MP backs protest to homes on West Bowling field

Bradford Telegraph and Argus: David Ward meeting objectors to the application for 45 houses David Ward meeting objectors to the application for 45 houses

An MP who is among objectors to plans by Bradford Council for a cluster of homes on a greenfield site says it would be “shameful” for councillors to approve their own application in the face of mass local opposition.

David Ward (Lib Dem, Bradford East) and 62 others have written to the Council to oppose plans to build off Parkway, West Bowling.

When a planning committee meets to decide on the application for 45 houses on Wednesday, its members will also be informed that a petition opposing the houses has been signed by 83 people.

But, despite this, the application is still recommended for approval by officers.

Objectors also say it was unfair the application was submitted a few days before Christmas, when few people were likely to be aware of it – and that as it was a Council application, more could have been done to make sure residents’ concerns were taken into account.

The Council responded by saying: “The Council cannot dictate when planning applications are submitted.”

The plans are for three and two-bedroom houses and the application states it “provides a sympathetic proposal to a difficult development site” and “will improve the current vacant site, reducing anti-social behaviour and improve the amenity value and safety of local residents whilst protecting their privacy.”

But residents say the estate would lose an area of green space which is used by many people in the community.

They have also argued the roads cannot cope with the extra traffic 45 houses could bring and say local schools do not have the capacity for the new families.

Mr Ward visited residents at the site last month, and wrote an objection letter to the Council shortly afterwards.

In it he repeats the residents’ objections, and on the green space issue says: “My constituents fear that losing this space in its entirety would mean that their children are displaced and they would lose what they consider to be a residential amenity.”

Dr Mohammad Rehan, who lives on nearby Highbridge Terrace, said: “When we discussed this with local councillors they fully understood our concerns. It just seems like they’ve decided to go ahead with it and don’t care about what people have said.

“The feeling I get after reading that it has been recommended for approval is that they made their decision a while ago and now they are just going to impose it. If it is approved it’s a shameful representation for the Council.”

Wednesday’s meeting takes place at 10am at City Hall.

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:41am Sat 15 Feb 14

alive and awake says...

The elections aren't far away. Anybody remember when Rev. Flowers was involved in planning?
The elections aren't far away. Anybody remember when Rev. Flowers was involved in planning? alive and awake

10:32am Sat 15 Feb 14

sorrow&anger says...

When it comes to planning and helping greedy developers become even richer, City Hall never listens to its citizens. This application will be rubber stamped as usual.
When it comes to planning and helping greedy developers become even richer, City Hall never listens to its citizens. This application will be rubber stamped as usual. sorrow&anger

11:04am Sat 15 Feb 14

Mr Capp says...

This land used to be occupied by blocks of flats so what the objection is i don't know!
This land used to be occupied by blocks of flats so what the objection is i don't know! Mr Capp

11:39am Sat 15 Feb 14

wobbley-bob says...

Mr Capp wrote:
This land used to be occupied by blocks of flats so what the objection is i don't know!
And is now only used as an off road track by the local numpties on Motorbikes & in 4x4's.
[quote][p][bold]Mr Capp[/bold] wrote: This land used to be occupied by blocks of flats so what the objection is i don't know![/p][/quote]And is now only used as an off road track by the local numpties on Motorbikes & in 4x4's. wobbley-bob

12:07am Sun 16 Feb 14

saleemy says...

Lets use the land and amd house 200 polish and roma gypsy families there.give them wallers up there a taste of their own medicine.
:D
Lets use the land and amd house 200 polish and roma gypsy families there.give them wallers up there a taste of their own medicine. :D saleemy

8:02pm Sun 16 Feb 14

northern pig says...

Mr Capp wrote:
This land used to be occupied by blocks of flats so what the objection is i don't know!
I agree if affordable homes are built for first time buyers,bring it on but a Big no to social housing where people ARE TAKING THE P**S AND BEING A BURDEN ON WORKING CLASS TAXPAERS LIKE ME.We have enough of those!!!
[quote][p][bold]Mr Capp[/bold] wrote: This land used to be occupied by blocks of flats so what the objection is i don't know![/p][/quote]I agree if affordable homes are built for first time buyers,bring it on but a Big no to social housing where people ARE TAKING THE P**S AND BEING A BURDEN ON WORKING CLASS TAXPAERS LIKE ME.We have enough of those!!! northern pig

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree