Arnison aims to hit a home run

Paul Arnison aims to give City’s 13,000 home fans some festive cheer

Paul Arnison aims to give City’s 13,000 home fans some festive cheer

First published in Bantams Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Photograph of the Author by , Bradford City Reporter

Paul Arnison has outlined his ten-point plan to make sure City enjoy a merry Christmas.

Three of the four festive games are at Valley Parade, starting with Chester tomorrow, and the defender believes it is vital that they cash in to stay in the thick of the promotion hunt.

With only three points separating the eight clubs beneath leaders Wycombe, there is little margin for error but Arnison is confident City can use the run of home games to their advantage.

Arnison said: “Hopefully we can come out of this period with at least another ten points and then we’ll be right up there. With three of the games at home, I think it’s a realistic target to look to win them all and get at least a draw at Lincoln.

“We know our home form needs to be better but with the team and squad we’ve got, we are good enough to push on and hopefully the results over Christmas will reflect that.

“We go into every game confident, especially here when we’ve got 12,000-13,000 fans behind us. They will lift us and hopefully we can make it a good Christmas period and head into January in a strong position.”

Last week’s sickening loss at Brentford was the right back’s first start since he limped off against Bournemouth at the end of September.

And while delighted to return to the fray, Arnison remains mystified that City left London empty-handed.

“The lads were absolutely gutted in the dressing room afterwards and, looking back now, it’s still difficult to take.

“It was totally frustrating because I thought there was only one team going to win. We looked rampant going forward, especially in the second half.

“The least we wanted was to come away with a draw. To not even take a point having played so well and created so many chances was massively disappointing.

“We will play worse than that this season and win. It’s a cliché but it’s true.”

Arnison had been restricted to just one fleeting appearance from the bench in the previous 14 games.

After recovering from a thigh injury, he found his way blocked by TJ Moncur.

It has been a tough time for the summer capture from Carlisle but he is aiming to make the right back spot his own again from now on.

He added: “Hopefully I’ve shown the manager what I can do and I’ll get a chance again.

“I was a bit shocked to get the call the day before Brentford but you’ve got to be ready. The conditions were heavy but I always enjoy playing whether it’s on a lovely pitch or a mud heap.

“It’s been pure frustration for me since I’ve been out of the side but you’ve got to bide your time, especially when the lads are doing well.

“I’ve just tried to work hard in training and playing in the reserve games. It is difficult but now I’ve got my chance again, I feel fine and hopefully I can help the team push on.”

City old boy Eddie Johnson could be in line for a Valley Parade return.

Johnson, who rejoined hometown club Chester earlier this season, has missed the last three games with a hamstring injury but hopes to be fit enough.

Midfielders Tony Dinning and David Mannix will not be involved after manager Mark Wright told the pair they could leave the club.

Wright’s ruthless approach has transformed Chester’s fortunes with two wins in three games, including only their second clean sheet of the season against Notts County last week.

Wright said: “From the first day that I got here until now I think we are a completely different side.

“The players don’t want to concede goals and our defenders have got to live or die with those situations.”

Chester were beaten three times by City last term and have not won at Valley Parade since 1972.

Comments (16)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:57am Fri 19 Dec 08

Waynus says...

So the picture has been set. Chester haven't won at VP since 1972 and we beat them all 3 times last season. They have old boy Johnson in their side, who to be fair, is crap. Prediction, 2-0 to Chester with Johnson getting both!

No, seriously, this is a game we should be winning. Yes, they are on a good little run and kept a clean sheet last week. However, they were playing Notts County with their 'impressive' strike-force!

I, like Arnison, predict 10 points in our next 4 games. However, I think we will get 3 points at Lincoln and only 1 against the Shrews. It would be nice if we can collect all 3 against one of our rivals, but I just can't see us beating them. Fingers crossed and all that.
So the picture has been set. Chester haven't won at VP since 1972 and we beat them all 3 times last season. They have old boy Johnson in their side, who to be fair, is crap. Prediction, 2-0 to Chester with Johnson getting both! No, seriously, this is a game we should be winning. Yes, they are on a good little run and kept a clean sheet last week. However, they were playing Notts County with their 'impressive' strike-force! I, like Arnison, predict 10 points in our next 4 games. However, I think we will get 3 points at Lincoln and only 1 against the Shrews. It would be nice if we can collect all 3 against one of our rivals, but I just can't see us beating them. Fingers crossed and all that. Waynus
  • Score: 0

5:13pm Fri 19 Dec 08

ricky says...

we must work hard and earn the right yes we played well last week and lost yet there as been hardly any complaints yet when we play poor and get results so called city fans slate the players and like i posted last week its a results buissness and performances come second i would rather win and play poor than outplay a team and get nothing yes we want to see good football but its 4th tier football we are watching not the premier league

as for the next four games i think we will get either 8 or 9 pts just feel to win 3 and draw one maybe asking alot cant see many teams getting more than that over xmas but what we must do is not lose to shrewsbury i would gladly take a point now if we have picked up good results before we play them
we must work hard and earn the right yes we played well last week and lost yet there as been hardly any complaints yet when we play poor and get results so called city fans slate the players and like i posted last week its a results buissness and performances come second i would rather win and play poor than outplay a team and get nothing yes we want to see good football but its 4th tier football we are watching not the premier league as for the next four games i think we will get either 8 or 9 pts just feel to win 3 and draw one maybe asking alot cant see many teams getting more than that over xmas but what we must do is not lose to shrewsbury i would gladly take a point now if we have picked up good results before we play them ricky
  • Score: 0

5:57pm Fri 19 Dec 08

Bredon Bantam says...

If somebody offered me EIGHT points now I would "snap their arm off".

Having said that THREE points tommorow would be massive!

It goes without saying Onwards & Upwards!!
If somebody offered me EIGHT points now I would "snap their arm off". Having said that THREE points tommorow would be massive! It goes without saying Onwards & Upwards!! Bredon Bantam
  • Score: 0

10:02pm Fri 19 Dec 08

macca1969 says...

Its nice to see a player trying to be positive about our xmas games instead of talking the oppo up.Well done arni try having a word or 2 with stu see if he can start being more positive about our chances.Still hoping for a big performance and the 5 goals to city tomorrow get in there.
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE
Its nice to see a player trying to be positive about our xmas games instead of talking the oppo up.Well done arni try having a word or 2 with stu see if he can start being more positive about our chances.Still hoping for a big performance and the 5 goals to city tomorrow get in there. MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE macca1969
  • Score: 0

11:29pm Fri 19 Dec 08

Bradford1903 says...

ricky wrote:
we must work hard and earn the right yes we played well last week and lost yet there as been hardly any complaints yet when we play poor and get results so called city fans slate the players and like i posted last week its a results buissness and performances come second i would rather win and play poor than outplay a team and get nothing yes we want to see good football but its 4th tier football we are watching not the premier league as for the next four games i think we will get either 8 or 9 pts just feel to win 3 and draw one maybe asking alot cant see many teams getting more than that over xmas but what we must do is not lose to shrewsbury i would gladly take a point now if we have picked up good results before we play them
Quite right, I would rather see us play poorly and win, than as last Sat.

Judging by the amount of goals they've scored, I'm sure there are a few Wycombe suppporters who have not been impressed by many of their performances, by as they are top of the league, they won't be complaining.

We need to be more difficult to beat, because you can't play well all of the time, and it's how you do when you don't play well that often defines your season.
[quote][p][bold]ricky[/bold] wrote: we must work hard and earn the right yes we played well last week and lost yet there as been hardly any complaints yet when we play poor and get results so called city fans slate the players and like i posted last week its a results buissness and performances come second i would rather win and play poor than outplay a team and get nothing yes we want to see good football but its 4th tier football we are watching not the premier league as for the next four games i think we will get either 8 or 9 pts just feel to win 3 and draw one maybe asking alot cant see many teams getting more than that over xmas but what we must do is not lose to shrewsbury i would gladly take a point now if we have picked up good results before we play them [/p][/quote]Quite right, I would rather see us play poorly and win, than as last Sat. Judging by the amount of goals they've scored, I'm sure there are a few Wycombe suppporters who have not been impressed by many of their performances, by as they are top of the league, they won't be complaining. We need to be more difficult to beat, because you can't play well all of the time, and it's how you do when you don't play well that often defines your season. Bradford1903
  • Score: 0

11:45pm Fri 19 Dec 08

soulman says...

A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward.
A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward. soulman
  • Score: 0

12:05am Sat 20 Dec 08

Bradford1903 says...

soulman wrote:
A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward.
If we are up against Hollyoaks does this mean that Gemma Atkinson is playing. If so they'll be playing the big two up front, so hopefully they should be a bit easier to break down!
[quote][p][bold]soulman[/bold] wrote: A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward. [/p][/quote]If we are up against Hollyoaks does this mean that Gemma Atkinson is playing. If so they'll be playing the big two up front, so hopefully they should be a bit easier to break down! Bradford1903
  • Score: 0

10:39am Sat 20 Dec 08

soulman says...

Bradford1903 wrote:
soulman wrote: A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward.
If we are up against Hollyoaks does this mean that Gemma Atkinson is playing. If so they'll be playing the big two up front, so hopefully they should be a bit easier to break down!
He He He He !
[quote][p][bold]Bradford1903[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]soulman[/bold] wrote: A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward. [/p][/quote]If we are up against Hollyoaks does this mean that Gemma Atkinson is playing. If so they'll be playing the big two up front, so hopefully they should be a bit easier to break down![/p][/quote]He He He He ! soulman
  • Score: 0

11:45pm Sat 20 Dec 08

Waynus' Agent says...

Bradford1903 wrote:
soulman wrote:
A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward.
If we are up against Hollyoaks does this mean that Gemma Atkinson is playing. If so they'll be playing the big two up front, so hopefully they should be a bit easier to break down!
If the big two are up front, they are sure to be a handful! Two Bazza's on one chest!
[quote][p][bold]Bradford1903[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]soulman[/bold] wrote: A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward. [/p][/quote]If we are up against Hollyoaks does this mean that Gemma Atkinson is playing. If so they'll be playing the big two up front, so hopefully they should be a bit easier to break down![/p][/quote]If the big two are up front, they are sure to be a handful! Two Bazza's on one chest! Waynus' Agent
  • Score: 0

11:49pm Sat 20 Dec 08

Waynus' Agent says...

soulman wrote:
A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward.
What negative? Is this the 'have a dig at Waynus for anything' site? I posted a comment that beating the Shrews would be a big ask. What is negative about that? I did say we would collect 10 points from the next 4 games (harder now after today). Did you call Arni negative too?

p.s. The opening paragraph regarding Chester was a joke, not a serious comment. Lay off mate!
[quote][p][bold]soulman[/bold] wrote: A hell of a lot negative Waynus. Look we should beat HOLLYOAKS and lets go forward. [/p][/quote]What negative? Is this the 'have a dig at Waynus for anything' site? I posted a comment that beating the Shrews would be a big ask. What is negative about that? I did say we would collect 10 points from the next 4 games (harder now after today). Did you call Arni negative too? p.s. The opening paragraph regarding Chester was a joke, not a serious comment. Lay off mate! Waynus' Agent
  • Score: 0

12:10pm Sun 21 Dec 08

dannbradfc says...

not keen on the new user name. sounds like a parody to me. You are been negative in general throughout most of your posts thus SOULMAN is right to point it out. Give some credit as well we're not bottom of the league mate. Also noticed on another post your back to name-calling with bad language e.g. D***. yes they were trying to get a bite but No need and surprised you not reported.
not keen on the new user name. sounds like a parody to me. You are been negative in general throughout most of your posts thus SOULMAN is right to point it out. Give some credit as well we're not bottom of the league mate. Also noticed on another post your back to name-calling with bad language e.g. D***. yes they were trying to get a bite but No need and surprised you not reported. dannbradfc
  • Score: 0

10:25pm Sun 21 Dec 08

Waynus says...

dannbradfc wrote:
not keen on the new user name. sounds like a parody to me. You are been negative in general throughout most of your posts thus SOULMAN is right to point it out. Give some credit as well we're not bottom of the league mate. Also noticed on another post your back to name-calling with bad language e.g. D***. yes they were trying to get a bite but No need and surprised you not reported.
I ask again then since you have been reading the above posts, where have I been negative? I simply agreed we could get 10 points but stated it would be more difficult to beat Shrewsbury than it would to beat Lincoln.

As you will no doubt know, since you seem to dissect every post I make, I have been positive until recently. May I also refer you to your own post in which you said almost the same as I did,
"got to say Stu at fault yesterday" ETC. Are you also being negative then??

As for my comment to Tyker, he deserved it. He attacked me and my posts for no reason other than to get a bite. I didn't call him a name, I simply told him to act his age instead of the size of his bodily part. If you are going to get involved in other people's posts, I again ask that you get your facts straight.

Finally, the 'alternative username' was tongue-in-cheek. Are others allowed to have a dig at me without me trying to defuse the situation with a bit of humour. Double standards again Dann. It is getting boring and others have already pointed this out to you in the past.

If you want to challenge my views, fine, but don't get involved in other issues. I asked Soulman where I had been negative and you respond. Another poster tried to get me to 'bite' and again you seem to think it is your business. WHY??
[quote][p][bold]dannbradfc[/bold] wrote: not keen on the new user name. sounds like a parody to me. You are been negative in general throughout most of your posts thus SOULMAN is right to point it out. Give some credit as well we're not bottom of the league mate. Also noticed on another post your back to name-calling with bad language e.g. D***. yes they were trying to get a bite but No need and surprised you not reported.[/p][/quote]I ask again then since you have been reading the above posts, where have I been negative? I simply agreed we could get 10 points but stated it would be more difficult to beat Shrewsbury than it would to beat Lincoln. As you will no doubt know, since you seem to dissect every post I make, I have been positive until recently. May I also refer you to your own post in which you said almost the same as I did, "got to say Stu at fault yesterday" ETC. Are you also being negative then?? As for my comment to Tyker, he deserved it. He attacked me and my posts for no reason other than to get a bite. I didn't call him a name, I simply told him to act his age instead of the size of his bodily part. If you are going to get involved in other people's posts, I again ask that you get your facts straight. Finally, the 'alternative username' was tongue-in-cheek. Are others allowed to have a dig at me without me trying to defuse the situation with a bit of humour. Double standards again Dann. It is getting boring and others have already pointed this out to you in the past. If you want to challenge my views, fine, but don't get involved in other issues. I asked Soulman where I had been negative and you respond. Another poster tried to get me to 'bite' and again you seem to think it is your business. WHY?? Waynus
  • Score: 0

10:49am Mon 22 Dec 08

YorkshireSteel says...

Our players need to stop talking and start performing!
Our players need to stop talking and start performing! YorkshireSteel
  • Score: 0

3:22pm Mon 22 Dec 08

dannbradfc says...

Waynus wrote:
dannbradfc wrote: not keen on the new user name. sounds like a parody to me. You are been negative in general throughout most of your posts thus SOULMAN is right to point it out. Give some credit as well we're not bottom of the league mate. Also noticed on another post your back to name-calling with bad language e.g. D***. yes they were trying to get a bite but No need and surprised you not reported.
I ask again then since you have been reading the above posts, where have I been negative? I simply agreed we could get 10 points but stated it would be more difficult to beat Shrewsbury than it would to beat Lincoln. As you will no doubt know, since you seem to dissect every post I make, I have been positive until recently. May I also refer you to your own post in which you said almost the same as I did, "got to say Stu at fault yesterday" ETC. Are you also being negative then?? As for my comment to Tyker, he deserved it. He attacked me and my posts for no reason other than to get a bite. I didn't call him a name, I simply told him to act his age instead of the size of his bodily part. If you are going to get involved in other people's posts, I again ask that you get your facts straight. Finally, the 'alternative username' was tongue-in-cheek. Are others allowed to have a dig at me without me trying to defuse the situation with a bit of humour. Double standards again Dann. It is getting boring and others have already pointed this out to you in the past. If you want to challenge my views, fine, but don't get involved in other issues. I asked Soulman where I had been negative and you respond. Another poster tried to get me to 'bite' and again you seem to think it is your business. WHY??
didn't really want to get into this but must respond.

Firstly the vast majority of your posts ARE either negative or of the complaining variety. You appeaR to have a covert agenda against McCall. Yes someof m posts are of the same variety when i feel they are warranted however i also mention positives or post purely on positive matters, thus taking a more realistic and balanced view i believe.

As for dissecting other peoples posts and getting involved i seem to remember it was me who first acused You of that a short while since and guess you are just responding tit-for-tat. Indeed i am sure will have both the date and time written down somewhere in your records. Ineed you are the GRAND MASTER at getting ivolved in others conversations.

As for others pointing out the boring posts YOu apear to be the main recpitent of such accusations zzzzzzzzzzzzz etc

I also maintai that you are the biggest double-standard contributor on any site/forum anywhere, something your no doubt proud of. For evidence again review your records and ACT YOUR AGE!!!!!! lol

Feel free to respond with further name calling/swearing etc

And Merry Christmas W aynus i'm sure its a fun day round at yours and look in hopeful anticipation of an invite.

Here's a positive W aynus City may get promoted in 2009.
[quote][p][bold]Waynus[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]dannbradfc[/bold] wrote: not keen on the new user name. sounds like a parody to me. You are been negative in general throughout most of your posts thus SOULMAN is right to point it out. Give some credit as well we're not bottom of the league mate. Also noticed on another post your back to name-calling with bad language e.g. D***. yes they were trying to get a bite but No need and surprised you not reported.[/p][/quote]I ask again then since you have been reading the above posts, where have I been negative? I simply agreed we could get 10 points but stated it would be more difficult to beat Shrewsbury than it would to beat Lincoln. As you will no doubt know, since you seem to dissect every post I make, I have been positive until recently. May I also refer you to your own post in which you said almost the same as I did, "got to say Stu at fault yesterday" ETC. Are you also being negative then?? As for my comment to Tyker, he deserved it. He attacked me and my posts for no reason other than to get a bite. I didn't call him a name, I simply told him to act his age instead of the size of his bodily part. If you are going to get involved in other people's posts, I again ask that you get your facts straight. Finally, the 'alternative username' was tongue-in-cheek. Are others allowed to have a dig at me without me trying to defuse the situation with a bit of humour. Double standards again Dann. It is getting boring and others have already pointed this out to you in the past. If you want to challenge my views, fine, but don't get involved in other issues. I asked Soulman where I had been negative and you respond. Another poster tried to get me to 'bite' and again you seem to think it is your business. WHY??[/p][/quote]didn't really want to get into this but must respond. Firstly the vast majority of your posts ARE either negative or of the complaining variety. You appeaR to have a covert agenda against McCall. Yes someof m posts are of the same variety when i feel they are warranted however i also mention positives or post purely on positive matters, thus taking a more realistic and balanced view i believe. As for dissecting other peoples posts and getting involved i seem to remember it was me who first acused You of that a short while since and guess you are just responding tit-for-tat. Indeed i am sure will have both the date and time written down somewhere in your records. Ineed you are the GRAND MASTER at getting ivolved in others conversations. As for others pointing out the boring posts YOu apear to be the main recpitent of such accusations zzzzzzzzzzzzz etc I also maintai that you are the biggest double-standard contributor on any site/forum anywhere, something your no doubt proud of. For evidence again review your records and ACT YOUR AGE!!!!!! lol Feel free to respond with further name calling/swearing etc And Merry Christmas W aynus i'm sure its a fun day round at yours and look in hopeful anticipation of an invite. Here's a positive W aynus City may get promoted in 2009. dannbradfc
  • Score: 0

7:18pm Mon 22 Dec 08

Waynus says...

Once again you respond with name calling. Very grown up!

Waynus, BD6 says...
11:54am Mon 22 Dec 08
In relation to Jones, I personally hope he can be kept.

Waynus, BD6 says...
11:45pm Sun 21 Dec 08
That said, those that won't renew their tickets or want to see McCall sacked now, are going a little over the top.

Waynus, BD6 says...
11:44am Mon 22 Dec 08
Although I agree that those calling for McCall's head at this stage may be a little mad, I don't agree that he should be given a job for life, just because of his past performances on the pitch. As my brother pointed out recently, not all great players make it in management. Not that I am saying he won't make it in management, but time is starting to run out for some fans.

Waynus, BD6 says...
12:44am Sun 21 Dec 08
To say 'we have gone backwards' and 'not renewing their season ticket because it is the worst team in 30 years' is a little sad really. Obviously 'eskimo' has alzheimers. Can he not remember Accrington at home last season? We were not far off the bottom places this time last season (19th and just 6 points off the drop zone) and yet we are now joint 3rd. How is that not improvement?

Waynus, BD6 says...
9:55pm Sun 21 Dec 08
Some of Conlon's flicks and touches yesterday were very good. I can't believe he is made scapegoat AGAIN! The amount of times he dropped deep and flicked a pass onto Boulding or Daley was impressive.

Waynus, BD6 says...
9:57am Fri 19 Dec 08
I, like Arnison, predict 10 points in our next 4 games. However, I think we will get 3 points at Lincoln and only 1 against the Shrews. It would be nice if we can collect all 3 against one of our rivals, but I just can't see us beating them. Fingers crossed and all that.

Waynus, BD6 says...
10:09am Fri 19 Dec 08
As for Baz, I think it is a good decision by McCall. Don't increase the length just because someone else is sniffing around.

Waynus' Agent, Here, there and everywhere! says...
4:32pm Fri 19 Dec 08
I am with the side that think he should be given a 6 month deal. He has scored goals and deserves an extension. He has and can continue to do a job for us in this league.

Please explain why the above quotes are not P O S I T I V E ! ! ! We obviously have a different meaning in our respective dictionaries.

I, as well as others have asked you to keep to the posts and to not get involved in other people's posts. I haven't done since, but you just can't seem to help yourself. What was it? Was it the fact that a couple of people said, "I agree Waynus"? Is that what did it?

I won't respond with name-calling. Everyone that has read this thread will know that I haven't called you a name and that it is you AGAIN that have started a fight for no good reason.

I received criticism from some for my posts. I took the feedback on board and haven't attacked anyone else views. However, you seem hellbent on attacking every single post I make, unless it is in agreement with your own views!

AND EVERYONE CAN READ THAT FOR THEMSELVES!
Once again you respond with name calling. Very grown up! Waynus, BD6 says... 11:54am Mon 22 Dec 08 In relation to Jones, I personally hope he can be kept. Waynus, BD6 says... 11:45pm Sun 21 Dec 08 That said, those that won't renew their tickets or want to see McCall sacked now, are going a little over the top. Waynus, BD6 says... 11:44am Mon 22 Dec 08 Although I agree that those calling for McCall's head at this stage may be a little mad, I don't agree that he should be given a job for life, just because of his past performances on the pitch. As my brother pointed out recently, not all great players make it in management. Not that I am saying he won't make it in management, but time is starting to run out for some fans. Waynus, BD6 says... 12:44am Sun 21 Dec 08 To say 'we have gone backwards' and 'not renewing their season ticket because it is the worst team in 30 years' is a little sad really. Obviously 'eskimo' has alzheimers. Can he not remember Accrington at home last season? We were not far off the bottom places this time last season (19th and just 6 points off the drop zone) and yet we are now joint 3rd. How is that not improvement? Waynus, BD6 says... 9:55pm Sun 21 Dec 08 Some of Conlon's flicks and touches yesterday were very good. I can't believe he is made scapegoat AGAIN! The amount of times he dropped deep and flicked a pass onto Boulding or Daley was impressive. Waynus, BD6 says... 9:57am Fri 19 Dec 08 I, like Arnison, predict 10 points in our next 4 games. However, I think we will get 3 points at Lincoln and only 1 against the Shrews. It would be nice if we can collect all 3 against one of our rivals, but I just can't see us beating them. Fingers crossed and all that. Waynus, BD6 says... 10:09am Fri 19 Dec 08 As for Baz, I think it is a good decision by McCall. Don't increase the length just because someone else is sniffing around. Waynus' Agent, Here, there and everywhere! says... 4:32pm Fri 19 Dec 08 I am with the side that think he should be given a 6 month deal. He has scored goals and deserves an extension. He has and can continue to do a job for us in this league. Please explain why the above quotes are not P O S I T I V E ! ! ! We obviously have a different meaning in our respective dictionaries. I, as well as others have asked you to keep to the posts and to not get involved in other people's posts. I haven't done since, but you just can't seem to help yourself. What was it? Was it the fact that a couple of people said, "I agree Waynus"? Is that what did it? I won't respond with name-calling. Everyone that has read this thread will know that I haven't called you a name and that it is you AGAIN that have started a fight for no good reason. I received criticism from some for my posts. I took the feedback on board and haven't attacked anyone else views. However, you seem hellbent on attacking every single post I make, unless it is in agreement with your own views! AND EVERYONE CAN READ THAT FOR THEMSELVES! Waynus
  • Score: 0

4:42pm Tue 23 Dec 08

dannbradfc says...

looks like you need to start taking your pills again. All i said that SOULMAN had a point in saying your been negative then you atacked with lets be fair what amounts to just a build up of vitriolic abuse filled with self righteous delusion.

I've been posting as normal about normal issues. that includes the aforementioned 'negative' observation, which wasn't an attack merely AN OBSERVATION. My further post as is this is merely a response.

Cant be bothered getting into this at mo so just take the tablets and chill my friend. It is Christmas afterall.
looks like you need to start taking your pills again. All i said that SOULMAN had a point in saying your been negative then you atacked with lets be fair what amounts to just a build up of vitriolic abuse filled with self righteous delusion. I've been posting as normal about normal issues. that includes the aforementioned 'negative' observation, which wasn't an attack merely AN OBSERVATION. My further post as is this is merely a response. Cant be bothered getting into this at mo so just take the tablets and chill my friend. It is Christmas afterall. dannbradfc
  • Score: 0
Post a comment

Remember you are personally responsible for what you post on this site and must abide by our site terms. Do not post anything that is false, abusive or malicious. If you wish to complain, please use the ‘report this post’ link.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree