Petitions submitted in fight to save public toilets

Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Margaret Tucker and Gayle Rodgers with Shipley Market traders who do not want the council to close the town's public toilets. Margaret Tucker and Gayle Rodgers with Shipley Market traders who do not want the council to close the town's public toilets.

The fight to save Aire Valley public toilets from Bradford Council's axe is heating up with huge petitions being handed in against the planned closures.

The only public loos in Shipley, Bingley and St Ives Estate may be shut next year to save what some have branded "pathetic" and "paltry" annual maintenance bills.

St Ives attracts coachloads of inner city school children and special needs pupils sent there to experience nature. The yearly toilet bill is just £7,200.

"The Council probably spends more than that on balloons for one of its endless City Park parties," said Bingley Rural councillor Mike Ellis.

"It's an absolute disgrace, it's a pathetic sum of money.

"St Ives Estate is an extremely well-used visitor centre and to close the toilets would be an absolute disgrace," Cllr Ellis said.

Friends of St Ives has so far collected 1,200 signatures against the move.

"I've done petitions before, but nothing like this - people are so emotional about it that nobody refuses to sign," said the group's chairman Pam Laking.

"We have a new visitor centre and children come here 30 at a time and use it as a classroom.

"School governors have told me if there are no toilets, the pupils will not be able to visit," she said.

St Ives has an on-line campaign which can be reached via Bradford Council's e-petition website until July 10.

Meanwhile protesters in Bingley and Shipley have now closed their petitions with 2,200 and 1,800 names against closure respectively.

But they are continuing to gather more signatures for paper petitions to be handed in when the matter will be discussed by Full Council at City Hall on July 15.

"In Shipley we are a designated transport hub with a train station and a bus station and what - no toilets?" said traders' spokesman Barry Cooper of Perkins Jewellers.

"The sums they will save are just paltry compared to the city's budget and we have support from the Alzheimers Society, Age UK, Carers Resources, local MP Philip Davies and all the ward councillors," Mr Cooper said.

Paul Smithson, Alzheimer’s Society Services Manager, Bradford confirmed their concerns:

"In order for people living with dementia to live well in their local communities they need access to facilities that they are familiar and could become confused if they find that these have been closed.

"The Alzheimer’s Society has made huge strides recently in encouraging businesses and organisations in the Shipley area to become more dementia friendly and local authority members who are making these decisions need to recognise the impact that this will have on people living with dementia,"Mr Smithson said.

Ros Dawson, chair of Bingley Community Council Group, said there was still widespread disbelief that the such basic amenities could be lost.

"People are just incredulous. It costs just £38,000 a year to run Bingley's toilets and that's only because the rateable value is so high - twice what it is in Ilkley."

"Public toilets are vital amenities and the very least which Bradford Council should provide."

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:39pm Fri 27 Jun 14

angry bradfordian says...

Cllr Ellis is spot on about the amount of money compared to that spent on City Park to avoid it becoming a white elephant. Anyone remember the millions it was meant to generate? Instead it cost £24m and needs more spent on events to attract people in.

I find it unbelievable the council can justify it by the saving of just £7k when it's such a popular spot.
St Ives appears in tourist literature and many a walking guide so it must attract visitors from outside the city- something the city puddle would struggle to claim!
Cllr Ellis is spot on about the amount of money compared to that spent on City Park to avoid it becoming a white elephant. Anyone remember the millions it was meant to generate? Instead it cost £24m and needs more spent on events to attract people in. I find it unbelievable the council can justify it by the saving of just £7k when it's such a popular spot. St Ives appears in tourist literature and many a walking guide so it must attract visitors from outside the city- something the city puddle would struggle to claim! angry bradfordian
  • Score: 12

6:40pm Fri 27 Jun 14

damraf says...

Each is the 90 councillors each receive about £14000 a year minimum in expenses is 7200 too much to help the people they represent
Each is the 90 councillors each receive about £14000 a year minimum in expenses is 7200 too much to help the people they represent damraf
  • Score: 7

10:10am Sat 28 Jun 14

Bikerbeardy says...

Cant believe it, where does the spending cuts end ?, i recently went on a council funded training course and the confirmation letter said " due to budget reductions refreshments are no longer provided " !!!!, not even a coffee on a full days training course.
Cant believe it, where does the spending cuts end ?, i recently went on a council funded training course and the confirmation letter said " due to budget reductions refreshments are no longer provided " !!!!, not even a coffee on a full days training course. Bikerbeardy
  • Score: 1
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree