Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
|
|
All the latest news, views, match reports and pictures from Valley Parade |
6:40am Monday 6th September 2010 in
City 0, Port Vale 2
There are plenty of issues surrounding City at the moment.
The worrying lack of points; the lack of goals; the lack of a settled side. There are the injuries to big-hitters Simon Ramsden and Michael Flynn and the lack of form from players capable of doing much more.
But one issue continues to cloud everything else at Valley Parade and it reared its ugly head once more during this fourth loss of a depressing start to the season.
Director Steve Longbottom had tried to take the bull by the horns in his boardroom notes in the programme entitled “To boo or not to boo”.
He laid out the case for both sides before coming up with the blindingly obvious conclusion that hounding your own team serves absolutely no purpose.
Peter Taylor would rather not get involved. He has already had his say on the matter after the Stevenage game.
He is reluctant to dive into the debate again but felt forced to do so after Tommy Doherty, the biggest name of his summer shopping haul, was singled out following Vale’s second goal.
The midfield playmaker had just claimed an unfortunate assist in a joke goal to nip City’s hopes of a fightback.
Doherty collected a bobbled pass facing his own goal and then hurried a lob wedge of a return back towards Jon McLaughlin. The keeper took a touch because of the height of the pass, miscontrolled badly and presented Justin Richards with the easiest of tap-ins.
It was a bad goal all round – and how the boo boys made sure Doherty knew it when he received the ball from the resulting kick-off.
Taylor was far from impressed, saying: “I’m 57 years of age and I can’t understand it where a midfield player who’s been outstanding in the game makes a mistake and then he’s going to get booed.
“If someone can explain to me how that’s going to help, then I’ll introduce booing in training. How’s that going to make the player feel the next time he comes and plays here?
“But I can’t say any more. Tommy Doherty had a superb game before that pass. He’s strong enough to handle it.”
Again it was a minority. But a minority who are clearly having an impact.
Of course, it’s far easier to be generous when you’ve won the game. Vale chief Micky Adams knew his team could prey on City’s nerves but felt the home supporters were good.
He also echoed Taylor’s pre-match thoughts that the players have got to handle it, saying: “This is the one big club in the division. There’s big support and you’ve got to live with that and deal with it.
“But Peter knows what he’s doing and doesn’t need any advice from me. He’s been there, seen it and done it and he’ll know what he needs.”
Saturday was much better than the last two home games. With a touch of fortune in front of goal, the scoring drought would have been sorted. But how Taylor must envy the attacking resources that Adams has at his disposal.
The Richards “boys” sound like a pair of wild-west gunslingers – and Marc and Justin certainly fire the bullets, with nine goals between them already. In contrast, no City player has got more than one.
At least they created chances this time, particularly in a flurry right at the end of the first half which should have sent them into the dressing room on level terms.
Marc Richards, rumoured to have been a Taylor target, had nodded Vale ahead with an unmarked header from a corner which City felt should never have been awarded after the same player had handled in the build-up.
It was one of several curious non-decisions from rookie referee David Coote, in his first proper season in the middle after years running the line. He had given a similarly baffling performance two years ago against Morecambe on his whistle-blowing debut.
Both teams also had strong shouts for penalties – City for another missed handball, while Vale were mystified as to how Luke O’Brien’s foul on Gary Roberts inside the box was only given as a free-kick on the edge.
Coming two minutes after the opening goal, a penalty then would surely have killed it. Instead, City grabbed the lifeline with arguably their best bit of pressure at home all season. In the league, anyhow.
Jake Speight once again represented the brightest spark with his in-yer-face energy. He skipped past Gareth Owen to slid in a cross which a panicky John McCombe hacked against his own bar.
David Syers, another one who looked up for the battle on the right side of midfield, drove across goal before Speight squandered City’s best chance.
Luke Oliver, for once not getting his shirt tugged, headed across the six-yard box and Speight looked certain to score at the far post. But instead of stooping to head, he tried to control and shoot and the ball bobbled up against his left arm – and the referee did not miss that one.
With Doherty getting more on the ball, City pushed and probed again after the break but there was no obvious sign of a recovery. The tempo picked up but the final options were still rushed and shots wayward.
O’Brien’s withdrawal in a double substitution produced a few groans, especially as Robbie Threlfall had been struggling behind him. Breaks from Syers and Speight came to nothing and the discontent in some quarters was building.
Doherty was robbed of possession by Roberts, who tried to imitate his Rotherham wonder goal from the halfway line with another dip from 50 yards at the same end. This time it sailed into the TL Dallas Stand. Then Vale’s hustling forced the comical coup de grace.
City, to their credit, kept going in the closing 15 minutes and should have pegged one back.
Substitute Louis Moult wriggled through a gap on the right wing before cutting back to Gareth Evans to shoot. The striker had not had a good afternoon in front of goal but this one looked bound for the net – until it smacked into the back of Speight a yard out.
The game finished with a minor push and shove in the tunnel involving Moult but Vale assistant Geoff Horsfield smoothed matters over before the row could escalate.
How City need to cut out the simmering argument with their more vocal critics before it gets out of hand. But nobody needs reminding there is only one way to do that.
Attendance: 10,834
Comments(19)
Meat Pie
says...
8:49am Mon 6 Sep 10
exiledbantam
says...
8:50am Mon 6 Sep 10
spleen ventor
says...
9:11am Mon 6 Sep 10
claytonian
says...
9:40am Mon 6 Sep 10
skyblogger
says...
10:18am Mon 6 Sep 10
Spenvalleyspartan
says...
10:43am Mon 6 Sep 10
claytonian wrote:Spot on although most on here will disagree. Hardly brought anything to the table in the 2nd half. Looked busted and unfit and like Evans should have been subbed with half an hour left. You will now be given an education into how you don't know what your talking about. That Doherty is a great passer who has every right to be on the peripheral to wait for the ball to come to him so he can produce that killer pass! He certainly produced a killer pass alright!!! Jury is still out on our biggest signing of the summer!
taylor is kidding himself if he thinks doherty had an otherwise blinder,the guy has no legs and was totally shafted physically by half time,think a bit of kidology or is it self preservation is kicking in,peters had everything he asked for but watching the last 2 games i cant see a great turn round in performance,hope i'm wrong.
bcfc1903
says...
10:49am Mon 6 Sep 10
skyblogger wrote:I never saw our teams players jogging back and the cretins who boo haven't got a clue about support.How on earth does booing a player help the team,i'm no rocket scientist but that reaction must have a massive effect on most players that haven't got a skin as thick as a Rhinos arse.Get real,these fools are costing the club points.
when you see your teams players jog back, whilst vales are sprinting to the possibility of an opportunity due to a bizarre pass back, then you have a right to boo. christ if thats them playing with a fear factor I would not want to see them laid back. on another note if you pay with peanuts you get monkeys so who are we kidding! we can only dream of paying the wages the mighty port vale pay their strikers. Maybe we should look for a marks and spencer shelf stacker this time and push the boat out again.
skyblogger
says...
10:59am Mon 6 Sep 10
lonniejockstrap
says...
12:43pm Mon 6 Sep 10
Waynus71
says...
12:48pm Mon 6 Sep 10
Crags
says...
1:57pm Mon 6 Sep 10
bcfc1903
says...
2:15pm Mon 6 Sep 10
skyblogger wrote:I don't call the people who boo the team fans,half - witted spectators would be a better description,all those spectators blowing hot air would be a far better pass time for them.The team are commited ,as for the"fans pay their money"it's an excuse for some behaving like cretins and it's wearing a little thin,after all i pay my money to watch a game of football not have some burke who hasn't got a clue slagging the team i love off.
its not the fans m8 that cost the club points, how dare you blame the fans. DO THE FANS ALL BLOW AT ONCE TO GET THE BALL OVER THE LINE? IF IT WAS all the fans fault then why have we lost two games in two away too? Is it the fans fault there too? get real! the fans pay good money to watch their team, the team may not be world beaters but all the fans want is commitment! End of!
2storey
says...
3:05pm Mon 6 Sep 10
skyblogger wrote:you dont pay money to watch city, you get your season ticket through your dole money, which hardworking supporters pay for, we dont want you at vp, goodbye
its not the fans m8 that cost the club points, how dare you blame the fans. DO THE FANS ALL BLOW AT ONCE TO GET THE BALL OVER THE LINE? IF IT WAS all the fans fault then why have we lost two games in two away too? Is it the fans fault there too? get real! the fans pay good money to watch their team, the team may not be world beaters but all the fans want is commitment! End of!
slaphead10
says...
4:54pm Mon 6 Sep 10
nippy2172
says...
6:36pm Mon 6 Sep 10
StaffsBantam
says...
7:07pm Mon 6 Sep 10
nippy2172 wrote:How can you make an all encompassing comment like that.
Well its what city fans are good for isnt it backing there team through thick and thin!! oh no sorry thats other fans .. Frustrating as it may be !!!! GOOD OLD BRADFORDIANS STRIKE AGAIN....
bcfc1903
says...
8:59pm Mon 6 Sep 10
nippy2172 wrote:To say all BCFC fans are causing this rukus down at VP couldn't be further from the truth,it's a minority,and like many minorities they seem to have bigger mouths and less braincells than the rest.CTID
Well its what city fans are good for isnt it backing there team through thick and thin!! oh no sorry thats other fans .. Frustrating as it may be !!!! GOOD OLD BRADFORDIANS STRIKE AGAIN....
Bradford1903
says...
12:54am Tue 7 Sep 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Bradford and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Bradford and surrounding areas now
Search Now »
Homes for sale and to let in Bradford and surrounding areas.
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Bradford and surrounding areas
Search Now »
probes67 says...
8:12am Mon 6 Sep 10