Sport RSS Feed


Bradford Bulls review of the season


Few of us would turn our noses up at the chance of an extended holiday.

But as the Bulls clock off early for a second year running, players and staff are left pining for a return to work.

Time for rest and recuperation is always welcome after another long season but not when the Super League play-offs have yet to even kick off. Watching another year of post-season action from the comfort of the couch will prove a painful experience for everyone with tendencies towards red, amber and black.

That results this season are unacceptable is a fact as clear as day. Attempting to put a finger on where it all went wrong is when it starts to get murky.

Overnight, a promising campaign appeared to catastrophically implode but, rather than one spark lighting the fuse, a number of factors combined to create a volatile mix.

In hindsight, the Bulls entered the season undermanned. A squad containing just 18 players over the age of 20 was always going to rely on good luck with injuries and placing your fortunes in the hands of fate is a dangerous game.

There were good reasons why Bradford scaled back on the playing budget for 2010 – investment in an impressive new training facility at Tong School being one of them – but ultimately they were far outweighed by the consequences.

Speculation in attracting one or two more players could have reaped financial reward through greater attendances, prize money and the exposure earned through play-off qualification – now, that much is obvious.

That said, the Bulls’ luck with injuries proved to be spectacularly bad.

When Steve McNamara’s side won 29-10 at Wakefield on May 14 without Matt Orford to move fourth in Super League, the extent of the talismanic half-back’s injury woes had not yet been truly revealed.

But after appearing in Bradford’s devastating 26-22 Challenge Cup quarter-final defeat against Warrington, the club’s marquee signing did not take the field again all season.

Without their field general, the Bulls lost 12 of their final 13 league games, eventually slumping to a tenth-place finish.

If that wasn’t bad enough, Orford was joined on the sidelines at various points by captaincy duo Andy Lynch and Jamie Langley, prop enforcer Nick Scruton and attacking sparkplug Brett Kearney.

The sheer toll of the walking wounded could not have been predicted, yet a failure to dip into the loan market, despite wiggle room beneath the salary cap, was probably short-sighted.

Coinciding with the carnage, boss McNamara decided to accept the England coaching job at the tail-end of April and even he later admitted splitting duties between the two roles proved more difficult than anticipated.

In the circumstances, McNamara’s premature departure following a 35-18 defeat at Harlequins – the Bulls’ eighth in a row – was almost inevitable, the situation hardly helped by the RFL’s timing of the national-team announcement.

Following his appointment as England chief, McNamara presided over nine defeats in his final 12 games, going out with a whimper, rather than the fanfare early-season form had suggested.

To their credit, the club have already taken drastic action to address the slide.

By attracting Mick Potter to the club, the board have a coach with outstanding knowledge of the game, not afraid to make unpopular decisions for the benefit of the team and not willing to take any nonsense from his players.

Fresh investment in the playing squad will also result in greater depth of talent out on the field, while the bold Pledge 10,000 ticket scheme is something every Bulls supporter should jump on board with.

A busy summer still lies ahead, with a resolution of the situation regarding Orford’s future a priority and at least two or three signings still to come, but the future promises much.

Comments(30)

bullsfan says...
8:55am Thu 9 Sep 10

Simply could do better.

obi wan kanobi says...
9:09am Thu 9 Sep 10

I said there would be 2 or 3 more signings. We should have had a new coach last year.

Baaa says...
9:13am Thu 9 Sep 10

Well written rounded article. Well done Connor for all your brilliant articles this season. Shame results have not been favourable and at times the messenger has been shot at sometimes. Guess its frustration from the fans. Still we still have a good team and we will climb back up the table. Things could be worse and have been in the past so not all is lost. Just imagine being a Salford fan (I have full admiration for them and their loyalty) .
COYB

Adey says...
9:48am Thu 9 Sep 10

2 or 3 more signings? So does that mean if Orford doesn't come back it's 3, if he does then it's 2? It'll be interesting to see who else we sign as, other than the halves, I'd say we have plenty of cover in almost every position

the1bully says...
9:57am Thu 9 Sep 10

to be honest i disagree with the comments about the fan fare of how things could have gone for macca and also the comments about looking good i 4th.

1. macca would never have got a good send off his overall decision making made a bad situation terrible.
2. 4th place was a false position at an early stage of the season- i honestly dont think we woud ahve done much better- 7th at best, prob 8th.

macmoody says...
10:17am Thu 9 Sep 10

the1bully wrote:
to be honest i disagree with the comments about the fan fare of how things could have gone for macca and also the comments about looking good i 4th. 1. macca would never have got a good send off his overall decision making made a bad situation terrible. 2. 4th place was a false position at an early stage of the season- i honestly dont think we woud ahve done much better- 7th at best, prob 8th.
Facts can be twisted to suit any argument.
Is any position ever a 'false' position. The Bulls picked up enough points to reach fourth at the time hence they were a worthy fourth-placed side.
Also, your first point is true in the context of the entire season but if the Bulls had managed to held on to fourth then would there not have been a fanfare? In the circumstances I think most of us would have been happy with fourth this season. That's what the article is getting at.

dibsy says...
10:44am Thu 9 Sep 10

Reading some comments on this web site a lot of you want to know whos going.Well I have heard from a very good source,Reardon off to Crusaders,Sheriffe off to Wakefield,Menzies off,Worriancy signed 1 year contract last week had him in the office Monday morning and decided to terminate the contract he signed,hes not happy about this so hes going to take legal action.Also they have terminated Glen Hall contract ,think hes going to Castleford.There the ones I know about,I am 75% sure about this.I am getting like Birky Bull.So if Orford comes back we still should have 1 over seas spot available.

ratters2 says...
11:03am Thu 9 Sep 10

Seems Bulls on the verge of announcing another forward signing, Any clues anyone ?

The J Man says...
11:27am Thu 9 Sep 10

I've read on a forum that we're supposed to be announcing Ian Sibbitt from Salford on saturday.

If this is true then i think its a very poor signing...he's a back rower & we have plenty of them so no idea why we would want another one & a very average one at that???

Seems like a waste of salary cap money that could be better spent elsewhere so i just hope it aint true.

Think we're sorted in the forwards now & its just half backs we need really...a strike centre would be nice but half backs are the priority surely???

Reading Bullette says...
12:23pm Thu 9 Sep 10

The J Man wrote:
I've read on a forum that we're supposed to be announcing Ian Sibbitt from Salford on saturday.

If this is true then i think its a very poor signing...he's a back rower & we have plenty of them so no idea why we would want another one & a very average one at that???

Seems like a waste of salary cap money that could be better spent elsewhere so i just hope it aint true.

Think we're sorted in the forwards now & its just half backs we need really...a strike centre would be nice but half backs are the priority surely???
Well J man. I suppose you have read the article. It does say that they went in with two few players last season and clearly Mick Potter is not buying into that. Sibbitt will be relatively cheap, has a lot of experience and won't be playing every week but if the club got another injury crisis then he would be a useful player to bring in. If he does come he will have to compete for a place and that' something the club haven't had for a while.

blue marlin says...
12:24pm Thu 9 Sep 10

just see this on bbc 606 rl forum bulls looking at gavin henson 1 year deal

Bone_idle18 says...
12:52pm Thu 9 Sep 10

blue marlin wrote:
just see this on bbc 606 rl forum bulls looking at gavin henson 1 year deal
I can't see it, he's come out saying he wants to play for Wales in the RU world cup.

jambo says...
1:42pm Thu 9 Sep 10

If you look at Bradford this season compared with Leeds the main difference is the quality in depth that Leeds have over Bradford. A fully fit Bulls side went to Headingley and went toe to toe with the champions and earned a hard fought draw. A few injuries later and the club went on the worst losing run of the SL era.

That's not to say Leeds have not had injuries this year, they have. But when they've had a man down they've had 2 or 3 good players able to step up and take those spots. The Bulls had 18 players over the age of 20 in the first team squad. Or to put it another way; a decent 1st team and no back up.

Player signings are the job of the head coach. This was stated at the fans forum, the club apparantly had room under the cap to go looking for a loan player but McBanana either didn't want to or didn't have any contacts with agents who could provide a player.

haitch says...
2:00pm Thu 9 Sep 10

jambo wrote:
If you look at Bradford this season compared with Leeds the main difference is the quality in depth that Leeds have over Bradford. A fully fit Bulls side went to Headingley and went toe to toe with the champions and earned a hard fought draw. A few injuries later and the club went on the worst losing run of the SL era. That's not to say Leeds have not had injuries this year, they have. But when they've had a man down they've had 2 or 3 good players able to step up and take those spots. The Bulls had 18 players over the age of 20 in the first team squad. Or to put it another way; a decent 1st team and no back up. Player signings are the job of the head coach. This was stated at the fans forum, the club apparantly had room under the cap to go looking for a loan player but McBanana either didn't want to or didn't have any contacts with agents who could provide a player.
It's right to say Bulls had cruel luck with injuries. Problem was it all went wrong after Orford left as he was the only real "footballing" brain in the side.
No team can operate without two or three playmakers around which to work. It comes down to the previous coach not having a clue and building a side devoid of ideas.

SMftS loves Ashbournes Titty Lip says...
2:04pm Thu 9 Sep 10

Nothing wrong with Sibbit. Hes a experiened pro and a hardworker, will be a good squad man.

I would guess Orford is off.

theviking52 says...
3:56pm Thu 9 Sep 10

read this;
Orford stalked by Eels and Raiders, while Cooper and Cronk stay put Brad Walter
September 10, 2010
PARRAMATTA have targeted Matt Orford to play halfback while they wait for Quade Cooper or Cooper Cronk to become available - but the Eels face stiff competition from Canberra for the services of the former Manly captain.

Orford, 32, who has been playing in England, is understood to have met last week with Parramatta chief executive Paul Osborne and coach Daniel Anderson. Anderson said the Eels lacked a top-line playmaker after they bowed out of play-off contention. Eels officials made a strong bid to lure Cooper from rugby union after attempts to persuade Cronk to move north after the Storm salary-cap scandal failed, but they have again fallen short.

mumbyfan says...
5:20pm Thu 9 Sep 10

Paul Cooke released by Wakefield.

Covers standoff/loose forward...

Discuss...

The J Man says...
5:34pm Thu 9 Sep 10

Wouldnt touch him with a barge pole mate.

How many clubs have binned him off now in last few yrs?? Complete idiot off the pitch & not what we want at our club at all.

Bradfordremoved says...
6:09pm Thu 9 Sep 10

haitch wrote:
jambo wrote:
If you look at Bradford this season compared with Leeds the main difference is the quality in depth that Leeds have over Bradford. A fully fit Bulls side went to Headingley and went toe to toe with the champions and earned a hard fought draw. A few injuries later and the club went on the worst losing run of the SL era. That's not to say Leeds have not had injuries this year, they have. But when they've had a man down they've had 2 or 3 good players able to step up and take those spots. The Bulls had 18 players over the age of 20 in the first team squad. Or to put it another way; a decent 1st team and no back up. Player signings are the job of the head coach. This was stated at the fans forum, the club apparantly had room under the cap to go looking for a loan player but McBanana either didn't want to or didn't have any contacts with agents who could provide a player.
It's right to say Bulls had cruel luck with injuries. Problem was it all went wrong after Orford left as he was the only real "footballing" brain in the side.
No team can operate without two or three playmakers around which to work. It comes down to the previous coach not having a clue and building a side devoid of ideas.
I absolutely agree. The team has been short of line breakers for a number of years. Orford had too much to do by himself although clearly Kearney and le Strange were also brought in to assist with the problem. Sykes has struggled manfully to be the place kicker with Orford out and if Orford is not coming back (my guess is Bulls are waiting for him to decide) we must buy somebody who can put the place kicks in.

Missed the blogs yesterday and glad to see we got Elima. Arguably we just need Orford back believing he will not be wasting his time back with the Bulls and we can only hope he sees everything we've seen as positive.

Duckett says...
6:10pm Thu 9 Sep 10

Sibbitt not good enough - how many more "good squad players" (translated = "average") do we want, we already have plenty of them, it's top quality we're short of.

Adey says...
7:49pm Thu 9 Sep 10

mumbyfan wrote:
Paul Cooke released by Wakefield.

Covers standoff/loose forward...

Discuss...
Arguably the worst excuse of a stand-off ever to grace a pitch. He can only pass one direction, his kicking game is average, and that's before you touch his rotten attitude

gordon ramsay says...
9:38pm Thu 9 Sep 10

Duckett wrote:
Sibbitt not good enough - how many more "good squad players" (translated = "average") do we want, we already have plenty of them, it's top quality we're short of.
for the past 2 seasons we have been shockingly BELOW average. we do need "numbers" to boost a terrible squad in some ways to protect some of the kids. we do need depth.

in addition however, completely agree that its top quality, particularly the halves that we need. sorry, absolutely desperate for!!!!

signings like the ones so far and sibbit give us some depth. we really do need some craft at 6 and 7.

Tricky Dicky says...
2:05am Fri 10 Sep 10

You are wasted Connor. You should be working in the political offices of one of the major parties. Stop making excuses. We had the worst side for many years cobbled together by the worse coach since ??? supported by the worst backroom staff since Captain Bligh said "you'll do". We were a disaster waiting to happen. The three wise monkeys of Hood, McNamara and LSH gave us week after week of spin and we drank it in. Sorry, Connor, but you have been far too sychophantic when an independent journalist should have been honestly critical of a desperate regime. The only bit of truth in the article was that we have appointed a proven professional to the Head Coach position and let's hope the Bulls' management never commit the same folly of imposing an untried and untested coach on this great club. Sorry for the brutal assessment but for the past 4 years we have had the blind leading the blind. Some positive signings coming through but I am still waiting for the clear-out list to be published so that I really do believe that we have turned the corner.

Sheffieldbull says...
8:50am Fri 10 Sep 10

I must say Tricky, that's a very fair assessment of the last 4 years, it won't be popular with some, but right on the mark for a lot.

Duckett says...
12:58pm Fri 10 Sep 10

All correct Tricky, I am afraid. The worst season in S/L history orchestrated by the worst chairman in the club's history..spin, spin and more spin from the very beginning. Connor swallowed it hook line and sinker. In the old days good old Brian Smith of the T&A would have reported things as he saw them and Hood would not have had such an easy ride.

Reading Bullette says...
5:28pm Fri 10 Sep 10

Duckett wrote:
All correct Tricky, I am afraid. The worst season in S/L history orchestrated by the worst chairman in the club's history..spin, spin and more spin from the very beginning. Connor swallowed it hook line and sinker. In the old days good old Brian Smith of the T&A would have reported things as he saw them and Hood would not have had such an easy ride.
It's alright guys having a go at Connor but the game has changed and so have newspapers. Brian Smith- God love him - belongs to the dinosaur age of Fox and Caisley. Hood may well have made mistakes but he didn't run out on the club when the money had been spent like a certain other Chairman we could all mention. Totally bottleless. Leave Connor and Hood and everyone else alone. Connor has been very proactive in what he's done and - he has no doubt been well programmed by the club. He probably knows what a mess they were left in better than most - with a few exceptions- on here just what has gone on. There are always people on here complaining about marketing well to do that you need a partnership with the local paper and slagging off for the sake of it doesn't make for a good relationship. This paper needs the Bulls onside and the Bulls need them. Times- and thankfully Chairmen have changed. AS for Hood well he apparently works his butt off and the club will come through this period- starting now - and I have no doubt some people on here will be very disappointed when that happens.

Sheffieldbull says...
10:15pm Fri 10 Sep 10

Reading Bullette, what planet are you on? You really must be having a laugh but the truth is people are laughing at you!.....
"dinosaur age of Caisley" please explain.
"Connor has been very proactive in what he's done and - he has no doubt been well programmed by the club" bet he'll really love you for making that statement!!!
"AS for Hood well he apparently works his butt off and the club will come through this period- starting now - and I have no doubt some people on here will be very disappointed when that happens." NOW TELL ME, are you really suggesting that posters on here DO NOT WANT the Bulls to prosper - fool! sorry, but I can't think of a better word for you.
By the way, Brian Smith.. Great journalist and top guy, always was, still is!!!

Reading Bullette says...
7:22am Sat 11 Sep 10

Easy; Caisley's days have gone. When the going got tough he ran out. Couldn't cope with what other people had to deal with; In other words: reality and change; dinosaur. As for Connor, he is not - unlike us - a fan. He writes objectively and he will know, far more than we will, just what's gone on and going on now at the club. The club will have put him in the picture. Therefore he doesn't write with a fans head on. He has criticised when its due but he also rightly gives praise where that's due also. He can't simply - like us- look at results. He has to give - because he has more knowledge - a balanced view. And believe me there are some on here who would like to see the club fail. Hard to imagine, I know but it's true.

Sheffieldbull says...
9:59am Sat 11 Sep 10

Reading, If you wish to 'lump' the Bulls most successful years into what you call a 'dinosaur era', well of course, that's you're right. My question now is-at whose door do you lay the blame of the 'desperate regime' we have endured for the past four years? Before you play the Financial/Caisley card again, concider this, only the performances on the pitch have led to the lack of bodies on the terraces, thus leading to a even greater financial debarcle. The Head Coach from Hull didn't draw a straw, he was appointed. When things started to free-fall he was further supported and paying fans were expected to continue to cough-up for the dire fare served up on the pitch - how arrogant is that?
People feel that this paper has somewhat supported that regime by constantly 'spinning' the Bulls line on things - problems, what problems?
I've been critical of the Bull's management in the past but also totally support new initiatives of the present - that of course, is my right.

Reading Bullette says...
10:19am Sat 11 Sep 10

Sheffieldbull wrote:
Reading, If you wish to 'lump' the Bulls most successful years into what you call a 'dinosaur era', well of course, that's you're right. My question now is-at whose door do you lay the blame of the 'desperate regime' we have endured for the past four years? Before you play the Financial/Caisley card again, concider this, only the performances on the pitch have led to the lack of bodies on the terraces, thus leading to a even greater financial debarcle. The Head Coach from Hull didn't draw a straw, he was appointed. When things started to free-fall he was further supported and paying fans were expected to continue to cough-up for the dire fare served up on the pitch - how arrogant is that?
People feel that this paper has somewhat supported that regime by constantly 'spinning' the Bulls line on things - problems, what problems?
I've been critical of the Bull's management in the past but also totally support new initiatives of the present - that of course, is my right.
It is indeed as it is my right to my opinion. All I am saying is that the Caisley era is now gone and he showed by running out he couldn't adapt to change. He's gone! Connor can only print what he knows. As I said he can be critical of performances and things he thinks are wrong - and he often is - but times have changed in papers. They no longer report news; that's done on the internet etc. What they do is embellish and extend the news. The Bulls will no doubt keep Connor up to speed with things and he will then work out what he wants to say or to leave out. But he can't come out everyday just slagging off, like Duckett does, without balancing things out.


Matt Orford played just 14 games for the Bulls this season due to a serious shoulder injury Steve McNamara dlft the Bulls by mutual consent on July 12

Matt Orford played just 14 games for the Bulls this season due to a serious shoulder injury

Steve McNamara dlft the Bulls by mutual consent on July 12



Most popular


Get Adobe Flash player

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses