Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
8:30am Thursday 9th September 2010 in
Few of us would turn our noses up at the chance of an extended holiday.
But as the Bulls clock off early for a second year running, players and staff are left pining for a return to work.
Time for rest and recuperation is always welcome after another long season but not when the Super League play-offs have yet to even kick off. Watching another year of post-season action from the comfort of the couch will prove a painful experience for everyone with tendencies towards red, amber and black.
That results this season are unacceptable is a fact as clear as day. Attempting to put a finger on where it all went wrong is when it starts to get murky.
Overnight, a promising campaign appeared to catastrophically implode but, rather than one spark lighting the fuse, a number of factors combined to create a volatile mix.
In hindsight, the Bulls entered the season undermanned. A squad containing just 18 players over the age of 20 was always going to rely on good luck with injuries and placing your fortunes in the hands of fate is a dangerous game.
There were good reasons why Bradford scaled back on the playing budget for 2010 – investment in an impressive new training facility at Tong School being one of them – but ultimately they were far outweighed by the consequences.
Speculation in attracting one or two more players could have reaped financial reward through greater attendances, prize money and the exposure earned through play-off qualification – now, that much is obvious.
That said, the Bulls’ luck with injuries proved to be spectacularly bad.
When Steve McNamara’s side won 29-10 at Wakefield on May 14 without Matt Orford to move fourth in Super League, the extent of the talismanic half-back’s injury woes had not yet been truly revealed.
But after appearing in Bradford’s devastating 26-22 Challenge Cup quarter-final defeat against Warrington, the club’s marquee signing did not take the field again all season.
Without their field general, the Bulls lost 12 of their final 13 league games, eventually slumping to a tenth-place finish.
If that wasn’t bad enough, Orford was joined on the sidelines at various points by captaincy duo Andy Lynch and Jamie Langley, prop enforcer Nick Scruton and attacking sparkplug Brett Kearney.
The sheer toll of the walking wounded could not have been predicted, yet a failure to dip into the loan market, despite wiggle room beneath the salary cap, was probably short-sighted.
Coinciding with the carnage, boss McNamara decided to accept the England coaching job at the tail-end of April and even he later admitted splitting duties between the two roles proved more difficult than anticipated.
In the circumstances, McNamara’s premature departure following a 35-18 defeat at Harlequins – the Bulls’ eighth in a row – was almost inevitable, the situation hardly helped by the RFL’s timing of the national-team announcement.
Following his appointment as England chief, McNamara presided over nine defeats in his final 12 games, going out with a whimper, rather than the fanfare early-season form had suggested.
To their credit, the club have already taken drastic action to address the slide.
By attracting Mick Potter to the club, the board have a coach with outstanding knowledge of the game, not afraid to make unpopular decisions for the benefit of the team and not willing to take any nonsense from his players.
Fresh investment in the playing squad will also result in greater depth of talent out on the field, while the bold Pledge 10,000 ticket scheme is something every Bulls supporter should jump on board with.
A busy summer still lies ahead, with a resolution of the situation regarding Orford’s future a priority and at least two or three signings still to come, but the future promises much.
Comments(30)
obi wan kanobi
says...
9:09am Thu 9 Sep 10
Baaa
says...
9:13am Thu 9 Sep 10
Adey
says...
9:48am Thu 9 Sep 10
the1bully
says...
9:57am Thu 9 Sep 10
macmoody
says...
10:17am Thu 9 Sep 10
the1bully wrote:Facts can be twisted to suit any argument.
to be honest i disagree with the comments about the fan fare of how things could have gone for macca and also the comments about looking good i 4th. 1. macca would never have got a good send off his overall decision making made a bad situation terrible. 2. 4th place was a false position at an early stage of the season- i honestly dont think we woud ahve done much better- 7th at best, prob 8th.
dibsy
says...
10:44am Thu 9 Sep 10
ratters2
says...
11:03am Thu 9 Sep 10
The J Man
says...
11:27am Thu 9 Sep 10
Reading Bullette
says...
12:23pm Thu 9 Sep 10
The J Man wrote:Well J man. I suppose you have read the article. It does say that they went in with two few players last season and clearly Mick Potter is not buying into that. Sibbitt will be relatively cheap, has a lot of experience and won't be playing every week but if the club got another injury crisis then he would be a useful player to bring in. If he does come he will have to compete for a place and that' something the club haven't had for a while.
I've read on a forum that we're supposed to be announcing Ian Sibbitt from Salford on saturday.
If this is true then i think its a very poor signing...he's a back rower & we have plenty of them so no idea why we would want another one & a very average one at that???
Seems like a waste of salary cap money that could be better spent elsewhere so i just hope it aint true.
Think we're sorted in the forwards now & its just half backs we need really...a strike centre would be nice but half backs are the priority surely???
blue marlin
says...
12:24pm Thu 9 Sep 10
Bone_idle18
says...
12:52pm Thu 9 Sep 10
blue marlin wrote:I can't see it, he's come out saying he wants to play for Wales in the RU world cup.
just see this on bbc 606 rl forum bulls looking at gavin henson 1 year deal
jambo
says...
1:42pm Thu 9 Sep 10
haitch
says...
2:00pm Thu 9 Sep 10
jambo wrote:It's right to say Bulls had cruel luck with injuries. Problem was it all went wrong after Orford left as he was the only real "footballing" brain in the side.
If you look at Bradford this season compared with Leeds the main difference is the quality in depth that Leeds have over Bradford. A fully fit Bulls side went to Headingley and went toe to toe with the champions and earned a hard fought draw. A few injuries later and the club went on the worst losing run of the SL era. That's not to say Leeds have not had injuries this year, they have. But when they've had a man down they've had 2 or 3 good players able to step up and take those spots. The Bulls had 18 players over the age of 20 in the first team squad. Or to put it another way; a decent 1st team and no back up. Player signings are the job of the head coach. This was stated at the fans forum, the club apparantly had room under the cap to go looking for a loan player but McBanana either didn't want to or didn't have any contacts with agents who could provide a player.
SMftS loves Ashbournes Titty Lip
says...
2:04pm Thu 9 Sep 10
theviking52
says...
3:56pm Thu 9 Sep 10
mumbyfan
says...
5:20pm Thu 9 Sep 10
The J Man
says...
5:34pm Thu 9 Sep 10
Bradfordremoved
says...
6:09pm Thu 9 Sep 10
haitch wrote:I absolutely agree. The team has been short of line breakers for a number of years. Orford had too much to do by himself although clearly Kearney and le Strange were also brought in to assist with the problem. Sykes has struggled manfully to be the place kicker with Orford out and if Orford is not coming back (my guess is Bulls are waiting for him to decide) we must buy somebody who can put the place kicks in.
jambo wrote:It's right to say Bulls had cruel luck with injuries. Problem was it all went wrong after Orford left as he was the only real "footballing" brain in the side.
If you look at Bradford this season compared with Leeds the main difference is the quality in depth that Leeds have over Bradford. A fully fit Bulls side went to Headingley and went toe to toe with the champions and earned a hard fought draw. A few injuries later and the club went on the worst losing run of the SL era. That's not to say Leeds have not had injuries this year, they have. But when they've had a man down they've had 2 or 3 good players able to step up and take those spots. The Bulls had 18 players over the age of 20 in the first team squad. Or to put it another way; a decent 1st team and no back up. Player signings are the job of the head coach. This was stated at the fans forum, the club apparantly had room under the cap to go looking for a loan player but McBanana either didn't want to or didn't have any contacts with agents who could provide a player.
No team can operate without two or three playmakers around which to work. It comes down to the previous coach not having a clue and building a side devoid of ideas.
Duckett
says...
6:10pm Thu 9 Sep 10
Adey
says...
7:49pm Thu 9 Sep 10
mumbyfan wrote:Arguably the worst excuse of a stand-off ever to grace a pitch. He can only pass one direction, his kicking game is average, and that's before you touch his rotten attitude
Paul Cooke released by Wakefield.
Covers standoff/loose forward...
Discuss...
gordon ramsay
says...
9:38pm Thu 9 Sep 10
Duckett wrote:for the past 2 seasons we have been shockingly BELOW average. we do need "numbers" to boost a terrible squad in some ways to protect some of the kids. we do need depth.
Sibbitt not good enough - how many more "good squad players" (translated = "average") do we want, we already have plenty of them, it's top quality we're short of.
Tricky Dicky
says...
2:05am Fri 10 Sep 10
Sheffieldbull
says...
8:50am Fri 10 Sep 10
Duckett
says...
12:58pm Fri 10 Sep 10
Reading Bullette
says...
5:28pm Fri 10 Sep 10
Duckett wrote:It's alright guys having a go at Connor but the game has changed and so have newspapers. Brian Smith- God love him - belongs to the dinosaur age of Fox and Caisley. Hood may well have made mistakes but he didn't run out on the club when the money had been spent like a certain other Chairman we could all mention. Totally bottleless. Leave Connor and Hood and everyone else alone. Connor has been very proactive in what he's done and - he has no doubt been well programmed by the club. He probably knows what a mess they were left in better than most - with a few exceptions- on here just what has gone on. There are always people on here complaining about marketing well to do that you need a partnership with the local paper and slagging off for the sake of it doesn't make for a good relationship. This paper needs the Bulls onside and the Bulls need them. Times- and thankfully Chairmen have changed. AS for Hood well he apparently works his butt off and the club will come through this period- starting now - and I have no doubt some people on here will be very disappointed when that happens.
All correct Tricky, I am afraid. The worst season in S/L history orchestrated by the worst chairman in the club's history..spin, spin and more spin from the very beginning. Connor swallowed it hook line and sinker. In the old days good old Brian Smith of the T&A would have reported things as he saw them and Hood would not have had such an easy ride.
Sheffieldbull
says...
10:15pm Fri 10 Sep 10
Reading Bullette
says...
7:22am Sat 11 Sep 10
Sheffieldbull
says...
9:59am Sat 11 Sep 10
Reading Bullette
says...
10:19am Sat 11 Sep 10
Sheffieldbull wrote:It is indeed as it is my right to my opinion. All I am saying is that the Caisley era is now gone and he showed by running out he couldn't adapt to change. He's gone! Connor can only print what he knows. As I said he can be critical of performances and things he thinks are wrong - and he often is - but times have changed in papers. They no longer report news; that's done on the internet etc. What they do is embellish and extend the news. The Bulls will no doubt keep Connor up to speed with things and he will then work out what he wants to say or to leave out. But he can't come out everyday just slagging off, like Duckett does, without balancing things out.
Reading, If you wish to 'lump' the Bulls most successful years into what you call a 'dinosaur era', well of course, that's you're right. My question now is-at whose door do you lay the blame of the 'desperate regime' we have endured for the past four years? Before you play the Financial/Caisley card again, concider this, only the performances on the pitch have led to the lack of bodies on the terraces, thus leading to a even greater financial debarcle. The Head Coach from Hull didn't draw a straw, he was appointed. When things started to free-fall he was further supported and paying fans were expected to continue to cough-up for the dire fare served up on the pitch - how arrogant is that?
People feel that this paper has somewhat supported that regime by constantly 'spinning' the Bulls line on things - problems, what problems?
I've been critical of the Bull's management in the past but also totally support new initiatives of the present - that of course, is my right.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Bradford and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Bradford and surrounding areas now
Search Now »
Homes for sale and to let in Bradford and surrounding areas.
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Bradford and surrounding areas
Search Now »
bullsfan says...
8:55am Thu 9 Sep 10