Developers will cherry-pick profitable green areas for housing, fear Bradford councillors

Councillor Adrian Naylor Councillor Adrian Naylor

Concerns have been raised that Bradford Council will have to sacrifice large tracts of the Green Belt to attract cash-strapped developers.

Councillor Adrian Naylor (Ind, Craven) said new planning guidelines from the Government encouraged local authorities to boost the economy by promoting development.

He said once the Council revealed its new housing allocations, developers would cherry-pick the leafier areas first, as these were easier and more profitable sites to build on.

He said: “The Government focus on planning for need will lead to Bradford having to release large tracts of Green Belt which will be developed, but overall the new housing targets will not be met.

“Developers will love areas such as Ilkley or Wharfedale, but will leave the expensive, more difficult city centre sites undeveloped.”

Councillor Val Slater, executive member with responsibility for housing, agreed the Government’s current planning policy could endanger green space.

She said: “We do have concerns that Government planning policies could mean developers being able to ride roughshod over local opinion and put green space in jeopardy. However, our Local Plan will protect land and provide clear guidance to developers on preferred sites and what type of development can be built there.

“This means we can be very clear about whether a site is appropriate for the use a developer proposes for it and strengthen our position in any potential legal challenges from developers about land use. Our priority is to ensure that building is done on brownfield sites first.”

Councillor John Penning- ton, Conservative planning spokesman, said developers were struggling to sell their homes because people couldn’t get mortgages.

He said: “I think they are going to be very hesitant to build anything so Coun Naylor is right, they are going to cherry-pick the green areas.”

He said one solution would be to get the banks lending again.

Leader of the Liberal Democrats at the Council, Councillor Jeanette Sunder-land, said no more green fields should be allocated for housing. She said: “What the Council ought to do is just dig its heels in and say, ‘This is our plan’, not start rolling over about Green Belt or urban green space.

“It should dig its heels in and say, ‘No, we want to solve the problem of what we do with the city centre’.”

She said Bradford’s young people were migrating to Leeds, where they could buy city centre flats. Elizabeth Helmich, of the Heaton Residents’ Association, agreed the city centre needed development.

She said: “People say they love Bradford, but they will move out if the city doesn’t offer them what they need.

“We should be using Bradford’s brownfield sites to build these houses. An awful lot aren’t being built. The Council needs to stop pussyfooting around and make sure they go ahead.”

Comments(5)

BD16 says...
8:30am Mon 4 Mar 13

Val Slaters changed her tune: http://www.thetelegr
aphandargus.co.uk/ne
ws/9493091.Councillo
r_ready_to_be__Devil
_s_Disciple__over_Gr
een_Belt/

Avro says...
10:32am Mon 4 Mar 13

Adriian Naylor and his cohorts sacrificed a large swathe of city centre land which has yet to be built on!

Albion. says...
11:24am Mon 4 Mar 13

Why not turn "brownfield sites" into "greenfield sites" and improve the quality of life for those living around them? There are some such sites that have been derelict for decades.

sorrow&anger says...
11:30am Mon 4 Mar 13

Cllr Val Slater said “the Government’s current planning policy could endanger green space”.

Wrong, what a turncoat. It is City Hall’s policy that endangers green space. The Council have just destroyed 15 acres of their own green fields at Buck Lane to make way for an unnecessary industrial estate. If they’re so concerned about preserving our countryside why can’t factories be built on brownfields?

Shipleyvegas says...
1:09pm Wed 6 Mar 13

Albion. wrote:
Why not turn "brownfield sites" into "greenfield sites" and improve the quality of life for those living around them? There are some such sites that have been derelict for decades.
Good idea - small amount of investment in the dereliction to smarten the whole district up wouldn't do any harm

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree