By a CORRESPONDENT
THE battle for the hearts and minds and, indeed, the sheer commitment
of Scottish milk producers continues unabated. Following Tuesday's
adjudication by the Monopolies and Mergers Commission against proposals
by the Scottish Milk Board to acquire the Scottish business of the
Co-operative Wholesale Society, claims and counter claims have been
flying fast and loose.
The strongest words came yesterday from the chairman of the SMMB
Andrew Howie, who said: ''It seems to me that the MMC don't understand
the market place. They appear to be viewing the Scottish situation as if
it were contained purely within a domestic ring fence -- nothing could
be further from the truth.
''They just don't understand how the market works, and to accuse us of
being in a position where we are able to manipulate the price of milk is
quite unbelievable.''
Mr Howie, who is clearly staking his stewardship of the SMMB on this
issue, continued: ''The dairy trade will have to rationalise for
survival. If we in the board are not to be allowed to acquire CWS, then
it may well be that a Danish or Irish company will step in. That, in
turn, would put the domestic market at risk, and we could see an influx
of imports. It's a sad state of affairs.''
Meanwhile, the Scottish Dairy Trade Federation have put their point of
view through their chief executive Dr Donald McQueen, who said: ''I hope
Scottish dairy farmers will not see the deliberations of the MMC as a
defeat. We are on the threshold of a new era, and there are tremendous
opportunities in prospect for both dairy farmers and the trade.
''We want to put the industry on a firm footing. The way is clear
following what has already happened in England and Wales, with a clear
separation of their milk board from its commercial operation Dairy
Crest. Shares have been offered to 30,000 dairy farmers, so we find it
hard to understand why this should not happen in Scotland.''
Dr McQueen added: ''The MMC have been totally objective, and it seems
the Government now has to take the initiative -- though we in the trade
are more than willing to meet with the SMMB.''
Whether that invitation will prove acceptable is open to question,
because Dr McQueen added this proviso: ''There is little point in raking
over past issues, because we have consistently indicated a willingness
to talk to the board, provided they come up with realistic proposals.''
The SMMB have obviously anticipated this approach, and Andrew Howie
responded yesterday by saying: ''We are still willing to sit down and
discuss matters with the trade. We are all in the same industry and we
are certain we can give a suitable guarantee that will be acceptable to
everyone.''
Meanwhile, the Scottish National Farmers' Union made their pitch
yesterday through milk convener Alex Brown, who said: ''The MMC seem to
think there is such a thing as a separate Scottish milk market. This
will come as a surprise to anyone involved in the industry. Even with
the present system, milk prices in Scotland are closely linked to those
set in England -- a point the dairy trade in Scotland never tire of
reminding milk producers.
''It is unrealistic to think that milk purchasers will fail to buy
milk from Scottish co-operatives when the statutory powers are removed.
They will source the cheaper supplies just as they do now, whether from
Northern Ireland, England, or the rest of the EC.''
The debate is set to continue on a higher plane, with the Scottish
Office confirming that meetings are to take place between Government
representatives, the SMMB, and the NFU, later this week as to how the
verdict of the MMC will affect the legislation currently before
Parliament to wind-up the milk boards.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article