The following have been dealt with by Bradford magistrates:

Andrew Robert Old, aged 26, of North Street, Eastbrook; three counts of theft, three counts of failure to surrender to custody, six-month community order made. Jaroslaw Trawinski, aged 45, of New Hey Road, East Bowling; theft, £120 fine, £15 costs. Martin Darrell Kinch, aged 42, of Halstead Place, Great Horton; producing cannabis, £80 fine, £100 costs. Lee Daniel Mackerill, aged 19, of Acton Street, Bradford Moor; producing cannabis, £250 fine, £95 costs. Darren Perrow, aged 41, of Regency Court, Girlington; failure to provide a specimen, £165 fine, £15 costs.

Attia Kausar, aged 39, of Oak Lane, Manningham; application to reopen case of driving without due care and attention, granted; £360 fine, £100 costs, licence endorsed. Haroon Rashid, aged 20, of Coniston Grove, Heaton; failure to surrender to custody, £15 costs, detained until court rises; breach of the peace, bound over in the sum of £75 for six months. Noman Khan, aged 21, of Alton Grove, Heaton; using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, £100 fine, £100 costs. Matthew Robert Smith, aged 29, of Buttershaw Drive, Buttershaw; application to amend the requirements of a community order due to change of address, granted, order to continue.

Christopher Derek Fox, aged 51, of Tudor Court, Manchester Road, Broomfields; failure to comply with community order, order to continue with additional ten hours’ unpaid work. Liam Marcus Innes, aged 27, of Tichbourne Road, West Bowling; failure to comply with community order, order to continue, with 29 days curfew. Raheel Iqbal, aged 25, of Haslingden Drive, Heaton; two counts of failure to comply with community order, order revoked, resentenced for original offences of assault, 12-month community order made.

We wish to point out that all the information in this court file is provided by the magistrates’ court, which collates the details largely form prosecutors and the police. In calculating the amount of any fine, the court takes into account the income of the offender as well as the seriousness of the offence.