Keighley district residents’ shock warning on floods

Councillor Adrian Naylor

Councillor Adrian Naylor

First published in News Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Photograph of the Author by

Three thousand residents across Keighley district and the Worth Valley have been issued with advice on what to do should reservoirs breach.

Householders living close to six ‘high priority’ sites are being sent letters explaining their homes are within so-called inundation areas, which would take the full force of flooding.

The letters are accompanied by a leaflet called Don’t Panic, Prepare! which outlines what people can do to protect themselves and their property in the case of an emergency.

Bradford Council, which distributed the letters this week according to government guidelines, has been accused of creating anxiety and generating more questions than answers.

The local authority has defended the move, stressing the likelihood of a reservoir breach is extremely low and there is “no cause for concern.”

Letters have been sent to people living close to Yorkshire Water-owned Watersheddles, Ponden and Lower Laithe reservoirs, Stanbury; Leeming above Oxenhope, Silsden reservoir and Thornton Moor.

Coun Adrian Naylor, a Silsden town councillor who also represents the Craven ward on Bradford Council, said 786 properties would be affected in Silsden, the largest number of any of the identified areas.

“I’m concerned that this letter has come out and whilst it might be a bureaucratic notice, it will understandably cause concern to those who receive it. Following the recent issues of flooding it may be, by warning residents of all possible eventualities, an attempt by the authorities to cover their backs,” he said.

“Why has it taken so long for this information to come out?

“Another issue is what this will do to people’s ability to obtain home insurance or sell their property if they are deemed to be in an ‘at risk’ area.”

Silsden Town Council chairman, Chris Atkinson, said: “I’m concerned about the fact over 780 properties in the town are receiving this letter.

“It will be up to individual householders to check the implications with their insurers. I would hope this doesn’t blight their properties.”

Worth Valley councillor Glen Miller, the Tory group leader on Bradford Council, also raised concerns about the potential impact on homeowners’ insurance.

“We have all seen the devastation that flooding has brought to large areas in recent months and we are all aware that this and other incidents in previous years have heightened insurers’ awareness of the risks to properties at certain locations,” he said.

Mike Powell, the council’s emergency planning manager, said: “We and other authorities such as the Environment Agency have a statutory responsibility to prepare for any eventuality which might put people who live within the vicinity of a reservoir at risk.”

Former Yorkshire water employee and Thornton and Allerton councillor Malcolm Sykes said: “ I was amazed when I heard about this letter, which is scaremongering. What the Council has done is absolutely unnecessary.”

Brett Marshall of Yorkshire Water said: “There is no reason to think the risk of flooding from reservoirs has increased. Yorkshire Water maintains all of its reservoirs to a high standard. This maintenance is prescribed and inspected by an independent, government-appointed engineer. Although the chances of there being flooding caused by a reservoir breach are very slim, it is still important that people understand the risks and how to respond.”

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:49am Thu 27 Mar 14

Tonybaloni says...

Check out UN agenda 21. They want us all to have something to worry about.
They also want us to abandon the countryside and move into towns and cities. #UselessEaters
Check out UN agenda 21. They want us all to have something to worry about. They also want us to abandon the countryside and move into towns and cities. #UselessEaters Tonybaloni
  • Score: -1

10:22am Thu 27 Mar 14

June Oh says...

So are not Yorkshire Water responsible if their reservoirs break?
I would have thought it was YW who need insurance..
So are not Yorkshire Water responsible if their reservoirs break? I would have thought it was YW who need insurance.. June Oh
  • Score: 8

1:59pm Thu 27 Mar 14

justjustice says...

Someone on the council must have shaken hands with an insurance company, the fact that such letter have been sent out now means that these people may have to declare that their homes are at a low risk of flooding; this will greatly increase their house insurance premiums!

These reservoirs have been here for decades, why now?
Someone on the council must have shaken hands with an insurance company, the fact that such letter have been sent out now means that these people may have to declare that their homes are at a low risk of flooding; this will greatly increase their house insurance premiums! These reservoirs have been here for decades, why now? justjustice
  • Score: 5

2:15pm Thu 27 Mar 14

A650 says...

All councils in England with reservoirs over a certain size in their areas are sending these letters to residents. It follows a recommendation in the Pitt Review following the 2007 summer floods. It’s a government initiative not a local authority one.

It’s taken so long time I expect because it’s a lot of work mapping where the water would go, what speed, depth etc.

Obviously the risk is very low there should be no effect on insurance unless insurance companies smell a fast buck. In which case the government should lean on them.

Councillors need to calm down and check their facts before pushing the panic button.
All councils in England with reservoirs over a certain size in their areas are sending these letters to residents. It follows a recommendation in the Pitt Review following the 2007 summer floods. It’s a government initiative not a local authority one. It’s taken so long time I expect because it’s a lot of work mapping where the water would go, what speed, depth etc. Obviously the risk is very low there should be no effect on insurance unless insurance companies smell a fast buck. In which case the government should lean on them. Councillors need to calm down and check their facts before pushing the panic button. A650
  • Score: 3

2:17pm Thu 27 Mar 14

A650 says...

Yorkshire Water & United Utilities are responsible for the infrastructure. Local Authority and Environment Agency responsible for responding if they breach.

Who picks up the bill later? Not sure but it shouldn't affect premiums. There hasn't been a reservoir breach in the UK since the 19th century. The Ulley reservoir breach in 2007 was averted before disaster struck so now plans have to be in place.
Yorkshire Water & United Utilities are responsible for the infrastructure. Local Authority and Environment Agency responsible for responding if they breach. Who picks up the bill later? Not sure but it shouldn't affect premiums. There hasn't been a reservoir breach in the UK since the 19th century. The Ulley reservoir breach in 2007 was averted before disaster struck so now plans have to be in place. A650
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree