In-demand Bradford City striker Ross Hannah will not be allowed out on loan again

Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Ross Hannah scored nine goals in 14 games during a three-month stay at Grimsby, including the winner in his farewell match on Friday night Ross Hannah scored nine goals in 14 games during a three-month stay at Grimsby, including the winner in his farewell match on Friday night

City have told Ross Hannah’s potential suitors: If you want him, buy him.

The in-form striker is back at Valley Parade from his prolific spell with Blue Square Bet Premier leaders Grimsby.

Hannah netted nine goals in 14 games with the Mariners and signed off his three-month stay with the winner against promotion rivals Wrexham on Friday night.

With Hannah returning to City, Phil Parkinson insists he will be part of the squad plans for the holiday period – and has allowed youngster Adam Baker to join Harrogate Town for a month.

But 26-year-old Hannah, whose contract is up in the summer, has not been involved in the first team this season and it looks likely that his future will be elsewhere – but not for another loan spell.

Grimsby are desperate to get him back permanently and promotion rivals Mansfield and Luton are also thought to be monitoring his situation closely.

The chase for Hannah will hot up when the transfer window reopens next week but City will only entertain cash offers.

“Grimsby are interested in signing him and one or two others have made contact, as you would expect with a player who has been scoring regularly,” said Parkinson.

“With the run Ross has had, he is going to attract interest. But there’s no way he’s going on loan again. We’ve stressed that to Grimsby and to anyone else.

“Ross will be with us unless an offer comes in which the board and myself feel is right for the club to accept.

“He has done really well at Grimsby. There were times we could have called him back with the number of games we’ve had in periods this season but we let him stay there for the full three months.

“We wanted to be fair to him and to them. But now he comes back in the picture for the busy Christmas period.”

Grimsby claim they are in talks with City over signing Hannah but admit they are “a little way apart”.

Mariners joint-boss Paul Hurst said: “At the minute, I would say it’s not looking likely, but who knows?

“The downside of the (Wrexham) match being on TV is that there might have been a few more people watching. But Ross loves it here and would love to stay.

“At the same time, if suddenly a different club come in and offer him a much better package, then he’ll obviously look at that.”

Comments (59)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:36am Mon 24 Dec 12

bcfc1903 says...

Quite right too...Ross is a fine player and a proven goalscorer at Blue Square level so a fee of £40,000/£50,000 is a reasonable price to pay. I'm sure there are a few teams near the top of the Blue Squre premier league bidding to buy Hannah. Promotion to the 2nd division of the football league is supposed to be worth between 500,000 and 650,000 pounds so it's a no brainer for clubs involved in the promotion dog fight in that particular league. If no club comes in with a decent offer, Ross could still do a job for BCFC in the hopefully promotion run in...in the second half of our season.
Quite right too...Ross is a fine player and a proven goalscorer at Blue Square level so a fee of £40,000/£50,000 is a reasonable price to pay. I'm sure there are a few teams near the top of the Blue Squre premier league bidding to buy Hannah. Promotion to the 2nd division of the football league is supposed to be worth between 500,000 and 650,000 pounds so it's a no brainer for clubs involved in the promotion dog fight in that particular league. If no club comes in with a decent offer, Ross could still do a job for BCFC in the hopefully promotion run in...in the second half of our season. bcfc1903
  • Score: 0

9:45am Mon 24 Dec 12

Hoggy64 says...

Never understood why he wasn't given a chance at City. He seems to score goals for everyone else. Let's be honest other than Wells we haven't exactly got another prolific striker.
We should give him a proper opportunity to show what he can do for us.
Never understood why he wasn't given a chance at City. He seems to score goals for everyone else. Let's be honest other than Wells we haven't exactly got another prolific striker. We should give him a proper opportunity to show what he can do for us. Hoggy64
  • Score: 0

9:48am Mon 24 Dec 12

Saltaire Bantam says...

Wells and Hannah would make a lethal partnership. Guarenteed promotion
Wells and Hannah would make a lethal partnership. Guarenteed promotion Saltaire Bantam
  • Score: 0

9:56am Mon 24 Dec 12

shoatsy says...

Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Wells and Hannah would make a lethal partnership. Guarenteed promotion
Plenty of muscle up front with them two up there, They would get bullied out of the game, Hanson is doing a great job this season bullies defenders prefer him over Hannah very day of the week he would be fourth choice for me. Good luck in the future Ross!! Great lad but not good enough to be starting for us!!
[quote][p][bold]Saltaire Bantam[/bold] wrote: Wells and Hannah would make a lethal partnership. Guarenteed promotion[/p][/quote]Plenty of muscle up front with them two up there, They would get bullied out of the game, Hanson is doing a great job this season bullies defenders prefer him over Hannah very day of the week he would be fourth choice for me. Good luck in the future Ross!! Great lad but not good enough to be starting for us!! shoatsy
  • Score: 0

9:56am Mon 24 Dec 12

COLATS says...

Parky knows he's not good enough for league one when we go up? So might as well try get some dosh for him. Those asking for him to be given a run in the team, who do u suggest he leaves out for Ross??? It baffles me.
Parky knows he's not good enough for league one when we go up? So might as well try get some dosh for him. Those asking for him to be given a run in the team, who do u suggest he leaves out for Ross??? It baffles me. COLATS
  • Score: 0

10:40am Mon 24 Dec 12

Hoggy64 says...

The point is we have struggled to find a decent 3rd choice striker. Those that Parky has brought in haven't exactly been prolific. Hannah is a proven goalscorer albeit at a lower level but so was Hanson and he's done well because he's been given a long run in the team.
Perhaps there is more to Ross being out of favour than his ability ?
The point is we have struggled to find a decent 3rd choice striker. Those that Parky has brought in haven't exactly been prolific. Hannah is a proven goalscorer albeit at a lower level but so was Hanson and he's done well because he's been given a long run in the team. Perhaps there is more to Ross being out of favour than his ability ? Hoggy64
  • Score: 0

10:52am Mon 24 Dec 12

nowt fresh says...

Hoggy64 wrote:
The point is we have struggled to find a decent 3rd choice striker. Those that Parky has brought in haven't exactly been prolific. Hannah is a proven goalscorer albeit at a lower level but so was Hanson and he's done well because he's been given a long run in the team. Perhaps there is more to Ross being out of favour than his ability ?
Fair comment Hoggy64 when Ross played for us last season we had no one who could supply that telling pass, but this season could be different with the likes of Jones,Doyle,Hines,Re
id,ETC ETC,we have nothing to lose having him on the bench and using him as we have done with Wells in the past,Hanson/Wells to start with Connell/Hannah to bring on as required..!!
[quote][p][bold]Hoggy64[/bold] wrote: The point is we have struggled to find a decent 3rd choice striker. Those that Parky has brought in haven't exactly been prolific. Hannah is a proven goalscorer albeit at a lower level but so was Hanson and he's done well because he's been given a long run in the team. Perhaps there is more to Ross being out of favour than his ability ?[/p][/quote]Fair comment Hoggy64 when Ross played for us last season we had no one who could supply that telling pass, but this season could be different with the likes of Jones,Doyle,Hines,Re id,ETC ETC,we have nothing to lose having him on the bench and using him as we have done with Wells in the past,Hanson/Wells to start with Connell/Hannah to bring on as required..!! nowt fresh
  • Score: 0

11:08am Mon 24 Dec 12

Cityman23 says...

Unless aother striker comes in, in January, Hannah is worth keeping-at least as a stand-by/squad player.
Unless aother striker comes in, in January, Hannah is worth keeping-at least as a stand-by/squad player. Cityman23
  • Score: 0

11:10am Mon 24 Dec 12

Victor Clayton says...

the question for me would be - is he faster than Connel? if the answer is yes, then give him a proper chance. if no, then probably not needed.
the question for me would be - is he faster than Connel? if the answer is yes, then give him a proper chance. if no, then probably not needed. Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

11:18am Mon 24 Dec 12

tinytoonster says...

nowt fresh wrote:
Hoggy64 wrote:
The point is we have struggled to find a decent 3rd choice striker. Those that Parky has brought in haven't exactly been prolific. Hannah is a proven goalscorer albeit at a lower level but so was Hanson and he's done well because he's been given a long run in the team. Perhaps there is more to Ross being out of favour than his ability ?
Fair comment Hoggy64 when Ross played for us last season we had no one who could supply that telling pass, but this season could be different with the likes of Jones,Doyle,Hines,Re

id,ETC ETC,we have nothing to lose having him on the bench and using him as we have done with Wells in the past,Hanson/Wells to start with Connell/Hannah to bring on as required..!!
good call. busy period, need back up.
[quote][p][bold]nowt fresh[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Hoggy64[/bold] wrote: The point is we have struggled to find a decent 3rd choice striker. Those that Parky has brought in haven't exactly been prolific. Hannah is a proven goalscorer albeit at a lower level but so was Hanson and he's done well because he's been given a long run in the team. Perhaps there is more to Ross being out of favour than his ability ?[/p][/quote]Fair comment Hoggy64 when Ross played for us last season we had no one who could supply that telling pass, but this season could be different with the likes of Jones,Doyle,Hines,Re id,ETC ETC,we have nothing to lose having him on the bench and using him as we have done with Wells in the past,Hanson/Wells to start with Connell/Hannah to bring on as required..!![/p][/quote]good call. busy period, need back up. tinytoonster
  • Score: 0

11:52am Mon 24 Dec 12

Prisoner Cell Block A says...

Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups)

Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,)

Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals)

Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals)

Striker number five Hannah (goals)

He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months.

Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time.


If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.
Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop. Prisoner Cell Block A
  • Score: 0

11:53am Mon 24 Dec 12

parader no1 says...

Sorry to have to say it again but Parky will not play Hannah as he doesnt rate him.
Sorry to have to say it again but Parky will not play Hannah as he doesnt rate him. parader no1
  • Score: 0

12:12pm Mon 24 Dec 12

COLATS says...

Parky defo bringing in another striker in jan. so wots the point in keeping him, we may as well cash in on him as he will go for nowt in summer??
Parky defo bringing in another striker in jan. so wots the point in keeping him, we may as well cash in on him as he will go for nowt in summer?? COLATS
  • Score: 0

12:15pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Victor Clayton says...

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups)

Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,)

Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals)

Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals)

Striker number five Hannah (goals)

He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months.

Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time.


If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.
prisoner. I don't agree that Hanson is No 1 striker, but regardless. do you think that if Wells got injured we would score enough goals to gain promotion?
[quote][p][bold]Prisoner Cell Block A[/bold] wrote: Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.[/p][/quote]prisoner. I don't agree that Hanson is No 1 striker, but regardless. do you think that if Wells got injured we would score enough goals to gain promotion? Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

12:31pm Mon 24 Dec 12

gspot01 says...

I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him.
.
Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years. gspot01
  • Score: 0

12:42pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Victor Clayton says...

gspot01 wrote:
I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him.
.
Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
[quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun! Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

12:57pm Mon 24 Dec 12

COLATS says...

Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote:
I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him.
.
Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
[quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him??? COLATS
  • Score: 0

1:20pm Mon 24 Dec 12

bettyswollocks says...

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.
Agreed
[quote][p][bold]Prisoner Cell Block A[/bold] wrote: Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.[/p][/quote]Agreed bettyswollocks
  • Score: 0

1:32pm Mon 24 Dec 12

spleen ventor says...

When will people realise that Hanson offers far more then just the goals he scores. As someone who goes to most of the away games I've lost count of the number of times he's won defensive headers in his own penalty box from opposition corners...can you honestly see anyone else out muscling the opponents centre half in such situations?
....NO!...first name on the team sheet for me.
When will people realise that Hanson offers far more then just the goals he scores. As someone who goes to most of the away games I've lost count of the number of times he's won defensive headers in his own penalty box from opposition corners...can you honestly see anyone else out muscling the opponents centre half in such situations? ....NO!...first name on the team sheet for me. spleen ventor
  • Score: 0

1:37pm Mon 24 Dec 12

nowt fresh says...

COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
Why does anyone need dropping as you suggest ? bring him on from the bench as and when needed and if another club come in with an acceptable offer then we will take it, Phil Parkinson said “We wanted to be fair to him and to them. But now he comes back in the picture for the busy Christmas period.” so I would assume he will have him on the bench other wise no point in his above comment, we have 10 games between now and 26th January and as teams are allowed 7 subs there is no reason why he shouldn't make the bench ?? if Phil Parkinson doesn't rate him as some are suggesting on here then any offer is better than loaning him out IMO, looking for 14 points from our 7 league games over the holiday period and the end of January time will tell.
[quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]Why does anyone need dropping as you suggest ? bring him on from the bench as and when needed and if another club come in with an acceptable offer then we will take it, Phil Parkinson said “We wanted to be fair to him and to them. But now he comes back in the picture for the busy Christmas period.” so I would assume he will have him on the bench other wise no point in his above comment, we have 10 games between now and 26th January and as teams are allowed 7 subs there is no reason why he shouldn't make the bench ?? if Phil Parkinson doesn't rate him as some are suggesting on here then any offer is better than loaning him out IMO, looking for 14 points from our 7 league games over the holiday period and the end of January time will tell. nowt fresh
  • Score: 0

1:37pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Victor Clayton says...

COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote:
I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him.
.
Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
connell
[quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]connell Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

1:44pm Mon 24 Dec 12

RuggerTyke says...

Hanson, Wells and Connell are the main strikers with Connell mostly a sub.

Why can't Hannah be used as an impact player given he's a poacher.

He can be our Owen/Chicho, coming late in games and making a difference.
Hanson, Wells and Connell are the main strikers with Connell mostly a sub. Why can't Hannah be used as an impact player given he's a poacher. He can be our Owen/Chicho, coming late in games and making a difference. RuggerTyke
  • Score: 0

1:57pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Victor Clayton says...

nowt fresh wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
Why does anyone need dropping as you suggest ? bring him on from the bench as and when needed and if another club come in with an acceptable offer then we will take it, Phil Parkinson said “We wanted to be fair to him and to them. But now he comes back in the picture for the busy Christmas period.” so I would assume he will have him on the bench other wise no point in his above comment, we have 10 games between now and 26th January and as teams are allowed 7 subs there is no reason why he shouldn't make the bench ?? if Phil Parkinson doesn't rate him as some are suggesting on here then any offer is better than loaning him out IMO, looking for 14 points from our 7 league games over the holiday period and the end of January time will tell.
if we don't have to drop anyone thats even better!
[quote][p][bold]nowt fresh[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]Why does anyone need dropping as you suggest ? bring him on from the bench as and when needed and if another club come in with an acceptable offer then we will take it, Phil Parkinson said “We wanted to be fair to him and to them. But now he comes back in the picture for the busy Christmas period.” so I would assume he will have him on the bench other wise no point in his above comment, we have 10 games between now and 26th January and as teams are allowed 7 subs there is no reason why he shouldn't make the bench ?? if Phil Parkinson doesn't rate him as some are suggesting on here then any offer is better than loaning him out IMO, looking for 14 points from our 7 league games over the holiday period and the end of January time will tell.[/p][/quote]if we don't have to drop anyone thats even better! Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

2:17pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Citytilidie says...

I'd be very surprised if one of the players in January wasn't a replacement for Hanson granted he wins everything in the air but first touch and finishing prowess just ain't happening if we want promotion this is where we need to strengthen,missed chances cost points if we can can attract a benson or Tom pope type top three it will be! Simples
I'd be very surprised if one of the players in January wasn't a replacement for Hanson granted he wins everything in the air but first touch and finishing prowess just ain't happening if we want promotion this is where we need to strengthen,missed chances cost points if we can can attract a benson or Tom pope type top three it will be! Simples Citytilidie
  • Score: 0

2:17pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Whoisevans? says...

Grimsby have already had one bargain from us with Ian Woods many years ago if they want Hannah they will have to cough up. Gloooooriiiaaa Ross Hannah's off to Mansfield lol
Grimsby have already had one bargain from us with Ian Woods many years ago if they want Hannah they will have to cough up. Gloooooriiiaaa Ross Hannah's off to Mansfield lol Whoisevans?
  • Score: 0

2:53pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Saltaire Bantam says...

Hanson has only had 4 league assists this season. Some supporters seem to think that he supplies all the goals and this is not true. How come Hanson didn't take a penalty against Arsenal. I can't believe a centre forward would refuse to take a penalty? As for him being good at defending corners. Why not play him at centre half then?
Hanson has only had 4 league assists this season. Some supporters seem to think that he supplies all the goals and this is not true. How come Hanson didn't take a penalty against Arsenal. I can't believe a centre forward would refuse to take a penalty? As for him being good at defending corners. Why not play him at centre half then? Saltaire Bantam
  • Score: 0

3:04pm Mon 24 Dec 12

nowt fresh says...

Citytilidie wrote:
I'd be very surprised if one of the players in January wasn't a replacement for Hanson granted he wins everything in the air but first touch and finishing prowess just ain't happening if we want promotion this is where we need to strengthen,missed chances cost points if we can can attract a benson or Tom pope type top three it will be! Simples
"missed chances cost points" and neither Well's or Connell have missed chances this season ?, Hanson's an easy option for criticism because he is not on par with Well's for scoring goals read " spleen ventor" 1:32pm post says it all IMO,Benson could not do a "James Hanson" job for us defending set pieces ETC Tom Pope has yet to prove he's more than a one season wonder,take this season out and he's been far from prolific, Tom Eaves who's on loan at Bristol Rovers from Bolton could do a similar job to Hanson he's scored 7 goals from 15 games for a poor team 20 years old 6ft 5inch, but why the suggestion someone will be brought to replace Hanson when we are 3 points off an automatic promotion place after our disastrous run with major players injuries is possibly wishful thinking on your behalf, my priority would be an out and out attacking midfield players, but then again football is all about fans opinions.
[quote][p][bold]Citytilidie[/bold] wrote: I'd be very surprised if one of the players in January wasn't a replacement for Hanson granted he wins everything in the air but first touch and finishing prowess just ain't happening if we want promotion this is where we need to strengthen,missed chances cost points if we can can attract a benson or Tom pope type top three it will be! Simples[/p][/quote]"missed chances cost points" and neither Well's or Connell have missed chances this season ?, Hanson's an easy option for criticism because he is not on par with Well's for scoring goals read " spleen ventor" 1:32pm post says it all IMO,Benson could not do a "James Hanson" job for us defending set pieces ETC Tom Pope has yet to prove he's more than a one season wonder,take this season out and he's been far from prolific, Tom Eaves who's on loan at Bristol Rovers from Bolton could do a similar job to Hanson he's scored 7 goals from 15 games for a poor team 20 years old 6ft 5inch, but why the suggestion someone will be brought to replace Hanson when we are 3 points off an automatic promotion place after our disastrous run with major players injuries is possibly wishful thinking on your behalf, my priority would be an out and out attacking midfield players, but then again football is all about fans opinions. nowt fresh
  • Score: 0

3:24pm Mon 24 Dec 12

balbrigganfc says...

Predicting Hannah to score more goals, and to sign for a club this season.
Predicting Hannah to score more goals, and to sign for a club this season. balbrigganfc
  • Score: 0

3:28pm Mon 24 Dec 12

tyker2 says...

Tom Eaves leaving Bristo Rovers at the end of his loan spll soon:Scott Neilson has had is contract at Crawley cancelled in readiness of a move to Luton:wonder if Luton are one of the clubs looking at Hannah.
Tom Eaves leaving Bristo Rovers at the end of his loan spll soon:Scott Neilson has had is contract at Crawley cancelled in readiness of a move to Luton:wonder if Luton are one of the clubs looking at Hannah. tyker2
  • Score: 0

3:31pm Mon 24 Dec 12

COLATS says...

Victor Clayton wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote:
I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him.
.
Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
connell
He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??
[quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]connell[/p][/quote]He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game?? COLATS
  • Score: 0

3:36pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Victor Clayton says...

COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote:
I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him.
.
Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
connell
He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??
I bet he could. have you never laced pair? its easy!
[quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]connell[/p][/quote]He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??[/p][/quote]I bet he could. have you never laced pair? its easy! Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

3:43pm Mon 24 Dec 12

cookie_brighton says...

Merry christmas to all city players, staff and supporters...hope you all have a wonderful day, especially to my old mate...lenny berry (city gent mascot).
Im glad Ross is returning to city, I hope he has some playing time whilst here, however, once the window is opened in january, I guess he will be gone.
I see that Accrington are having keeper problems with no1 keeper Dunbavin out with shoulder surgery, on loan replacement keeper Rachubka was sent off last saturday in the 1-1 draw with Plymouth. If Accrington do not appeal the sending off of Rachubka the possibility is they will call on rookie keeper 18 year old Andrew Dawber.
We look good for the 3 points.
On another point.......did anyone see the 8 goals Chelsea put past villa.....7 different players scoring......I thought villa were not in the game at all, chelsea opened their defence easily and when villa got anywhere near chelseas goal area, which was rare, they lost the ball or shot well over. If city keep Benteke quiet, as he was their striker, I think we have a chance, especially if city play like they did against Arsenal.
CTID.
Merry christmas to all city players, staff and supporters...hope you all have a wonderful day, especially to my old mate...lenny berry (city gent mascot). Im glad Ross is returning to city, I hope he has some playing time whilst here, however, once the window is opened in january, I guess he will be gone. I see that Accrington are having keeper problems with no1 keeper Dunbavin out with shoulder surgery, on loan replacement keeper Rachubka was sent off last saturday in the 1-1 draw with Plymouth. If Accrington do not appeal the sending off of Rachubka the possibility is they will call on rookie keeper 18 year old Andrew Dawber. We look good for the 3 points. On another point.......did anyone see the 8 goals Chelsea put past villa.....7 different players scoring......I thought villa were not in the game at all, chelsea opened their defence easily and when villa got anywhere near chelseas goal area, which was rare, they lost the ball or shot well over. If city keep Benteke quiet, as he was their striker, I think we have a chance, especially if city play like they did against Arsenal. CTID. cookie_brighton
  • Score: 0

3:54pm Mon 24 Dec 12

nowt fresh says...

cookie_brighton wrote:
Merry christmas to all city players, staff and supporters...hope you all have a wonderful day, especially to my old mate...lenny berry (city gent mascot). Im glad Ross is returning to city, I hope he has some playing time whilst here, however, once the window is opened in january, I guess he will be gone. I see that Accrington are having keeper problems with no1 keeper Dunbavin out with shoulder surgery, on loan replacement keeper Rachubka was sent off last saturday in the 1-1 draw with Plymouth. If Accrington do not appeal the sending off of Rachubka the possibility is they will call on rookie keeper 18 year old Andrew Dawber. We look good for the 3 points. On another point.......did anyone see the 8 goals Chelsea put past villa.....7 different players scoring......I thought villa were not in the game at all, chelsea opened their defence easily and when villa got anywhere near chelseas goal area, which was rare, they lost the ball or shot well over. If city keep Benteke quiet, as he was their striker, I think we have a chance, especially if city play like they did against Arsenal. CTID.
Yes and as Dion Dublin & Alan Shearer said they were poor on cross's and Chelsea bombarded them early doors with cross's maybe we could do the same it paid against Arsenal ?.
[quote][p][bold]cookie_brighton[/bold] wrote: Merry christmas to all city players, staff and supporters...hope you all have a wonderful day, especially to my old mate...lenny berry (city gent mascot). Im glad Ross is returning to city, I hope he has some playing time whilst here, however, once the window is opened in january, I guess he will be gone. I see that Accrington are having keeper problems with no1 keeper Dunbavin out with shoulder surgery, on loan replacement keeper Rachubka was sent off last saturday in the 1-1 draw with Plymouth. If Accrington do not appeal the sending off of Rachubka the possibility is they will call on rookie keeper 18 year old Andrew Dawber. We look good for the 3 points. On another point.......did anyone see the 8 goals Chelsea put past villa.....7 different players scoring......I thought villa were not in the game at all, chelsea opened their defence easily and when villa got anywhere near chelseas goal area, which was rare, they lost the ball or shot well over. If city keep Benteke quiet, as he was their striker, I think we have a chance, especially if city play like they did against Arsenal. CTID.[/p][/quote]Yes and as Dion Dublin & Alan Shearer said they were poor on cross's and Chelsea bombarded them early doors with cross's maybe we could do the same it paid against Arsenal ?. nowt fresh
  • Score: 0

3:56pm Mon 24 Dec 12

nowt fresh says...

COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
connell
He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??
So you have to have played the game to form an opinion COLATS ????.
[quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]connell[/p][/quote]He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??[/p][/quote]So you have to have played the game to form an opinion COLATS ????. nowt fresh
  • Score: 0

4:03pm Mon 24 Dec 12

northyorksbantam says...

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups)

Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,)

Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals)

Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals)

Striker number five Hannah (goals)

He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months.

Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time.


If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.
Good post and quite agree,don't think Nakhi will be too happy you haven't given him as many attributes as Thompson and Connell though, so would add pace for him as well ;-)
[quote][p][bold]Prisoner Cell Block A[/bold] wrote: Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.[/p][/quote]Good post and quite agree,don't think Nakhi will be too happy you haven't given him as many attributes as Thompson and Connell though, so would add pace for him as well ;-) northyorksbantam
  • Score: 0

4:21pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Edinburgh -bantam says...

As Nahki Wells is doubtful for the Accie game I expect Hannah to feature in the squad.

Last season the 5 subs rule probably meant that he didn't appear regularly enough for us to form an opinion.

If his confidence is high from his scoring antics at Grimsby he may surprise some of you.
As Nahki Wells is doubtful for the Accie game I expect Hannah to feature in the squad. Last season the 5 subs rule probably meant that he didn't appear regularly enough for us to form an opinion. If his confidence is high from his scoring antics at Grimsby he may surprise some of you. Edinburgh -bantam
  • Score: 0

4:29pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Birky_Neil says...

I agree with everything parker has done this season but still find it hard to get my head around why city don't want him? He has scored 9 in 14 games in one league below us.
I would play him for last 20 mins in games now to see what he can do for us. He clearly bangs them in for fun when he goes out on loan. He is getting better all the time. Just cannot understand why he has been an outcast at city.
I agree with everything parker has done this season but still find it hard to get my head around why city don't want him? He has scored 9 in 14 games in one league below us. I would play him for last 20 mins in games now to see what he can do for us. He clearly bangs them in for fun when he goes out on loan. He is getting better all the time. Just cannot understand why he has been an outcast at city. Birky_Neil
  • Score: 0

4:38pm Mon 24 Dec 12

nowt fresh says...

Edinburgh -bantam wrote:
As Nahki Wells is doubtful for the Accie game I expect Hannah to feature in the squad. Last season the 5 subs rule probably meant that he didn't appear regularly enough for us to form an opinion. If his confidence is high from his scoring antics at Grimsby he may surprise some of you.
Where you heard that about Naki Wells being doubtful Edinburgh ?.
[quote][p][bold]Edinburgh -bantam[/bold] wrote: As Nahki Wells is doubtful for the Accie game I expect Hannah to feature in the squad. Last season the 5 subs rule probably meant that he didn't appear regularly enough for us to form an opinion. If his confidence is high from his scoring antics at Grimsby he may surprise some of you.[/p][/quote]Where you heard that about Naki Wells being doubtful Edinburgh ?. nowt fresh
  • Score: 0

4:42pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Victor Clayton says...

Birky_Neil wrote:
I agree with everything parker has done this season but still find it hard to get my head around why city don't want him? He has scored 9 in 14 games in one league below us.
I would play him for last 20 mins in games now to see what he can do for us. He clearly bangs them in for fun when he goes out on loan. He is getting better all the time. Just cannot understand why he has been an outcast at city.
agree. espeially if Wells is out.
[quote][p][bold]Birky_Neil[/bold] wrote: I agree with everything parker has done this season but still find it hard to get my head around why city don't want him? He has scored 9 in 14 games in one league below us. I would play him for last 20 mins in games now to see what he can do for us. He clearly bangs them in for fun when he goes out on loan. He is getting better all the time. Just cannot understand why he has been an outcast at city.[/p][/quote]agree. espeially if Wells is out. Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

5:06pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Pablo says...

The sad thing is that we'll never know whether Ross could be a success at City.

Last season PP's tactics, performances and results could easily have earned him the sack. However, the Board gave him a chance and so far, he's turned things round.

Similarly, we had the sad attempts of Will Atkinson last season to look anything but a footballer. The more PP persevered with him, the worse poor Will performed. He gave him further chances this season and Will is now a valued member of the squad.

Now, Ross Hannah has never turned in one bad performance, on the rare occasions PP has called upon him, but has never been given a real chance.

Ross is the nearest thing to a natural goalscorer that we have. He's the ideal replacement for Wells whereas Connell and Thompson definitely aren't.

I can't see PP changing his tune now, so I hope Ross goes back to where he's wanted and shoots Grimsby to promotion.
The sad thing is that we'll never know whether Ross could be a success at City. Last season PP's tactics, performances and results could easily have earned him the sack. However, the Board gave him a chance and so far, he's turned things round. Similarly, we had the sad attempts of Will Atkinson last season to look anything but a footballer. The more PP persevered with him, the worse poor Will performed. He gave him further chances this season and Will is now a valued member of the squad. Now, Ross Hannah has never turned in one bad performance, on the rare occasions PP has called upon him, but has never been given a real chance. Ross is the nearest thing to a natural goalscorer that we have. He's the ideal replacement for Wells whereas Connell and Thompson definitely aren't. I can't see PP changing his tune now, so I hope Ross goes back to where he's wanted and shoots Grimsby to promotion. Pablo
  • Score: 0

5:39pm Mon 24 Dec 12

cookie_brighton says...

nowt fresh.

it is posted on the city website that wells and doyle maybe doubtful for the accrington game, they both phoned in over the weekend with a stomache bug, they missed group training on sunday and today, monday.
nowt fresh. it is posted on the city website that wells and doyle maybe doubtful for the accrington game, they both phoned in over the weekend with a stomache bug, they missed group training on sunday and today, monday. cookie_brighton
  • Score: 0

5:47pm Mon 24 Dec 12

ohgreat3 says...

Goalscorers are very valuable assets and I think that Ross Hannah should be given a chance at city and not sold for a small fee as I think he has a great future ahead of him. It would be a shame to see him knocking them in for a rival club and the Blue square is not an easy league to score goals in,and has quality as can be seen by the sucess of promoted clubs.
Goalscorers are very valuable assets and I think that Ross Hannah should be given a chance at city and not sold for a small fee as I think he has a great future ahead of him. It would be a shame to see him knocking them in for a rival club and the Blue square is not an easy league to score goals in,and has quality as can be seen by the sucess of promoted clubs. ohgreat3
  • Score: 0

5:53pm Mon 24 Dec 12

cookie_brighton says...

I have rated Ross Hannah since he arrived at B.C.F.C. I agree with most that he has not had a chance to prove himself.
CTID
I have rated Ross Hannah since he arrived at B.C.F.C. I agree with most that he has not had a chance to prove himself. CTID cookie_brighton
  • Score: 0

6:26pm Mon 24 Dec 12

COLATS says...

Victor Clayton wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote:
I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him.
.
Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
connell
He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??
I bet he could. have you never laced pair? its easy!
Ha ha merry Christmas
[quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]connell[/p][/quote]He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??[/p][/quote]I bet he could. have you never laced pair? its easy![/p][/quote]Ha ha merry Christmas COLATS
  • Score: 0

6:28pm Mon 24 Dec 12

COLATS says...

nowt fresh wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
connell
He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??
So you have to have played the game to form an opinion COLATS ????.
Yes a decent one???
[quote][p][bold]nowt fresh[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]connell[/p][/quote]He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??[/p][/quote]So you have to have played the game to form an opinion COLATS ????.[/p][/quote]Yes a decent one??? COLATS
  • Score: 0

6:28pm Mon 24 Dec 12

1955bantam says...

It’s a disgrace how Parkinson has treated this player and a lot of supporters are wondering why. Hannah always acts in a very professional way and gives 100%.It may be that Parkinson doesn’t want to use players he hasn’t brought in himself. At the start of the season he said he still had plans for him, gave him a year's contract, and then left him in the wilderness. He ought to do the right thing now and let him go and get on with his career.
It’s a disgrace how Parkinson has treated this player and a lot of supporters are wondering why. Hannah always acts in a very professional way and gives 100%.It may be that Parkinson doesn’t want to use players he hasn’t brought in himself. At the start of the season he said he still had plans for him, gave him a year's contract, and then left him in the wilderness. He ought to do the right thing now and let him go and get on with his career. 1955bantam
  • Score: 0

6:33pm Mon 24 Dec 12

COLATS says...

We will be two leagues higher than conference next season( hopefully) so no point keeping him if we can get some cash for him now?? Good luck Ross where ever u end up?
We will be two leagues higher than conference next season( hopefully) so no point keeping him if we can get some cash for him now?? Good luck Ross where ever u end up? COLATS
  • Score: 0

7:53pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Birky_Neil says...

Saltaire Bantam wrote:
Wells and Hannah would make a lethal partnership. Guarenteed promotion
I totally agree with you there but we would miss Hanson for tracking back and defending corners. I think we would be stupid to sell Hanna and think he should be on the bench at least.
[quote][p][bold]Saltaire Bantam[/bold] wrote: Wells and Hannah would make a lethal partnership. Guarenteed promotion[/p][/quote]I totally agree with you there but we would miss Hanson for tracking back and defending corners. I think we would be stupid to sell Hanna and think he should be on the bench at least. Birky_Neil
  • Score: 0

7:56pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Birky_Neil says...

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups)

Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,)

Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals)

Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals)

Striker number five Hannah (goals)

He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months.

Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time.


If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.
you make me laugh. Thompson up front before Hanna! Tell me how many goals Tommo has scored?
[quote][p][bold]Prisoner Cell Block A[/bold] wrote: Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.[/p][/quote]you make me laugh. Thompson up front before Hanna! Tell me how many goals Tommo has scored? Birky_Neil
  • Score: 0

9:03pm Mon 24 Dec 12

alfucham says...

And so this thread just goes to prove we all see the game differently and opinion varies as to who is any good or not.

The majority think Hannah is worth a keep but he is never played so it is probably better he went as pp says he cannot go on loan again.

cash in before he goes for free as the Bantams go up.

Thank god you have a team now that uinderstand the game and why has it taken so long.

i have seen just ten minutes (the last ten v brentford)and its clearly 500 per cent better than the dross served over 5 years or more.

You can be champions.

lend Hannah to Bradford Park Avenue and we may be chasing you up the pyramid come April.

you"ll have to pay his wages though as we made a measly few quid in getting as far as doncaster in the cup whilst city have finally hit the jackpot.

Remember many Avenue fans have a soft spot for City after they were robbed of a football team for 15 years and shared Citys climb from the mid eighties.

well done you Bantams.

Things must be better.
I don"t see the fatman being slaughtered every week on here.

I"m sure he will be happier.Abit of his prop up loans may now look a tad safer than chucking brass down"t drain.
But remember" it ain"t over till the fat lady sings"and I"m still not convinced of Lawnees karaoke skills after 20 years.

Well done you Paraders have a happy christmas and remember to take the Avenue in if you get a spare fixture with all the chaos your success has brought.

arsenal took me back to the Everton game (against Stuart et al,Champions Everton)in 1989-90 and Tottenham.

Lee Palins goal stands long in the memory.

Brian Mitchells was something special too.

Things go in cycles and it looks like its the Paraders turn to turn the gloom.

Wish our politicians could do the same for our once proud City.

the City centre looks like Hiroshima.August 1945.

Did Hitler make that £80 million hole?

£80 million for a big hole eh.

that would have built some ground and some team.

But Bradford has a Hole.

Enjoy the ride
And so this thread just goes to prove we all see the game differently and opinion varies as to who is any good or not. The majority think Hannah is worth a keep but he is never played so it is probably better he went as pp says he cannot go on loan again. cash in before he goes for free as the Bantams go up. Thank god you have a team now that uinderstand the game and why has it taken so long. i have seen just ten minutes (the last ten v brentford)and its clearly 500 per cent better than the dross served over 5 years or more. You can be champions. lend Hannah to Bradford Park Avenue and we may be chasing you up the pyramid come April. you"ll have to pay his wages though as we made a measly few quid in getting as far as doncaster in the cup whilst city have finally hit the jackpot. Remember many Avenue fans have a soft spot for City after they were robbed of a football team for 15 years and shared Citys climb from the mid eighties. well done you Bantams. Things must be better. I don"t see the fatman being slaughtered every week on here. I"m sure he will be happier.Abit of his prop up loans may now look a tad safer than chucking brass down"t drain. But remember" it ain"t over till the fat lady sings"and I"m still not convinced of Lawnees karaoke skills after 20 years. Well done you Paraders have a happy christmas and remember to take the Avenue in if you get a spare fixture with all the chaos your success has brought. arsenal took me back to the Everton game (against Stuart et al,Champions Everton)in 1989-90 and Tottenham. Lee Palins goal stands long in the memory. Brian Mitchells was something special too. Things go in cycles and it looks like its the Paraders turn to turn the gloom. Wish our politicians could do the same for our once proud City. the City centre looks like Hiroshima.August 1945. Did Hitler make that £80 million hole? £80 million for a big hole eh. that would have built some ground and some team. But Bradford has a Hole. Enjoy the ride alfucham
  • Score: 0

9:09pm Mon 24 Dec 12

alfucham says...

alfucham wrote:
And so this thread just goes to prove we all see the game differently and opinion varies as to who is any good or not. The majority think Hannah is worth a keep but he is never played so it is probably better he went as pp says he cannot go on loan again. cash in before he goes for free as the Bantams go up. Thank god you have a team now that uinderstand the game and why has it taken so long. i have seen just ten minutes (the last ten v brentford)and its clearly 500 per cent better than the dross served over 5 years or more. You can be champions. lend Hannah to Bradford Park Avenue and we may be chasing you up the pyramid come April. you"ll have to pay his wages though as we made a measly few quid in getting as far as doncaster in the cup whilst city have finally hit the jackpot. Remember many Avenue fans have a soft spot for City after they were robbed of a football team for 15 years and shared Citys climb from the mid eighties. well done you Bantams. Things must be better. I don"t see the fatman being slaughtered every week on here. I"m sure he will be happier.Abit of his prop up loans may now look a tad safer than chucking brass down"t drain. But remember" it ain"t over till the fat lady sings"and I"m still not convinced of Lawnees karaoke skills after 20 years. Well done you Paraders have a happy christmas and remember to take the Avenue in if you get a spare fixture with all the chaos your success has brought. arsenal took me back to the Everton game (against Stuart et al,Champions Everton)in 1989-90 and Tottenham. Lee Palins goal stands long in the memory. Brian Mitchells was something special too. Things go in cycles and it looks like its the Paraders turn to turn the gloom. Wish our politicians could do the same for our once proud City. the City centre looks like Hiroshima.August 1945. Did Hitler make that £80 million hole? £80 million for a big hole eh. that would have built some ground and some team. But Bradford has a Hole. Enjoy the ride
Sorry Everton was 88-89.Tottenham was 89-90.i think.

Anyway they were good days with a great set of lads and a chairman who was similarly slaughtered.
[quote][p][bold]alfucham[/bold] wrote: And so this thread just goes to prove we all see the game differently and opinion varies as to who is any good or not. The majority think Hannah is worth a keep but he is never played so it is probably better he went as pp says he cannot go on loan again. cash in before he goes for free as the Bantams go up. Thank god you have a team now that uinderstand the game and why has it taken so long. i have seen just ten minutes (the last ten v brentford)and its clearly 500 per cent better than the dross served over 5 years or more. You can be champions. lend Hannah to Bradford Park Avenue and we may be chasing you up the pyramid come April. you"ll have to pay his wages though as we made a measly few quid in getting as far as doncaster in the cup whilst city have finally hit the jackpot. Remember many Avenue fans have a soft spot for City after they were robbed of a football team for 15 years and shared Citys climb from the mid eighties. well done you Bantams. Things must be better. I don"t see the fatman being slaughtered every week on here. I"m sure he will be happier.Abit of his prop up loans may now look a tad safer than chucking brass down"t drain. But remember" it ain"t over till the fat lady sings"and I"m still not convinced of Lawnees karaoke skills after 20 years. Well done you Paraders have a happy christmas and remember to take the Avenue in if you get a spare fixture with all the chaos your success has brought. arsenal took me back to the Everton game (against Stuart et al,Champions Everton)in 1989-90 and Tottenham. Lee Palins goal stands long in the memory. Brian Mitchells was something special too. Things go in cycles and it looks like its the Paraders turn to turn the gloom. Wish our politicians could do the same for our once proud City. the City centre looks like Hiroshima.August 1945. Did Hitler make that £80 million hole? £80 million for a big hole eh. that would have built some ground and some team. But Bradford has a Hole. Enjoy the ride[/p][/quote]Sorry Everton was 88-89.Tottenham was 89-90.i think. Anyway they were good days with a great set of lads and a chairman who was similarly slaughtered. alfucham
  • Score: 0

9:13pm Mon 24 Dec 12

Victor Clayton says...

COLATS wrote:
nowt fresh wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
COLATS wrote:
Victor Clayton wrote:
gspot01 wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.
I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun!
Who would u drop for him???
connell
He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??
So you have to have played the game to form an opinion COLATS ????.
Yes a decent one???
merry Christmas from me too.
[quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]nowt fresh[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]COLATS[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gspot01[/bold] wrote: I like Hannah and no doubt he's a goalscorer at his level....which is not at our level. I dont understand the city fans who constantly say he should be given a chance and the lad above who says wells and hannah would gaurantee us promotion just doesn't understand football because as somebody rightly pointed out they would get bullied out of the game. I'm not Hansons biggest fan but I believe Wells wouldn be half the player without him. . Let Ross go to further his career and who knows he may just make it at this level in a couple of years.[/p][/quote]I don't know if Hannah is good enough for league 2. but he is proven at the league below. he is a Bradford city player and I would like see him given a chance. frankly, I don't understand fans who dont want to give him a chance. We are harly banging them in for fun![/p][/quote]Who would u drop for him???[/p][/quote]connell[/p][/quote]He can't lace Connell,s boots I take it u never played the game??[/p][/quote]So you have to have played the game to form an opinion COLATS ????.[/p][/quote]Yes a decent one???[/p][/quote]merry Christmas from me too. Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

12:01am Wed 26 Dec 12

Bantam76 says...

I appreciate PP's comments about being fair to both Ross and Grimsby in letting the full three-month loan take place, but in hindsight, maybe Ross should've been brought back earlier, given a chance in the team whilst we could've given other players a breather, then PP would've been ideally situated to see if it was worth keeping Ross or selling him before this window ends and he goes for nothing come the summer.

It's difficult now to say what to do for the best - if there is a new striker in line to come to VP, then yes, sell whilst we can get something.
I appreciate PP's comments about being fair to both Ross and Grimsby in letting the full three-month loan take place, but in hindsight, maybe Ross should've been brought back earlier, given a chance in the team whilst we could've given other players a breather, then PP would've been ideally situated to see if it was worth keeping Ross or selling him before this window ends and he goes for nothing come the summer. It's difficult now to say what to do for the best - if there is a new striker in line to come to VP, then yes, sell whilst we can get something. Bantam76
  • Score: 0

6:17am Wed 26 Dec 12

tyker2 says...

we will see today how Hannah is arted by the manager:will he be seected to stat,will he be on the bench.will he be brought on at any sthage.

If he is spending Boxing Day watching the game rom the stands then he is not rated and we will diminish the chances of selling him for a reasonable sum.

My view get homim on as a sub for Wells assuming,of course,that he is fit
we will see today how Hannah is arted by the manager:will he be seected to stat,will he be on the bench.will he be brought on at any sthage. If he is spending Boxing Day watching the game rom the stands then he is not rated and we will diminish the chances of selling him for a reasonable sum. My view get homim on as a sub for Wells assuming,of course,that he is fit tyker2
  • Score: 0

12:08pm Thu 27 Dec 12

Prisoner Cell Block A says...

Victor Clayton wrote:
Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups)

Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,)

Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals)

Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals)

Striker number five Hannah (goals)

He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months.

Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time.


If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.
prisoner. I don't agree that Hanson is No 1 striker, but regardless. do you think that if Wells got injured we would score enough goals to gain promotion?
More so than if Hanson was out injured.

Makes no difference if you or I class JH as number one striker, Parkinson does. Which is why he stays on the pitch when fit and his partners are rotated.
[quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Prisoner Cell Block A[/bold] wrote: Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.[/p][/quote]prisoner. I don't agree that Hanson is No 1 striker, but regardless. do you think that if Wells got injured we would score enough goals to gain promotion?[/p][/quote]More so than if Hanson was out injured. Makes no difference if you or I class JH as number one striker, Parkinson does. Which is why he stays on the pitch when fit and his partners are rotated. Prisoner Cell Block A
  • Score: 0

12:41pm Thu 27 Dec 12

Prisoner Cell Block A says...

northyorksbantam wrote:
Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups)

Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,)

Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals)

Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals)

Striker number five Hannah (goals)

He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months.

Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time.


If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.
Good post and quite agree,don't think Nakhi will be too happy you haven't given him as many attributes as Thompson and Connell though, so would add pace for him as well ;-)
Of course, my bad.

Height and pace, two attributes that can rarely be countered and to have a strike force blessed with both is brilliant.
[quote][p][bold]northyorksbantam[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Prisoner Cell Block A[/bold] wrote: Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.[/p][/quote]Good post and quite agree,don't think Nakhi will be too happy you haven't given him as many attributes as Thompson and Connell though, so would add pace for him as well ;-)[/p][/quote]Of course, my bad. Height and pace, two attributes that can rarely be countered and to have a strike force blessed with both is brilliant. Prisoner Cell Block A
  • Score: 0

12:48pm Thu 27 Dec 12

Prisoner Cell Block A says...

Birky_Neil wrote:
Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups)

Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,)

Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals)

Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals)

Striker number five Hannah (goals)

He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months.

Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time.


If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.
you make me laugh. Thompson up front before Hanna! Tell me how many goals Tommo has scored?
Two in his last two outings and created two in the game prior to that.

You miss my point, that was my thoughts on how Parky sees his strike force and the order he would pick them, as has been proven by him placing them and picking them in that order if you are fair and honest.

Personally up to the last couple of games I wouldn't have given Thompson a start as I felt like his legs had gone but his Boxing Day display was his best of the season and he has started to look like the player who took us to task when he was at Morecambe.
[quote][p][bold]Birky_Neil[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Prisoner Cell Block A[/bold] wrote: Striker number one Hanson (Muscle, goals, defensive help, set ups) Striker number two Wells (Goals, skill,) Striker number three Connell (Hold up, skill, goals) Striker number four Thompson ( Muscle, hold up, goals) Striker number five Hannah (goals) He doesn't bring anything more to the table than his goals and thos ehave not been often enough and Parky sees his other attributes in training, rates them so much he has loaned him out twice in less than 18 months. Isn't anyone else getting the idea here, he isn't rated by our manager who is doing a fairly decent job of making the right calls at the right time. If we get 20k for him from a non-leage side we'll be ****-a-hoop.[/p][/quote]you make me laugh. Thompson up front before Hanna! Tell me how many goals Tommo has scored?[/p][/quote]Two in his last two outings and created two in the game prior to that. You miss my point, that was my thoughts on how Parky sees his strike force and the order he would pick them, as has been proven by him placing them and picking them in that order if you are fair and honest. Personally up to the last couple of games I wouldn't have given Thompson a start as I felt like his legs had gone but his Boxing Day display was his best of the season and he has started to look like the player who took us to task when he was at Morecambe. Prisoner Cell Block A
  • Score: 0

1:49am Fri 28 Dec 12

The obvious says...

Sell him quick before the seemingly annual financial problems return...hurry do it now! Lol
Sell him quick before the seemingly annual financial problems return...hurry do it now! Lol The obvious
  • Score: 0

12:01pm Fri 28 Dec 12

Prisoner Cell Block A says...

The obvious wrote:
Sell him quick before the seemingly annual financial problems return...hurry do it now! Lol
Please expand upon this wonderful knowledge you appear to have.

Obviously ignore facts so you can make your story as salicious as possible.

Don't take into account the 300k banked from the Arsenal game, nor the sale of the building to the 'free school' and we will not be getting a 1m+ boost from our league cup semi final games.

None of the above should deter you from trying to stir up something that doesn't exist but feel free to do so anyway.

What a dry lunch.
[quote][p][bold]The obvious[/bold] wrote: Sell him quick before the seemingly annual financial problems return...hurry do it now! Lol[/p][/quote]Please expand upon this wonderful knowledge you appear to have. Obviously ignore facts so you can make your story as salicious as possible. Don't take into account the 300k banked from the Arsenal game, nor the sale of the building to the 'free school' and we will not be getting a 1m+ boost from our league cup semi final games. None of the above should deter you from trying to stir up something that doesn't exist but feel free to do so anyway. What a dry lunch. Prisoner Cell Block A
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree