- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@Bradford_TandA
All the latest news and views from the T&A
@tandasport
All the latest sport from the T&A
@TandABusiness
Latest business headlines from the T&A
- Find us on Facebook
The Telegraph & Argus
Like us on Facebook
Bradford Council executive to decide future of controversial Odeon building (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Executive committee to determine whether £1 sale of Odeon building goes ahead
7:00am Thursday 7th February 2013 in News
By Jo Winrow, City Hall Reporter
The former Odeon building in Bradford city centre
A decision over whether Bradford Council buys the former city centre Odeon building for £1 will be made by the authority’s Labour-run executive, it has been confirmed.
There had been speculation that the strategic director of regeneration, Barra Mac Ruairi and Councillor David Green, leader of the Council, could be granted the authority to decide the future of the run-down 1930s building, which has been empty since 2000.
But last week, members of the regeneration and economy overview and scrutiny committee recommended that “due to the risks associated with the site and the high political profile the final decision in relation to the transfer of the asset should be made by the Council’s executive.
As a result the opposition leader, Councillor Glen Miller, leader of the Conservative group, called for clarification on the issue, stating that as many councillors as possible should be involved in taking the decision – such as at a meeting of full Council, where all 90 members would be able to have their say.
Coun Miller said: “I welcome the fact that Councillor Green has recognised that a decision regarding such an important local landmark as the Odeon should not be delegated to one councillor and one officer.
“Therefore, to an extent I welcome confirmation that the executive committee will take the decision, though in light of the fact that the executive is made up entirely of Labour councillors, who do not make up a majority of the Council, I do think that it would be even better were the whole Council to be allowed to vote on the Odeon’s fate. This would ensure transparency”.
Coun Green added: “I think it’s only right and proper that a decision on something with this amount of public interest, is made in an open and democratic way, as we’ve said since the offer to buy the Odeon was first made.”
The opportunity to save the building comes after the Homes and Communities Agency, which owns it, terminated a long-standing legal agreement in September with developer Langtree, which had wanted to demolish the building and build a £40 million New Victoria Place development of offices, a hotel and apartments.
The Council is considering an offer from the HCA to take the building on for £1 plus £100,000 of maintenance cash.
Comments(13)
mad matt
says...
8:17am Thu 7 Feb 13
Joedavid
says...
8:26am Thu 7 Feb 13
T&A should be asking for the report on the buildings condition that should have been ready at the end of January.
Where is it?
What does it say?
Get pushing T&A look after Bradford people.
Avro
says...
8:34am Thu 7 Feb 13
mad matt wrote:Totally agree!
Council buys it for £1 and it'll cost the council tax payers £1million to do it up - no thank you!
angry bradfordian
says...
8:46am Thu 7 Feb 13
mad matt wrote:Depends what you mean by ''doing it up'
Council buys it for £1 and it'll cost the council tax payers £1million to do it up - no thank you!
A million pounds may be a wise investment if it helps turn it into a venue that attracts people into the city centre. They've just spent £24m (probably more) the the pond for solely that reason.
The council spent an awful lot of money in refurbishing the Alhambra in the 80's and I doubt anyone could say it was anything other than money well spent.
Thee Voice of Reason
says...
9:36am Thu 7 Feb 13
markjoe
says...
10:19am Thu 7 Feb 13
Why does this council mess around trying to work out pie in the sky ideas instead of looking at what is available to them.
Joedavid
says...
10:51am Thu 7 Feb 13
Nothing as far as I understand it they await the next step after the Council decides the above.
Think there are 2 or 3 schemes in the pipeline, they have been reported in the T&A.
Albion.
says...
11:35am Thu 7 Feb 13
Joedavid wrote:Exactly.
"What happen to the developer who wanted to turn it into a music venue? "
Nothing as far as I understand it they await the next step after the Council decides the above.
Think there are 2 or 3 schemes in the pipeline, they have been reported in the T&A.
johnhem
says...
12:31pm Thu 7 Feb 13
Joedavid wrote:don't expect any help from the T&A, they have their own agenda. anything that threatens the st georges hall affects their plans for expansion/move, and a music venue could do just that.
Should be the whole 90 Councillors that decide, not just a few, not sounding right this new situation, but certainly wrong that 2 men would be deciding.
T&A should be asking for the report on the buildings condition that should have been ready at the end of January.
Where is it?
What does it say?
Get pushing T&A look after Bradford people.
angry bradfordian
says...
12:43pm Thu 7 Feb 13
johnhem wrote:That would explain why when the story about the new city centre masterplan was in the T&A, the fairly major bit about demolishing the Odeon wasn't mentioned but waffle about 'business forests' and 'cultural expansion zones' was.
Joedavid wrote:don't expect any help from the T&A, they have their own agenda. anything that threatens the st georges hall affects their plans for expansion/move, and a music venue could do just that.
Should be the whole 90 Councillors that decide, not just a few, not sounding right this new situation, but certainly wrong that 2 men would be deciding.
T&A should be asking for the report on the buildings condition that should have been ready at the end of January.
Where is it?
What does it say?
Get pushing T&A look after Bradford people.
Interesting to see that masterplan includes plans to 'boost nightlife' but also stop the chance of a new concert venue.
Not so simple
says...
1:28pm Thu 7 Feb 13
This is a ten, sorry twenty, sorry best part of fifty year observation.
False promises, rushed developments and demolitions.
Wasted resources, negative impact on the residents of Bradford and the reflection of the city throughout the land.
Sack the lot of em, better still do em for treason
mr-dog
says...
7:38pm Thu 7 Feb 13
angry bradfordian says...
7:53am Thu 7 Feb 13
On the other hand, if they decide to keep it, why are they wasting money paying consultants to write a report saying it should be demolished?