Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
10:23am Friday 21st May 2010 in
Ambitious £100 million proposals for a cross-rail link through Bradford to put the city back on the map and generate economic growth have been unveiled by a group of businessmen.
The proposals would replace the rail Interchange and Forster Square stations with a new glass-sided four-track central station on a new viaduct across Leeds Road providing views of the Cathedral quarter and linking into the planned Westfield retail mall.
Movers behind the plan include two prominent businessmen Andrew Mason and John Pennington, who is also a Bradford councillor.
They say that linking less than one mile of rail track to join up the two halves of the city would put Bradford at the heart of West Yorkshire’s rail network, including links to a proposed new rail route to Leeds-Bradford International Airport, and enable the district to benefit from a predicted surge in rail travel.
The plan would take about five years to complete and they will lobby local and central government to back it as part of an integrated transport strategy.
The campaigners believe the development would encourage new investment and boost job creation, including attracting civil service jobs from London because of cheaper office space in Bradford.
The cross-rail link would run from the Interchange under Bridge Street, cross the site of the former Exchange Station in a 38ft wide strip passing between the Law Courts and Vicar Lane.
It would sweep across Hall Ings at the bottom of Leeds Road on an arched viaduct, navigate Well Street before descending near St. Peter’s House, Forster Square and Lower Cheapside. Gradually the lines would reach ground level to the east of the present Forster Square station and join the existing Shipley line.
The redundant lines to Forster Square would be retained as sidings for freight traffic which is expected to grow. The campaigners say the new station would become ‘Bradford International’ as part of the national railway network and extending to Europe.
It will also incorporate the already planned new magistrates’ Court centre in Exchange Square.
Andrew Mason, managing director of Shipley-based Newmason Properties and chairman of the Bradford Property Forum, said: “The case for a cross-rail link between the two existing stations is overwhelming. Bradford must be on the national railway network rather than two cul-de-sacs.
“One central station will provide a new 24-hour gateway to the city centre and join a district divided by two halves where one cannot reach the other without re-direction through Leeds – and all because we are one mile of track short.”
The cross-rail group has involved architects and civil engineers in drawing up the technical details of the plan.
They have been assured that the route is capable of carrying ‘heavy rail’ and the drop between the Interchange and Foster Square would not be an issue.
They say that 80 per cent of the land needed was already in public ownership. The central station development would mean using some of the land earmarked for the Westfield shopping site and the group has been speaking with the Australian developers whose plans are on hold.
They believe that when the Westfield development does proceed, it would be scaled down to meet changed trends and economic conditions.
John Pennington, who used to own Bradford’s Midland Hotel and Pennington’s night club in the city, said: “With the fastest growing population in the UK we should re-visit our ‘model city’ with the old blinkers removed. In a local economy where entrepreneurship remains, where the youth need hope and jobs, we must provide the tools to enable success.
“Bradford is at the bottom of its cycle and worth a punt by investors, but only if the infrastructure allows people to come and go cheaply, efficiently and conveniently.
“We are the sixth largest city in England yet have a dead end motorway at the M606, two dead end stations and an inner ring road that finishes at a T-junction. We must recover from a cul-de-sac of decline.”
The group also includes Paul Mackie, chairman of Bradford quantity surveyors RPP Ltd, and Roger Owen, former property director of Morrisons supermarkets.
The idea has also won support from Gerry Sutcliffe, MP for Bradford South, and Shipley MP Philip Davies.
WHY WOULD THE CROSS-RAIL LINK BE NEEDED?
Why the cross-rail group says the time is right for the development. * Rail passenger journeys in the district have risen by 60 per cent in the past decade and are forecast to grow by another 45 per cent by 2050. * Network Rail will spend £530m for a 40 per cent increase in trains in the north with 700 extra services. * This will carry 3.5 million extra passengers and provide better services from Leeds and Sheffield to the north east and north west, but only pay ‘lip service’ to Bradford. * Cross-rail would make Bradford an attractive proposition. * It would be greener by encouraging more rail travel with shorter journey times and cheaper travel. * It would provide an uninterrupted circular route from Bradford to Shipley, Leeds, Wakefield, and Halifax in both directions and link Ilkley and Skipton to Halifax and Huddersfield. * It would provide direct access to Transpennine services, including Manchester Airport, Harrogate and York and national routes to Scotland and London. * With improvements at Baildon station it would link into the proposed new Leeds-Bradford Airport rail link.
Comments(58)
holden caulfield
says...
10:42am Fri 21 May 10
Apollo
says...
10:45am Fri 21 May 10
jimmyblue
says...
10:49am Fri 21 May 10
enviroMENTAL
says...
10:53am Fri 21 May 10
Exbradfordian
says...
11:05am Fri 21 May 10
MarkPullen
says...
11:52am Fri 21 May 10
peedoffratepayer
says...
11:57am Fri 21 May 10
Mekon
says...
11:59am Fri 21 May 10
Rambo
says...
12:12pm Fri 21 May 10
albion
says...
12:17pm Fri 21 May 10
Rambo wrote:It has already been scaled down two or three times from the original plan.
"They believe that when the Westfield development does proceed, it would be scaled down to meet changed trends and economic conditions"
.
(Just like the Odsal Superdome....)
.
Thats the biggest quote of the whole article. So if anything ever happens with Broadway, its most likely going to be a pale shadow of what was originally envisioned?
Rambo
says...
12:27pm Fri 21 May 10
Moon on a stick
says...
12:39pm Fri 21 May 10
OdsalMan
says...
12:39pm Fri 21 May 10
HB28
says...
12:44pm Fri 21 May 10
Moon on a stick
says...
12:54pm Fri 21 May 10
DCarbz
says...
1:05pm Fri 21 May 10
Collos
says...
1:14pm Fri 21 May 10
Flabbermouth
says...
1:22pm Fri 21 May 10
richardk9
says...
1:23pm Fri 21 May 10
Baildon Bystander
says...
1:29pm Fri 21 May 10
bradford pedant
says...
1:38pm Fri 21 May 10
Flabbermouth wrote:It's KEIGHLEY not Keithley. It would help if locals who criticise could spell !
100 Million to join 2 ends of a place that nobody really wants to go............. Brilliant, what a fantastic difference it will make to all the manythousands of people coming from Keithley and Ilkley. What with the new hotel opening and the temporary park Bradford is on the up
markjoe
says...
1:40pm Fri 21 May 10
bradford pedant
says...
1:40pm Fri 21 May 10
shaunp2112
says...
1:43pm Fri 21 May 10
ms walker
says...
1:47pm Fri 21 May 10
Exbradfordian wrote:There are more than half a million civil servants, Exbradfordian - they aren't all going to lose their jobs, and as the civil service is restructured over the coming years, there will be many opportunities for new larger departments to be located in an area which is central, easily accessible and inexpensive.
"including attracting civil service jobs from London" - what planet do they live on. Do they live in a bubble - the tories have just announced massive cuts in the civil service - there won't be any jobs to relocate.
I don't want to appear negative but I can't believe this will ever come to fruition. If it does by a miracle, then there should be assurances that the local businesses/communtie
s benefit. There should be quota of jobs that have to go to the Bradford unemployed.
markjoe
says...
1:51pm Fri 21 May 10
bradford pedant
says...
1:52pm Fri 21 May 10
shaunp2112 wrote:ODEON...not Odean
Go for it. Lets start digging and then just leave massive holes in the city! (Oh, already done that). Well why not then turn them holes into gardens or fill them up with water that will end up full of sick and rubbish! (Oh, in the precess of doing that). Well why not just forget about the whole thing and leave this eyesore of a city to rot! (Yeah that's it - been doin that for years). The whole of Bradford is a mess. lets start from the top with the eyesore that is the old Yorkshire Bank and across the road John Street then lets go through the city and look at Kirgate or further down to the mess that is Westfield. Or lets look at what was once a magnificent building - the Odean - left to rot!! Where is worth going in this City???? I tell you where - the M606 - and out!!!
shaunp2112
says...
2:02pm Fri 21 May 10
bradford pedant
says...
2:05pm Fri 21 May 10
richardk9 wrote:Bradford is a back water and will most likely remain that way. The vast majority of Bradford residents are happy with pound shops, charity shops and fast food outlets and of course Greggs.
This idea has been proposed many times in the last 150 years, let's hope it becomes a reality this time otherwise Bradford will remain a backwater as far as transport links go.
bradford pedant
says...
2:05pm Fri 21 May 10
richardk9 wrote:Bradford is a back water and will most likely remain that way. The vast majority of Bradford residents are happy with pound shops, charity shops and fast food outlets and of course Greggs.
This idea has been proposed many times in the last 150 years, let's hope it becomes a reality this time otherwise Bradford will remain a backwater as far as transport links go.
bradford pedant
says...
2:07pm Fri 21 May 10
shaunp2112 wrote:Thank you and point taken.
Message for bradford pedant - writing a quick comment whilst on a lunch break from work will contain some incorrect spellings - you failed to notice "precess" where it should have been process. And if you want to be really picky your sentence should contain some punctuation as I think that many Bradfordians can spell the word businesses as your sentence reads. Why would any business wish to invest in this city - I removed my business from here years ago and have had far better success. This city was dying and another stupid waste of money will just kill it off completely. Could the last person to leave please make sure the lights are off!
bradford pedant
says...
2:09pm Fri 21 May 10
bradford pedant wrote:or even BEING corrected before I receive a deluge of further corrections.
shaunp2112 wrote: Message for bradford pedant - writing a quick comment whilst on a lunch break from work will contain some incorrect spellings - you failed to notice "precess" where it should have been process. And if you want to be really picky your sentence should contain some punctuation as I think that many Bradfordians can spell the word businesses as your sentence reads. Why would any business wish to invest in this city - I removed my business from here years ago and have had far better success. This city was dying and another stupid waste of money will just kill it off completely. Could the last person to leave please make sure the lights are off!Thank you and point taken. I don't mind be corrected.
markjoe
says...
2:15pm Fri 21 May 10
shaunp2112 wrote:If new ideas and money isn't invested in the city how will it grow. This idea wont only just benefit the city but surrounding areas
Message for bradford pedant - writing a quick comment whilst on a lunch break from work will contain some incorrect spellings - you failed to notice "precess" where it should have been process. And if you want to be really picky your sentence should contain some punctuation as I think that many Bradfordians can spell the word businesses as your sentence reads. Why would any business wish to invest in this city - I removed my business from here years ago and have had far better success. This city was dying and another stupid waste of money will just kill it off completely. Could the last person to leave please make sure the lights are off!
shaunp2112
says...
2:16pm Fri 21 May 10
kirkstallbantam
says...
2:20pm Fri 21 May 10
markjoe
says...
2:27pm Fri 21 May 10
kirkstallbantam wrote:Well said
Stop whining at each other and get behind this scheme. Sure, it is a pipe dream but at least Mr Pennington is having a go at sorting this mess of a city out. Bravo
bradford pedant
says...
2:32pm Fri 21 May 10
kirkstallbantam wrote:Sadly some pipe-dreams have a habit of costing the tax payer.
Stop whining at each other and get behind this scheme. Sure, it is a pipe dream but at least Mr Pennington is having a go at sorting this mess of a city out. Bravo
spionkop64
says...
2:41pm Fri 21 May 10
Exbradfordian
says...
2:48pm Fri 21 May 10
Exbradfordian wrote: "including attracting civil service jobs from London" - what planet do they live on. Do they live in a bubble - the tories have just announced massive cuts in the civil service - there won't be any jobs to relocate. I don't want to appear negative but I can't believe this will ever come to fruition. If it does by a miracle, then there should be assurances that the local businesses/communtie s benefit. There should be quota of jobs that have to go to the Bradford unemployed.There are more than half a million civil servants, Exbradfordian - they aren't all going to lose their jobs, and as the civil service is restructured over the coming years, there will be many opportunities for new larger departments to be located in an area which is central, easily accessible and inexpensive. I think this is a brilliant idea. I would love to see it happen.
the Laird
says...
3:29pm Fri 21 May 10
peedoffratepayer
says...
3:37pm Fri 21 May 10
markjoe wrote:Was it a nasty bump on the head?, or do you wear rose-tinted spectacles? "A great idea that will come to fruition" - your having a laugh!!
This is a great idea that will come to fruition. Having read the above comments about over pie in the sky scheme for the city this is back by private companies and is not a council backed scheme.
Moon on a stick
says...
3:55pm Fri 21 May 10
peedoffratepayer wrote:Allow the man a dream at least, that's all we have left in Bradford our dreams, don't take them away too!
markjoe wrote: This is a great idea that will come to fruition. Having read the above comments about over pie in the sky scheme for the city this is back by private companies and is not a council backed scheme.Was it a nasty bump on the head?, or do you wear rose-tinted spectacles? "A great idea that will come to fruition" - your having a laugh!!
jonathancrewdson
says...
5:00pm Fri 21 May 10
Moon on a stick
says...
5:37pm Fri 21 May 10
jonathancrewdson wrote:Sounds like a good idea, if your company listens to the Civic Society, retailers and residents if there are any left then hopefully it should give you some ideas. Apart from a rail link more affordable and long stay parking and reigning back the overzealous parking attendants plus cancelling the lunancy of making all roads chargable to park on in the centre would be a good start.
I'm setting up a new not-for-profit company to fill the vacuum following Bradford Centre Regeneration being closed and the aim this time is not just to promote investment in the city centre but also to set up practical projects to do something to improve the chances of businesses in the area.
This is certainly something we will be looking to support. The issue of Bradford not having a cross-rail and the potential benefits that would bring will not go away until it happens.
caribouk
says...
5:41pm Fri 21 May 10
ravacity
says...
6:11pm Fri 21 May 10
jonathancrewdson wrote:glad to see their is still a few bradfordians still believing in this city including pennington/mason and the above post,the train operators **** has funding from 2014 to develop new lines and wants to hear from local authorities wtih proposals to improve its rail infrastructure.so this scheme could be possible,bradford needs it residents to back these proposals then we might get somewhere
I'm setting up a new not-for-profit company to fill the vacuum following Bradford Centre Regeneration being closed and the aim this time is not just to promote investment in the city centre but also to set up practical projects to do something to improve the chances of businesses in the area. This is certainly something we will be looking to support. The issue of Bradford not having a cross-rail and the potential benefits that would bring will not go away until it happens.
Darbees
says...
7:13pm Fri 21 May 10
bcfc1903
says...
8:05pm Fri 21 May 10
davidh66
says...
8:31pm Fri 21 May 10
bcfc1903
says...
8:57pm Fri 21 May 10
watcher22
says...
9:30pm Fri 21 May 10
nothereforlong
says...
10:08pm Fri 21 May 10
lonniejockstrap
says...
11:55pm Fri 21 May 10
TirNaNog
says...
6:00am Sat 22 May 10
Writer
says...
8:00pm Sat 22 May 10
Stilladriver
says...
3:11pm Sun 23 May 10
bradford pedant wrote:It's good to see the good natured exchange between the two of you. And that some people do still value an effort being made to write proper English. But bradford pedant, I really can't believe that you wrote "as their appears to be more...."
kirkstallbantam wrote: Stop whining at each other and get behind this scheme. Sure, it is a pipe dream but at least Mr Pennington is having a go at sorting this mess of a city out. BravoSadly some pipe-dreams have a habit of costing the tax payer. However, I am more than happy for private investment to be used as their appears to be more accountability. I am a great supporter of John Pennington and I hope his group is successful in their aims, although why a cross city rail link is going to improve the lot of Bradfordians is still beyond me.
avagander
says...
8:59pm Wed 26 May 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Bradford and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Bradford and surrounding areas now
Search Now »
Homes for sale and to let in Bradford and surrounding areas.
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Bradford and surrounding areas
Search Now »
smallboy says...
10:40am Fri 21 May 10