Mystic Phil Parkinson proved right to stay cautious over Bradford City's future

There was plenty of finger-pointing in City’s defence as they conceded another goal to Oldham

City v Oldham match action

City v Oldham match action

City v Oldham match action

City v Oldham match action

City v Oldham match action

First published in Sport Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Photograph of the Author by , Bradford City Reporter

City 2, Oldham 3

Phil Parkinson had warned us all before the game. Rewind to Thursday’s press conference where he insisted that his forward planning was looking no further than the weekend.

Eight points above the dreaded drop, and seemingly home and hosed at that stage, but the Bantams boss refused to talk about next season. He wouldn’t even reveal any plans for next week.

It sounded an unnecessarily cautious approach from a team boosted by four points and back-to-back clean sheets on the road.

Surely it was the moment to put this current campaign to bed and start analysing how to right the wrongs over the coming months.

But no, Parkinson was adamant that this season was still very much alive. The job, in his words, was far from done.

And like his Oldham oppo Lee Johnson, who had told Jonson Clarke-Harris in the warm-up that he would end a four-month goal drought by scoring two, Parkinson’s clairvoyant skills proved spot on.

Unfortunately 2013-14 has not been consigned to history at Valley Parade; far from it.

It would still take a collapse on a monumental scale for City to plunge into the bottom four by tea-time on Saturday, May 3.

With six points and eight teams between them and the final relegation spot, not to mention a plus goal difference, they hold a strong enough hand for the desperate game of ‘stick or twist’ in the closing weeks.

But City’s future remains a gamble for at least another week or so – and who would they least like to play after the latest home no-show? Ah yes, it’s Rotherham again on Friday.

A visit to the ultimate bogey side and bogeyman with the Sky TV cameras to capture the night in all its glory ... no end-of-season niceties on the agenda there.

The masochists might suggest that at least it keeps the final month interesting. But this is not the same kind of interest generated by the same stage a year ago when City were going full throttle towards the play-offs.

How they could do with a few games of nothingness to let things wind down – and allow Parkinson to start putting a few future thoughts in place.

Some budget discussions have already taken place with the board but the details have to remain sketchy for now. Nobody can afford to make any big decisions when City’s destiny for next August is still not guaranteed.

It should have been. Saturday should have seen them break the 50-point barrier – that almost mystical mark that means safety and survival for those who pass through.

After all, it’s four years since Gillingham were the last side to reach their half-century at this level and still be relegated.

But City are still tantalisingly short by a point – and they can have no complaints about that after another sorry showing on their own patch.

A feature of Parkinson’s legacy in the Bantams hot-seat has been the way his team have performed at Valley Parade.

Acutely aware of the stage fright suffered by many of his predecessors, one of his priority tasks on taking the job was to rebuild that home ‘fortress’.

It played a large part in keeping them in the Football League in his first season; its significance was even bigger in getting City promoted in the second.

But now the gremlins are back – and like a band of squatters intent on trashing the place, they seem in no hurry to move along.

Three defeats in four home games, one point out of 12 – those are stats from the bad old days.

Stevenage was sloppy, Gillingham unlucky, Walsall awful. Sadly Oldham, certainly in the flattest of second halves, felt like Walsall part two.

Once again, there was no hint of a fightback when the going got tough. Too many simply disappeared; content to be second best against opponents who appeared to want it more.

Parkinson blamed himself for the tired legs after sticking with the bulk of the team that had looked so strong on the road. There was definitely a jaded air to the home performance.

But any slowness in thought and deed should not excuse some of the basic errors when City simply switched off.

All three Oldham goals looked poor defensively – and this from a team that had not conceded a goal in the previous three hours of away action.

But back at base camp, they were too often at sixes and sevens. Rory McArdle and Andrew Davies, the heartbeat of that back-four invincibility, played like they had never seen each other.

Oldham, backed by the largest away following since Rotherham brought 2,500 on Boxing Day, sensed blood; in particular, the whippet-like teenager Clarke-Harris – no wonder his manager had been so confident of ending a scoring drought dating back to December 29.

He was the provider for the first goal, outjumping McArdle for Connor Brown’s deep cross. Adam Drury was caught on his heels by James Wesolowski and the Australian converted from close range.

