SIR - The reason for replacing the Odeon with a modern glass building, I believe, is that retaining the twin towers is not financially viable. Is it not more important to retain Bradford's history, landmarks, heritage?
I was born in Bradford, as were my parents and grandparents, but currently feel I'm losing my identity with Bradford. At this rate it will be a dying city with no history left.
Those responsible for the regeneration of Bradford talk about investment, investment, investment, trying to bring people to work in Bradford and live in Bradford. It as though they are trying to compete with Leeds. Bradford is not Leeds.
Who will want to visit Bradford as it will be seen only as a new shopping area, with modern "tacky" buildings? Most people prefer to visit not only to shop but to explore the history, the culture, the landmarks of a city.
In the long run is it not more financially viable to keep Bradford landmarks to ensure it is an interesting place to visit for more than just shopping? This will bring in investment from visitors and the people of Bradford will still have their identify, a feeling of belonging.
I say retain the Odeon towers and keep our city alive!
Mrs D Tetley, Hall Road, Bradford
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article