BENSONS Crisps is ''feeling in a most vulnerable position'', chairman
and chief executive Malcolm Jones said yesterday. That was after interim
results which had been hard hit by the costs of closing three sites as
part of its strategy of concentrating the bulk of its manufacturing at
Kirkham in Lancashire.
A charge of #845,000 increased interim pre-tax losses from #386,000 to
#1.69m with an additional negative factor being a #271,000 rise in
interest charges to #401,000.
City reaction was unkind. The shares tumbled 14p to 44p with sentiment
also hurt by the passing of the interim dividend.
The #10m investment, which will take about #1.5m of annual costs out
of the business, is seen as being more surefooted than a substantial
marketing programme for a company which managed to increase its market
share by 1% to 7% last year in the highly competitive crisps sector.
Some 45% is sold to the supermarkets where margins are virtually
non-existent leaving profits to come from the small retail sector.
Overall turnover rose 7% to #17.7m of which about 30% is attributable
to the snacks side such as Tortilla Chips.
Bensons has sold its 45-strong van fleet for #743,000. That lost about
#665,000 in the last full financial year. The cash inflow will help
reduce group borrowings so that year-end gearing should be little above
50%.
While the second half is always the more profitable period, the
current three months are the most important, it seems that there will be
a full-year loss of about #500,000 compared with the 1993 profit of
#302,000.
However, Bensons would have to be in dire straits if a final dividend
of about 1p is not paid.
This looks a rather interesting recovery situation, particularly as
Unichip of Milan paid about 135p for its 4.8% stake.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article