City responded within 13 minutes. Matty Dolan lifted the crowd with a sliding tackle to win back possession on halfway and then delivered the best home pass of the day to find Adam Reach.

The winger took it well in his stride, negotiated the challenge of one-time Leeds keeper Paul Rachubka and finished with aplomb. So far, so good.

But the decisive moment arrived right on the break. Gary Harkins poked a pass into the goalmouth, nobody in a claret and amber jersey twitched a muscle and Clarke-Harris was all alone to lash in Oldham’s second.

Cue plenty of tea-potting and finger-pointing among the home players and a stunned silence in the stands – at least in three of them.

That deflated feeling lingered into the second half, both on and off the pitch. There was no conviction about City’s play and the subdued support reflected that.

Instead, Jonathan Grounds swept a long, low pass forward and Clarke-Harris outpaced McArdle and outmuscled Davies to steer in a killer third goal.

Gary Jones pegged one back in the final minute of stoppages after Mark Yeates had rattled a post but its only significance was to keep City in positive goal difference.

Boos once again accompanied the final whistle. It is suddenly becoming a Valley Parade habit.

Attendance: 14,920

Comments (10)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:06am Mon 7 Apr 14

gordon ramsay says...

Right Peter300..... Instead of posting pathetic tag ons to other peoples thoughts, let's have YOUR thoughts.

As a starter Peter...
1. How good is our recruitment since 2013 when we signed Gray and Nelson
2. Would you trust Parky to rebuild the squad with his recent record on signings
3. To say McLean was our first choice to replace Wells ... Do you think he's a good signing?

Just wondering if you have anything original to say?
Right Peter300..... Instead of posting pathetic tag ons to other peoples thoughts, let's have YOUR thoughts. As a starter Peter... 1. How good is our recruitment since 2013 when we signed Gray and Nelson 2. Would you trust Parky to rebuild the squad with his recent record on signings 3. To say McLean was our first choice to replace Wells ... Do you think he's a good signing? Just wondering if you have anything original to say? gordon ramsay
  • Score: 11

10:39am Mon 7 Apr 14

lawsonio123 says...

Straight to the point Mclean is not a good signing as for Parky please less of prediction and more action SORT IT OUT
Straight to the point Mclean is not a good signing as for Parky please less of prediction and more action SORT IT OUT lawsonio123
  • Score: 3

11:38am Mon 7 Apr 14

Joshuatoothill says...

I don't get why he changed his formation half way through the half he said he knew what formation they would play in mid week yet didn't counteract it from the start Bennett is useless don't know why he plays should have been Atkinson for him and McLean just dropping off stead don't know why McLean who we bought to score goals was playing on the wing and bennet was playing off stead it was appalling
I don't get why he changed his formation half way through the half he said he knew what formation they would play in mid week yet didn't counteract it from the start Bennett is useless don't know why he plays should have been Atkinson for him and McLean just dropping off stead don't know why McLean who we bought to score goals was playing on the wing and bennet was playing off stead it was appalling Joshuatoothill
  • Score: 0

1:13pm Mon 7 Apr 14

nowt fresh says...

Joshuatoothill wrote:
I don't get why he changed his formation half way through the half he said he knew what formation they would play in mid week yet didn't counteract it from the start Bennett is useless don't know why he plays should have been Atkinson for him and McLean just dropping off stead don't know why McLean who we bought to score goals was playing on the wing and bennet was playing off stead it was appalling
Agree Josh he stated the system Oldham would play and did not set his team up to counter it, then he subs a striker with a striker when were losing and then says in his post match interview "Stead had played 3 hard games in a week" these guys are pro footballers we needed 3 points we were losing why not take a defender off and GO FOR IT and if we lose being positive I and most Bradford City fans will accept that but like for like subs are not very creative IMO, just once Phil take your over cautious hat off and go for it when were losing.
[quote][p][bold]Joshuatoothill[/bold] wrote: I don't get why he changed his formation half way through the half he said he knew what formation they would play in mid week yet didn't counteract it from the start Bennett is useless don't know why he plays should have been Atkinson for him and McLean just dropping off stead don't know why McLean who we bought to score goals was playing on the wing and bennet was playing off stead it was appalling[/p][/quote]Agree Josh he stated the system Oldham would play and did not set his team up to counter it, then he subs a striker with a striker when were losing and then says in his post match interview "Stead had played 3 hard games in a week" these guys are pro footballers we needed 3 points we were losing why not take a defender off and GO FOR IT and if we lose being positive I and most Bradford City fans will accept that but like for like subs are not very creative IMO, just once Phil take your over cautious hat off and go for it when were losing. nowt fresh
  • Score: 2

6:10pm Mon 7 Apr 14

Hove edge bantam says...

Mystic Parkinson can predict all he wants it's what he does about it that counts After Saturdays abject failure to read the opposition can he predict where the 4 points needed for survival are coming from Plenty like me would like to know He has done a tremendous job for us and I imagine reaped the rewards but how many supporters can honestly say he is the man to take us forward from here Not only do we need strengthening on the pitch but at management level as well Sentiment can be a good thing but can also be misguided
Mystic Parkinson can predict all he wants it's what he does about it that counts After Saturdays abject failure to read the opposition can he predict where the 4 points needed for survival are coming from Plenty like me would like to know He has done a tremendous job for us and I imagine reaped the rewards but how many supporters can honestly say he is the man to take us forward from here Not only do we need strengthening on the pitch but at management level as well Sentiment can be a good thing but can also be misguided Hove edge bantam
  • Score: 2

9:43pm Mon 7 Apr 14

KnightMcCall says...

Joshuatoothill wrote:
I don't get why he changed his formation half way through the half he said he knew what formation they would play in mid week yet didn't counteract it from the start Bennett is useless don't know why he plays should have been Atkinson for him and McLean just dropping off stead don't know why McLean who we bought to score goals was playing on the wing and bennet was playing off stead it was appalling
That appalling that it led to our best spell and equaliser.
[quote][p][bold]Joshuatoothill[/bold] wrote: I don't get why he changed his formation half way through the half he said he knew what formation they would play in mid week yet didn't counteract it from the start Bennett is useless don't know why he plays should have been Atkinson for him and McLean just dropping off stead don't know why McLean who we bought to score goals was playing on the wing and bennet was playing off stead it was appalling[/p][/quote]That appalling that it led to our best spell and equaliser. KnightMcCall
  • Score: -4

9:46pm Mon 7 Apr 14

KnightMcCall says...

lawsonio123 wrote:
Straight to the point Mclean is not a good signing as for Parky please less of prediction and more action SORT IT OUT
McLean was excellent at Coventry. He works very hard and will benefit from pre-season. Why City fans are so quick to slag off our own players I will never know.
[quote][p][bold]lawsonio123[/bold] wrote: Straight to the point Mclean is not a good signing as for Parky please less of prediction and more action SORT IT OUT[/p][/quote]McLean was excellent at Coventry. He works very hard and will benefit from pre-season. Why City fans are so quick to slag off our own players I will never know. KnightMcCall
  • Score: -3

9:58pm Mon 7 Apr 14

KnightMcCall says...

gordon ramsay wrote:
Right Peter300..... Instead of posting pathetic tag ons to other peoples thoughts, let's have YOUR thoughts.

As a starter Peter...
1. How good is our recruitment since 2013 when we signed Gray and Nelson
2. Would you trust Parky to rebuild the squad with his recent record on signings
3. To say McLean was our first choice to replace Wells ... Do you think he's a good signing?

Just wondering if you have anything original to say?
Surely the fact that we are 12th is what matters. If PP cant recruit then where did Davies, Reid, Mcardle, Mchugh, Doyle and Jones come from. He also brought Atkinson and Hines in who played important roles last season and some fans wanted us to keep.

As for those he brought in last summer, they Couldnt dislodge existing players who deserve the credit for keeping their places. However, De vita looks good but has been injured for weeks. Taylor also injured or both of these could have played more games recently. Kennedy was the only signing that looks poor but so what, some things dont work out.

More recently, Reach, Bennett and Dolan have all contributed to securing our league one status so all of this nonsense about not being able to recruit is just nonsense.
[quote][p][bold]gordon ramsay[/bold] wrote: Right Peter300..... Instead of posting pathetic tag ons to other peoples thoughts, let's have YOUR thoughts. As a starter Peter... 1. How good is our recruitment since 2013 when we signed Gray and Nelson 2. Would you trust Parky to rebuild the squad with his recent record on signings 3. To say McLean was our first choice to replace Wells ... Do you think he's a good signing? Just wondering if you have anything original to say?[/p][/quote]Surely the fact that we are 12th is what matters. If PP cant recruit then where did Davies, Reid, Mcardle, Mchugh, Doyle and Jones come from. He also brought Atkinson and Hines in who played important roles last season and some fans wanted us to keep. As for those he brought in last summer, they Couldnt dislodge existing players who deserve the credit for keeping their places. However, De vita looks good but has been injured for weeks. Taylor also injured or both of these could have played more games recently. Kennedy was the only signing that looks poor but so what, some things dont work out. More recently, Reach, Bennett and Dolan have all contributed to securing our league one status so all of this nonsense about not being able to recruit is just nonsense. KnightMcCall
  • Score: -5

12:46pm Tue 8 Apr 14

gordon ramsay says...

KnightMcCall wrote:
gordon ramsay wrote: Right Peter300..... Instead of posting pathetic tag ons to other peoples thoughts, let's have YOUR thoughts. As a starter Peter... 1. How good is our recruitment since 2013 when we signed Gray and Nelson 2. Would you trust Parky to rebuild the squad with his recent record on signings 3. To say McLean was our first choice to replace Wells ... Do you think he's a good signing? Just wondering if you have anything original to say?
Surely the fact that we are 12th is what matters. If PP cant recruit then where did Davies, Reid, Mcardle, Mchugh, Doyle and Jones come from. He also brought Atkinson and Hines in who played important roles last season and some fans wanted us to keep. As for those he brought in last summer, they Couldnt dislodge existing players who deserve the credit for keeping their places. However, De vita looks good but has been injured for weeks. Taylor also injured or both of these could have played more games recently. Kennedy was the only signing that looks poor but so what, some things dont work out. More recently, Reach, Bennett and Dolan have all contributed to securing our league one status so all of this nonsense about not being able to recruit is just nonsense.
I am not a parky hater. However, his recruitment throughout 2013 was horrendous.

The players signed could not dislodge the other players for 1 reason... they were rubbish!!!!!! thats what poor recruitment is!!

2012 recruitment was excelent (jones, darby, davies, doyle, etc etc)

2013 recruitment was absoltely shocking (gray,nelson, taylor, yeates, folan, de vita, kennedy, graham etc etc etc and worst of all mclean!!)

i reserve judgement on the most recent ones
[quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gordon ramsay[/bold] wrote: Right Peter300..... Instead of posting pathetic tag ons to other peoples thoughts, let's have YOUR thoughts. As a starter Peter... 1. How good is our recruitment since 2013 when we signed Gray and Nelson 2. Would you trust Parky to rebuild the squad with his recent record on signings 3. To say McLean was our first choice to replace Wells ... Do you think he's a good signing? Just wondering if you have anything original to say?[/p][/quote]Surely the fact that we are 12th is what matters. If PP cant recruit then where did Davies, Reid, Mcardle, Mchugh, Doyle and Jones come from. He also brought Atkinson and Hines in who played important roles last season and some fans wanted us to keep. As for those he brought in last summer, they Couldnt dislodge existing players who deserve the credit for keeping their places. However, De vita looks good but has been injured for weeks. Taylor also injured or both of these could have played more games recently. Kennedy was the only signing that looks poor but so what, some things dont work out. More recently, Reach, Bennett and Dolan have all contributed to securing our league one status so all of this nonsense about not being able to recruit is just nonsense.[/p][/quote]I am not a parky hater. However, his recruitment throughout 2013 was horrendous. The players signed could not dislodge the other players for 1 reason... they were rubbish!!!!!! thats what poor recruitment is!! 2012 recruitment was excelent (jones, darby, davies, doyle, etc etc) 2013 recruitment was absoltely shocking (gray,nelson, taylor, yeates, folan, de vita, kennedy, graham etc etc etc and worst of all mclean!!) i reserve judgement on the most recent ones gordon ramsay
  • Score: 1

10:44pm Tue 8 Apr 14

KnightMcCall says...

gordon ramsay wrote:
KnightMcCall wrote:
gordon ramsay wrote: Right Peter300..... Instead of posting pathetic tag ons to other peoples thoughts, let's have YOUR thoughts. As a starter Peter... 1. How good is our recruitment since 2013 when we signed Gray and Nelson 2. Would you trust Parky to rebuild the squad with his recent record on signings 3. To say McLean was our first choice to replace Wells ... Do you think he's a good signing? Just wondering if you have anything original to say?
Surely the fact that we are 12th is what matters. If PP cant recruit then where did Davies, Reid, Mcardle, Mchugh, Doyle and Jones come from. He also brought Atkinson and Hines in who played important roles last season and some fans wanted us to keep. As for those he brought in last summer, they Couldnt dislodge existing players who deserve the credit for keeping their places. However, De vita looks good but has been injured for weeks. Taylor also injured or both of these could have played more games recently. Kennedy was the only signing that looks poor but so what, some things dont work out. More recently, Reach, Bennett and Dolan have all contributed to securing our league one status so all of this nonsense about not being able to recruit is just nonsense.
I am not a parky hater. However, his recruitment throughout 2013 was horrendous.

The players signed could not dislodge the other players for 1 reason... they were rubbish!!!!!! thats what poor recruitment is!!

2012 recruitment was excelent (jones, darby, davies, doyle, etc etc)

2013 recruitment was absoltely shocking (gray,nelson, taylor, yeates, folan, de vita, kennedy, graham etc etc etc and worst of all mclean!!)

i reserve judgement on the most recent ones
How you can class any performance that led to promotion and then survival as shocking is beyond me. If the signings drove the squad on then great (and it did). We have a squad and both Yeates and De vita were good signings when they happened. You cannot judge signings after the event. Even Kennedy was well received when he signed. Based on the players PP has brought to the club and the success we have had it is ridiculous to say he cant sign good players. Its not like he has had a bundle of cash to spend.

As for reserving judgement...you mean that you are not willing to put your neck on the line until they either succeed or fail...the manager does not have that luxury. Hindsight is not a skill.
[quote][p][bold]gordon ramsay[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]gordon ramsay[/bold] wrote: Right Peter300..... Instead of posting pathetic tag ons to other peoples thoughts, let's have YOUR thoughts. As a starter Peter... 1. How good is our recruitment since 2013 when we signed Gray and Nelson 2. Would you trust Parky to rebuild the squad with his recent record on signings 3. To say McLean was our first choice to replace Wells ... Do you think he's a good signing? Just wondering if you have anything original to say?[/p][/quote]Surely the fact that we are 12th is what matters. If PP cant recruit then where did Davies, Reid, Mcardle, Mchugh, Doyle and Jones come from. He also brought Atkinson and Hines in who played important roles last season and some fans wanted us to keep. As for those he brought in last summer, they Couldnt dislodge existing players who deserve the credit for keeping their places. However, De vita looks good but has been injured for weeks. Taylor also injured or both of these could have played more games recently. Kennedy was the only signing that looks poor but so what, some things dont work out. More recently, Reach, Bennett and Dolan have all contributed to securing our league one status so all of this nonsense about not being able to recruit is just nonsense.[/p][/quote]I am not a parky hater. However, his recruitment throughout 2013 was horrendous. The players signed could not dislodge the other players for 1 reason... they were rubbish!!!!!! thats what poor recruitment is!! 2012 recruitment was excelent (jones, darby, davies, doyle, etc etc) 2013 recruitment was absoltely shocking (gray,nelson, taylor, yeates, folan, de vita, kennedy, graham etc etc etc and worst of all mclean!!) i reserve judgement on the most recent ones[/p][/quote]How you can class any performance that led to promotion and then survival as shocking is beyond me. If the signings drove the squad on then great (and it did). We have a squad and both Yeates and De vita were good signings when they happened. You cannot judge signings after the event. Even Kennedy was well received when he signed. Based on the players PP has brought to the club and the success we have had it is ridiculous to say he cant sign good players. Its not like he has had a bundle of cash to spend. As for reserving judgement...you mean that you are not willing to put your neck on the line until they either succeed or fail...the manager does not have that luxury. Hindsight is not a skill. KnightMcCall
  • Score: -2

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree