Salford owner Dr Marwan Koukash's wife to bid for Bradford Bulls

Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Dr Marwan Koukash, with Salford boss Brian Noble Dr Marwan Koukash, with Salford boss Brian Noble

Salford Red Devils owner Dr Marwan Koukash has revealed his wife is fronting a bid to buy the Bulls.

The one-time Palestinian refugee and wealthy racehorse owner, who bought Salford just over a year ago, took to Twitter to announce that Mandy Koukash was seeking to take control of Bradford.

Dr Koukash tweeted: “I had to do mine and the kids' tea tonight as my wife is busy finalising her bid to buy Bradford.

“I hope nothing will stand in her way. The bid is almost compete. Good luck to her. If my wife cannot buy Bradford, she would invest in the club.”

All offers for the Bulls must be lodged with Leeds-based administrator David Wilson by close of play today.

Dr Koukash’s involvement in a bid for the Bulls began to surface during the past fortnight and he used Twitter to deny that one of his six brothers was interested in buying the club.

However, he has now admitted his wife Mandy wants to take control while reiterating his own commitment to Salford.

Dr Koukash, when speaking to the T&A last week, spoke of the potential to revive the fortunes of the Bulls.

He said: “The potential at Bradford is huge. There were nearly 6,000 people there for the last home game against London Broncos, despite all the difficulties.

“The club has been raped of its best assets, but people are still paying their hard-earned money and turning up through the turnstiles.

“At any club, it's easy to build a team. It's a lot more difficult to build a fanbase. But the fanbase is there at Bradford.

“It would be quite easy for Bradford to be playing in front of 15,000 people week in and week out if they had the team.”

Dr Koukash also said that Francis Cummins’ men were more than capable of surviving relegation despite their six-point deduction and loss of Garreth Carvell, Jarrod Sammut and Nick Scruton.

He added: “There are people saying that Bradford being relegated is a foregone conclusion because of the six points.

“But I totally disagree because they have already won two games and are more than capable of beating those clubs again.

“They need to get it (the ownership situation) resolved very quickly because the longer they leave it in the hands of the administrator then the more people will walk away from the club.

“You will always have vultures circling the club and trying to take players at a knockdown price.”

Rival bidders include representatives from Bradford Park Avenue, Bradford City, London-based businessman Richard Lamb and former owner Omar Khan.

Debenture holder Marc Green, of Leeds-based Safeguard Security Group, has been a key figure in negotiations behind the scenes with the administrator, the RFL and prospective buyers.

Comments (67)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:26pm Wed 12 Mar 14

bradfordbronco says...

Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.
Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future. bradfordbronco
  • Score: 30

2:42am Thu 13 Mar 14

puddin says...

Why is Omar Khan in the running thought he was ill.
Why is Omar Khan in the running thought he was ill. puddin
  • Score: 30

7:02am Thu 13 Mar 14

Loadofbull70 says...

bradfordbronco wrote:
Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.
Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.
[quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.[/p][/quote]Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league. Loadofbull70
  • Score: 11

7:13am Thu 13 Mar 14

Bowlingboy says...

Well I didn't see that coming.....
here's to better things!
With regards to ok lets hope an embezzlement investigation catches up with that guy sooner rather than later. ....
Well I didn't see that coming..... here's to better things! With regards to ok lets hope an embezzlement investigation catches up with that guy sooner rather than later. .... Bowlingboy
  • Score: 24

7:29am Thu 13 Mar 14

bradfordbronco says...

Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.
Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.
Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.
[quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.[/p][/quote]Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.[/p][/quote]Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash. bradfordbronco
  • Score: -3

7:45am Thu 13 Mar 14

Bulls2014 says...

if mandy koukash gets the club .. this could be massive !!!!!!
they would clear all the debt .... then the rfl could look at getting the -6 wiped off.

next season we could buy the likes of sonny bill wiliams !!! it is well known thr dr wanted to buy players like this .... if they have a joint bank account its great news for the bulls !!!!!!!!!
if mandy koukash gets the club .. this could be massive !!!!!! they would clear all the debt .... then the rfl could look at getting the -6 wiped off. next season we could buy the likes of sonny bill wiliams !!! it is well known thr dr wanted to buy players like this .... if they have a joint bank account its great news for the bulls !!!!!!!!! Bulls2014
  • Score: 3

7:54am Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.
The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife. Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: 27

8:02am Thu 13 Mar 14

BD16 says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.
Got to admit those were my first thoughts as well. I'd be worried if I were a Salford fan this morning.
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.[/p][/quote]Got to admit those were my first thoughts as well. I'd be worried if I were a Salford fan this morning. BD16
  • Score: 19

8:06am Thu 13 Mar 14

Sheffieldbull says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.
I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least.

I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect!

Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.[/p][/quote]I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least. I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect! Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks. Sheffieldbull
  • Score: 21

8:22am Thu 13 Mar 14

spanglishbull.uk says...

Sheff,
Ignore T.V.O.R,the fellow is an imbecile.He will be praying today that Mrs Koukash does not take over the Bulls.It will absolutely ruin whatever life he has.
Sheff, Ignore T.V.O.R,the fellow is an imbecile.He will be praying today that Mrs Koukash does not take over the Bulls.It will absolutely ruin whatever life he has. spanglishbull.uk
  • Score: 7

8:27am Thu 13 Mar 14

Bull4eva says...

Sheffieldbull wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.
I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least.

I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect!

Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.
Where's the negativity of TVOR post?? Also both Gary and Kath don't own clubs where as Mrs Koukash will.. They are both CEO's.
[quote][p][bold]Sheffieldbull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.[/p][/quote]I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least. I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect! Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.[/p][/quote]Where's the negativity of TVOR post?? Also both Gary and Kath don't own clubs where as Mrs Koukash will.. They are both CEO's. Bull4eva
  • Score: 3

8:33am Thu 13 Mar 14

Bowlingboy says...

It can only be a positive.
If you look at the current situation it couldn't possibly get any worse.
So the only way is up!
It can only be a positive. If you look at the current situation it couldn't possibly get any worse. So the only way is up! Bowlingboy
  • Score: 15

8:44am Thu 13 Mar 14

grafter1980 says...

If the KouKash's get involved will be very interested to hear the appraisal of what's gone on over the last 18 months. Not one to mince his words. Good News - there might be a plan involving putting money into the club not endless construction of smoke and mirrors.
If the KouKash's get involved will be very interested to hear the appraisal of what's gone on over the last 18 months. Not one to mince his words. Good News - there might be a plan involving putting money into the club not endless construction of smoke and mirrors. grafter1980
  • Score: 15

8:47am Thu 13 Mar 14

spanglishbull.uk says...

Bull4eva,
T.V.O.R says Dr Koukash would own 2 clubs.Not true.His wife would own one,he would own one.There is the negativity.Have you never heard of Husband and Wife running different companies before.
Bull4eva, T.V.O.R says Dr Koukash would own 2 clubs.Not true.His wife would own one,he would own one.There is the negativity.Have you never heard of Husband and Wife running different companies before. spanglishbull.uk
  • Score: -4

8:48am Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

Bull4eva wrote:
Sheffieldbull wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.
I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least.

I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect!

Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.
Where's the negativity of TVOR post?? Also both Gary and Kath don't own clubs where as Mrs Koukash will.. They are both CEO's.
They get in a beef about me and look for things that aren't there.
I was pointing out what is clearly obvious, he can't own 2 clubs but this way he can.
For the record and my opinion on this, this is the only one I see with any legs. The other bids I see as simply returning the Bulls to the same situation they are in now.
The Dr could put his dog in charge for all I care if he is pulling the strings behind the scenes. It appears the only viable route forward.
[quote][p][bold]Bull4eva[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheffieldbull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.[/p][/quote]I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least. I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect! Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.[/p][/quote]Where's the negativity of TVOR post?? Also both Gary and Kath don't own clubs where as Mrs Koukash will.. They are both CEO's.[/p][/quote]They get in a beef about me and look for things that aren't there. I was pointing out what is clearly obvious, he can't own 2 clubs but this way he can. For the record and my opinion on this, this is the only one I see with any legs. The other bids I see as simply returning the Bulls to the same situation they are in now. The Dr could put his dog in charge for all I care if he is pulling the strings behind the scenes. It appears the only viable route forward. Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: 8

8:51am Thu 13 Mar 14

Sheffieldbull says...

Bull4eva wrote:
Sheffieldbull wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.
I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least.

I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect!

Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.
Where's the negativity of TVOR post?? Also both Gary and Kath don't own clubs where as Mrs Koukash will.. They are both CEO's.
You need to revisit your thinking here pal. I never suggested they own Clubs (well, not since Sheffield) They would if they had the sort of funds that the Koukash’s have at their disposal.
So, you are confident TVOR isn’t looking for negatives eh? Good luck with that!
[quote][p][bold]Bull4eva[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheffieldbull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.[/p][/quote]I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least. I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect! Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.[/p][/quote]Where's the negativity of TVOR post?? Also both Gary and Kath don't own clubs where as Mrs Koukash will.. They are both CEO's.[/p][/quote]You need to revisit your thinking here pal. I never suggested they own Clubs (well, not since Sheffield) They would if they had the sort of funds that the Koukash’s have at their disposal. So, you are confident TVOR isn’t looking for negatives eh? Good luck with that! Sheffieldbull
  • Score: 3

8:51am Thu 13 Mar 14

Sad bull says...

Sheffieldbull wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.
I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least.

I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect!

Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.
My thoughts exactly but what's good for the goose etc etc.
[quote][p][bold]Sheffieldbull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: The headline would be more accurate if it said, the Dr wants to own 2 clubs, one in the name of his wife.[/p][/quote]I was wondering how you would try and attach some sort of negative spin on this story – weak to say the least. I for one do not care who buys the Club, as long as somebody does. If that somebody who takes over the Bulls, has investment and passion, coupled with sound business acumen – that would be perfect! Shades of Gary and Kath here methinks.[/p][/quote]My thoughts exactly but what's good for the goose etc etc. Sad bull
  • Score: -2

8:53am Thu 13 Mar 14

The Man From the Pru says...

Bull4eva this taken from an article in the YEP,

Gary Hetherington is chief executive of Leeds Carnegie RUFC and Leeds Rugby Ltd, as well as an OWNER and operator of Headingley Carnegie Stadium and Leeds Rhinos.

Kath Hetherington had a major stake in Hull, which she sold to Adam Pearson two years ago.

What more can be said.
Bull4eva this taken from an article in the YEP, Gary Hetherington is chief executive of Leeds Carnegie RUFC and Leeds Rugby Ltd, as well as an OWNER and operator of Headingley Carnegie Stadium and Leeds Rhinos. Kath Hetherington had a major stake in Hull, which she sold to Adam Pearson two years ago. What more can be said. The Man From the Pru
  • Score: 1

9:04am Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6.
Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways? Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: 11

9:22am Thu 13 Mar 14

spanglishbull.uk says...

T.V.O.R.
Never thought I would agree with you on any point but I fully agree with you on your point.Would the RFL want somebody with passion to take the game forward?In my opinion they will see it as a threat to the old regime but will they try to block it? That is another question.If it came to fruition that the bid was the best and accepted by the Administrator I believe they would have a lot more explaining to do and maybe more Court appearances.By the way regarding the "Golden Ticket" I thought I had read that the vote was 7-5 against with two clubs Bradford and Catalan not there to vote.Could be a stalemate now with a revote.
T.V.O.R. Never thought I would agree with you on any point but I fully agree with you on your point.Would the RFL want somebody with passion to take the game forward?In my opinion they will see it as a threat to the old regime but will they try to block it? That is another question.If it came to fruition that the bid was the best and accepted by the Administrator I believe they would have a lot more explaining to do and maybe more Court appearances.By the way regarding the "Golden Ticket" I thought I had read that the vote was 7-5 against with two clubs Bradford and Catalan not there to vote.Could be a stalemate now with a revote. spanglishbull.uk
  • Score: 2

9:22am Thu 13 Mar 14

Lythambull says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6.
Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
It's a possibility, but the pressure on the RFL now that the Koukash bid is out there must be enormous. Shrewd business indeed by the doctor. Hope it comes off for them but I'm holding off from a chorus of "We're in the money" until all the bids are dealt with and a decision has been formalised.
Either way, Koukash has been a breath of fresh air for the sport and I hope he continues to reinvigorate it long after the dust settles around our ownership troubles.
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?[/p][/quote]It's a possibility, but the pressure on the RFL now that the Koukash bid is out there must be enormous. Shrewd business indeed by the doctor. Hope it comes off for them but I'm holding off from a chorus of "We're in the money" until all the bids are dealt with and a decision has been formalised. Either way, Koukash has been a breath of fresh air for the sport and I hope he continues to reinvigorate it long after the dust settles around our ownership troubles. Lythambull
  • Score: 12

9:35am Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

spanglishbull.uk wrote:
T.V.O.R.
Never thought I would agree with you on any point but I fully agree with you on your point.Would the RFL want somebody with passion to take the game forward?In my opinion they will see it as a threat to the old regime but will they try to block it? That is another question.If it came to fruition that the bid was the best and accepted by the Administrator I believe they would have a lot more explaining to do and maybe more Court appearances.By the way regarding the "Golden Ticket" I thought I had read that the vote was 7-5 against with two clubs Bradford and Catalan not there to vote.Could be a stalemate now with a revote.
The golden ticket idea was an reasonable idea at the wrong time.
It actively encouraged wreckless spending at a time London and Wakefield were close to admin and Bradford were in complete meltdown. It could never be backed and those that did back it were probably those who spend to the cap and feel they have surplus income or massive financial backing.
[quote][p][bold]spanglishbull.uk[/bold] wrote: T.V.O.R. Never thought I would agree with you on any point but I fully agree with you on your point.Would the RFL want somebody with passion to take the game forward?In my opinion they will see it as a threat to the old regime but will they try to block it? That is another question.If it came to fruition that the bid was the best and accepted by the Administrator I believe they would have a lot more explaining to do and maybe more Court appearances.By the way regarding the "Golden Ticket" I thought I had read that the vote was 7-5 against with two clubs Bradford and Catalan not there to vote.Could be a stalemate now with a revote.[/p][/quote]The golden ticket idea was an reasonable idea at the wrong time. It actively encouraged wreckless spending at a time London and Wakefield were close to admin and Bradford were in complete meltdown. It could never be backed and those that did back it were probably those who spend to the cap and feel they have surplus income or massive financial backing. Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: 6

9:37am Thu 13 Mar 14

flashdonut says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6.
Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
Love him or hate him, TVOR is on the money here. Don't let previous bickering blinker you people.
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?[/p][/quote]Love him or hate him, TVOR is on the money here. Don't let previous bickering blinker you people. flashdonut
  • Score: 5

9:52am Thu 13 Mar 14

AUGUST1964 says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses.
See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt!
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?[/p][/quote]COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt! AUGUST1964
  • Score: 7

9:55am Thu 13 Mar 14

Videoref says...

Isn't it a change to see something positive and someone with a pound in their pocket showing a genuine interest in buying the club after all the c**p we've been through of late. COYB
Isn't it a change to see something positive and someone with a pound in their pocket showing a genuine interest in buying the club after all the c**p we've been through of late. COYB Videoref
  • Score: 12

10:04am Thu 13 Mar 14

Loadofbull70 says...

bradfordbronco wrote:
Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.
Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.
Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.
Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own.

Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option.

Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.
[quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.[/p][/quote]Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.[/p][/quote]Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.[/p][/quote]Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own. Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option. Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive. Loadofbull70
  • Score: 8

10:08am Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

AUGUST1964 wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses.
See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt!
Gotta love you Viking.
2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other.
BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person.
You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others.

Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?
[quote][p][bold]AUGUST1964[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?[/p][/quote]COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt![/p][/quote]Gotta love you Viking. 2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other. BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person. You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others. Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs? Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: 0

10:18am Thu 13 Mar 14

AUGUST1964 says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
AUGUST1964 wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt!
Gotta love you Viking. 2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other. BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person. You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others. Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?
Just admit it you copied it "just a thought", someone elses thoughts,you're a fraud and you know it.
Don't need brownie points,its just that other people have seen through you also.
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AUGUST1964[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?[/p][/quote]COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt![/p][/quote]Gotta love you Viking. 2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other. BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person. You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others. Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?[/p][/quote]Just admit it you copied it "just a thought", someone elses thoughts,you're a fraud and you know it. Don't need brownie points,its just that other people have seen through you also. AUGUST1964
  • Score: -2

10:19am Thu 13 Mar 14

BCFC LAD says says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
AUGUST1964 wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses.
See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt!
Gotta love you Viking.
2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other.
BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person.
You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others.

Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?
Same applies to Leeds and Wakefield, Wakefield needing to win to avoid relegation or Leeds needing to win to guarantee a top 4 spot, not even to think about meeting in the Challenge cup. The precedent is already there.
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AUGUST1964[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?[/p][/quote]COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt![/p][/quote]Gotta love you Viking. 2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other. BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person. You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others. Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?[/p][/quote]Same applies to Leeds and Wakefield, Wakefield needing to win to avoid relegation or Leeds needing to win to guarantee a top 4 spot, not even to think about meeting in the Challenge cup. The precedent is already there. BCFC LAD says
  • Score: 0

10:20am Thu 13 Mar 14

Bone_idle18 says...

Iuess he wants a bigger club, and will ditch Salford once the Bulls are back where they belong. In so doing, we'll get a lot of salfords good palyers too.

I think his(her) first job is to secure SL next year, then expect alford to be sold and Buklls to reap the benefits.

He's bound to want a club with 10,000plus crowds rather than 4000 crowds.

I think, with the Koucash's on board, we'd be back in the big 4 in a couple of years.
Iuess he wants a bigger club, and will ditch Salford once the Bulls are back where they belong. In so doing, we'll get a lot of salfords good palyers too. I think his(her) first job is to secure SL next year, then expect alford to be sold and Buklls to reap the benefits. He's bound to want a club with 10,000plus crowds rather than 4000 crowds. I think, with the Koucash's on board, we'd be back in the big 4 in a couple of years. Bone_idle18
  • Score: -5

10:25am Thu 13 Mar 14

Andybulls says...

The RFL have clearly shown that they are trying to put Dr Koukash in his place by fining him £1000 for swearing when no complaint was raised. They said he has a responsibility to behave in a particular way as Chairman. They didn't fine the last 3 chairmen and I think their behaviour could be deemed to be far worse than swearing! The good Dr has been quoted as saying that if his wife cannot buy the bulls she should invest. That is exactly what we need proper money invested. If we might then get the 6 points back and some additional cash to bring players in, we ouldt have a chance of staying up.
The RFL have clearly shown that they are trying to put Dr Koukash in his place by fining him £1000 for swearing when no complaint was raised. They said he has a responsibility to behave in a particular way as Chairman. They didn't fine the last 3 chairmen and I think their behaviour could be deemed to be far worse than swearing! The good Dr has been quoted as saying that if his wife cannot buy the bulls she should invest. That is exactly what we need proper money invested. If we might then get the 6 points back and some additional cash to bring players in, we ouldt have a chance of staying up. Andybulls
  • Score: 5

10:34am Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

AUGUST1964 wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
AUGUST1964 wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt!
Gotta love you Viking. 2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other. BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person. You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others. Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?
Just admit it you copied it "just a thought", someone elses thoughts,you're a fraud and you know it.
Don't need brownie points,its just that other people have seen through you also.
I have a brain in my head and I can think for myself not tow the line and say what everyone would like to hear to make myself popular or one of the clique.
It's an obvious problem, every club gets a vote but if 2 votes are connected there is a conflict. For their ideas there are 2 votes off the bat.
For what it is worth I think Koukash is looking for a bigger club than Salford because the market of Manchester that he thought he could break into doesn't exist. So the Bulls with upwards of 15k fans when successful is bound to be of interest.
Sorry if that has already been mentioned elsewhere as it's rare 2 people might have the same opinion.
[quote][p][bold]AUGUST1964[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AUGUST1964[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?[/p][/quote]COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt![/p][/quote]Gotta love you Viking. 2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other. BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person. You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others. Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?[/p][/quote]Just admit it you copied it "just a thought", someone elses thoughts,you're a fraud and you know it. Don't need brownie points,its just that other people have seen through you also.[/p][/quote]I have a brain in my head and I can think for myself not tow the line and say what everyone would like to hear to make myself popular or one of the clique. It's an obvious problem, every club gets a vote but if 2 votes are connected there is a conflict. For their ideas there are 2 votes off the bat. For what it is worth I think Koukash is looking for a bigger club than Salford because the market of Manchester that he thought he could break into doesn't exist. So the Bulls with upwards of 15k fans when successful is bound to be of interest. Sorry if that has already been mentioned elsewhere as it's rare 2 people might have the same opinion. Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: 0

11:04am Thu 13 Mar 14

Bone_idle18 says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
AUGUST1964 wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
AUGUST1964 wrote:
Thee Voice of Reason wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?
COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt!
Gotta love you Viking. 2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other. BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person. You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others. Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?
Just admit it you copied it "just a thought", someone elses thoughts,you're a fraud and you know it.
Don't need brownie points,its just that other people have seen through you also.
I have a brain in my head and I can think for myself not tow the line and say what everyone would like to hear to make myself popular or one of the clique.
It's an obvious problem, every club gets a vote but if 2 votes are connected there is a conflict. For their ideas there are 2 votes off the bat.
For what it is worth I think Koukash is looking for a bigger club than Salford because the market of Manchester that he thought he could break into doesn't exist. So the Bulls with upwards of 15k fans when successful is bound to be of interest.
Sorry if that has already been mentioned elsewhere as it's rare 2 people might have the same opinion.
As they say "great minds think alike" :)
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AUGUST1964[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]AUGUST1964[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is a though, it is barely a week ago since the Dr's golden ticket idea was voted out by a vote of 9 to 5. So if his "wife" owned the Bulls and 2 smaller teams are relegated a revote my turn from 9 to 5 to 6 to 6. Just thinking out loud but would the RFL want someone with passion to take the game forward or would they see this as a threat and block it to stay in their old ways?[/p][/quote]COPIED almost word for word from a post by someone on RLFANS forum ,at least if you are trying to be clever do it with your own brain not someone elses. See Sheff and Spanglish, he's exposed again as a loud mouthed know-nowt![/p][/quote]Gotta love you Viking. 2 people coming up with the same conclusion so they are either the same person or copied each other. BD16 saw his wife as being the puppet in this take over too so we must be the same person. You get your brownie points in with the clique by trying to score points that aren't there to score and consider possibility of there being 6bn people in the world so some might end up with the same conclusions as others. Here is another though, you'll have to forgive me if someone comes up with the same theory but the RFL might see this as a conflict of interests. Say if Salford needed to beat Bradford to make the playoffs. What would the RFL and everyone else to that matter think if Bulls laid down for them with man and wife running both clubs?[/p][/quote]Just admit it you copied it "just a thought", someone elses thoughts,you're a fraud and you know it. Don't need brownie points,its just that other people have seen through you also.[/p][/quote]I have a brain in my head and I can think for myself not tow the line and say what everyone would like to hear to make myself popular or one of the clique. It's an obvious problem, every club gets a vote but if 2 votes are connected there is a conflict. For their ideas there are 2 votes off the bat. For what it is worth I think Koukash is looking for a bigger club than Salford because the market of Manchester that he thought he could break into doesn't exist. So the Bulls with upwards of 15k fans when successful is bound to be of interest. Sorry if that has already been mentioned elsewhere as it's rare 2 people might have the same opinion.[/p][/quote]As they say "great minds think alike" :) Bone_idle18
  • Score: -3

11:17am Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

Here is another thought.

Has the licence been transfered back to OK Bulls at this stage or is it still with BB2014? This could be key in what bid gets accepted and it would also explain why Omar Khan is once again sniffing round the scene.

If the licence was transfered on the basis of a 28day licence after that 28 days was it returned to the business it was orginally part of, OK Bulls who is being run by the administrator?

The key thing in this is based on what happened with Ken Bates at Leeds United. He owned enough of the debt to vote down CVA's etc going forward to secure himself the club. In a way this is what OK could do if he has suffient debt to push the vote through if a CVA is on the table to take the club back.

If they are simply bidding for the licence and assets of the club so that OK Bulls is then wound up I'm guessing that would have a different outcome.

My worry is OK has a claim on the club, but hopefully the RFL would not pass him fit and proper as he owned the club as it went into admin.

Did OK actually submit a bid last time? which was rejected does anyone know?
Here is another thought. Has the licence been transfered back to OK Bulls at this stage or is it still with BB2014? This could be key in what bid gets accepted and it would also explain why Omar Khan is once again sniffing round the scene. If the licence was transfered on the basis of a 28day licence after that 28 days was it returned to the business it was orginally part of, OK Bulls who is being run by the administrator? The key thing in this is based on what happened with Ken Bates at Leeds United. He owned enough of the debt to vote down CVA's etc going forward to secure himself the club. In a way this is what OK could do if he has suffient debt to push the vote through if a CVA is on the table to take the club back. If they are simply bidding for the licence and assets of the club so that OK Bulls is then wound up I'm guessing that would have a different outcome. My worry is OK has a claim on the club, but hopefully the RFL would not pass him fit and proper as he owned the club as it went into admin. Did OK actually submit a bid last time? which was rejected does anyone know? Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: -5

11:50am Thu 13 Mar 14

northern pig says...

I like His style.He maybe a Palestinian but he talks like a Yorkshire man,he tells it like it is and is not afraid of being controversial. A breath of fresh air. We can only hope his wife's bid is the winner and she shares his philosophy.
I like His style.He maybe a Palestinian but he talks like a Yorkshire man,he tells it like it is and is not afraid of being controversial. A breath of fresh air. We can only hope his wife's bid is the winner and she shares his philosophy. northern pig
  • Score: 15

11:56am Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

You have to love the Clique voting you down without offering an opinon of their own.

Serious question if anyone know, who is the current business behind the Bulls? Has it gone back to OK Bulls and the administrators or is it BB2014 still until further notice?
You have to love the Clique voting you down without offering an opinon of their own. Serious question if anyone know, who is the current business behind the Bulls? Has it gone back to OK Bulls and the administrators or is it BB2014 still until further notice? Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: -2

11:59am Thu 13 Mar 14

BierleyBoy says...

Koukash is a superb self publicist.
He's been linked with buying Oldham Athletic and Oldham rugby . He's rumoured to be investing in a ground for. Swinton Lions.
Now this with his wife at the Bulls. Everyone is talking about him, and so far he's only invested in one club. Nothing will come of the Bulls bid.
Koukash is a superb self publicist. He's been linked with buying Oldham Athletic and Oldham rugby . He's rumoured to be investing in a ground for. Swinton Lions. Now this with his wife at the Bulls. Everyone is talking about him, and so far he's only invested in one club. Nothing will come of the Bulls bid. BierleyBoy
  • Score: -10

12:01pm Thu 13 Mar 14

The Man From the Pru says...

This will put to rest the worries, of those, who think husband and wife can not own RL clubs. I suggest you follow the lead.

TVOR, still confused as to who the VIKING is I see. You have once again, plagerised the thoughts and posts of others. As has been said by others, never a kind word for the Bulls. I bet your face and those of other idiots on here, will be a right site, if and when Mrs Koukash, takes over the club.

http://www.therfl.co
.uk/news/article/297
41/koukash-wife-bull
s-bid-is
This will put to rest the worries, of those, who think husband and wife can not own RL clubs. I suggest you follow the lead. TVOR, still confused as to who the VIKING is I see. You have once again, plagerised the thoughts and posts of others. As has been said by others, never a kind word for the Bulls. I bet your face and those of other idiots on here, will be a right site, if and when Mrs Koukash, takes over the club. http://www.therfl.co .uk/news/article/297 41/koukash-wife-bull s-bid-is The Man From the Pru
  • Score: 0

12:02pm Thu 13 Mar 14

A650 says...

There is no business behind the Bulls as they stand now. The adminstrator is running the club. It's not OK or BB2014.

It's limbo until the administrator decides...and then it's up to the RFL. Quite a palarva.
There is no business behind the Bulls as they stand now. The adminstrator is running the club. It's not OK or BB2014. It's limbo until the administrator decides...and then it's up to the RFL. Quite a palarva. A650
  • Score: 7

12:10pm Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

The Man From the Pru wrote:
This will put to rest the worries, of those, who think husband and wife can not own RL clubs. I suggest you follow the lead. TVOR, still confused as to who the VIKING is I see. You have once again, plagerised the thoughts and posts of others. As has been said by others, never a kind word for the Bulls. I bet your face and those of other idiots on here, will be a right site, if and when Mrs Koukash, takes over the club. http://www.therfl.co .uk/news/article/297 41/koukash-wife-bull s-bid-is
You will see my face on the terraces if she does take over. I went to the Castleford game but before that I never went under the Khan & Sutcliffe era as I didn't believe a word coming out of Odsal and did not trust them with my money.
[quote][p][bold]The Man From the Pru[/bold] wrote: This will put to rest the worries, of those, who think husband and wife can not own RL clubs. I suggest you follow the lead. TVOR, still confused as to who the VIKING is I see. You have once again, plagerised the thoughts and posts of others. As has been said by others, never a kind word for the Bulls. I bet your face and those of other idiots on here, will be a right site, if and when Mrs Koukash, takes over the club. http://www.therfl.co .uk/news/article/297 41/koukash-wife-bull s-bid-is[/p][/quote]You will see my face on the terraces if she does take over. I went to the Castleford game but before that I never went under the Khan & Sutcliffe era as I didn't believe a word coming out of Odsal and did not trust them with my money. Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: -1

12:11pm Thu 13 Mar 14

grafter1980 says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
Here is another thought.

Has the licence been transfered back to OK Bulls at this stage or is it still with BB2014? This could be key in what bid gets accepted and it would also explain why Omar Khan is once again sniffing round the scene.

If the licence was transfered on the basis of a 28day licence after that 28 days was it returned to the business it was orginally part of, OK Bulls who is being run by the administrator?

The key thing in this is based on what happened with Ken Bates at Leeds United. He owned enough of the debt to vote down CVA's etc going forward to secure himself the club. In a way this is what OK could do if he has suffient debt to push the vote through if a CVA is on the table to take the club back.

If they are simply bidding for the licence and assets of the club so that OK Bulls is then wound up I'm guessing that would have a different outcome.

My worry is OK has a claim on the club, but hopefully the RFL would not pass him fit and proper as he owned the club as it went into admin.

Did OK actually submit a bid last time? which was rejected does anyone know?
Okay wont have that much debt in there, sure RFL have more. I assume he settled a good amount of it with ST sales money just before leaving, particually if RFL are already advancing extra money to pay wages.
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is another thought. Has the licence been transfered back to OK Bulls at this stage or is it still with BB2014? This could be key in what bid gets accepted and it would also explain why Omar Khan is once again sniffing round the scene. If the licence was transfered on the basis of a 28day licence after that 28 days was it returned to the business it was orginally part of, OK Bulls who is being run by the administrator? The key thing in this is based on what happened with Ken Bates at Leeds United. He owned enough of the debt to vote down CVA's etc going forward to secure himself the club. In a way this is what OK could do if he has suffient debt to push the vote through if a CVA is on the table to take the club back. If they are simply bidding for the licence and assets of the club so that OK Bulls is then wound up I'm guessing that would have a different outcome. My worry is OK has a claim on the club, but hopefully the RFL would not pass him fit and proper as he owned the club as it went into admin. Did OK actually submit a bid last time? which was rejected does anyone know?[/p][/quote]Okay wont have that much debt in there, sure RFL have more. I assume he settled a good amount of it with ST sales money just before leaving, particually if RFL are already advancing extra money to pay wages. grafter1980
  • Score: 0

12:43pm Thu 13 Mar 14

MeccaBingo1 says...

Best News in 5 years for the Bulls

Simple
Best News in 5 years for the Bulls Simple MeccaBingo1
  • Score: 9

12:46pm Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

If this did come off, I wonder how many who were shouting the RFL down for not letting Moore and Co have free reign and no special measures placed upon them will quietly thank them for dodging a massive bullet. Under BB2014 the club were never going to have the funds to be competitive and at best would be treading water.

Due the another of Moore tantrums, the club might actually get what it needs and put all this rubbish behind them.
If this did come off, I wonder how many who were shouting the RFL down for not letting Moore and Co have free reign and no special measures placed upon them will quietly thank them for dodging a massive bullet. Under BB2014 the club were never going to have the funds to be competitive and at best would be treading water. Due the another of Moore tantrums, the club might actually get what it needs and put all this rubbish behind them. Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: 5

1:22pm Thu 13 Mar 14

oddshapedballs says...

spanglishbull.uk wrote:
Bull4eva,
T.V.O.R says Dr Koukash would own 2 clubs.Not true.His wife would own one,he would own one.There is the negativity.Have you never heard of Husband and Wife running different companies before.
Tvor wasnt negative and I thought exactly the same. This isnt negative at all. Really hope it happens and as a salford fan id be worried as m.k aint too happy with the support they get so maybe its just a way to move over
[quote][p][bold]spanglishbull.uk[/bold] wrote: Bull4eva, T.V.O.R says Dr Koukash would own 2 clubs.Not true.His wife would own one,he would own one.There is the negativity.Have you never heard of Husband and Wife running different companies before.[/p][/quote]Tvor wasnt negative and I thought exactly the same. This isnt negative at all. Really hope it happens and as a salford fan id be worried as m.k aint too happy with the support they get so maybe its just a way to move over oddshapedballs
  • Score: -1

1:22pm Thu 13 Mar 14

oddshapedballs says...

spanglishbull.uk wrote:
Bull4eva,
T.V.O.R says Dr Koukash would own 2 clubs.Not true.His wife would own one,he would own one.There is the negativity.Have you never heard of Husband and Wife running different companies before.
Tvor wasnt negative and I thought exactly the same. This isnt negative at all. Really hope it happens and as a salford fan id be worried as m.k aint too happy with the support they get so maybe its just a way to move over
[quote][p][bold]spanglishbull.uk[/bold] wrote: Bull4eva, T.V.O.R says Dr Koukash would own 2 clubs.Not true.His wife would own one,he would own one.There is the negativity.Have you never heard of Husband and Wife running different companies before.[/p][/quote]Tvor wasnt negative and I thought exactly the same. This isnt negative at all. Really hope it happens and as a salford fan id be worried as m.k aint too happy with the support they get so maybe its just a way to move over oddshapedballs
  • Score: 1

1:23pm Thu 13 Mar 14

taurusthebull says...

BierleyBoy wrote:
Koukash is a superb self publicist.
He's been linked with buying Oldham Athletic and Oldham rugby . He's rumoured to be investing in a ground for. Swinton Lions.
Now this with his wife at the Bulls. Everyone is talking about him, and so far he's only invested in one club. Nothing will come of the Bulls bid.
Bierleyboy, your almost right in what you say, his offer to buy Oldham Athletic was rejected by the board there, because , the Doc wanted to pull down Boundary Park, and build a brand new stadium for ORLFC & OAFC to share, but the board in their infinite wisdom turned it down on the basis of they were already in a redevelopment of said Boundary Park , and had spent a lot of monies in the process, and didn't think they would be recompensed , Blinkered or what !! K***heads. On the other hand the chairman at ORLFC would have snatched The Docs hand off . Have heard of the Swinton stadium , and await developments.
[quote][p][bold]BierleyBoy[/bold] wrote: Koukash is a superb self publicist. He's been linked with buying Oldham Athletic and Oldham rugby . He's rumoured to be investing in a ground for. Swinton Lions. Now this with his wife at the Bulls. Everyone is talking about him, and so far he's only invested in one club. Nothing will come of the Bulls bid.[/p][/quote]Bierleyboy, your almost right in what you say, his offer to buy Oldham Athletic was rejected by the board there, because , the Doc wanted to pull down Boundary Park, and build a brand new stadium for ORLFC & OAFC to share, but the board in their infinite wisdom turned it down on the basis of they were already in a redevelopment of said Boundary Park , and had spent a lot of monies in the process, and didn't think they would be recompensed , Blinkered or what !! K***heads. On the other hand the chairman at ORLFC would have snatched The Docs hand off . Have heard of the Swinton stadium , and await developments. taurusthebull
  • Score: 5

1:29pm Thu 13 Mar 14

StevieLad says...

The Man From the Pru wrote:
This will put to rest the worries, of those, who think husband and wife can not own RL clubs. I suggest you follow the lead.

TVOR, still confused as to who the VIKING is I see. You have once again, plagerised the thoughts and posts of others. As has been said by others, never a kind word for the Bulls. I bet your face and those of other idiots on here, will be a right site, if and when Mrs Koukash, takes over the club.

http://www.therfl.co

.uk/news/article/297

41/koukash-wife-bull

s-bid-is
You write just like Viking yourself, commas all over the place, gives away your age.

Either that or you read a serious amount of Dickens
[quote][p][bold]The Man From the Pru[/bold] wrote: This will put to rest the worries, of those, who think husband and wife can not own RL clubs. I suggest you follow the lead. TVOR, still confused as to who the VIKING is I see. You have once again, plagerised the thoughts and posts of others. As has been said by others, never a kind word for the Bulls. I bet your face and those of other idiots on here, will be a right site, if and when Mrs Koukash, takes over the club. http://www.therfl.co .uk/news/article/297 41/koukash-wife-bull s-bid-is[/p][/quote]You write just like Viking yourself, commas all over the place, gives away your age. Either that or you read a serious amount of Dickens StevieLad
  • Score: -4

1:33pm Thu 13 Mar 14

salford red says...

this man is good for rugby league he speaks his mind, and his sticks to his word. one post here said Salford fans should be worried.not at al,l and remember at this moment Salford red devils. the only club he and his family own in England.
the rfl need shaking up and men like him are needed in the game.
hope everything goes right for the bulls
this man is good for rugby league he speaks his mind, and his sticks to his word. one post here said Salford fans should be worried.not at al,l and remember at this moment Salford red devils. the only club he and his family own in England. the rfl need shaking up and men like him are needed in the game. hope everything goes right for the bulls salford red
  • Score: 24

1:38pm Thu 13 Mar 14

StevieLad says...

Thee Voice of Reason wrote:
Here is another thought.

Has the licence been transfered back to OK Bulls at this stage or is it still with BB2014? This could be key in what bid gets accepted and it would also explain why Omar Khan is once again sniffing round the scene.

If the licence was transfered on the basis of a 28day licence after that 28 days was it returned to the business it was orginally part of, OK Bulls who is being run by the administrator?

The key thing in this is based on what happened with Ken Bates at Leeds United. He owned enough of the debt to vote down CVA's etc going forward to secure himself the club. In a way this is what OK could do if he has suffient debt to push the vote through if a CVA is on the table to take the club back.

If they are simply bidding for the licence and assets of the club so that OK Bulls is then wound up I'm guessing that would have a different outcome.

My worry is OK has a claim on the club, but hopefully the RFL would not pass him fit and proper as he owned the club as it went into admin.

Did OK actually submit a bid last time? which was rejected does anyone know?
This is obviously lifted straight from SuperLeagueFans.com. Some of the words have changed and sentences jumbled around but I call shenanigans.

Potentially great news for the club, best news in ages but let's not let that get in the way of the traditional bickering. Where's the guy that shouts "BARRACK ROOM LAWYERS"?

A650, administrators come in to run a company in place of directors. There necessarily must be a company (or corporate entity) behind it. Just avoid that bit of misinformation.
[quote][p][bold]Thee Voice of Reason[/bold] wrote: Here is another thought. Has the licence been transfered back to OK Bulls at this stage or is it still with BB2014? This could be key in what bid gets accepted and it would also explain why Omar Khan is once again sniffing round the scene. If the licence was transfered on the basis of a 28day licence after that 28 days was it returned to the business it was orginally part of, OK Bulls who is being run by the administrator? The key thing in this is based on what happened with Ken Bates at Leeds United. He owned enough of the debt to vote down CVA's etc going forward to secure himself the club. In a way this is what OK could do if he has suffient debt to push the vote through if a CVA is on the table to take the club back. If they are simply bidding for the licence and assets of the club so that OK Bulls is then wound up I'm guessing that would have a different outcome. My worry is OK has a claim on the club, but hopefully the RFL would not pass him fit and proper as he owned the club as it went into admin. Did OK actually submit a bid last time? which was rejected does anyone know?[/p][/quote]This is obviously lifted straight from SuperLeagueFans.com. Some of the words have changed and sentences jumbled around but I call shenanigans. Potentially great news for the club, best news in ages but let's not let that get in the way of the traditional bickering. Where's the guy that shouts "BARRACK ROOM LAWYERS"? A650, administrators come in to run a company in place of directors. There necessarily must be a company (or corporate entity) behind it. Just avoid that bit of misinformation. StevieLad
  • Score: 3

2:03pm Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

The fat lady is no longer starting to sing. Viking is warming up with his rendition of "We're in the money" instead.

I give it 20min after the news in announced he will be back on these forum, that he doesn't read or look at anymore, (well he does just under the names August1964, The man from the Pru, etc).
The fat lady is no longer starting to sing. Viking is warming up with his rendition of "We're in the money" instead. I give it 20min after the news in announced he will be back on these forum, that he doesn't read or look at anymore, (well he does just under the names August1964, The man from the Pru, etc). Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: -1

2:23pm Thu 13 Mar 14

spanglishbull.uk says...

Stevie Lad,
I am here.I have already commented on this news.For the first time ever I have already said I agree with T.V.O.R.on some of his thoughts.One of the first comments.Go back to the beginning.Let us wait and see and hopefully it will be some good definite news and not wishful thinking.If you go back a week or two you will also read,inside info.Koukash in the mix.By the way my inside info.is genuine as anybody who knows who I am will tell you.
Stevie Lad, I am here.I have already commented on this news.For the first time ever I have already said I agree with T.V.O.R.on some of his thoughts.One of the first comments.Go back to the beginning.Let us wait and see and hopefully it will be some good definite news and not wishful thinking.If you go back a week or two you will also read,inside info.Koukash in the mix.By the way my inside info.is genuine as anybody who knows who I am will tell you. spanglishbull.uk
  • Score: 4

3:39pm Thu 13 Mar 14

northern pig says...

Some of the negative comments posted on this forum on a daily basis.by some of the regular subscribers makes me wonder if', they alternate between walking the floor and wringing their hands while reciteing woe is me and sat with a lap top on their knee chomping prozac.Come on, let's have some hope..
, It could be a good news day.I certainly hope so!
Some of the negative comments posted on this forum on a daily basis.by some of the regular subscribers makes me wonder if', they alternate between walking the floor and wringing their hands while reciteing woe is me and sat with a lap top on their knee chomping prozac.Come on, let's have some hope.. , It could be a good news day.I certainly hope so! northern pig
  • Score: 5

3:41pm Thu 13 Mar 14

StevieLad says...

spanglishbull.uk wrote:
Stevie Lad,
I am here.I have already commented on this news.For the first time ever I have already said I agree with T.V.O.R.on some of his thoughts.One of the first comments.Go back to the beginning.Let us wait and see and hopefully it will be some good definite news and not wishful thinking.If you go back a week or two you will also read,inside info.Koukash in the mix.By the way my inside info.is genuine as anybody who knows who I am will tell you.
I couldn't remember who it was who said it, sorry.

Yes, among the comments one does find the odd nugget of truth. Often a lot quicker than it appears above the "Comments" line! Fingers firmly crossed re the possible deal. It would lift the mood immeasurably
[quote][p][bold]spanglishbull.uk[/bold] wrote: Stevie Lad, I am here.I have already commented on this news.For the first time ever I have already said I agree with T.V.O.R.on some of his thoughts.One of the first comments.Go back to the beginning.Let us wait and see and hopefully it will be some good definite news and not wishful thinking.If you go back a week or two you will also read,inside info.Koukash in the mix.By the way my inside info.is genuine as anybody who knows who I am will tell you.[/p][/quote]I couldn't remember who it was who said it, sorry. Yes, among the comments one does find the odd nugget of truth. Often a lot quicker than it appears above the "Comments" line! Fingers firmly crossed re the possible deal. It would lift the mood immeasurably StevieLad
  • Score: -3

4:28pm Thu 13 Mar 14

Videoref says...

StevieLad wrote:
The Man From the Pru wrote:
This will put to rest the worries, of those, who think husband and wife can not own RL clubs. I suggest you follow the lead.

TVOR, still confused as to who the VIKING is I see. You have once again, plagerised the thoughts and posts of others. As has been said by others, never a kind word for the Bulls. I bet your face and those of other idiots on here, will be a right site, if and when Mrs Koukash, takes over the club.

http://www.therfl.co


.uk/news/article/297


41/koukash-wife-bull


s-bid-is
You write just like Viking yourself, commas all over the place, gives away your age.

Either that or you read a serious amount of Dickens
Or is educated?
[quote][p][bold]StevieLad[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]The Man From the Pru[/bold] wrote: This will put to rest the worries, of those, who think husband and wife can not own RL clubs. I suggest you follow the lead. TVOR, still confused as to who the VIKING is I see. You have once again, plagerised the thoughts and posts of others. As has been said by others, never a kind word for the Bulls. I bet your face and those of other idiots on here, will be a right site, if and when Mrs Koukash, takes over the club. http://www.therfl.co .uk/news/article/297 41/koukash-wife-bull s-bid-is[/p][/quote]You write just like Viking yourself, commas all over the place, gives away your age. Either that or you read a serious amount of Dickens[/p][/quote]Or is educated? Videoref
  • Score: 9

5:12pm Thu 13 Mar 14

Papa Smurfs Wig says...

Of course there won't be a conflict of interests, yeh right.
Bradford Park Avenue will want it so they can get a ground for free, Richard Lamb l don't really know. Bradford City seem to be the ones offering hrlp with having a ground and the council can cash in on Odsal.
Omar, does once bitten, twice shy spring to mind?
Of course there won't be a conflict of interests, yeh right. Bradford Park Avenue will want it so they can get a ground for free, Richard Lamb l don't really know. Bradford City seem to be the ones offering hrlp with having a ground and the council can cash in on Odsal. Omar, does once bitten, twice shy spring to mind? Papa Smurfs Wig
  • Score: -3

6:34pm Thu 13 Mar 14

Thee Voice of Reason says...

At least someone with sense has seen fit to switch the Leeds game to Thursday now not to clash with City.
At least someone with sense has seen fit to switch the Leeds game to Thursday now not to clash with City. Thee Voice of Reason
  • Score: -3

6:56pm Thu 13 Mar 14

bcfc1903 says...

If Dr Koukash's wife did get involved, that would be absolutely brilliant for Bradford Bulls and the fans. Hopefully it will happen because the club with that family's commitment to the sport and the club would bring much needed stability and ultimate success. Everyone in the game knows the potential the Bulls have with crowds of 15,000 and on occasions more when watching a successful team. Hope the Bulls can get this family involved.

Good luck for the game against the Giants.
If Dr Koukash's wife did get involved, that would be absolutely brilliant for Bradford Bulls and the fans. Hopefully it will happen because the club with that family's commitment to the sport and the club would bring much needed stability and ultimate success. Everyone in the game knows the potential the Bulls have with crowds of 15,000 and on occasions more when watching a successful team. Hope the Bulls can get this family involved. Good luck for the game against the Giants. bcfc1903
  • Score: 8

9:11pm Thu 13 Mar 14

axlef1963 says...

Could this be the end of our nightmare.If you look at it logically Mrs Koukash is the only one amongst the group of bidders who has any money to invest in the bulls properly.i hope it all goes through quickly know and on another poit ifalll the crediters are paid does that mean we get our points.heres hopeing COYB
Could this be the end of our nightmare.If you look at it logically Mrs Koukash is the only one amongst the group of bidders who has any money to invest in the bulls properly.i hope it all goes through quickly know and on another poit ifalll the crediters are paid does that mean we get our points.heres hopeing COYB axlef1963
  • Score: 4

11:54pm Thu 13 Mar 14

bradfordbronco says...

What does it matter whether TVOR copied the comments or thought of it himself. He is quite correct in what he says. I actually made the same point to someone this evening.. I'm not sure the RFL would want Koukash getting too much power. Lets face it his wife would be no more than a front for him.

The RFL want rid of Bradford anyway so will find a way to reject the bid. The thing is if the administrator accepts the bid and they pay off all the creditors then what grounds would the RFL have for rejecting the bid. Also they have to refund the 6 points since that was based on not paying any creditors off.

TVOR also asks who owns the club. The answer is the administrator acting for OK Bull Ltd. The players union leader recently confirmed that all the players contracts had been transferred back to OK Bulls Ltd from Bfd Bulls 2014 Ltd.

Mr Lamb seems quiet. I wouldn't rule him out of the equation although he didn't offer as good a deal to the administrator as Bfd Bulls 2014 Ltd did last time. So where does that leave him now.

Bfd Bulls 2014 Ltd did their best to sort the problems but had little money as they told us. Had the RFL given them more leeway I still think they were a good option as they had the bulls at heart and were quite willing to step aside if somebody like Koukash got involved.

As it stands at the moment Koukash could throw money at it just to upset the RFL. He has found a fan base is harder to build in Salford than attracting players. The Bulls would seem to be a better long term project if he wanted to invest in the stadium. He would have one of the best sites in the country. The opportunities at the bulls are massive and would appeal to his ambitious nature

We'll find out soon hopefully
What does it matter whether TVOR copied the comments or thought of it himself. He is quite correct in what he says. I actually made the same point to someone this evening.. I'm not sure the RFL would want Koukash getting too much power. Lets face it his wife would be no more than a front for him. The RFL want rid of Bradford anyway so will find a way to reject the bid. The thing is if the administrator accepts the bid and they pay off all the creditors then what grounds would the RFL have for rejecting the bid. Also they have to refund the 6 points since that was based on not paying any creditors off. TVOR also asks who owns the club. The answer is the administrator acting for OK Bull Ltd. The players union leader recently confirmed that all the players contracts had been transferred back to OK Bulls Ltd from Bfd Bulls 2014 Ltd. Mr Lamb seems quiet. I wouldn't rule him out of the equation although he didn't offer as good a deal to the administrator as Bfd Bulls 2014 Ltd did last time. So where does that leave him now. Bfd Bulls 2014 Ltd did their best to sort the problems but had little money as they told us. Had the RFL given them more leeway I still think they were a good option as they had the bulls at heart and were quite willing to step aside if somebody like Koukash got involved. As it stands at the moment Koukash could throw money at it just to upset the RFL. He has found a fan base is harder to build in Salford than attracting players. The Bulls would seem to be a better long term project if he wanted to invest in the stadium. He would have one of the best sites in the country. The opportunities at the bulls are massive and would appeal to his ambitious nature We'll find out soon hopefully bradfordbronco
  • Score: 1

12:05am Fri 14 Mar 14

bradfordbronco says...

Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.
Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.
Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.
Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own.

Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option.

Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.
Think you will find I never mentioned Koukash (Mr or Mrs) as being a non starter. I asked you to provide evidence and you haven't.

Anyway for the record BCFC, Bfd Park Ave and Omar khan and the security guard are non starters They all only want the club to syphon money off for themselves. We might as well just liquidate and cause maximum problems for the RFL.

Mr Lamb might be the favourite.although he's keeping very quiet about it this time. I hope the Koukash's do get the nod but i'm not convinced they're actually serious contenders. We'll probably find out long before you prove that i said the Koukash's are non starters. Over to you Loadofbull70 get researching!!
[quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.[/p][/quote]Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.[/p][/quote]Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.[/p][/quote]Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own. Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option. Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.[/p][/quote]Think you will find I never mentioned Koukash (Mr or Mrs) as being a non starter. I asked you to provide evidence and you haven't. Anyway for the record BCFC, Bfd Park Ave and Omar khan and the security guard are non starters They all only want the club to syphon money off for themselves. We might as well just liquidate and cause maximum problems for the RFL. Mr Lamb might be the favourite.although he's keeping very quiet about it this time. I hope the Koukash's do get the nod but i'm not convinced they're actually serious contenders. We'll probably find out long before you prove that i said the Koukash's are non starters. Over to you Loadofbull70 get researching!! bradfordbronco
  • Score: -1

7:08am Fri 14 Mar 14

cleckbull says...

This site should be for comments about about Bradford bulls
.....NOT pathetic arguments between losers saying he said she said etc etc
Its not a competition between yourselves...there's no prizes fools
Boring boring boring
This site should be for comments about about Bradford bulls .....NOT pathetic arguments between losers saying he said she said etc etc Its not a competition between yourselves...there's no prizes fools Boring boring boring cleckbull
  • Score: 6

7:10am Fri 14 Mar 14

flashdonut says...

Question. How much influence have the RFL got over this decision? Surely it is down to the creditor? As long as they fit the RFL firt & proper test then what can they sa?
Question. How much influence have the RFL got over this decision? Surely it is down to the creditor? As long as they fit the RFL firt & proper test then what can they sa? flashdonut
  • Score: 4

8:29am Fri 14 Mar 14

BD16 says...

bradfordbronco wrote:
Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.
Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.
Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.
Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own. Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option. Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.
Think you will find I never mentioned Koukash (Mr or Mrs) as being a non starter. I asked you to provide evidence and you haven't. Anyway for the record BCFC, Bfd Park Ave and Omar khan and the security guard are non starters They all only want the club to syphon money off for themselves. We might as well just liquidate and cause maximum problems for the RFL. Mr Lamb might be the favourite.although he's keeping very quiet about it this time. I hope the Koukash's do get the nod but i'm not convinced they're actually serious contenders. We'll probably find out long before you prove that i said the Koukash's are non starters. Over to you Loadofbull70 get researching!!
Talking of evidence: Can you provide some for your claims that BCFC, Park Avenue, Omar Khan and "The security guard" only want the Bulls so they can siphon off money?

Thought not.............
[quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.[/p][/quote]Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.[/p][/quote]Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.[/p][/quote]Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own. Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option. Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.[/p][/quote]Think you will find I never mentioned Koukash (Mr or Mrs) as being a non starter. I asked you to provide evidence and you haven't. Anyway for the record BCFC, Bfd Park Ave and Omar khan and the security guard are non starters They all only want the club to syphon money off for themselves. We might as well just liquidate and cause maximum problems for the RFL. Mr Lamb might be the favourite.although he's keeping very quiet about it this time. I hope the Koukash's do get the nod but i'm not convinced they're actually serious contenders. We'll probably find out long before you prove that i said the Koukash's are non starters. Over to you Loadofbull70 get researching!![/p][/quote]Talking of evidence: Can you provide some for your claims that BCFC, Park Avenue, Omar Khan and "The security guard" only want the Bulls so they can siphon off money? Thought not............. BD16
  • Score: -1

12:59pm Fri 14 Mar 14

StevieLad says...

flashdonut wrote:
Question. How much influence have the RFL got over this decision? Surely it is down to the creditor? As long as they fit the RFL firt & proper test then what can they sa?
They do own the lease on the ground, I think
[quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: Question. How much influence have the RFL got over this decision? Surely it is down to the creditor? As long as they fit the RFL firt & proper test then what can they sa?[/p][/quote]They do own the lease on the ground, I think StevieLad
  • Score: 0

2:12pm Fri 14 Mar 14

bradfordbronco says...

BD16 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.
Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.
Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.
Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own. Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option. Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.
Think you will find I never mentioned Koukash (Mr or Mrs) as being a non starter. I asked you to provide evidence and you haven't. Anyway for the record BCFC, Bfd Park Ave and Omar khan and the security guard are non starters They all only want the club to syphon money off for themselves. We might as well just liquidate and cause maximum problems for the RFL. Mr Lamb might be the favourite.although he's keeping very quiet about it this time. I hope the Koukash's do get the nod but i'm not convinced they're actually serious contenders. We'll probably find out long before you prove that i said the Koukash's are non starters. Over to you Loadofbull70 get researching!!
Talking of evidence: Can you provide some for your claims that BCFC, Park Avenue, Omar Khan and "The security guard" only want the Bulls so they can siphon off money?

Thought not.............
Hi BD16 it is getting a bit boring now like cleckbull points out, but I like to argue my corner. I can't provide evidence regarding my comments about BCFC etc as it is purely my opinion not factual evidence.

Loadofbull70 is arguing about something that he says I wrote which I clearly didn't. All I have done is ask him where I wrote it. He can't because I didn't. He's still upset with me because I made a sarcastic comment about one of his comments talking about the top 8 finish. Shall we draw a line under it now?
[quote][p][bold]BD16[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.[/p][/quote]Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.[/p][/quote]Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.[/p][/quote]Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own. Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option. Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.[/p][/quote]Think you will find I never mentioned Koukash (Mr or Mrs) as being a non starter. I asked you to provide evidence and you haven't. Anyway for the record BCFC, Bfd Park Ave and Omar khan and the security guard are non starters They all only want the club to syphon money off for themselves. We might as well just liquidate and cause maximum problems for the RFL. Mr Lamb might be the favourite.although he's keeping very quiet about it this time. I hope the Koukash's do get the nod but i'm not convinced they're actually serious contenders. We'll probably find out long before you prove that i said the Koukash's are non starters. Over to you Loadofbull70 get researching!![/p][/quote]Talking of evidence: Can you provide some for your claims that BCFC, Park Avenue, Omar Khan and "The security guard" only want the Bulls so they can siphon off money? Thought not.............[/p][/quote]Hi BD16 it is getting a bit boring now like cleckbull points out, but I like to argue my corner. I can't provide evidence regarding my comments about BCFC etc as it is purely my opinion not factual evidence. Loadofbull70 is arguing about something that he says I wrote which I clearly didn't. All I have done is ask him where I wrote it. He can't because I didn't. He's still upset with me because I made a sarcastic comment about one of his comments talking about the top 8 finish. Shall we draw a line under it now? bradfordbronco
  • Score: 0

3:57pm Fri 14 Mar 14

salford red says...

seemingly bulls you owe a lot to brian noble...it was he who urged the koukash family to have an interest....which it seemed they did not beoire brian nobles intervention....if brian n oble want a coaching t at the bulls.. I would be happy to see john kear at Salford red devils
seemingly bulls you owe a lot to brian noble...it was he who urged the koukash family to have an interest....which it seemed they did not beoire brian nobles intervention....if brian n oble want a coaching t at the bulls.. I would be happy to see john kear at Salford red devils salford red
  • Score: 0

7:12pm Fri 14 Mar 14

BD16 says...

bradfordbronco wrote:
BD16 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote:
Loadofbull70 wrote:
bradfordbronco wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.
Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.
Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.
Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own. Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option. Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.
Think you will find I never mentioned Koukash (Mr or Mrs) as being a non starter. I asked you to provide evidence and you haven't. Anyway for the record BCFC, Bfd Park Ave and Omar khan and the security guard are non starters They all only want the club to syphon money off for themselves. We might as well just liquidate and cause maximum problems for the RFL. Mr Lamb might be the favourite.although he's keeping very quiet about it this time. I hope the Koukash's do get the nod but i'm not convinced they're actually serious contenders. We'll probably find out long before you prove that i said the Koukash's are non starters. Over to you Loadofbull70 get researching!!
Talking of evidence: Can you provide some for your claims that BCFC, Park Avenue, Omar Khan and "The security guard" only want the Bulls so they can siphon off money?

Thought not.............
Hi BD16 it is getting a bit boring now like cleckbull points out, but I like to argue my corner. I can't provide evidence regarding my comments about BCFC etc as it is purely my opinion not factual evidence.

Loadofbull70 is arguing about something that he says I wrote which I clearly didn't. All I have done is ask him where I wrote it. He can't because I didn't. He's still upset with me because I made a sarcastic comment about one of his comments talking about the top 8 finish. Shall we draw a line under it now?
Fair point, and I apologise. I just read you asking for proof and then you made what seemed a baseless accusation. We all want the best for our teams and I hope it works out this time for the Bulls, I can appreciate what they've been through in the last few years.

Good luck for Sunday.
[quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BD16[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Loadofbull70[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bradfordbronco[/bold] wrote: Would be nice if someone with the passion of Koukash was involved. We don't necessarily need a millionaire looking to buy instant success, but we do need a millionaire who can take care of the cash flow problems so that the business can start to build on solid foundations and plan ahead for the future.[/p][/quote]Thought there was no chance of this muppet bronco ? A millionaire is exactly what we need who will inject cash fast. We need to get out of special measures & buy a squad who can compete to stay in super league.[/p][/quote]Thing i said BCFC, Park Ave and Omar Khan were non starters. Please check and get to me if i got it wrong.I never mentioned Mrs Koukash.[/p][/quote]Think you`ll find you said Koukash is a non starter ! problem when you back bit everybody else’s comments you need to look at your own. Enough time wasted on you ! This is a real possibility Robbie has done some great work here trying to get Mr Koukash involved this is a very rich family. He has quite rightly stuck his hat on Salford’s peg but has encouraged his wife to get involved. They have & are willing to put cash in which is something of a must if we are to survive. If this does not come off it will more than likely be Valley Parade and Bradford City ownership as it will be the only real viable option. Fingers crossed could be a dream end to a long nightmare for us True Bradford Bulls supporters. Fanny & the remaining players deserve better & if we can get some good quality additions to the squad I am sure we will survive.[/p][/quote]Think you will find I never mentioned Koukash (Mr or Mrs) as being a non starter. I asked you to provide evidence and you haven't. Anyway for the record BCFC, Bfd Park Ave and Omar khan and the security guard are non starters They all only want the club to syphon money off for themselves. We might as well just liquidate and cause maximum problems for the RFL. Mr Lamb might be the favourite.although he's keeping very quiet about it this time. I hope the Koukash's do get the nod but i'm not convinced they're actually serious contenders. We'll probably find out long before you prove that i said the Koukash's are non starters. Over to you Loadofbull70 get researching!![/p][/quote]Talking of evidence: Can you provide some for your claims that BCFC, Park Avenue, Omar Khan and "The security guard" only want the Bulls so they can siphon off money? Thought not.............[/p][/quote]Hi BD16 it is getting a bit boring now like cleckbull points out, but I like to argue my corner. I can't provide evidence regarding my comments about BCFC etc as it is purely my opinion not factual evidence. Loadofbull70 is arguing about something that he says I wrote which I clearly didn't. All I have done is ask him where I wrote it. He can't because I didn't. He's still upset with me because I made a sarcastic comment about one of his comments talking about the top 8 finish. Shall we draw a line under it now?[/p][/quote]Fair point, and I apologise. I just read you asking for proof and then you made what seemed a baseless accusation. We all want the best for our teams and I hope it works out this time for the Bulls, I can appreciate what they've been through in the last few years. Good luck for Sunday. BD16
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree