The row that is continuing about the use of roller security shutters on shop fronts is one that is perhaps a little difficult to resolve, as both sides of the argument have their merits.

On the one hand, it is difficult to argue with those businesses and traders who complain that their premises are at greater risk of attack from thieves and vandals because of the lack of shutters.

On the other, Bradford Council's policy of not allowing shutters in certain areas - especially conservation areas - does make a lot of sense aesthetically.

It is a somewhat depressing sight to see a part of the city or district, after hours, with all the shop windows covered with metal shutters and grilles.

It hardly inspires confidence and seems to send out the wrong signal - that the area is crime-ridden and needs to go into lockdown when the people have departed.

Of course, the traders must be listened to - their shops and businesses are their livelihood, and few of them will be able to deal with repeated break-ins and vandalism.

The way forward is not for traders to install the shutters with disregard for planning regulations in certain areas - that could end up costing them much more in the long run if enforcement action is implemented.

But perhaps there is a way for the council and businesses to work together to look at alternative ways of improving security so that the visual impact of shutters is not needed, but the businesses are still kept safe. And whatever rulings are made, either with regard to shutters or otherwise, must be fair and consistent across the district.