Sheriffe relief after 'amazing' victory (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Sheriffe relief after 'amazing' victory
7:30am Tuesday 24th March 2009 in
Rikki Sheriffe says the Bulls’ “unbelievable” late win in Perpignan has boosted confidence immeasurably.
The in-form winger was on the scoresheet again as Bradford pulled off a last-gasp success against Catalans.
It was their first Super League win of the year and the relief among the players was plain to see as they gleefully celebrated Dave Halley’s crucial touchdown.
“There was so much pressure lifted off our shoulders in an instant,” said Sheriffe.
“We kept going until the death. It paid off and the feeling was just unbelievable. It was an amazing game.”
Slick Bradford threw away the shackles to race into an 18-6 lead, playing with a belief and enterprise not yet seen in this campaign.
“We were on fire for the first 30 minutes and now we need to keep playing at that tempo and that pace,” added Sheriffe, who rounded off a sweeping 70-metre break in the first half with a classy finish.
“It was really enjoyable. It’s nice to score those ones where you believe in your team-mates and think ‘Hey up, he might break here.
“You just keep going and get your just rewards. It was a great team try.”
Sheriffe has now scored in each of the last three games and is proving a worthwhile capture from Harlequins.
He said: “It’s a good feeling. I came here to score and I seem to be doing that.
“I’d just been chuckling with Semi (Tadulala) about how whenever he scores I do too and it happened again.”
Comments(45)
Gumshoe
says...
8:39am Tue 24 Mar 09
Adey wrote:Agree on all points Adey. His attacking is pretty good and if he continues to score then great but he needs to improve his defence especially position wise as he has been caught out numerous times already this year and teams yet to play will have made note of this.
all well and good scoring them Rikki but you have to stop them scoring as well! His pace and finishing ability isn't the problem...his basic skills of catching, passing and defending are very very questionable! BUT....lets hope that we see a marked improvement over the next couple of matches. I really don't fancy an early cup exit!
Sure Cas will be throwing at him on Sunday so he needs to be on his game. A win there will be massive for us going back to France where we know their strengths and weaknesses (or should do!)so a decent run in CC would be boost for us.
micksey
says...
8:54am Tue 24 Mar 09
steampig
says...
9:40am Tue 24 Mar 09
Gumshoe wrote:The guy is capable of scoring plenty of try's the concern is definately his defence, it doesnt help when he plays outside Sykes who is also questionable in defence.
Adey wrote: all well and good scoring them Rikki but you have to stop them scoring as well! His pace and finishing ability isn't the problem...his basic skills of catching, passing and defending are very very questionable! BUT....lets hope that we see a marked improvement over the next couple of matches. I really don't fancy an early cup exit!Agree on all points Adey. His attacking is pretty good and if he continues to score then great but he needs to improve his defence especially position wise as he has been caught out numerous times already this year and teams yet to play will have made note of this. Sure Cas will be throwing at him on Sunday so he needs to be on his game. A win there will be massive for us going back to France where we know their strengths and weaknesses (or should do!)so a decent run in CC would be boost for us.
cas will be a very tough game for us, Mind you every game is very tough for us this term.
Adey
says...
9:45am Tue 24 Mar 09
steampig wrote:Just on this weekend's opponents...how much would we all give to have James Evans back in the fold at 3 or 4? Our biggest loss in the offseason if you ask me.
Gumshoe wrote:The guy is capable of scoring plenty of try's the concern is definately his defence, it doesnt help when he plays outside Sykes who is also questionable in defence. cas will be a very tough game for us, Mind you every game is very tough for us this term.Adey wrote: all well and good scoring them Rikki but you have to stop them scoring as well! His pace and finishing ability isn't the problem...his basic skills of catching, passing and defending are very very questionable! BUT....lets hope that we see a marked improvement over the next couple of matches. I really don't fancy an early cup exit!Agree on all points Adey. His attacking is pretty good and if he continues to score then great but he needs to improve his defence especially position wise as he has been caught out numerous times already this year and teams yet to play will have made note of this. Sure Cas will be throwing at him on Sunday so he needs to be on his game. A win there will be massive for us going back to France where we know their strengths and weaknesses (or should do!)so a decent run in CC would be boost for us.
graham smith
says...
9:52am Tue 24 Mar 09
My daughter came home on Sunday evening to tell me of some bad news about one of her friends who had died on the field whilst playing for the Wakefield Trinity Wildcats reserve team, his name was Leon Walker, this young man gave his life to our sport.
I know that the Bradford Bulls fans have just about come to terms with the death of Adam Watene last October, some of us still find it hard to understand how a healthy person can just go like that.
I am sure that you are all behind me in sending out our deepest condolences to Leons family, John Kear and the Wakefield Trinity Wildcats and all their supporters.
You all know that I always finish my blogs with COM’ON YOU BULLS, but not for today as we remember,
LEON WALKER
MAY REST IN PEASE
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
10:03am Tue 24 Mar 09
micksey wrote:Yeah but you thought Marcus St Hillaire and Nathan McAvoy were quality.
I like what I see of him, I think there's a lot of ability, but he has had a tough start in a team playing badly and his confidence did look down against Hull. All in all, not a bad start and if he can beef up his defence then he'll be a very good signing.
You're judgement of players is absolutley shocking.
steampig
says...
10:04am Tue 24 Mar 09
Adey wrote:yeah Evans was a huge loss, and not replaced, another questionable decision which will no doubt bite us as the season progresses.
steampig wrote:Just on this weekend's opponents...how much would we all give to have James Evans back in the fold at 3 or 4? Our biggest loss in the offseason if you ask me.Gumshoe wrote:The guy is capable of scoring plenty of try's the concern is definately his defence, it doesnt help when he plays outside Sykes who is also questionable in defence. cas will be a very tough game for us, Mind you every game is very tough for us this term.Adey wrote: all well and good scoring them Rikki but you have to stop them scoring as well! His pace and finishing ability isn't the problem...his basic skills of catching, passing and defending are very very questionable! BUT....lets hope that we see a marked improvement over the next couple of matches. I really don't fancy an early cup exit!Agree on all points Adey. His attacking is pretty good and if he continues to score then great but he needs to improve his defence especially position wise as he has been caught out numerous times already this year and teams yet to play will have made note of this. Sure Cas will be throwing at him on Sunday so he needs to be on his game. A win there will be massive for us going back to France where we know their strengths and weaknesses (or should do!)so a decent run in CC would be boost for us.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
10:46am Tue 24 Mar 09
Gumshoe
says...
11:05am Tue 24 Mar 09
steampig wrote:I agree, a big loss who was consistent in all aspects of his game, something we seem to have been lacking so far this season.
Adey wrote:yeah Evans was a huge loss, and not replaced, another questionable decision which will no doubt bite us as the season progresses.steampig wrote:Just on this weekend's opponents...how much would we all give to have James Evans back in the fold at 3 or 4? Our biggest loss in the offseason if you ask me.Gumshoe wrote:The guy is capable of scoring plenty of try's the concern is definately his defence, it doesnt help when he plays outside Sykes who is also questionable in defence. cas will be a very tough game for us, Mind you every game is very tough for us this term.Adey wrote: all well and good scoring them Rikki but you have to stop them scoring as well! His pace and finishing ability isn't the problem...his basic skills of catching, passing and defending are very very questionable! BUT....lets hope that we see a marked improvement over the next couple of matches. I really don't fancy an early cup exit!Agree on all points Adey. His attacking is pretty good and if he continues to score then great but he needs to improve his defence especially position wise as he has been caught out numerous times already this year and teams yet to play will have made note of this. Sure Cas will be throwing at him on Sunday so he needs to be on his game. A win there will be massive for us going back to France where we know their strengths and weaknesses (or should do!)so a decent run in CC would be boost for us.
HANLEY IS A LEGEND
says...
11:41am Tue 24 Mar 09
One note of caution which we all have picked up is the defence of the back line.
My question is who would have any of our backs in the Top four.
Probably only "SEMI".
Platts goes backwards & sidewards, Sykes comes out of the line,& Sheriffe is a statue.BJ is one person who is trying this season.
My big gripe is still the coaching.Why is Deacon still kicking to touch for penalties."My wife could kick better in her slippers".Seriously this is one aspect of our game which could be improved..Sykes can kick better out of hand.Same with Newton & Deacon who must be encouraged to run with ball from the ruck area ,as Leeds & Saints do.
Lets hope the coaching staff do read most of the comments on here.Actually we the spectors see all the action at first hand...
Ralphie
says...
12:02pm Tue 24 Mar 09
The Catalans are also going through a lean spell and with a bit more luck could have won. We have conceded over 100 points in the last three games and Castleford will be flying after their latest win.
I really hope win can pull something off at Cas but I fear the worst!
haitch
says...
12:20pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Sherrife took his try superbly and showed nice pace but as has been said he really has problems in defence, not just his inability but playing outside Sykes is difficult for any player.
Not sure about the Evans comments. He is a hard working player but lacks pace far an outside back. We have to look much higher than James Evans if we are to aspire to bringing back Bulls of old.
micksey
says...
12:33pm Tue 24 Mar 09
shaun from richmond
says...
1:36pm Tue 24 Mar 09
All this has done is buy McNamara another few weeks in charge, which I believe is a very bad thing for the Bradford Bulls!!
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
2:34pm Tue 24 Mar 09
steampig
says...
2:59pm Tue 24 Mar 09
shaun from richmond wrote:i have to agree a win against another struggling team should not be seen as a great victory, however a win is a win and having seen the other games it might well be some time before we see another one. Still lets hope that we do start to string together some wins its been depressing seeing the once Mighty Bulls, one of the Big 4 struggling against other poor sides and hailing a win against a poor side, who we would once have really put to the sword in style. !
Anybody would think we had just won Superleague!! All this has done is buy McNamara another few weeks in charge, which I believe is a very bad thing for the Bradford Bulls!!
Gumshoe
says...
3:06pm Tue 24 Mar 09
haitch wrote:He might not have been the quickest Haitch but he was strong in defence, reliable gave 100% and scored tries, I for one would like to have in our team/squad for another season. I agree we have to set our sights higher but until that time comes we need consistency from players week in week out and Evans was one of those.
Yes the defence is a problem but just how much is difficult to judge. With the quality Aussies in Catalans side they can score freely against any side on their day. They have opened up all the top sides in the recent past so lets not be too hard on our boys. I agree totally with Ralphie. Our concentration must be spot on at Cas and let's hope after that game we are talking about progression and not back to square one!. Sherrife took his try superbly and showed nice pace but as has been said he really has problems in defence, not just his inability but playing outside Sykes is difficult for any player. Not sure about the Evans comments. He is a hard working player but lacks pace far an outside back. We have to look much higher than James Evans if we are to aspire to bringing back Bulls of old.
He may just come back and bite us on Sunday along with Hudson and Ferres!!
haitch
says...
3:12pm Tue 24 Mar 09
steampig wrote:Just ignore them Steampig. They love to see the Bulls lose. Absolutely no one has said the Bulls have solved their problems let alone intimated they'd won superleague. Bulls have made a step in the right direction. They won a game. They only played the one game in France so all they could do was win it.
shaun from richmond wrote: Anybody would think we had just won Superleague!! All this has done is buy McNamara another few weeks in charge, which I believe is a very bad thing for the Bradford Bulls!!i have to agree a win against another struggling team should not be seen as a great victory, however a win is a win and having seen the other games it might well be some time before we see another one. Still lets hope that we do start to string together some wins its been depressing seeing the once Mighty Bulls, one of the Big 4 struggling against other poor sides and hailing a win against a poor side, who we would once have really put to the sword in style. !
The problem is the above two posters hate to see the Bulls win and even worse Macca have any success. If you come even close to proving them wrong the insults will fly. Believe me...Ignore.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
3:18pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Haitch is turning into a right thicko.
haitch
says...
3:20pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Gumshoe wrote:I agree with your every word Gumshoe. The point I make is IMO he was not a BIG loss. Leon. Les and Hape were big losses as indeed was JP. Evans was a steady player and better than any centre we have at present (not that thats difficult). But he was injured a lot and to me, fairly run of the mill in other respects.
haitch wrote: Yes the defence is a problem but just how much is difficult to judge. With the quality Aussies in Catalans side they can score freely against any side on their day. They have opened up all the top sides in the recent past so lets not be too hard on our boys. I agree totally with Ralphie. Our concentration must be spot on at Cas and let's hope after that game we are talking about progression and not back to square one!. Sherrife took his try superbly and showed nice pace but as has been said he really has problems in defence, not just his inability but playing outside Sykes is difficult for any player. Not sure about the Evans comments. He is a hard working player but lacks pace far an outside back. We have to look much higher than James Evans if we are to aspire to bringing back Bulls of old.He might not have been the quickest Haitch but he was strong in defence, reliable gave 100% and scored tries, I for one would like to have in our team/squad for another season. I agree we have to set our sights higher but until that time comes we need consistency from players week in week out and Evans was one of those. He may just come back and bite us on Sunday along with Hudson and Ferres!!
steampig
says...
3:21pm Tue 24 Mar 09
haitch wrote:Good advice, Cheers!!
steampig wrote:Just ignore them Steampig. They love to see the Bulls lose. Absolutely no one has said the Bulls have solved their problems let alone intimated they'd won superleague. Bulls have made a step in the right direction. They won a game. They only played the one game in France so all they could do was win it. The problem is the above two posters hate to see the Bulls win and even worse Macca have any success. If you come even close to proving them wrong the insults will fly. Believe me...Ignore.shaun from richmond wrote: Anybody would think we had just won Superleague!! All this has done is buy McNamara another few weeks in charge, which I believe is a very bad thing for the Bradford Bulls!!i have to agree a win against another struggling team should not be seen as a great victory, however a win is a win and having seen the other games it might well be some time before we see another one. Still lets hope that we do start to string together some wins its been depressing seeing the once Mighty Bulls, one of the Big 4 struggling against other poor sides and hailing a win against a poor side, who we would once have really put to the sword in style. !
micksey
says...
5:24pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:this from the guy who bigged up Matt King.
micksey wrote: I like what I see of him, I think there's a lot of ability, but he has had a tough start in a team playing badly and his confidence did look down against Hull. All in all, not a bad start and if he can beef up his defence then he'll be a very good signing.Yeah but you thought Marcus St Hillaire and Nathan McAvoy were quality. You're judgement of players is absolutley shocking.
shaun from richmond
says...
5:36pm Tue 24 Mar 09
haitch wrote:Oh grow up "HAITCH" just cos I gave you a good kicking over not attending games at Odsal!!
steampig wrote:Just ignore them Steampig. They love to see the Bulls lose. Absolutely no one has said the Bulls have solved their problems let alone intimated they'd won superleague. Bulls have made a step in the right direction. They won a game. They only played the one game in France so all they could do was win it. The problem is the above two posters hate to see the Bulls win and even worse Macca have any success. If you come even close to proving them wrong the insults will fly. Believe me...Ignore.shaun from richmond wrote: Anybody would think we had just won Superleague!! All this has done is buy McNamara another few weeks in charge, which I believe is a very bad thing for the Bradford Bulls!!i have to agree a win against another struggling team should not be seen as a great victory, however a win is a win and having seen the other games it might well be some time before we see another one. Still lets hope that we do start to string together some wins its been depressing seeing the once Mighty Bulls, one of the Big 4 struggling against other poor sides and hailing a win against a poor side, who we would once have really put to the sword in style. !
I was only joking! Blimey Ive given Micksey much worse over the years and he still "loves me".......So come "HAITCH" grow a pair, and stop being a BIG BABY!!!
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
6:08pm Tue 24 Mar 09
micksey wrote:Thats right, you know the guy who is a world class three quarter after all, played at the higest levels available and all that.
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:this from the guy who bigged up Matt King.micksey wrote: I like what I see of him, I think there's a lot of ability, but he has had a tough start in a team playing badly and his confidence did look down against Hull. All in all, not a bad start and if he can beef up his defence then he'll be a very good signing.Yeah but you thought Marcus St Hillaire and Nathan McAvoy were quality. You're judgement of players is absolutley shocking.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
6:14pm Tue 24 Mar 09
shaun from richmond wrote:Thing is though, no one on here as come anywhere remotley close to proving us wrong. The believer brigade dont half come out with some crap these days.
haitch wrote:Oh grow up "HAITCH" just cos I gave you a good kicking over not attending games at Odsal!! I was only joking! Blimey Ive given Micksey much worse over the years and he still "loves me".......So come "HAITCH" grow a pair, and stop being a BIG BABY!!!steampig wrote:Just ignore them Steampig. They love to see the Bulls lose. Absolutely no one has said the Bulls have solved their problems let alone intimated they'd won superleague. Bulls have made a step in the right direction. They won a game. They only played the one game in France so all they could do was win it. The problem is the above two posters hate to see the Bulls win and even worse Macca have any success. If you come even close to proving them wrong the insults will fly. Believe me...Ignore.shaun from richmond wrote: Anybody would think we had just won Superleague!! All this has done is buy McNamara another few weeks in charge, which I believe is a very bad thing for the Bradford Bulls!!i have to agree a win against another struggling team should not be seen as a great victory, however a win is a win and having seen the other games it might well be some time before we see another one. Still lets hope that we do start to string together some wins its been depressing seeing the once Mighty Bulls, one of the Big 4 struggling against other poor sides and hailing a win against a poor side, who we would once have really put to the sword in style. !
Adeybull
says...
6:26pm Tue 24 Mar 09
shaun io
says...
6:37pm Tue 24 Mar 09
micksey
says...
6:51pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Adeybull wrote:Don't worry we all know the burke for who and what he is.
Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.
And Shaun, you know and I both know who won our spats, by a distance, hence you disappeared off the site for months tail between your sheepish legs.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
7:57pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Adeybull wrote:Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry.
Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.
The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls.
I am the king of the interactive RL world.
shaun from richmond
says...
8:42pm Tue 24 Mar 09
micksey wrote:I enjoy our spats Micksey, always have! We both have different views, which is fine!
Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Don't worry we all know the burke for who and what he is. And Shaun, you know and I both know who won our spats, by a distance, hence you disappeared off the site for months tail between your sheepish legs.
Its a shame Haitch wont come out to play anymore!!
As for you beating me in our spats? You couldnt beat an egg Micksey!!
Adeybull
says...
10:10pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...
Adeybull wrote:Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry.
Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.
The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls.
I am the king of the interactive RL world.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
10:16pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Adeybull wrote:Rest it then instead of trying to act clever.
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry. The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls. I am the king of the interactive RL world.
No one even listens to you except your boyfriend.
theknowledge
says...
11:57pm Tue 24 Mar 09
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Steve Mac for the Sack I know who you are. Your trouble is your just a gobsh**te who spouts but isn't man enough to do it face to face a bit like at Widnes eh ML84.
Adeybull wrote:Rest it then instead of trying to act clever. No one even listens to you except your boyfriend.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry. The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls. I am the king of the interactive RL world.
haitch
says...
11:59pm Tue 24 Mar 09
haitch wrote:And the insults flew!!..I rest my case.
steampig wrote:Just ignore them Steampig. They love to see the Bulls lose. Absolutely no one has said the Bulls have solved their problems let alone intimated they'd won superleague. Bulls have made a step in the right direction. They won a game. They only played the one game in France so all they could do was win it. The problem is the above two posters hate to see the Bulls win and even worse Macca have any success. If you come even close to proving them wrong the insults will fly. Believe me...Ignore.shaun from richmond wrote: Anybody would think we had just won Superleague!! All this has done is buy McNamara another few weeks in charge, which I believe is a very bad thing for the Bradford Bulls!!i have to agree a win against another struggling team should not be seen as a great victory, however a win is a win and having seen the other games it might well be some time before we see another one. Still lets hope that we do start to string together some wins its been depressing seeing the once Mighty Bulls, one of the Big 4 struggling against other poor sides and hailing a win against a poor side, who we would once have really put to the sword in style. !
Actually I'm a bit late with this post as all Broadband went down from just after 5pm till now.
Adeybull
says...
12:35am Wed 25 Mar 09
Back to thread and the point I was going to make originally - IIRC the club made it clear they had to release Evans because of the tightened-up overseas player rules. Then only to find that because of rulings elsewhere they could have kept him as they made clear they had wanted to. Guess it was Evans or Beaver?
Must admit I was pretty peed off to see Jimmy go - he did a pretty good job for us, and I bet he proves a point on Sunday.
haitch
says...
9:45am Wed 25 Mar 09
Reading Bullette
says...
10:49am Wed 25 Mar 09
theknowledge wrote:Be careful. If you know what Liam did at Widnes, then he will accuse you of being someone else! He is a complete to$$er.
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Steve Mac for the Sack I know who you are. Your trouble is your just a gobsh**te who spouts but isn't man enough to do it face to face a bit like at Widnes eh ML84.Adeybull wrote:Rest it then instead of trying to act clever. No one even listens to you except your boyfriend.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry. The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls. I am the king of the interactive RL world.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
12:21pm Wed 25 Mar 09
theknowledge wrote:Oooooo, you know who I am, WOW..That's great
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Steve Mac for the Sack I know who you are. Your trouble is your just a gobsh**te who spouts but isn't man enough to do it face to face a bit like at Widnes eh ML84.Adeybull wrote:Rest it then instead of trying to act clever. No one even listens to you except your boyfriend.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry. The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls. I am the king of the interactive RL world.
You mean when I told Macca he was garbage, 5 yards away from him, when he was surrounded by all his boys? Is that the time you mean?
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
12:44pm Wed 25 Mar 09
Adeybull wrote:Have a day off Adeybell, youve tried to make your point before and failed miserabley.
Sorry Haitch, bit mischievous of me but I'll admit the reason I posted my bit was cos I knew it would react the way it always does - it can't help itself - and in doing so prove your point to Steampig and everyone else. Which, despite thinking itself so clever, it did right on cue. Back to thread and the point I was going to make originally - IIRC the club made it clear they had to release Evans because of the tightened-up overseas player rules. Then only to find that because of rulings elsewhere they could have kept him as they made clear they had wanted to. Guess it was Evans or Beaver? Must admit I was pretty peed off to see Jimmy go - he did a pretty good job for us, and I bet he proves a point on Sunday.
Get back on RLFannies where you can pretend youre something special.
Security word - fill-ring
We all know that you like to fill Ferociuis Sadvark's ring (piece)
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
3:30pm Wed 25 Mar 09
Reading Bullette wrote:Who's Liam?
theknowledge wrote:Be careful. If you know what Liam did at Widnes, then he will accuse you of being someone else! He is a complete to$$er.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Steve Mac for the Sack I know who you are. Your trouble is your just a gobsh**te who spouts but isn't man enough to do it face to face a bit like at Widnes eh ML84.Adeybull wrote:Rest it then instead of trying to act clever. No one even listens to you except your boyfriend.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry. The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls. I am the king of the interactive RL world.
theknowledge
says...
4:00pm Wed 25 Mar 09
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:The alter ego you used to e-mail the club with to apologise after your tough man actions act at Widnes. 5 yards more like 50 yards away sat in the stand.
Reading Bullette wrote:Who's Liam?theknowledge wrote:Be careful. If you know what Liam did at Widnes, then he will accuse you of being someone else! He is a complete to$$er.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Steve Mac for the Sack I know who you are. Your trouble is your just a gobsh**te who spouts but isn't man enough to do it face to face a bit like at Widnes eh ML84.Adeybull wrote:Rest it then instead of trying to act clever. No one even listens to you except your boyfriend.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry. The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls. I am the king of the interactive RL world.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
4:53pm Wed 25 Mar 09
theknowledge wrote:Wrong, check your email again.
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:The alter ego you used to e-mail the club with to apologise after your tough man actions act at Widnes. 5 yards more like 50 yards away sat in the stand.Reading Bullette wrote:Who's Liam?theknowledge wrote:Be careful. If you know what Liam did at Widnes, then he will accuse you of being someone else! He is a complete to$$er.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Steve Mac for the Sack I know who you are. Your trouble is your just a gobsh**te who spouts but isn't man enough to do it face to face a bit like at Widnes eh ML84.Adeybull wrote:Rest it then instead of trying to act clever. No one even listens to you except your boyfriend.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry. The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls. I am the king of the interactive RL world.
Right behind the dug out sunshine, where you were all sat, and you know it.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
4:57pm Wed 25 Mar 09
theknowledge wrote:Wrong, check your email again, Mr.
Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:The alter ego you used to e-mail the club with to apologise after your tough man actions act at Widnes. 5 yards more like 50 yards away sat in the stand.Reading Bullette wrote:Who's Liam?theknowledge wrote:Be careful. If you know what Liam did at Widnes, then he will accuse you of being someone else! He is a complete to$$er.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Steve Mac for the Sack I know who you are. Your trouble is your just a gobsh**te who spouts but isn't man enough to do it face to face a bit like at Widnes eh ML84.Adeybull wrote:Rest it then instead of trying to act clever. No one even listens to you except your boyfriend.Steve Mac for the Sack wrote:Soooo predictable. I rest my case...Adeybull wrote: Can I remind people that the person who currently posts as "Steve Mack for the Sack" is regularly banned from RLFans every time he returns with a new alias. The Mods are well aware of his real motives, and of the aggressive way he attacks anyone who argues with him (debate is impossible). You can see the same approach on here. But form your own views.Oh look, it's Adeybell, one of the two musketeers. I converse on RLFans daily and have done for almost as long as you have. You have no idea who I am, small fry. The only attacker is your boyfriend, Ferocious small balls. I am the king of the interactive RL world.
Right behind the dug out sunshine, where you were all sat, and you know it, ask the dentist, he was talking to me.
It wasn't an hardman act either, I stood up and told Macca what I thought of him, it just so happens that you all didn't like hearing it, so you all turned around, must have been at least 4 of you all shouting, f'ing and sending abusive hand gestures my way.
You know what happened that night, you dont have to tell porkies.
Steve Mac for the Sack
says...
5:01pm Wed 25 Mar 09
All because of two simple words which were..."Rubbish Macca"
Well, you know what they say, the truth hurts. And that really did sting.
More Sport stories
- Lulia ready for Bradford Bulls baptism of fire against Warriors
- Bradford City: Fearless Jones out to upset the form book
- Bradford Park Avenue get into a spot of bother
- Bradford Bulls: Lulia set to offset Purtell blow
- Bradford City salvage ‘ugly’ point
- Heavy defeat for Albion Sports
- Fox feels time is right to return to coaching
- Bradford Bulls: Happiness is the key to consistency says Pryce
- Davies delivers extra dose of Bradford City love
Rikki Sheriffe has scored three tries in three games
Most popular
Local Information
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Adey says...
7:36am Tue 24 Mar 09
BUT....lets hope that we see a marked improvement over the next couple of matches. I really don't fancy an early cup exit!