Bradford University study confirms wind farms have a major impact

Environmental groups have warned climate change is the biggest threat to the countryside after researchers suggested wind turbines could affect the tranquillity of rural areas.

Research into tranquillity at the University of Bradford has confirmed while the countryside on the urban fringe can be peaceful, it is threatened by illegal dumping and the presence of wind turbines and that these effects can be quantified.

But environmental groups, including Bradford Friends of the Earth, have agreed wind farms should be “sensitively sited”, but warned that the greatest threat to the countryside was climate change.

The announcement comes after the Bronte Society formally objected to Calderdale Council about proposals by Yorkshire Wind Power to replace turbines at its Ovenden Moor Windfarm with turbines double the size.

Greg Watts, professor of transportation noise at the School of Engineering, Design and Technology at the university and his team carried out a study, which examined environmental features in and around Ogden Water, Country Park and Nature Reserve.

It included recruiting 30 people, aged 18 to 77, who were accompanied by researchers on five-mile walks, asked to stop at various points and make observations on how peaceful settings were.

He said: “We asked people to consider what was tranquil about a particular place and what threatened that tranquillity.

“We found illegal dumping and wind turbines had an adverse effect. It was not only the noise and visual intrusion of the turbines themselves, but the buildings and service roads in and around the site that had probably affected people’s perception of tranquillity. It was this industrialisation of open green spaces that reduced their ability to be restorative.”

Professor Watts will present his findings at a conference this week in New York.

Rob Glover, treasurer of Friends of the Earth Bradford, said onshore wind represented an important step towards reducing carbon emissions and dependence on fossil fuels and tackling climate change.

He said: “However, that must not blind us to just accepting any development anywhere.

“We fully agree that any new windfarm proposal needs to demonstrate through the planning process that the location has been chosen carefully and that impacts on the surrounding environment have been minimised as far as practicable.

“If wind turbines are not sensitively sited, we can lose the support of the public.

“But one of the biggest threats to our countryside is climate change – and this is exactly what wind power alongside other clean energy sources can help defeat.”

Prof Watts said that the factors influencing tranquillity highlighted in the research would benefit planners and conservationists in designing more relaxing environments.

They could use a prediction method devised by researchers which would allow improvements in planning to be quantified.

He said: “When people are surrounded by nature and hear natural sounds rather than mechanical noises they find it easier to relax and to recover from stress.”

Emma Hill, project manager at Bradford Environmental Action Trust, said: “BEAT will be obviously in favour of energy generation from renewable sources but it is about things being in the right place.”

Comments(6)

angry bradfordian says...
7:33am Wed 22 Aug 12

If I've read this story properly, the report says that climate change is the biggest threat to the countryside, but still people are saying we shouldn't have turbines.
I've been walking on Ogden/Ovenden Moor for the last 15 years and can't recall seeing much of an impact from service roads or buildings. If anything there's more of an impact from walkers, farmers and their vehicles but it would be ludicrous to suggest that they are removed.

It seems that somebody at the T&A has an agenda against turbines, because any time there's any anti-turbine report it seems to be published with a sensational headline like 'turbines threaten our tranquility'

Albion. says...
11:31am Wed 22 Aug 12

angry bradfordian wrote:
If I've read this story properly, the report says that climate change is the biggest threat to the countryside, but still people are saying we shouldn't have turbines.
I've been walking on Ogden/Ovenden Moor for the last 15 years and can't recall seeing much of an impact from service roads or buildings. If anything there's more of an impact from walkers, farmers and their vehicles but it would be ludicrous to suggest that they are removed.

It seems that somebody at the T&A has an agenda against turbines, because any time there's any anti-turbine report it seems to be published with a sensational headline like 'turbines threaten our tranquility'
And is usually accompanied by a deluge of comments from those who seem to comment on every forum in the country which has a thread running on this subject (I refer to the pro-nuclear brigade).

Bone_idle18 says...
12:55pm Wed 22 Aug 12

I like them and wouldn't object to turbines near me.

In fact, if I could get planning permission, I'd have one in my garden.

The Link says...
6:51pm Wed 22 Aug 12

I think the grounds on which people object to the construction of turbines is petty and ridiculous. In this case they want to replace 24 turbines with 9, not only will this mean less damage to the surrounding area in the long term from vehicles accessing the site to carry out essential maintenance work ( with there been less turbines to maintain ) but it will also mean there will be a lesser number of these turbines to look at ( and that is what is supposedly the problem here ). If the developers are not granted permission to carry out the works then they WILL find some where to put these new turbines and that means a new site, surely this is going to have a bigger impact on the environment then just upgrading an existing site. We also need to think about the local economy, there will be local businesses employed to carry out works at the site. The argument that people want to protect a heritage site well let me say this building Hirstwood next to Saltaire hasn't stopped the tourists, I travel to London often and there are some absolute atrocious monstrosities but that hasn't put tourist off from going to look at Big Ben neither. These people seem to care more about the past more than their future relatives because fossil fuel is not going to last forever. Family means the most to me and therefore I would let them put a turbine in my garden if needs be.

Bone_idle18 says...
7:59pm Wed 22 Aug 12

I suspect objectors care more about the price of their house than the environment.A house that is probably no more natural to the landscape than a turbine.

eebygum says...
9:02pm Wed 22 Aug 12

If Turbines are so bad try having a Power station or a Nuclear plant next to your home, I know which I'd prefer. If these wind turbines are so poor at producing power why do the companies that run them keep registering big profits. They must be pretty lucrative other wise they wouldn't keep using them.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree