TEAMS from the Bradford Institute for Health Research will be involved in a study which will look at the impact of air pollution on children’s mental health and brain development.

And one Bradford professor says the work could help authorities intervene earlier to improve the health of children in urban areas.

Scientists at Queen Mary University London, who have been allocated £300,000 in funding, will examine the impact of the capital’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez) on children’s brain functioning.

The funding has been provided by the healthcare-focused Barts Charity and the Mayor of London.

The Children’s Health in London and Luton (Chill) Cognition study will run for a three-year period and look at whether better air quality as a result of reduced traffic improves brain development.

Between 2018 and 2020, the Ulez resulted in roadside nitrogen dioxide reducing by almost one third.

Children’s abilities will be measured through assessment of computer-based tasks to test skills such as problem solving and memory recall.

It will also consider whether any apparent boost to brain development has an impact on children’s mental health through a series of questionnaires.

The research will build on the ongoing CHILL study examining the effect of air pollution on respiratory health and lung development of 3,416 primary school children.

The Chill Cognition study will gather data from 85 primary schools in Luton and the London boroughs of Hackney, Tower Hamlets, Southwark, Lambeth, Westminster, Camden, Islington and the City.

Teams from the Bradford Institute for Health Research will be involved alongside scientists from Imperial College London, and the Universities of Bedfordshire, Edinburgh, Cambridge, Leeds and Southern California.

Professor Chris Griffiths, professor of primary care at Queen Mary University, said: “London’s Ulez and UK-wide lockdowns have resulted in unprecedented reductions in traffic pollution and there has never been a better opportunity to address how air pollution affects children’s health.”

Prof Griffiths, who is leading the research, added: “We hope to determine whether improved air quality, and specifically, traffic-related air pollution, results in better developmental and mental health outcomes for young people.”

Professor Mark Mon-Williams, professor of psychology at the Bradford Institute of Health Research said: “Ultimately this research could help to improve educational outcomes, identify children at risk of future mental health problems due to the air quality where they live, and this could enable earlier intervention and allow public services to provide the necessary support and action.”

In the past decade the Bradford institute has been a leader in the field of children's health research, with its groundbreaking Born in Bradford project revealing vital information about how different factors have influences the health of a generation of Bradford children.

There is growing concern about the impact of toxic air in the UK’s cities on public health, with evidence suggesting residents in areas with poor air quality are at greater risk of dying from Covid-19.

Late last year, a coroner ruled in a landmark inquest that air pollution contributed to the fatal asthma attack that killed nine-year-old Ella Kissi-Debrah in 2019.

Ella became the first person in the UK to have air pollution listed as the cause of death on their death certificate.

She lived 25 metres from the South Circular Road in Lewisham, south-east London – one of the capital’s busiest roads

On Wednesday this week, Philip Barlow, assistant coroner for Inner South London, said the government should take steps to tackle dangerous levels of particulate matter in cities.

In a prevention of future deaths report, the coroner said lower legal limits for particulate matter in line with World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines would reduce the number of deaths from air pollution in the UK.

He also said greater public awareness of air pollution information would help individuals reduce their personal exposure.

Mr Barlow warned the adverse effects of pollutants were not being sufficiently communicated to patients and their carers by medical staff.