Match Reports RSS Feed


Bradford City
All the latest news, views, match reports and pictures from Valley Parade

Another ref, another dodgy decision as Clarke red card follows softest of penalties


City 1, Shrewsbury 3

Trust the smallest man on the pitch to have the biggest impact – and no surprises that it should be referee Peter Quinn stealing centre stage.

Once again it was familiar territory for City; a third home loss on the spin and the man in black cast as the chief villain.

The not-so-mighty Quinn made an indelible mark on proceedings with a one-two just before half-time, giving Shrewsbury the softest of penalties and then dismissing Matt Clarke straight afterwards.

It left Stuart McCall to curse another awful official for the umpteenth time and City trying to pick up the pieces from their fifth defeat at Valley Parade.

It was also scant reward for the 100 or so fans who had worked so hard to get the game on in the first place.

Without their enthusiastic early-morning efforts to clear the snow from the pitch and around the ground, City would have been facing a third successive bout of thumb-twiddling. In hindsight, that would not have been a bad thing.

This was hardly a battle of the form teams. City went into it without a victory in five at home and Shrewsbury had won just twice in 15 anywhere.

City had not tasted Valley Parade victory for over two months, a poor run that was dragging them down despite a decent record on the road.

With back-to-back home games this week, it was imperative that they finally started to make the big-crowd advantage count – and for a good while it looked like that might happen.

City certainly came charging out the blocks, winning five corners in the opening ten minutes. Scott Neilson had a shot deflected behind and Gareth Evans volleyed over.

Simon Whaley almost delivered a sensational opening goal after seven minutes. His 30-yard thunderbolt clipped off a Shrewsbury leg and bounced against the bar with keeper David Button completely beaten.

The fast start continued as Michael Flynn threaded a lovely ball through for Evans but his finish was weak, while only striker Dave Hibbert’s outstretched leg prevented James Hanson’s diving header finding the bottom corner.

A goal surely had to come and it did in the 11th minute – but at the other end. Shrewsbury had hardly crossed the halfway line when Terry Dunfield stunned City with a crisp 25-yard half-volley that flew beyond Simon Eastwood.

It was a total sucker punch, given City’s dominance, but they emerged from a brief daze to grab an equaliser ten minutes later.

Zesh Rehman’s thumping clearing header released Evans, who drove deep into the Shrewsbury box, held off Kelvin Langmead’s challenge and intelligently squared for Hanson to knock home.

With an eighth goal of the season to his name, Hanson immediately went hunting another and Shane Cansdell-Sherriff atoned for a mistake in the Shrewsbury box with a desperate block from the big striker’s close-range shot.

The pitch was holding up fairly well, considering the recent weather. The covers had ensured the surface remained soft despite the heavy frosts.

City were trying to knock the ball around, with Whaley a more prominent figure after a few flat performances.

But City fell behind again a minute before the break after Clarke was adjudged to have nudged Steve Leslie. The Shrewsbury striker went down like a sack of spuds, considering the minimal contact, but referee Quinn whistled immediately and booked the centre half.

It was a very soft penalty to concede and Kevin McIntyre compounded City’s agony by sending Simon Eastwood the wrong way from the spot.

Things got even worse for City – and Clarke – within seconds after he ran into Hibbert chasing the ball out of play. Quinn ruled it another foul and judged Clarke to be last man, sending him off.

Clarke could not believe it and McCall was incandescent with rage on the touchline. He flew straight across to the diminutive referee as half-time sounded and angrily wagged a finger in his face.

Once again City were faced with playing the whole second half with a man down. Steve Williams was brought on to plug the defensive gap as Neilson made way.

Feelings were still running high among the fans when the game restarted and Quinn was booed incessantly.

Williams soon needed running repairs to his right hand, which left City briefly down to nine men before he was strapped up to continue.

City were pushing for an equaliser and Luke O’Brien was getting further and further forward on the left flank. The corner tally reached double figures but Lee Bullock’s header from Whaley’s kick flew straight at Button.

Bullock went much closer when he chested down a loose ball and drove it just the wrong side of the post. Then Whaley skidded an awkward effort which Button did well to push clear.

The referee continued to win no friends with the crowd when he decided not to book Dean Holden for halting O’Brien’s overlap with a tug of the full back’s shirt.

Omar Daley came on to a big roar in the 69th minute, replacing Whaley, who had produced his best City home performance. The substitute was tested straight away by a crunching tackle from Neal.

Eastwood fell awkwardly after a challenge with Hibbert for a clearance from his opposite number Button.

The pitch was cutting up badly, making it an even tougher task for City to claw their way back, and it became impossible 11 minutes from time when Shrewsbury added a third goal.

Eastwood made a good save from Neal but Hibbert was following up to kill off City for good.

Rehman got caught in possession inside his own area and Dunfield went down as he tried to retrieve the loose ball but this time the referee and assistant were unmoved.

It was petering out for City but there was one late positive. Daley produced a great run at the end, wiggling his way through four Shrewsbury players into a shooting position before Holden’s deflection diverted his effort behind the goal.

There was just time for one last boo at Quinn on the final whistle. Attendance: 11,522

Comments(13)

bradford321 says...
9:06am Tue 29 Dec 09

On the radio interview after the game SM said 'he didn't know what else to say to the team' at the end of the match - THATS BECAUSE HE HAS RUN OUT OF IDEAS! (sorry Stuart you will always be a legend for what you did for the club on the field, but its time for something fresh)

I'm tried of all the moaning (even if the decisions are blatently wrong) - you make your own luck in life!

If we had players who knew where the back of the net is then after the 1st 20 mins the sending off wouldn't have mattered.
The fact is we are not good enough.

The only reason why the mnmgt team will still be in place at the end of the season is because the club does not have the money to pay them out of their contracts.

bratfudlad says...
10:44am Tue 29 Dec 09

What a load of tosh,this site is becoming a platform for moaners who can only seek to blame the manager.Open your eyes,it is not an excuse to blame poor officials it is a fact .True we are lacking confidence and ideas and we can't keep possesion of the ball or pass it or get it down on the floor or score enough goals but look to the positives for instance ummm! well ummm good atmosphere until the ref starts

waynus71 says...
10:58am Tue 29 Dec 09

bratfudlad wrote:
What a load of tosh,this site is becoming a platform for moaners who can only seek to blame the manager.Open your eyes,it is not an excuse to blame poor officials it is a fact .True we are lacking confidence and ideas and we can't keep possesion of the ball or pass it or get it down on the floor or score enough goals but look to the positives for instance ummm! well ummm good atmosphere until the ref starts
Ok then, what would you have said to the players? We were bossing the game until the officials changed the course of the match. Evans should have done better with the 1 on 1 and there were a few other chances we should have done better with. However, there were also efforts that we were unlucky with. For example, we hit the bar, had 2 efforts cleared off the line and had an effort ruled out when it had clearly crossed the line. When you get that kind of luck (continuously) what more can he say?

The effort is there and we are only a couple of players away from being a very good side. The problem is, we signed 2 young strikers to compliment the lads already here. Unfortunately for McCall and us, Thorne has been injured all season and Boulding has picked up injuries/illnesses at the worst possible times, meaning Hanson and Evans have had to lead the line more than McCall was hoping. Both are good honest pros, but neither are natural goalscorers and that is what we are lacking. I am convinced that with a fit Thorne or a Dean Windass from 2/3 seasons ago, we would be in the top 3 by now.

Every team needs some luck to help them; even the most successful of sides, eg Man Utd and Chelsea. When was the last time you could say we had some good luck? They say it evens itself out over a season.... well if that's the case, we are going to have a fantastically lucky 2nd half of the season!

It isn't as bad as you (and some others) are making out! McCall should be given until the end of the season at the very least.

waynus71 says...
11:08am Tue 29 Dec 09

Sorry.... the above was in response to 'Bradford321' NOT 'bratfudlad'.

spleen ventor says...
12:15pm Tue 29 Dec 09

If people are satisfied with mid table in what is a truly awful league, with cretinous officials to match, then keep on backing McCall.
I said it more than two years ago, after a spineless Friday night debacle at Morecambe...City will never achieve promotion under McCall...I've seen nothing in the interviening 90 odd games to change my mind.

waynus71 says...
1:01pm Tue 29 Dec 09

spleen ventor wrote:
If people are satisfied with mid table in what is a truly awful league, with cretinous officials to match, then keep on backing McCall. I said it more than two years ago, after a spineless Friday night debacle at Morecambe...City will never achieve promotion under McCall...I've seen nothing in the interviening 90 odd games to change my mind.
Spleen, you will recall my comments from last season (from around the end of January) that basically agreed with your thoughts on McCall.

However, surely you can concede that we ARE a better team than recent results have shown? Okay, the league table doesn't look pretty, but if other teams (including Rochdale, Rotherham & Notts County) had missed 3/4 key players for half a season, they would have struggled too.

McCall brought in 2 young kids to compliment the 2 good strikers we already had. However, they have ended up having to play most of our games due to the injuries/illnesses to Thorne and Boulding. Who can legislate for that? McCall took a gamble on Thorne (just as Fergie did with Giggs & Owen), but it hasn't worked out.

In our last three games, we have been robbed by KEY decisions. It isn't sour grapes.... it is fact! We were more than a match for Rotherham, Carlisle & Shrewsbury, but key decisions went against us.

You can write off McCall's first season as he was simply not ready; he didn't know anything about the league or the players we needed. He then tried to go with big names with bigger reputations to get us out. It didn't work. However, he has now gone for the option that ALL City fans wanted and that was to BUILD a young and exciting side that will GROW together, just as the 1984-85 title-winning side did. They aint going to click within 5 months, but they will get better with experience. Give them a chance and hopefully they will turn into the next McCall, Hendrie, Ellis etc. We just need 'our' Bobby Campbell and Peter Jackson to complete the picture!!!!!!

Foolroy says...
2:07pm Tue 29 Dec 09

The ref. did ruin the game and the myopic linesman who was 15 yards from the laughable penalty decision and then Clarkes second foul was equally to blame.
Trouble is, do you see the situation getting any better when people started chanting for Omar to come on? He is quick but his passing skills leave a lot to be desired.

the_duke says...
2:36pm Tue 29 Dec 09

I followed City for years when I lived up there and still follow their results and go to games when I visit relatives. I now watch Bournemouth occasionally as I live nearby, but I can't take it any more. Why? The standard of refereeing! You've all complained on here about recent ref performances, well I've seen them just as bad down at Dean Court recently. I don't want to go any more because it's bad for my blood pressure. They are a disgrace and not fit to referee sunday leagues! Even when bad decisions go for you, it still makes my blood boil that these fools are not penalised for their incompetent performances.

spleen ventor says...
4:08pm Tue 29 Dec 09

waynus71 wrote:
spleen ventor wrote:
If people are satisfied with mid table in what is a truly awful league, with cretinous officials to match, then keep on backing McCall. I said it more than two years ago, after a spineless Friday night debacle at Morecambe...City will never achieve promotion under McCall...I've seen nothing in the interviening 90 odd games to change my mind.
Spleen, you will recall my comments from last season (from around the end of January) that basically agreed with your thoughts on McCall.

However, surely you can concede that we ARE a better team than recent results have shown? Okay, the league table doesn't look pretty, but if other teams (including Rochdale, Rotherham & Notts County) had missed 3/4 key players for half a season, they would have struggled too.

McCall brought in 2 young kids to compliment the 2 good strikers we already had. However, they have ended up having to play most of our games due to the injuries/illnesses to Thorne and Boulding. Who can legislate for that? McCall took a gamble on Thorne (just as Fergie did with Giggs & Owen), but it hasn't worked out.

In our last three games, we have been robbed by KEY decisions. It isn't sour grapes.... it is fact! We were more than a match for Rotherham, Carlisle & Shrewsbury, but key decisions went against us.

You can write off McCall's first season as he was simply not ready; he didn't know anything about the league or the players we needed. He then tried to go with big names with bigger reputations to get us out. It didn't work. However, he has now gone for the option that ALL City fans wanted and that was to BUILD a young and exciting side that will GROW together, just as the 1984-85 title-winning side did. They aint going to click within 5 months, but they will get better with experience. Give them a chance and hopefully they will turn into the next McCall, Hendrie, Ellis etc. We just need 'our' Bobby Campbell and Peter Jackson to complete the picture!!!!!!
Yes Waynus, I think we are a better side than our current position, I also think we have some decent players who, with the right coaching, selection and tactics, would be in a much higher place in the league.
I do believe if we had any of the current top six's manager it would be us looking down from a more loftier position

giveover says...
4:24pm Tue 29 Dec 09

Foolroy wrote:
The ref. did ruin the game and the myopic linesman who was 15 yards from the laughable penalty decision and then Clarkes second foul was equally to blame. Trouble is, do you see the situation getting any better when people started chanting for Omar to come on? He is quick but his passing skills leave a lot to be desired.
What passing skills the mans worse than useless.

MacG says...
7:40pm Tue 29 Dec 09

I've just had a second chance to look at the appalling decisions again given by the ref and lino and my blood pressures just shot up again!!

waynus71 says...
11:10am Wed 30 Dec 09

spleen ventor wrote:
waynus71 wrote:
spleen ventor wrote: If people are satisfied with mid table in what is a truly awful league, with cretinous officials to match, then keep on backing McCall. I said it more than two years ago, after a spineless Friday night debacle at Morecambe...City will never achieve promotion under McCall...I've seen nothing in the interviening 90 odd games to change my mind.
Spleen, you will recall my comments from last season (from around the end of January) that basically agreed with your thoughts on McCall. However, surely you can concede that we ARE a better team than recent results have shown? Okay, the league table doesn't look pretty, but if other teams (including Rochdale, Rotherham & Notts County) had missed 3/4 key players for half a season, they would have struggled too. McCall brought in 2 young kids to compliment the 2 good strikers we already had. However, they have ended up having to play most of our games due to the injuries/illnesses to Thorne and Boulding. Who can legislate for that? McCall took a gamble on Thorne (just as Fergie did with Giggs & Owen), but it hasn't worked out. In our last three games, we have been robbed by KEY decisions. It isn't sour grapes.... it is fact! We were more than a match for Rotherham, Carlisle & Shrewsbury, but key decisions went against us. You can write off McCall's first season as he was simply not ready; he didn't know anything about the league or the players we needed. He then tried to go with big names with bigger reputations to get us out. It didn't work. However, he has now gone for the option that ALL City fans wanted and that was to BUILD a young and exciting side that will GROW together, just as the 1984-85 title-winning side did. They aint going to click within 5 months, but they will get better with experience. Give them a chance and hopefully they will turn into the next McCall, Hendrie, Ellis etc. We just need 'our' Bobby Campbell and Peter Jackson to complete the picture!!!!!!
Yes Waynus, I think we are a better side than our current position, I also think we have some decent players who, with the right coaching, selection and tactics, would be in a much higher place in the league. I do believe if we had any of the current top six's manager it would be us looking down from a more loftier position
But surely that is just an opinion. You claim we would be looking down on other teams with a better manager/coach. On what basis is your claim made?

I'm not saying I disagree with you, but in order to make claims like that, you have to be able to back it up. Can you?

I am not convinced McCall is the right man to lead us back up the table (and said as much last February). However, I was in the minority and was slated for my views. That said, he has now brought in young players keen to learn and are showing improvement. Despite recent results, our backline look stronger and harder to break down. Might sound strange when we have conceded 3 in our last 3 games, but in two of those, we were down to 10 ment for more than 45 minutes and in the other, a wonder goal and an offside beat us.

I have been disappointed by Evans' finishing and it has let him down too often. However, we ARE creating chances and with better finishing (Thorne/Boulding or A N other) and a bit of luck and we could be comfortably sat in the top 7.

waynus71 says...
12:17pm Wed 30 Dec 09

spleen ventor wrote:
waynus71 wrote:
spleen ventor wrote: If people are satisfied with mid table in what is a truly awful league, with cretinous officials to match, then keep on backing McCall. I said it more than two years ago, after a spineless Friday night debacle at Morecambe...City will never achieve promotion under McCall...I've seen nothing in the interviening 90 odd games to change my mind.
Spleen, you will recall my comments from last season (from around the end of January) that basically agreed with your thoughts on McCall. However, surely you can concede that we ARE a better team than recent results have shown? Okay, the league table doesn't look pretty, but if other teams (including Rochdale, Rotherham & Notts County) had missed 3/4 key players for half a season, they would have struggled too. McCall brought in 2 young kids to compliment the 2 good strikers we already had. However, they have ended up having to play most of our games due to the injuries/illnesses to Thorne and Boulding. Who can legislate for that? McCall took a gamble on Thorne (just as Fergie did with Giggs & Owen), but it hasn't worked out. In our last three games, we have been robbed by KEY decisions. It isn't sour grapes.... it is fact! We were more than a match for Rotherham, Carlisle & Shrewsbury, but key decisions went against us. You can write off McCall's first season as he was simply not ready; he didn't know anything about the league or the players we needed. He then tried to go with big names with bigger reputations to get us out. It didn't work. However, he has now gone for the option that ALL City fans wanted and that was to BUILD a young and exciting side that will GROW together, just as the 1984-85 title-winning side did. They aint going to click within 5 months, but they will get better with experience. Give them a chance and hopefully they will turn into the next McCall, Hendrie, Ellis etc. We just need 'our' Bobby Campbell and Peter Jackson to complete the picture!!!!!!
Yes Waynus, I think we are a better side than our current position, I also think we have some decent players who, with the right coaching, selection and tactics, would be in a much higher place in the league. I do believe if we had any of the current top six's manager it would be us looking down from a more loftier position
You claim that with ANY of the managers of the current top 6, we would be higher. Here are the facts to prove you are just lashing out AGAIN!

Keith Hill - Been at Rochdale since 2003 and manager since Dec 06. (Win ratio 46%).
Eddie Howe - Been at Bournemouth since Dec 06 and manager since Dec 08. (Win ratio 54%).
Ronnie Moore - 2nd spell at club since Sept 09 (current spell win ratio 33%).
Dave Kevan - Been at County since 2007 and caretaker boss since Dec 09 (yet to take charge of first team in current spell - win ratio N/A).
John Still - Been at D&R since 2004 and in League2 as long as McCall (win ratio in that time 36%). Also relegated with Barnet in his time there.
Kevin Dillon - Been at Aldershot since Nov 09 (win ratio of 36%).

So, other than Howe at Bournemouth and possibly Hill at Rochdale, how are any of the others any better than McCall? For the record, his win ratio is currently 35% and there are plenty of games where we have been unlucky not to have won.

I concede that you could possibly add Moore's name to those two above, but there are already City fans moaning about McCall playing the long-ball. How much worse would that be under Ronnie? You can't have it all ways.


Stuart McCall confronts referee Peter Quinn at half-time Stuart McCall confronts referee Peter Quinn at half-time following Matt Clarke's dismissal

Most popular


Get Adobe Flash player

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses