a month? No, he doesn't so I'm sure they know whether McCall will be wanting them to stay or not!
how long did it take you think up of a negative slant on this? Why have you gone to such lengths to be miserable?
What you are trying to claim is complete rubbish but what's the point in arguing because you'll just think of something else to be miserable about.
Instead Waynus why don't you tell us why three weeks ago you were on here saying Stuart should be sacked (after Bury). you said this was not a snap judgement, you had considered everything and he had to go...now!
three wins and a draw later and you've gone quiet. does that mean you now back Stuart, if so it shows how stupid your views are and no doubt if we lose tomorrow and against County you'll be starting up your ridiculous demands again. why are you not on here telling us all its a mistake giving stuart a new deal?
Once again - please take some time to think before you speak. you genuinely depress fellow supporters on here and you need to take a look at yourself.
rubberball
says...
7:03pm Fri 20 Feb 09
JM, Skipton wrote:He needs to disappear,pronto.
Waynus wrote:You are such an idiot Waynus. you don't just look at the glass as half empty, you go around the room emptying other peoples' in an attempt to make everyone feel as miserable as you. how long did it take you think up of a negative slant on this? Why have you gone to such lengths to be miserable? What you are trying to claim is complete rubbish but what's the point in arguing because you'll just think of something else to be miserable about. Instead Waynus why don't you tell us why three weeks ago you were on here saying Stuart should be sacked (after Bury). you said this was not a snap judgement, you had considered everything and he had to go...now! three wins and a draw later and you've gone quiet. does that mean you now back Stuart, if so it shows how stupid your views are and no doubt if we lose tomorrow and against County you'll be starting up your ridiculous demands again. why are you not on here telling us all its a mistake giving stuart a new deal? Once again - please take some time to think before you speak. you genuinely depress fellow supporters on here and you need to take a look at yourself.fatbloke wrote: exactly SkiptonPaul..... Its down to McCall to agree contracts with backroom staff not the chairmen, they obviously provide the budget though. People quizzing why Jacobs et al not been offered one yet just confirms some people on here a clueless!Fatbloke, no I'm not clueless. I think you may be missing my point. McCall was approached several weeks ago regarding this new deal and he indicated he would like to continue. He even said so on these very pages, but announced he was too busy at the moment to discuss. Do you not think that as part of that discussion, he will have been asked for his thoughts on the coaching staff and whether he would be looking to keep them on or not? Of course it is Mccall's decision as to who works alongside him. My point is that he will have been asked for his view before today. He has known for a few weeks that he would be signing that contract and in the meantime, I am sure he will have given plenty of thought about the position of his backroom. Does he only speak to the Chairmen once a month? No, he doesn't so I'm sure they know whether McCall will be wanting them to stay or not!
BANTAM & BULL
says...
7:24pm Fri 20 Feb 09
Waynus
says...
8:26pm Fri 20 Feb 09
JM, Skipton wrote:If you read ALL my posts, instead of 'picking the negatives out', you will have seen my answer to your question already!
Waynus wrote:You are such an idiot Waynus. you don't just look at the glass as half empty, you go around the room emptying other peoples' in an attempt to make everyone feel as miserable as you.
fatbloke wrote: exactly SkiptonPaul..... Its down to McCall to agree contracts with backroom staff not the chairmen, they obviously provide the budget though. People quizzing why Jacobs et al not been offered one yet just confirms some people on here a clueless!Fatbloke, no I'm not clueless. I think you may be missing my point. McCall was approached several weeks ago regarding this new deal and he indicated he would like to continue. He even said so on these very pages, but announced he was too busy at the moment to discuss. Do you not think that as part of that discussion, he will have been asked for his thoughts on the coaching staff and whether he would be looking to keep them on or not? Of course it is Mccall's decision as to who works alongside him. My point is that he will have been asked for his view before today. He has known for a few weeks that he would be signing that contract and in the meantime, I am sure he will have given plenty of thought about the position of his backroom. Does he only speak to the Chairmen once a month? No, he doesn't so I'm sure they know whether McCall will be wanting them to stay or not!
how long did it take you think up of a negative slant on this? Why have you gone to such lengths to be miserable?
What you are trying to claim is complete rubbish but what's the point in arguing because you'll just think of something else to be miserable about.
Instead Waynus why don't you tell us why three weeks ago you were on here saying Stuart should be sacked (after Bury). you said this was not a snap judgement, you had considered everything and he had to go...now!
three wins and a draw later and you've gone quiet. does that mean you now back Stuart, if so it shows how stupid your views are and no doubt if we lose tomorrow and against County you'll be starting up your ridiculous demands again. why are you not on here telling us all its a mistake giving stuart a new deal?
Once again - please take some time to think before you speak. you genuinely depress fellow supporters on here and you need to take a look at yourself.
I haven't commented on McCall being offered a new contract, simply because I have agreed to keep reservation until the end of the season. What did you want me to do, be hypocritical and congratulate the club for giving McCall a new contract despite what I said last month?
I have 'gone quiet' because I was asked to. I will comment on whether I was wrong or not, come the end of the season (As I have said previously)!
As for the above comments, I simply asked why Jakes hadn't been offered a new deal between McCall giving verbal agreement and last night when he signed his deal. Why does that make me miserable?
If you have been on here for the last couple of years, you will know that I am one of our most positive posters. Admittedly, since December, I have posted a few negative comments about McCall but what others have I had a go at?
prop idol
says...
9:59pm Fri 20 Feb 09
bcfc idle supporters
says...
11:25pm Fri 20 Feb 09
prop idol wrote:YOU TIT
This is the end of citys chances of progressing I am afraid. The guy has little managerial experience and no tactical knowlege to move the club forward. S FcCall and Jacobs see you in the sunday league
Soulman
says...
11:33pm Fri 20 Feb 09
East_Bowling_Bantam
says...
12:08am Sat 21 Feb 09
!!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
STUART McCALL'S BRADFORD ARMY!!!!
the general 81-86
says...
11:33am Sat 21 Feb 09
Carl Smith
says...
2:09pm Sat 21 Feb 09
albion
says...
5:07pm Sat 21 Feb 09
Carl Smith wrote:Some of us were saying that LAST year, funny how things turnaround.
I believe we could be looking for a new coach..nothing against Jacobs but i dont think his nicely, nicely approach makes a good coach. We need axperience even more if we do go up. I agree with Waynus..the contract was verbal and was annouced in time for the buy your ticket before march deadline...all a PR Stunt. It would have been the same with Jacobs had there been an offer on the table. He's on his way!.
prop idol
says...
5:35pm Sat 21 Feb 09
dannbradfc
says...
8:36pm Sat 21 Feb 09
Waynus wrote:your're infuriating and i'm starting to think you do it on purpose. You spend ages slagging of Stu (wanting him sacked i believe) and berating Daley (quoting stats etc to get him dropped) then you totally back track. You're statement that if Daley is out we will miss out on 3rd place is unbelieveable and a case in point.
fatbloke wrote: John Hendrie is working in some sort of role as a sports consultant and apparentley has no intention in any manager/coaches role. I think he commented not so long back also that he spends a lot of time taking his son to and from Manchester. Maybe I mis understood Waynus and yes I do think you were looking to deep. Even if Jakes has been offered and agreed verbally my point was there is no rush to announce it, unlike McGod. I hear Daley out for the season!I wondered when we would be informed of the results from the scan. If this news is true (and I am not doubting you), it is devastating news. Although Daley hasn't been as good as some claim him to be, he is still a potential match winner. Just missing him from the starting line-up will give other teams a boost. I was hoping he would be out for no more than 4-6 weeks, but this news could be the difference between getting that 3rd place and not. It should give Jones, Colbeck and hopefully Brandon more impetus to get things right.
YOU WANTED DALEY OUT OF THE TEAM AND NOW YOU ARE SAYING THAT WE WILL NOT GET IN TOP 3 WITHOUT HIM
yOU ALSO SAID CITY WOULD NOT GET PROMOTED THIS SEASON (ESPECIALLY WITH sTU IN CHARGE) BUT ARE NOW TALKING ABOUT PROMOTION
yes people can change opinions but its usually over time. FICKLE is not strong enough in this case.
please admit you are doing this for a laugh and reaction or go to the doctors because delusion is quite serious and the worsening of symptoms can be delayed or offset
dannbradfc
says...
8:41pm Sat 21 Feb 09
Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:more backtrackers people should perhaps start listening to me a little sometimes i can and do make sense. Enigma and frustrating are both words i have used in the past to describe Daley but i've always seen his worth to us and the fear and problems he causes for the opposition
Or give them a free ride as there is less competition for places. I know I have knocked Omar quite often this season but in retrospect and watching our meek attempts at breaking darlo down once he left the field maybe I have been harsh, ok so he doesn't put enough ball in the box, and his shooting is woeful, but he does attract two or more markers and open spaces for others to utilise, just doesn't use the ball well enough when he creates that sort of opening. Enigma and frustrating, but get well soon Omar, hope you're back before the end of the season, but it sounds doubtful.
the general 81-86
says...
9:12pm Sat 21 Feb 09
dannbradfc wrote:Your spot on mate ,talk aboue someone who thinks he is any importance .He has stated he will write a letter to macca if he is wrong and city go up ,like stu is bothered what a pain in the old ar-e he his !!
Waynus wrote:your're infuriating and i'm starting to think you do it on purpose. You spend ages slagging of Stu (wanting him sacked i believe) and berating Daley (quoting stats etc to get him dropped) then you totally back track. You're statement that if Daley is out we will miss out on 3rd place is unbelieveable and a case in point. YOU WANTED DALEY OUT OF THE TEAM AND NOW YOU ARE SAYING THAT WE WILL NOT GET IN TOP 3 WITHOUT HIM yOU ALSO SAID CITY WOULD NOT GET PROMOTED THIS SEASON (ESPECIALLY WITH sTU IN CHARGE) BUT ARE NOW TALKING ABOUT PROMOTION yes people can change opinions but its usually over time. FICKLE is not strong enough in this case. please admit you are doing this for a laugh and reaction or go to the doctors because delusion is quite serious and the worsening of symptoms can be delayed or offsetfatbloke wrote: John Hendrie is working in some sort of role as a sports consultant and apparentley has no intention in any manager/coaches role. I think he commented not so long back also that he spends a lot of time taking his son to and from Manchester. Maybe I mis understood Waynus and yes I do think you were looking to deep. Even if Jakes has been offered and agreed verbally my point was there is no rush to announce it, unlike McGod. I hear Daley out for the season!I wondered when we would be informed of the results from the scan. If this news is true (and I am not doubting you), it is devastating news. Although Daley hasn't been as good as some claim him to be, he is still a potential match winner. Just missing him from the starting line-up will give other teams a boost. I was hoping he would be out for no more than 4-6 weeks, but this news could be the difference between getting that 3rd place and not. It should give Jones, Colbeck and hopefully Brandon more impetus to get things right.
bfc die hard 1
says...
10:05pm Sat 21 Feb 09
Waynus
says...
5:44pm Sun 22 Feb 09
dannbradfc wrote:Infuriating, me? Probably, but I thought you knew me by now. I have been sick of hearing about Daley this and Daley that, so I thought if you can't beat em and all that! I don't believe Daley is any likely to help us get 3rd place as Stuart is of getting us auto-promoted.
Waynus wrote:your're infuriating and i'm starting to think you do it on purpose. You spend ages slagging of Stu (wanting him sacked i believe) and berating Daley (quoting stats etc to get him dropped) then you totally back track. You're statement that if Daley is out we will miss out on 3rd place is unbelieveable and a case in point.
fatbloke wrote: John Hendrie is working in some sort of role as a sports consultant and apparentley has no intention in any manager/coaches role. I think he commented not so long back also that he spends a lot of time taking his son to and from Manchester. Maybe I mis understood Waynus and yes I do think you were looking to deep. Even if Jakes has been offered and agreed verbally my point was there is no rush to announce it, unlike McGod. I hear Daley out for the season!I wondered when we would be informed of the results from the scan. If this news is true (and I am not doubting you), it is devastating news. Although Daley hasn't been as good as some claim him to be, he is still a potential match winner. Just missing him from the starting line-up will give other teams a boost. I was hoping he would be out for no more than 4-6 weeks, but this news could be the difference between getting that 3rd place and not. It should give Jones, Colbeck and hopefully Brandon more impetus to get things right.
YOU WANTED DALEY OUT OF THE TEAM AND NOW YOU ARE SAYING THAT WE WILL NOT GET IN TOP 3 WITHOUT HIM
yOU ALSO SAID CITY WOULD NOT GET PROMOTED THIS SEASON (ESPECIALLY WITH sTU IN CHARGE) BUT ARE NOW TALKING ABOUT PROMOTION
yes people can change opinions but its usually over time. FICKLE is not strong enough in this case.
please admit you are doing this for a laugh and reaction or go to the doctors because delusion is quite serious and the worsening of symptoms can be delayed or offset
However, if I had come out and said that, do you think my comments would be supported or shot down?
That said, I have agreed to reserve judgement on McCall and his promotion push until the end of the season.... just for you!

Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with