News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Business leaders make new appeal for line to join two Bradford train stations

City Hall’s regeneration chief Barra Mac Ruairi City Hall’s regeneration chief Barra Mac Ruairi

Reviving a campaign to develop a cross-city rail link between Forster Square station and Bradford Interchange could jeopardise projects already in the pipeline, a regeneration meeting was told yesterday.

City Hall’s regeneration chief Barra Mac Ruairi said priority must continue to be given to projects such as the City Park and the Westfield Broadway shopping centre.

He was responding to a plea by Andrew Mason, managing director of Newmason Properties, for the Bradford cross-rail project to be revived.

It was shelved in 1989 following a review which concluded it was unlikely to generate enough passengers, would be visually intrusive and too expensive to run.

Mr Mason was addressing a Bradford Regeneration Summit focusing on transport and connectivity which was held at Leeds City College in Keighley.

Mr Ruairi said: “I welcome the passion but in these austere times we need to make sure we can deliver projects like Westfield.

“We need to pull these present projects together. I want to continue the course and the efforts we have made and not lose the opportunity we have before us.”

He said 25 officers in his department had spent many hours investigating the potential of the cross-link, including scrutinising the site, after being approached by Mr Mason.

It was concluded that the scheme was feasible but expensive and the transport and economic benefits were only small.

A major factor was the estimated cost of a new scheme which since 1989 had risen from £30 million to £140 million, he said.

Mr Mason argued that a link would transform the city.

He said: “If we want to increase the number of people coming to this city and we want the economy to flourish we must do more. If we want to change this city centre and create jobs and put life back into this place we must put a station at the heart of the city.”

He was backed by Roger Owen, a Bradford City director and former board member of Morrisons supermarket.

The summit also focussed on how to make roads safer in the city, on transport infrastructure between Bradford and Leeds and rail links to London Workshops were held on the transport plan and on flexible and sustainable travel choices.

Comments(15)

The Odeon Crusader says...
8:43am Fri 16 Jul 10

Not only would the swift and immediate removal of Barra Mac Ruairi save Bradford's regeneration from ploughing further into the mire, it would also go a long way towards meeting the Council's £159M budget cut announced earlier in the week...

Joedavid says...
8:58am Fri 16 Jul 10

Looks like this Council chap got at least 25 too many staff.

caribouk says...
8:58am Fri 16 Jul 10

Can't we regenerate the regeneration chief??

Collos says...
9:05am Fri 16 Jul 10

Business people want the cross city link most of the population want it but lets put a lake in front of the town hall instead.Anything pro active that will help the city the council in whatever form stops it but goes ahead with expensive follies.

Helter Skelter says...
9:45am Fri 16 Jul 10

Collos wrote:
Business people want the cross city link most of the population want it but lets put a lake in front of the town hall instead.Anything pro active that will help the city the council in whatever form stops it but goes ahead with expensive follies.
totally agree !! never looked at the 'lake' as a folly but I couldnt have put it better myself. Part of Bradford's downfall over many years is only having branch lines supplying the city.

markjoe says...
9:46am Fri 16 Jul 10

cross-rail link that is needed and could bring in jobs and money is too expensive. £3 million pound bridge going nowhere bring in no jobs or money, is good-value for money???

Joedavid says...
9:48am Fri 16 Jul 10

Get the trains in Leeds better train services and cheaper.

puddin says...
10:09am Fri 16 Jul 10

Joedavid wrote:
Get the trains in Leeds better train services and cheaper.
And how are you getting to Leeds, by car ,pushbike or walking Bradford needs the cross-link much more than hotels, a canal and a big pool.

mad matt says...
10:38am Fri 16 Jul 10

There was a time when you could catch a direct train from Bradford to almost anywhere in the country. Those days have gone but Bradford would certainly benefit from through services. This would give much more flexibility to the local public transport service and encourage the re-opening of a lot of the old intermediate stations.
There is far too much reliance on road transport - too much polution and gridlock. Why can't this country take the bull by the horns and put money into local, reliable, flexible AFFORDABLE rail transport

eebygum says...
11:22am Fri 16 Jul 10

The rail link would generate more trade more trade more money. Also this could kick start the work going a head with Westfield. Dig the lake 6 feet deep outside the town hall and don't tell the councillors might save some money on those useless lot.

Thee Voice of Reason says...
11:39am Fri 16 Jul 10

"It was concluded that the scheme was feasible but expensive and the transport and economic benefits were only small."

Maybe if the economic benefits were nil, it might be given the go ahead.

Like the £3m bridge we don't need or want.

Like the £24m park we don't need or want.

Like the wages of our councils regeneration staff, who we clearly don't need or want or see a reason what they do for their money.

mad matt says...
12:14pm Fri 16 Jul 10

If I remember right, this idea was first put forward in 1885 or thereabouts. The full plans are up at the Industrial Museum. It takes time to get owt done in this town. :(

bcfc1903 says...
2:25pm Fri 16 Jul 10

Absolute laughable comment by Ruairi,this bloke is one of the reasons why |Bradford has no forward thinking as you can always find a good reason to do nothing but you don't expect that negative tripe from someone paid to regenerate the City.Bradford would do well to sack him along with the rest of the "regeneration team" and put the money saved towards building crossrail.This same dumb negative thinking has also been used to explain why the Odeon couldn't be refurbished and reopened as a world class concert hall/conference venue.As a proud Bradfordian i find some of the so called
thinking from those paid handsomely to lead our City forward soul destroying.

mickcbcfc says...
12:04am Sat 17 Jul 10

well? lets say bradford is a dead end city. 2 stations poles apart. a link would be brilliant. from north to south. but where does bradford lies as in intercity links? bradford to manchester. bradford to blackpool. bradford to selby via york. bradford to london via interchange 3 times a day and once via forster sqaure. bradford to morecambe via forster square. a link to scotland via both staions would be viable.
but alass bradford council want a mirror pool. sad as we are a big city. got 2 big clubs bradford city and bradford bulls.
the infrastructure to this once great and i say once is via the M606.
waisted monies on the mirror pool and the doomed westfield sites should in hind sight spent on the link to open bradford up via passenger and frieght reducing costs to local and national buisnesses havin to go via leeds. and im bradford born and bred. i want out of this dead end city. no prospects. just doom and gloom.
i an ashamed to be a bradfordian. and i was once a public figure in this city as a top dj. glad im not now.

bcfc1903 says...
1:11am Sun 18 Jul 10

Chin up Mick,there are far worse places in the UK than Bradford.The City is lacking strong political leadership,but hopefully that is a temporary problem with the possibility of an elected mayor on the horizon.Given a little bit of tunnel vision at the top crossrail,Westfield and a refurbished Odeon could all still happen giving Bradford the status a City of it's size should have.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree