Bradford City striker Nahki Wells attracting Premier interest

Bradford City striker Wells attracting Premier interest

Wolves are thought to have been the mysterious bidder for Nahki Wells

James Meredith's Twitter pic where he revealed he had broken his right foot

First published in Sport
Last updated
Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Photograph of the Author by , Bradford City Reporter

Nahki Wells is still being tracked by a Premier League club as long-time admirers Wolves appeared to drop out of the race.

Aston Villa have been backed in to favourites for the City striker’s signature according to two leading bookmakers.

But the T&A understands that they are not the club involved – nor is it Sunderland, another team to be linked with him.

City insist they have received only one proper bid for Wells since the transfer window opened. It was an improvement on Peterborough’s, which was knocked back last summer, but still fell below what the club are looking for.

Two sides from the top flight had also registered an interest last week – and Julian Rhodes revealed that one of them remains very much in the picture.

Rhodes said: “One is still in the ring. They’ve been on to Phil (Parkinson) about Nahki and on that basis they could be coming in with something.

“We get inquiries every day but we’ve had no formal offers other than the one last week.”

Wolves are thought to have been the mysterious bidder after boss Kenny Jackett yesterday admitted defeat in their pursuit of the Bermudian.

Jackett, who is desperate to add a speedy striker to the Molineux ranks, said: “Some weeks ago we did enquire about Nahki Wells but I don’t think he will come to League One.

“His aims and ambitions are above our level but that particular enquiry was some weeks ago.”

Meanwhile, City have suffered another injury blow after James Meredith broke his foot.

Meredith suffered the injury in training yesterday and revealed the news last night on Twitter.

He posted a picture of his right foot in a protective boot before sending a tweet which read: "Didn't mean to keep anyone hanging, broke my foot today in training. Sorry guys."

Comments (75)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

7:46am Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: -2

8:01am Wed 8 Jan 14

rinkydink says...

All the best Mezza, but looks like we'll be getting a LB in the sales.

Cant see Parky keeping with McHugh at left back, as much as I rate the guy.

If Villa do want Nakhi then put a bid in and do it now. We need this saga over.
Not only is it boring its also disruptive to team and Nakhi himself.

Its also strange how things arent being reported on the official website, the rejected bid, mezza's foot..

Come on comms dept.. We dont want to rely on T&A to give us stories.. half of them are just that.
All the best Mezza, but looks like we'll be getting a LB in the sales. Cant see Parky keeping with McHugh at left back, as much as I rate the guy. If Villa do want Nakhi then put a bid in and do it now. We need this saga over. Not only is it boring its also disruptive to team and Nakhi himself. Its also strange how things arent being reported on the official website, the rejected bid, mezza's foot.. Come on comms dept.. We dont want to rely on T&A to give us stories.. half of them are just that. rinkydink
  • Score: -6

8:51am Wed 8 Jan 14

whisky1 says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue[/p][/quote]Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window whisky1
  • Score: 15

9:16am Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window
Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan.

Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings.

Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do!
[quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue[/p][/quote]Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window[/p][/quote]Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan. Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings. Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do! notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: 5

9:25am Wed 8 Jan 14

jamiejoe says...

that is a real blow for Meredith and the team, it looks like it will be the defence and attack that gets the mid-season shake up then ... and not the right midfield which most posters on here are craving.

let's hope we can get at least £2.5 million for Wells to help us to invest some more quality into the team ...
that is a real blow for Meredith and the team, it looks like it will be the defence and attack that gets the mid-season shake up then ... and not the right midfield which most posters on here are craving. let's hope we can get at least £2.5 million for Wells to help us to invest some more quality into the team ... jamiejoe
  • Score: 6

9:33am Wed 8 Jan 14

fatbloke says...

On the Syers story yesterday

I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often!

Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct.

So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.
On the Syers story yesterday I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often! Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct. So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's. fatbloke
  • Score: 2

9:33am Wed 8 Jan 14

Cityman23 says...

The Nahki Wells 'issue' is an important one and It's likely to dominate the back page until he leaves or the end of the transfer window arrives (which ever happens first). However, it would be taking our eyes of the ball if it was allowed to dominate the club's attention completely and distract from the main thing important to all City fans ie the matter of bringing in a replacement (in the short or long term) for 'NW'/and other fresh faces. Hopefully, this is also the view of Mr P and the other management at the club-I am sure it is!
The Nahki Wells 'issue' is an important one and It's likely to dominate the back page until he leaves or the end of the transfer window arrives (which ever happens first). However, it would be taking our eyes of the ball if it was allowed to dominate the club's attention completely and distract from the main thing important to all City fans ie the matter of bringing in a replacement (in the short or long term) for 'NW'/and other fresh faces. Hopefully, this is also the view of Mr P and the other management at the club-I am sure it is! Cityman23
  • Score: 2

9:48am Wed 8 Jan 14

passionate says...

jamiejoe wrote:
that is a real blow for Meredith and the team, it looks like it will be the defence and attack that gets the mid-season shake up then ... and not the right midfield which most posters on here are craving. let's hope we can get at least £2.5 million for Wells to help us to invest some more quality into the team ...
Nobody is bothered about the right midfield spot, right midfielders don't win or lose games as much as other positions. Most fans would say we need a goalscoring central midfielder and a striker...and now a left back.

Thompson and Yeates on the right are two of our best assets (have played at championship level) and the assists etc show that.
[quote][p][bold]jamiejoe[/bold] wrote: that is a real blow for Meredith and the team, it looks like it will be the defence and attack that gets the mid-season shake up then ... and not the right midfield which most posters on here are craving. let's hope we can get at least £2.5 million for Wells to help us to invest some more quality into the team ...[/p][/quote]Nobody is bothered about the right midfield spot, right midfielders don't win or lose games as much as other positions. Most fans would say we need a goalscoring central midfielder and a striker...and now a left back. Thompson and Yeates on the right are two of our best assets (have played at championship level) and the assists etc show that. passionate
  • Score: -2

9:56am Wed 8 Jan 14

whisky1 says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec


t
wrote:
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window
Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan.

Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings.

Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do!
I would not put Connell Oliver as dross who are to be moved on...Taylor we have not seen enough of but he was outstanding in his loan spell with Colchester. Any other players you want to have a pop at? As far as Rothers are concerned money is no object and they seem to have a clever way to avoid the cap (Sponsorship?) because their turnover cannot be enough to cover the players they have brought in. That is not to say that all PPs signings have been great but overall he has recruited well which is reflected in progress made over 2 seasons
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue[/p][/quote]Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window[/p][/quote]Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan. Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings. Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do![/p][/quote]I would not put Connell Oliver as dross who are to be moved on...Taylor we have not seen enough of but he was outstanding in his loan spell with Colchester. Any other players you want to have a pop at? As far as Rothers are concerned money is no object and they seem to have a clever way to avoid the cap (Sponsorship?) because their turnover cannot be enough to cover the players they have brought in. That is not to say that all PPs signings have been great but overall he has recruited well which is reflected in progress made over 2 seasons whisky1
  • Score: 8

10:04am Wed 8 Jan 14

fatbloke says...

On the Meredith story

Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if

1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20

2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set

So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM
On the Meredith story Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if 1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20 2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM fatbloke
  • Score: -2

10:06am Wed 8 Jan 14

fatbloke says...

On the Wells story

Hurry up and sell him and I hope it is Leeds or Huddersfield we rob blind
On the Wells story Hurry up and sell him and I hope it is Leeds or Huddersfield we rob blind fatbloke
  • Score: -8

10:11am Wed 8 Jan 14

Peter300 says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Yep, the headless chickens are up and running.
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue[/p][/quote]Yep, the headless chickens are up and running. Peter300
  • Score: 1

10:14am Wed 8 Jan 14

jamiejoe says...

Cityman23 wrote:
The Nahki Wells 'issue' is an important one and It's likely to dominate the back page until he leaves or the end of the transfer window arrives (which ever happens first). However, it would be taking our eyes of the ball if it was allowed to dominate the club's attention completely and distract from the main thing important to all City fans ie the matter of bringing in a replacement (in the short or long term) for 'NW'/and other fresh faces. Hopefully, this is also the view of Mr P and the other management at the club-I am sure it is!
I don't think we will see a replacement before he is actually sold
[quote][p][bold]Cityman23[/bold] wrote: The Nahki Wells 'issue' is an important one and It's likely to dominate the back page until he leaves or the end of the transfer window arrives (which ever happens first). However, it would be taking our eyes of the ball if it was allowed to dominate the club's attention completely and distract from the main thing important to all City fans ie the matter of bringing in a replacement (in the short or long term) for 'NW'/and other fresh faces. Hopefully, this is also the view of Mr P and the other management at the club-I am sure it is![/p][/quote]I don't think we will see a replacement before he is actually sold jamiejoe
  • Score: 3

10:15am Wed 8 Jan 14

Peter300 says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec


t
wrote:
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window
Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan.

Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings.

Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do!
What, just sign players for the sake of it? And it just shows the mentality of some people. Call the players dross who did so well last season and these people want to be taken seriously.
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue[/p][/quote]Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window[/p][/quote]Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan. Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings. Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do![/p][/quote]What, just sign players for the sake of it? And it just shows the mentality of some people. Call the players dross who did so well last season and these people want to be taken seriously. Peter300
  • Score: 8

10:16am Wed 8 Jan 14

Edinburgh -bantam says...

Tomorrow's headline " Will Nahki play against Bristol?"

Monday either "Nahki goes out on a high/ with a whimper"

or " I couldn't risk Nahki" says Parky.
Tomorrow's headline " Will Nahki play against Bristol?" Monday either "Nahki goes out on a high/ with a whimper" or " I couldn't risk Nahki" says Parky. Edinburgh -bantam
  • Score: 0

10:21am Wed 8 Jan 14

Peter300 says...

fatbloke wrote:
On the Syers story yesterday

I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often!

Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct.

So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.
Oh dear! You and your sources. And your source told you about this last season. And you never stopped moaning about it. I said when City were at Wembley last May, there is someone over there still rabbiting on about Dave Syers, can you believe that? People around me were just shaking their heads. The negative fan always finds something to complain about. Amazing that some people think Dave Syers is the only attacking midfielder in the country.
[quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Syers story yesterday I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often! Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct. So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.[/p][/quote]Oh dear! You and your sources. And your source told you about this last season. And you never stopped moaning about it. I said when City were at Wembley last May, there is someone over there still rabbiting on about Dave Syers, can you believe that? People around me were just shaking their heads. The negative fan always finds something to complain about. Amazing that some people think Dave Syers is the only attacking midfielder in the country. Peter300
  • Score: 2

10:24am Wed 8 Jan 14

whisky1 says...

fatbloke wrote:
On the Meredith story

Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if

1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20

2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set

So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM
Why don't you blame Reidy for global warming while your at it?
[quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Meredith story Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if 1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20 2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM[/p][/quote]Why don't you blame Reidy for global warming while your at it? whisky1
  • Score: 9

10:25am Wed 8 Jan 14

bcfc1903 says...

Don't see what the panic is. Can't see much happening til the Wells situation is resolved, he may go he may stay.

Good luck to James Meredith, hope you're a quick healer. Looks like a loanee left back will be first through the Valley Parade doors.
Don't see what the panic is. Can't see much happening til the Wells situation is resolved, he may go he may stay. Good luck to James Meredith, hope you're a quick healer. Looks like a loanee left back will be first through the Valley Parade doors. bcfc1903
  • Score: 1

10:28am Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

Peter300 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec



t
wrote:
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window
Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan.

Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings.

Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do!
What, just sign players for the sake of it? And it just shows the mentality of some people. Call the players dross who did so well last season and these people want to be taken seriously.
That's just the point though, the dross , most of whom don't even make our bench each week do need moving on as they are taking up wages we need for players who can improve the first team.

Taylor, Gray, Oliver, Kennedy, DeVita and Connell had very little or nothing to do with last years success so get your facts right.

Sorry but it is not okay to sit still and do nothing, perhaps if some of you actually went to games you would see where the issues are.

Parky is stuck in a hole right now and needs help from the board financially to get him out.
[quote][p][bold]Peter300[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue[/p][/quote]Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window[/p][/quote]Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan. Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings. Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do![/p][/quote]What, just sign players for the sake of it? And it just shows the mentality of some people. Call the players dross who did so well last season and these people want to be taken seriously.[/p][/quote]That's just the point though, the dross , most of whom don't even make our bench each week do need moving on as they are taking up wages we need for players who can improve the first team. Taylor, Gray, Oliver, Kennedy, DeVita and Connell had very little or nothing to do with last years success so get your facts right. Sorry but it is not okay to sit still and do nothing, perhaps if some of you actually went to games you would see where the issues are. Parky is stuck in a hole right now and needs help from the board financially to get him out. notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: -4

10:28am Wed 8 Jan 14

Peter300 says...

fatbloke wrote:
On the Meredith story

Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if

1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20

2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set

So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM
How simplistic can you get. I don't think Kyel Reid needs any help. Other team mates might need help from him. There are other ways to build-up play rather than always having the full-back at the wrong end of the pitch when City attack. Not everybody has to go charging up field every time City have the ball.
[quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Meredith story Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if 1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20 2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM[/p][/quote]How simplistic can you get. I don't think Kyel Reid needs any help. Other team mates might need help from him. There are other ways to build-up play rather than always having the full-back at the wrong end of the pitch when City attack. Not everybody has to go charging up field every time City have the ball. Peter300
  • Score: 1

10:31am Wed 8 Jan 14

Peter300 says...

fatbloke wrote:
On the Wells story

Hurry up and sell him and I hope it is Leeds or Huddersfield we rob blind
Don't forget that Halifax Bantam says Wells and Hanson off to Middlesbrough and Darby to Brighton. You heard this cast-iron piece of information from Halifax Bantam first. HB will give you the full breakdown.
[quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Wells story Hurry up and sell him and I hope it is Leeds or Huddersfield we rob blind[/p][/quote]Don't forget that Halifax Bantam says Wells and Hanson off to Middlesbrough and Darby to Brighton. You heard this cast-iron piece of information from Halifax Bantam first. HB will give you the full breakdown. Peter300
  • Score: 3

10:31am Wed 8 Jan 14

bcfc1903 says...

Kyle Reids a fine footballer but he's also a confidence player, back him and BCFC fans will see more of the type of displays he put on against Preston and Burton and many more games last season.
Kyle Reids a fine footballer but he's also a confidence player, back him and BCFC fans will see more of the type of displays he put on against Preston and Burton and many more games last season. bcfc1903
  • Score: 8

10:35am Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

Peter300 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Yep, the headless chickens are up and running.
Yes you of course know that all is fine.

One win in 14/15 games is pure relegation form. No Wells and Meredith out for weeks.

I am not being negative just stating the obvious. Perhaps you take too many Prozac tablets in the morning and think that all is okay.

Spoil your day in a minute when the Benefit Fraud investigators knock on your door ,FAW
[quote][p][bold]Peter300[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue[/p][/quote]Yep, the headless chickens are up and running.[/p][/quote]Yes you of course know that all is fine. One win in 14/15 games is pure relegation form. No Wells and Meredith out for weeks. I am not being negative just stating the obvious. Perhaps you take too many Prozac tablets in the morning and think that all is okay. Spoil your day in a minute when the Benefit Fraud investigators knock on your door ,FAW notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: 0

10:35am Wed 8 Jan 14

fatbloke says...

Peter300 wrote:
fatbloke wrote:
On the Syers story yesterday

I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often!

Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct.

So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.
Oh dear! You and your sources. And your source told you about this last season. And you never stopped moaning about it. I said when City were at Wembley last May, there is someone over there still rabbiting on about Dave Syers, can you believe that? People around me were just shaking their heads. The negative fan always finds something to complain about. Amazing that some people think Dave Syers is the only attacking midfielder in the country.
The way we set up suggests that PP doesn't l attack minded centre midfielders.

I am not been negative, tbh I couldn't care less if we gain promotion, get relegated or go bust. My desire for professional football does not exist these days.

My comment was in reply to people saying he may or may not come back or why he left in the first instance
[quote][p][bold]Peter300[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Syers story yesterday I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often! Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct. So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.[/p][/quote]Oh dear! You and your sources. And your source told you about this last season. And you never stopped moaning about it. I said when City were at Wembley last May, there is someone over there still rabbiting on about Dave Syers, can you believe that? People around me were just shaking their heads. The negative fan always finds something to complain about. Amazing that some people think Dave Syers is the only attacking midfielder in the country.[/p][/quote]The way we set up suggests that PP doesn't l attack minded centre midfielders. I am not been negative, tbh I couldn't care less if we gain promotion, get relegated or go bust. My desire for professional football does not exist these days. My comment was in reply to people saying he may or may not come back or why he left in the first instance fatbloke
  • Score: -11

10:37am Wed 8 Jan 14

fatbloke says...

whisky1 wrote:
fatbloke wrote:
On the Meredith story

Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if

1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20

2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set

So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM
Why don't you blame Reidy for global warming while your at it?
That would be silly
[quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Meredith story Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if 1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20 2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM[/p][/quote]Why don't you blame Reidy for global warming while your at it?[/p][/quote]That would be silly fatbloke
  • Score: 0

10:38am Wed 8 Jan 14

whisky1 says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
Peter300 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec


t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec




t
wrote:
Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue
Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window
Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan.

Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings.

Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do!
What, just sign players for the sake of it? And it just shows the mentality of some people. Call the players dross who did so well last season and these people want to be taken seriously.
That's just the point though, the dross , most of whom don't even make our bench each week do need moving on as they are taking up wages we need for players who can improve the first team.

Taylor, Gray, Oliver, Kennedy, DeVita and Connell had very little or nothing to do with last years success so get your facts right.

Sorry but it is not okay to sit still and do nothing, perhaps if some of you actually went to games you would see where the issues are.

Parky is stuck in a hole right now and needs help from the board financially to get him out.
No point in gurly panics we are mid table not bottom 4....Parky will be asking for money for new players consistently throughout the season like most managers. He doesn't need reminding by fans that we need to recruit. Its a shame you continue categorize decent professionals as dross. All those you mention have had a creditable career record and something to offer
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Peter300[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Need fresh faces in and it needs to be Now! Come on Phil your team is on its backside and failure to strengthen now will surely lead to a relegation battle. The Nahki Wells circus will take care of itself but let's not it be at the cost of going down as that will cost the club a lot more than any fee they get for him. I recon you could take 5,000 off the gate straight away on relegation which is a couple of million pounds a season in lost revenue[/p][/quote]Parky knows the squad needs freshening up he doesn't need foot stamping from some fans to tell him that. Decisions are made at board level not just by him and are also dependant on moving players on to stay within the wage cap. As ever things will come together in the last week of the window[/p][/quote]Yes , that might be the case, but there are only so many players out there available for loan. Rotherham have shipped out 4 and brought 1 in since January the 1st whilst we sit here almost 'dead in the water'. Why cant we shift players? Most of the dross that nobody wants were Parky's signings. Why wait until the last week of January to do it? Not being funny but there are 12 points up for grabs in January before the deadline closes, wasting time makes no sense. If we only get say 3 or 4 points out of next 4 games we will be in the do-do![/p][/quote]What, just sign players for the sake of it? And it just shows the mentality of some people. Call the players dross who did so well last season and these people want to be taken seriously.[/p][/quote]That's just the point though, the dross , most of whom don't even make our bench each week do need moving on as they are taking up wages we need for players who can improve the first team. Taylor, Gray, Oliver, Kennedy, DeVita and Connell had very little or nothing to do with last years success so get your facts right. Sorry but it is not okay to sit still and do nothing, perhaps if some of you actually went to games you would see where the issues are. Parky is stuck in a hole right now and needs help from the board financially to get him out.[/p][/quote]No point in gurly panics we are mid table not bottom 4....Parky will be asking for money for new players consistently throughout the season like most managers. He doesn't need reminding by fans that we need to recruit. Its a shame you continue categorize decent professionals as dross. All those you mention have had a creditable career record and something to offer whisky1
  • Score: 8

10:45am Wed 8 Jan 14

fatbloke says...

Peter300 wrote:
fatbloke wrote:
On the Meredith story

Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if

1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20

2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set

So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM
How simplistic can you get. I don't think Kyel Reid needs any help. Other team mates might need help from him. There are other ways to build-up play rather than always having the full-back at the wrong end of the pitch when City attack. Not everybody has to go charging up field every time City have the ball.
who mentioned 'always' having the full back at wrong end of the pitch?

who mentioned 'everyone has to go charging up field every time City have the ball'?

However it would be nice if 'occasionally' (as my original post stated) we did use the positive attribute of JM going forward sometimes instead of KR thinking he is something he isn't
[quote][p][bold]Peter300[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Meredith story Not had his best season or developed as quickly as I thought he would/could, however if 1. every now again when he goes flying past on the over lap can Kyle Reid please pass him it (occasionally)? JM has real drive to get in the box, a bit like Ashley Cole and our strikers would also benefit from this. Instead Reid tries a glory ball which comes off 1 in 20 2. when JM is running from deep in our half with the ball, could Kyle Reid stop pretending to be a statue on the half way line and make a move? He just stands there and waits till JM gets to him and takes the ball from him at arms length. This slows down our break/attack and only allows the oppo time to set So I blame KR for his lack of intelligence for the none development of JM[/p][/quote]How simplistic can you get. I don't think Kyel Reid needs any help. Other team mates might need help from him. There are other ways to build-up play rather than always having the full-back at the wrong end of the pitch when City attack. Not everybody has to go charging up field every time City have the ball.[/p][/quote]who mentioned 'always' having the full back at wrong end of the pitch? who mentioned 'everyone has to go charging up field every time City have the ball'? However it would be nice if 'occasionally' (as my original post stated) we did use the positive attribute of JM going forward sometimes instead of KR thinking he is something he isn't fatbloke
  • Score: 0

10:46am Wed 8 Jan 14

bcfc1903 says...

I'd have been more than happy with BCFC's position after 23 games had i been offered it at the start of the season. With a couple of quality acquisitions plus an experienced keeper this month, things will settle down. A couple of wins on the bounce and folk will be up for a pop at the playoffs. Obviously that first win of the year is crucial, so an extra effort from the BCFC fans would be a great start giving the players a boost of confidence giving them more chance of picking three points up against Bristol City.
I'd have been more than happy with BCFC's position after 23 games had i been offered it at the start of the season. With a couple of quality acquisitions plus an experienced keeper this month, things will settle down. A couple of wins on the bounce and folk will be up for a pop at the playoffs. Obviously that first win of the year is crucial, so an extra effort from the BCFC fans would be a great start giving the players a boost of confidence giving them more chance of picking three points up against Bristol City. bcfc1903
  • Score: 13

10:48am Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought! notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: -6

10:52am Wed 8 Jan 14

bcfc1903 says...

I guess if we win on Saturday we could be four points off a playoff place, thats what its like being in midtable.
I guess if we win on Saturday we could be four points off a playoff place, thats what its like being in midtable. bcfc1903
  • Score: 14

11:01am Wed 8 Jan 14

hx3bantam says...

fatbloke wrote:
Peter300 wrote:
fatbloke wrote:
On the Syers story yesterday

I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often!

Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct.

So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.
Oh dear! You and your sources. And your source told you about this last season. And you never stopped moaning about it. I said when City were at Wembley last May, there is someone over there still rabbiting on about Dave Syers, can you believe that? People around me were just shaking their heads. The negative fan always finds something to complain about. Amazing that some people think Dave Syers is the only attacking midfielder in the country.
The way we set up suggests that PP doesn't l attack minded centre midfielders.

I am not been negative, tbh I couldn't care less if we gain promotion, get relegated or go bust. My desire for professional football does not exist these days.

My comment was in reply to people saying he may or may not come back or why he left in the first instance
Yet you spend plenty of time on here pontificating about football? Strange! There's plenty of other forums you may not care less about out there. Have you tried sharing your wisdom with any of them? I think you should. I'm sure they'd value your input as much as we do!
[quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Peter300[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Syers story yesterday I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often! Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct. So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.[/p][/quote]Oh dear! You and your sources. And your source told you about this last season. And you never stopped moaning about it. I said when City were at Wembley last May, there is someone over there still rabbiting on about Dave Syers, can you believe that? People around me were just shaking their heads. The negative fan always finds something to complain about. Amazing that some people think Dave Syers is the only attacking midfielder in the country.[/p][/quote]The way we set up suggests that PP doesn't l attack minded centre midfielders. I am not been negative, tbh I couldn't care less if we gain promotion, get relegated or go bust. My desire for professional football does not exist these days. My comment was in reply to people saying he may or may not come back or why he left in the first instance[/p][/quote]Yet you spend plenty of time on here pontificating about football? Strange! There's plenty of other forums you may not care less about out there. Have you tried sharing your wisdom with any of them? I think you should. I'm sure they'd value your input as much as we do! hx3bantam
  • Score: 0

11:06am Wed 8 Jan 14

minkiebantam says...

jamiejoe wrote:
Cityman23 wrote: The Nahki Wells 'issue' is an important one and It's likely to dominate the back page until he leaves or the end of the transfer window arrives (which ever happens first). However, it would be taking our eyes of the ball if it was allowed to dominate the club's attention completely and distract from the main thing important to all City fans ie the matter of bringing in a replacement (in the short or long term) for 'NW'/and other fresh faces. Hopefully, this is also the view of Mr P and the other management at the club-I am sure it is!
I don't think we will see a replacement before he is actually sold
I agree, I think we are stuck between a rock and a hard place at the moment and cant see any new faces coming in until..
1: Wells is sold to the highest bidder and we know what we have in the wage pot.
2: We offload some of the fringe players (ie: Connell,Oliver,Gray,
Ravenhill), to keep below the 60% wage budget cap we have.
Bad news about Meredith, he hasnt been at his best so far IMO, but he was my player of the year last season and im sure he will come good again. Im guessing Mcugh will slip into LB for Sat?
It will be interesting to see if Wells plays on Sat? If he does and its his last game for the Bantams, Pls Pls Pls give him a good sending off. After all, in his time at VP, he has been a fantastic player and great role model for Lge 1 and 2 football.
CTID!!
[quote][p][bold]jamiejoe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Cityman23[/bold] wrote: The Nahki Wells 'issue' is an important one and It's likely to dominate the back page until he leaves or the end of the transfer window arrives (which ever happens first). However, it would be taking our eyes of the ball if it was allowed to dominate the club's attention completely and distract from the main thing important to all City fans ie the matter of bringing in a replacement (in the short or long term) for 'NW'/and other fresh faces. Hopefully, this is also the view of Mr P and the other management at the club-I am sure it is![/p][/quote]I don't think we will see a replacement before he is actually sold[/p][/quote]I agree, I think we are stuck between a rock and a hard place at the moment and cant see any new faces coming in until.. 1: Wells is sold to the highest bidder and we know what we have in the wage pot. 2: We offload some of the fringe players (ie: Connell,Oliver,Gray, Ravenhill), to keep below the 60% wage budget cap we have. Bad news about Meredith, he hasnt been at his best so far IMO, but he was my player of the year last season and im sure he will come good again. Im guessing Mcugh will slip into LB for Sat? It will be interesting to see if Wells plays on Sat? If he does and its his last game for the Bantams, Pls Pls Pls give him a good sending off. After all, in his time at VP, he has been a fantastic player and great role model for Lge 1 and 2 football. CTID!! minkiebantam
  • Score: 9

11:21am Wed 8 Jan 14

bcfc1903 says...

Ravenhill wont be offloaded, he's a good player, Oliver is a better defender than Taylor but will probably go due to his contract ending in June. Bates will go, Connell is a candidate as his contract ends in June, De Vita could go. Gray's contract ends in June, whether BCFC can work out a deal with him to cancel his contract is in the lap of the Gods due to the amount of cash he's on. He'd need to get another club. A bit of a mess and a big financial drain on BCFC.
Ravenhill wont be offloaded, he's a good player, Oliver is a better defender than Taylor but will probably go due to his contract ending in June. Bates will go, Connell is a candidate as his contract ends in June, De Vita could go. Gray's contract ends in June, whether BCFC can work out a deal with him to cancel his contract is in the lap of the Gods due to the amount of cash he's on. He'd need to get another club. A bit of a mess and a big financial drain on BCFC. bcfc1903
  • Score: 5

11:24am Wed 8 Jan 14

fatbloke says...

hx3bantam wrote:
fatbloke wrote:
Peter300 wrote:
fatbloke wrote:
On the Syers story yesterday

I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often!

Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct.

So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.
Oh dear! You and your sources. And your source told you about this last season. And you never stopped moaning about it. I said when City were at Wembley last May, there is someone over there still rabbiting on about Dave Syers, can you believe that? People around me were just shaking their heads. The negative fan always finds something to complain about. Amazing that some people think Dave Syers is the only attacking midfielder in the country.
The way we set up suggests that PP doesn't l attack minded centre midfielders.

I am not been negative, tbh I couldn't care less if we gain promotion, get relegated or go bust. My desire for professional football does not exist these days.

My comment was in reply to people saying he may or may not come back or why he left in the first instance
Yet you spend plenty of time on here pontificating about football? Strange! There's plenty of other forums you may not care less about out there. Have you tried sharing your wisdom with any of them? I think you should. I'm sure they'd value your input as much as we do!
If you follow me on here :-) You will find I have probably posted les then 30 posts in 6 months
[quote][p][bold]hx3bantam[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Peter300[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Syers story yesterday I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often! Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct. So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.[/p][/quote]Oh dear! You and your sources. And your source told you about this last season. And you never stopped moaning about it. I said when City were at Wembley last May, there is someone over there still rabbiting on about Dave Syers, can you believe that? People around me were just shaking their heads. The negative fan always finds something to complain about. Amazing that some people think Dave Syers is the only attacking midfielder in the country.[/p][/quote]The way we set up suggests that PP doesn't l attack minded centre midfielders. I am not been negative, tbh I couldn't care less if we gain promotion, get relegated or go bust. My desire for professional football does not exist these days. My comment was in reply to people saying he may or may not come back or why he left in the first instance[/p][/quote]Yet you spend plenty of time on here pontificating about football? Strange! There's plenty of other forums you may not care less about out there. Have you tried sharing your wisdom with any of them? I think you should. I'm sure they'd value your input as much as we do![/p][/quote]If you follow me on here :-) You will find I have probably posted les then 30 posts in 6 months fatbloke
  • Score: -1

11:26am Wed 8 Jan 14

theoutsider says...

We appear to be almost 'hawking' Wells and trying to keep 'the story alive'. Fact is that if any scout saw Wells v Rotherscum you might think twice and twice again before you parted with £3million or whatever. It is very much City who seems to be highlighting Wells availablity and as far as I see it no one is falling over themselves. Apparentlty Villa are the Premier League club. If I was Nakki I would stay put, play regular, improve and score goals rather than warm a bench. When he looks back he will wish he had stayed to carve himself a real reputation at VP.
We appear to be almost 'hawking' Wells and trying to keep 'the story alive'. Fact is that if any scout saw Wells v Rotherscum you might think twice and twice again before you parted with £3million or whatever. It is very much City who seems to be highlighting Wells availablity and as far as I see it no one is falling over themselves. Apparentlty Villa are the Premier League club. If I was Nakki I would stay put, play regular, improve and score goals rather than warm a bench. When he looks back he will wish he had stayed to carve himself a real reputation at VP. theoutsider
  • Score: 5

11:27am Wed 8 Jan 14

theoutsider says...

We appear to be almost 'hawking' Wells and trying to keep 'the story alive'. Fact is that if any scout saw Wells v Rotherscum you might think twice and twice again before you parted with £3million or whatever. It is very much City who seems to be highlighting Wells availablity and as far as I see it no one is falling over themselves. Apparently Villa are the Premier League club. If I was Nakki I would stay put, play regular, improve and score goals rather than warm a bench. When he looks back he will wish he had stayed to carve himself a real reputation at VP.
We appear to be almost 'hawking' Wells and trying to keep 'the story alive'. Fact is that if any scout saw Wells v Rotherscum you might think twice and twice again before you parted with £3million or whatever. It is very much City who seems to be highlighting Wells availablity and as far as I see it no one is falling over themselves. Apparently Villa are the Premier League club. If I was Nakki I would stay put, play regular, improve and score goals rather than warm a bench. When he looks back he will wish he had stayed to carve himself a real reputation at VP. theoutsider
  • Score: 0

11:33am Wed 8 Jan 14

audal says...

Wells will have centre stage on sat under the watchful eye of certain scouts, so he plays a blinder and we win and he gets his transfer or plays badly resulting in loss of interest and maybe a city defeat, it appears to be a catch 22 situation.
Wells will have centre stage on sat under the watchful eye of certain scouts, so he plays a blinder and we win and he gets his transfer or plays badly resulting in loss of interest and maybe a city defeat, it appears to be a catch 22 situation. audal
  • Score: 0

11:35am Wed 8 Jan 14

bcfc1903 says...

theoutsider wrote:
We appear to be almost 'hawking' Wells and trying to keep 'the story alive'. Fact is that if any scout saw Wells v Rotherscum you might think twice and twice again before you parted with £3million or whatever. It is very much City who seems to be highlighting Wells availablity and as far as I see it no one is falling over themselves. Apparentlty Villa are the Premier League club. If I was Nakki I would stay put, play regular, improve and score goals rather than warm a bench. When he looks back he will wish he had stayed to carve himself a real reputation at VP.
I agree, Wells isn't the finished article, he could move and be nothing more than a bit part player, on very good money. Would love him to sign a one year extension and see where BCFC is this time next year. I believe that if BCFC could keep hold of Wells he could be playing Championship football in the non too distant future with us. Unfortunately he seems set on leaving, whatever happens i wish him well.
[quote][p][bold]theoutsider[/bold] wrote: We appear to be almost 'hawking' Wells and trying to keep 'the story alive'. Fact is that if any scout saw Wells v Rotherscum you might think twice and twice again before you parted with £3million or whatever. It is very much City who seems to be highlighting Wells availablity and as far as I see it no one is falling over themselves. Apparentlty Villa are the Premier League club. If I was Nakki I would stay put, play regular, improve and score goals rather than warm a bench. When he looks back he will wish he had stayed to carve himself a real reputation at VP.[/p][/quote]I agree, Wells isn't the finished article, he could move and be nothing more than a bit part player, on very good money. Would love him to sign a one year extension and see where BCFC is this time next year. I believe that if BCFC could keep hold of Wells he could be playing Championship football in the non too distant future with us. Unfortunately he seems set on leaving, whatever happens i wish him well. bcfc1903
  • Score: 4

12:00pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Mr Perks says...

I'm now wondering if paying back Mr Lawn's 1 million last year was now the wisest move. I thought we were lucky to gain promotion and may struggle without some serious surgery on the squad before the season began. The squad wasn't really strengthened to any great degree and those that were signed now look surplus to requirements or fringe players at best. Worst case scenario is relegation back down to where we started, I'm praying that doesn't occur, but I fear a difficult few months with this squad in this league now.
I'm now wondering if paying back Mr Lawn's 1 million [plus interest] last year was now the wisest move. I thought we were lucky to gain promotion and may struggle without some serious surgery on the squad before the season began. The squad wasn't really strengthened to any great degree and those that were signed now look surplus to requirements or fringe players at best. Worst case scenario is relegation back down to where we started, I'm praying that doesn't occur, but I fear a difficult few months with this squad in this league now. Mr Perks
  • Score: 2

12:51pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Olivermac says...

fatbloke wrote:
On the Syers story yesterday

I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often!

Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct.

So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.
Yes you are probably right it's what they call negative thinking by Parky with a bit of luck we will break the record for the team with the most draws in a season.
[quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Syers story yesterday I was told by a very good source Parky did not like Syers because he got in the opposition box to often! Having watched the way we have set up since DS departure its evidence enough to suggest that my source was correct. So I would not expect us to be signing a box to box/goal scoring midfielder under Parky, unless he has had a change of heart about playing with 2 holding cm's.[/p][/quote]Yes you are probably right it's what they call negative thinking by Parky with a bit of luck we will break the record for the team with the most draws in a season. Olivermac
  • Score: 2

12:56pm Wed 8 Jan 14

whisky1 says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment whisky1
  • Score: 2

1:06pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Halifax Bantam says...

Peter300 wrote:
fatbloke wrote:
On the Wells story

Hurry up and sell him and I hope it is Leeds or Huddersfield we rob blind
Don't forget that Halifax Bantam says Wells and Hanson off to Middlesbrough and Darby to Brighton. You heard this cast-iron piece of information from Halifax Bantam first. HB will give you the full breakdown.
HB also states you are a complete tool!!!
[quote][p][bold]Peter300[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: On the Wells story Hurry up and sell him and I hope it is Leeds or Huddersfield we rob blind[/p][/quote]Don't forget that Halifax Bantam says Wells and Hanson off to Middlesbrough and Darby to Brighton. You heard this cast-iron piece of information from Halifax Bantam first. HB will give you the full breakdown.[/p][/quote]HB also states you are a complete tool!!! Halifax Bantam
  • Score: 0

1:17pm Wed 8 Jan 14

flashdonut says...

Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.
Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow. flashdonut
  • Score: -1

1:25pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Farsley Bantam says...

flashdonut wrote:
Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.
Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No?
Thought not
[quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.[/p][/quote]Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No? Thought not Farsley Bantam
  • Score: 5

1:42pm Wed 8 Jan 14

flashdonut says...

Farsley Bantam wrote:
flashdonut wrote:
Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.
Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No?
Thought not
If I had £1000 spare I would.
.
Pop.
.
Did you hear that? That sounded like a bubble bursting.
[quote][p][bold]Farsley Bantam[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.[/p][/quote]Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No? Thought not[/p][/quote]If I had £1000 spare I would. . Pop. . Did you hear that? That sounded like a bubble bursting. flashdonut
  • Score: -3

1:49pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Farsley Bantam says...

flashdonut wrote:
Farsley Bantam wrote:
flashdonut wrote: Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.
Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No? Thought not
If I had £1000 spare I would. . Pop. . Did you hear that? That sounded like a bubble bursting.
Nah that was me pulling out of your wife!
[quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Farsley Bantam[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.[/p][/quote]Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No? Thought not[/p][/quote]If I had £1000 spare I would. . Pop. . Did you hear that? That sounded like a bubble bursting.[/p][/quote]Nah that was me pulling out of your wife! Farsley Bantam
  • Score: -5

1:59pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Jimbobdiov says...

650-850k. Gone. : )
650-850k. Gone. : ) Jimbobdiov
  • Score: -6

2:00pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Jimbobdiov says...

"undisclosed fee" so as not to anger the Bradford fans being led to believe by their own board that Wells' worth is 2m or even 1m+ ?
"undisclosed fee" so as not to anger the Bradford fans being led to believe by their own board that Wells' worth is 2m or even 1m+ ? Jimbobdiov
  • Score: -6

2:04pm Wed 8 Jan 14

flashdonut says...

Farsley Bantam wrote:
flashdonut wrote:
Farsley Bantam wrote:
flashdonut wrote: Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.
Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No? Thought not
If I had £1000 spare I would. . Pop. . Did you hear that? That sounded like a bubble bursting.
Nah that was me pulling out of your wife!
Ha ha.
.
As much as I enjoy the winding up sometimes, even I have to applaud a great comeback.
.
Touche young man.
[quote][p][bold]Farsley Bantam[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Farsley Bantam[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.[/p][/quote]Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No? Thought not[/p][/quote]If I had £1000 spare I would. . Pop. . Did you hear that? That sounded like a bubble bursting.[/p][/quote]Nah that was me pulling out of your wife![/p][/quote]Ha ha. . As much as I enjoy the winding up sometimes, even I have to applaud a great comeback. . Touche young man. flashdonut
  • Score: 3

2:18pm Wed 8 Jan 14

fatbloke says...

Farsley Bantam wrote:
flashdonut wrote:
Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.
Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No?
Thought not
With the current 12 man squad we have because Parky will not play his own signings, I fear this could be a very good bet
[quote][p][bold]Farsley Bantam[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.[/p][/quote]Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No? Thought not[/p][/quote]With the current 12 man squad we have because Parky will not play his own signings, I fear this could be a very good bet fatbloke
  • Score: -3

2:57pm Wed 8 Jan 14

jackez20591 says...

Jimbobdiov wrote:
"undisclosed fee" so as not to anger the Bradford fans being led to believe by their own board that Wells' worth is 2m or even 1m+ ?
The majority of transfers are undisclosed fees you clown. The bidding club has made a private bid, hence why we dont know who it is.

None of us need the board to tell us what hes worth. Dwight Gayle was a much less prolific striker sold to championship for nothing and instantly sold to the premiership for £8 million.




Atleast Meredith getting injured means he cant trot out the exact same team for another week. Bad part is that he will just play McHugh there, seriously limiting our left wing attacks, which is our only form of attack.

8 days in, still no loan signings....
[quote][p][bold]Jimbobdiov[/bold] wrote: "undisclosed fee" so as not to anger the Bradford fans being led to believe by their own board that Wells' worth is 2m or even 1m+ ?[/p][/quote]The majority of transfers are undisclosed fees you clown. The bidding club has made a private bid, hence why we dont know who it is. None of us need the board to tell us what hes worth. Dwight Gayle was a much less prolific striker sold to championship for nothing and instantly sold to the premiership for £8 million. Atleast Meredith getting injured means he cant trot out the exact same team for another week. Bad part is that he will just play McHugh there, seriously limiting our left wing attacks, which is our only form of attack. 8 days in, still no loan signings.... jackez20591
  • Score: -4

2:58pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Stafford Heginbantam says...

Wells to Stoke city............????
????
Wells to Stoke city............???? ???? Stafford Heginbantam
  • Score: -1

2:59pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Stafford Heginbantam says...

Stoke City............????
?????????
Stoke City............???? ????????? Stafford Heginbantam
  • Score: -1

3:08pm Wed 8 Jan 14

lawsonio123 says...

Devil of a lot of talk now but strangely no action, has i said before this Piggy in the Pork does not seem to be wanted as much as we think. Maybe clubs are not fully convinced with what they see Are we going to be left waiting to the end of the transfer window and then accept a handful of silver Much has i like Nahki he is not worth 3million or anything like it His value is what someone is prepared to pay and they are not falling over each other with offers. City will have to taket what they can for in spite of all the talk action does speak louder than words .
Devil of a lot of talk now but strangely no action, has i said before this Piggy in the Pork does not seem to be wanted as much as we think. Maybe clubs are not fully convinced with what they see Are we going to be left waiting to the end of the transfer window and then accept a handful of silver Much has i like Nahki he is not worth 3million or anything like it His value is what someone is prepared to pay and they are not falling over each other with offers. City will have to taket what they can for in spite of all the talk action does speak louder than words . lawsonio123
  • Score: 0

4:02pm Wed 8 Jan 14

albioff says...

Maybe they will recruit a part time air traffic controller so they can continue playing hoof ball up aloft to the front.
Maybe they will recruit a part time air traffic controller so they can continue playing hoof ball up aloft to the front. albioff
  • Score: -1

4:03pm Wed 8 Jan 14

minkiebantam says...

"Brentford have signed Blackburn Rovers midfielder Alan Judge on loan until the end of the season.The former Republic of Ireland Under-21 international scored 17 goals in 112 appearances during his time at Meadow Lane and was named in PFA's League One Team of the Year in 2013."
Another good attacking midfielder taken on by a Lge 1rival team.
No pressure PP, but sounds like the best players available are being snapped up!!?
CTID!!
"Brentford have signed Blackburn Rovers midfielder Alan Judge on loan until the end of the season.The former Republic of Ireland Under-21 international scored 17 goals in 112 appearances during his time at Meadow Lane and was named in PFA's League One Team of the Year in 2013." Another good attacking midfielder taken on by a Lge 1rival team. No pressure PP, but sounds like the best players available are being snapped up!!? CTID!! minkiebantam
  • Score: -2

4:49pm Wed 8 Jan 14

lawsonio123 says...

albioff wrote:
Maybe they will recruit a part time air traffic controller so they can continue playing hoof ball up aloft to the front.
Surely you mean LONG BALL SPECIALISTS Keep Watching
[quote][p][bold]albioff[/bold] wrote: Maybe they will recruit a part time air traffic controller so they can continue playing hoof ball up aloft to the front.[/p][/quote]Surely you mean LONG BALL SPECIALISTS Keep Watching lawsonio123
  • Score: -3

5:13pm Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
[quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up. notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: -3

5:56pm Wed 8 Jan 14

moanmoanwhingewhinge says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec


t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer moanmoanwhingewhinge
  • Score: 2

5:59pm Wed 8 Jan 14

moanmoanwhingewhinge says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
And if we win on Saturday we could be 4 points off the play offs. But lets ignore that perspective and carry on panicking, eh?? Much more fun
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]And if we win on Saturday we could be 4 points off the play offs. But lets ignore that perspective and carry on panicking, eh?? Much more fun moanmoanwhingewhinge
  • Score: 1

6:20pm Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec



t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
[quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant. notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: -2

6:51pm Wed 8 Jan 14

KnightMcCall says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec


t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec




t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man. KnightMcCall
  • Score: 2

7:06pm Wed 8 Jan 14

KnightMcCall says...

fatbloke wrote:
Farsley Bantam wrote:
flashdonut wrote:
Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.
Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No?
Thought not
With the current 12 man squad we have because Parky will not play his own signings, I fear this could be a very good bet
PP signings: Davies, Mcardle, Meredith, Darby, Jones, Reid, Doyle, Thompson and Bates. He has also extended contract for Wells, Hanson so he is always playing his own signings. Add Atkinson, Egan, Good, Turgott, Dickson and Hines who all got game time. Stop talking rot about him not playing his own signings.

De vita and Yeates are good players. De vita struggled to break into team and then picked up injury. Yeates is an attacking option and not always a good defensive option.
[quote][p][bold]fatbloke[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Farsley Bantam[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]flashdonut[/bold] wrote: Fact is City are 33/1 to be relegated. Easy money. Putting my tenner on tomorrow.[/p][/quote]Put £1000 on if it's that easy. No? Thought not[/p][/quote]With the current 12 man squad we have because Parky will not play his own signings, I fear this could be a very good bet[/p][/quote]PP signings: Davies, Mcardle, Meredith, Darby, Jones, Reid, Doyle, Thompson and Bates. He has also extended contract for Wells, Hanson so he is always playing his own signings. Add Atkinson, Egan, Good, Turgott, Dickson and Hines who all got game time. Stop talking rot about him not playing his own signings. De vita and Yeates are good players. De vita struggled to break into team and then picked up injury. Yeates is an attacking option and not always a good defensive option. KnightMcCall
  • Score: 3

7:13pm Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec



t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec





t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
Another scrounger with a small manhood ............
[quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.[/p][/quote]Another scrounger with a small manhood ............ notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: -2

7:31pm Wed 8 Jan 14

shaun from richmond says...

audal wrote:
Wells will have centre stage on sat under the watchful eye of certain scouts, so he plays a blinder and we win and he gets his transfer or plays badly resulting in loss of interest and maybe a city defeat, it appears to be a catch 22 situation.
He had loads of Scouts watching him at the Boxing Day Rotherham game.......OOPS!!
[quote][p][bold]audal[/bold] wrote: Wells will have centre stage on sat under the watchful eye of certain scouts, so he plays a blinder and we win and he gets his transfer or plays badly resulting in loss of interest and maybe a city defeat, it appears to be a catch 22 situation.[/p][/quote]He had loads of Scouts watching him at the Boxing Day Rotherham game.......OOPS!! shaun from richmond
  • Score: -3

7:33pm Wed 8 Jan 14

KnightMcCall says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec


t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec




t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec






t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
Another scrounger with a small manhood ............
Oh dear. Did I upset you...diddums.
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.[/p][/quote]Another scrounger with a small manhood ............[/p][/quote]Oh dear. Did I upset you...diddums. KnightMcCall
  • Score: 5

7:37pm Wed 8 Jan 14

bcfc1903 says...

Parkinson has brought in some quality players, to say other wise is ludicrous, his picks in the summer were not his finest hour but the fella is a quality manager so I expect him to up his game this month and bring in two quality outfield players ( love to see Dean Furman back in the claret and amber) and an experienced keeper. Absolutely no worries as the club are in a good league position. In fact a couple of wins on the bounce and it will set the club up for a run at the top six.
Parkinson has brought in some quality players, to say other wise is ludicrous, his picks in the summer were not his finest hour but the fella is a quality manager so I expect him to up his game this month and bring in two quality outfield players ( love to see Dean Furman back in the claret and amber) and an experienced keeper. Absolutely no worries as the club are in a good league position. In fact a couple of wins on the bounce and it will set the club up for a run at the top six. bcfc1903
  • Score: 0

7:45pm Wed 8 Jan 14

shaun from richmond says...

KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec



t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec





t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
Its amazing that Connell did score 9 goals last term.....with such little game time!!
His goals to minutes on the pitch ratio must be very impressive?....makes you wonder why Parky wants rid?....specially with Wells on his way.
[quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.[/p][/quote]Its amazing that Connell did score 9 goals last term.....with such little game time!! His goals to minutes on the pitch ratio must be very impressive?....makes you wonder why Parky wants rid?....specially with Wells on his way. shaun from richmond
  • Score: 0

7:52pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Pablo says...

bcfc1903 wrote:
Parkinson has brought in some quality players, to say other wise is ludicrous, his picks in the summer were not his finest hour but the fella is a quality manager so I expect him to up his game this month and bring in two quality outfield players ( love to see Dean Furman back in the claret and amber) and an experienced keeper. Absolutely no worries as the club are in a good league position. In fact a couple of wins on the bounce and it will set the club up for a run at the top six.
Almost every post you make mentions Dean Furman.

He did a reasonable at City and has enjoyed a fairly successful career since, but I'm not sure he's worthy of so many mentions!
[quote][p][bold]bcfc1903[/bold] wrote: Parkinson has brought in some quality players, to say other wise is ludicrous, his picks in the summer were not his finest hour but the fella is a quality manager so I expect him to up his game this month and bring in two quality outfield players ( love to see Dean Furman back in the claret and amber) and an experienced keeper. Absolutely no worries as the club are in a good league position. In fact a couple of wins on the bounce and it will set the club up for a run at the top six.[/p][/quote]Almost every post you make mentions Dean Furman. He did a reasonable at City and has enjoyed a fairly successful career since, but I'm not sure he's worthy of so many mentions! Pablo
  • Score: 1

9:46pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Victor Clayton says...

shaun from richmond wrote:
KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec


t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec




t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec






t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
Its amazing that Connell did score 9 goals last term.....with such little game time!!
His goals to minutes on the pitch ratio must be very impressive?....makes you wonder why Parky wants rid?....specially with Wells on his way.
PP said he couldn't play Connell will Hanson because there would be no pace up front. Same for Connell and Gray I suppose, and Connell Gray wouldn't work, no height. So it's fairly evident that he isn't going to start. If, however he was happy with a place on the bench I would keep him.
[quote][p][bold]shaun from richmond[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.[/p][/quote]Its amazing that Connell did score 9 goals last term.....with such little game time!! His goals to minutes on the pitch ratio must be very impressive?....makes you wonder why Parky wants rid?....specially with Wells on his way.[/p][/quote]PP said he couldn't play Connell will Hanson because there would be no pace up front. Same for Connell and Gray I suppose, and Connell Gray wouldn't work, no height. So it's fairly evident that he isn't going to start. If, however he was happy with a place on the bench I would keep him. Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

9:48pm Wed 8 Jan 14

Victor Clayton says...

Victor Clayton wrote:
shaun from richmond wrote:
KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec



t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec





t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec







t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
Its amazing that Connell did score 9 goals last term.....with such little game time!!
His goals to minutes on the pitch ratio must be very impressive?....makes you wonder why Parky wants rid?....specially with Wells on his way.
PP said he couldn't play Connell will Hanson because there would be no pace up front. Same for Connell and Gray I suppose, and Connell Gray wouldn't work, no height. So it's fairly evident that he isn't going to start. If, however he was happy with a place on the bench I would keep him.
Sorry - Connell and wells wouldn't work.
[quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]shaun from richmond[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.[/p][/quote]Its amazing that Connell did score 9 goals last term.....with such little game time!! His goals to minutes on the pitch ratio must be very impressive?....makes you wonder why Parky wants rid?....specially with Wells on his way.[/p][/quote]PP said he couldn't play Connell will Hanson because there would be no pace up front. Same for Connell and Gray I suppose, and Connell Gray wouldn't work, no height. So it's fairly evident that he isn't going to start. If, however he was happy with a place on the bench I would keep him.[/p][/quote]Sorry - Connell and wells wouldn't work. Victor Clayton
  • Score: 0

9:51pm Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec



t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec





t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec







t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
Another scrounger with a small manhood ............
Oh dear. Did I upset you...diddums.
Not at all , as I said earlier your opinion is irrelevant, when you wake up in the morning you are still a nobody.
[quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.[/p][/quote]Another scrounger with a small manhood ............[/p][/quote]Oh dear. Did I upset you...diddums.[/p][/quote]Not at all , as I said earlier your opinion is irrelevant, when you wake up in the morning you are still a nobody. notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: -2

9:51pm Wed 8 Jan 14

notpoliticallycorrect says...

KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec

t
wrote:
KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec



t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec





t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec







t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
Another scrounger with a small manhood ............
Oh dear. Did I upset you...diddums.
Not at all , as I said earlier your opinion is irrelevant, when you wake up in the morning you are still a nobody.
[quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.[/p][/quote]Another scrounger with a small manhood ............[/p][/quote]Oh dear. Did I upset you...diddums.[/p][/quote]Not at all , as I said earlier your opinion is irrelevant, when you wake up in the morning you are still a nobody. notpoliticallycorrect
  • Score: -1

10:57pm Wed 8 Jan 14

bcfc1903 says...

Pablo wrote:
bcfc1903 wrote:
Parkinson has brought in some quality players, to say other wise is ludicrous, his picks in the summer were not his finest hour but the fella is a quality manager so I expect him to up his game this month and bring in two quality outfield players ( love to see Dean Furman back in the claret and amber) and an experienced keeper. Absolutely no worries as the club are in a good league position. In fact a couple of wins on the bounce and it will set the club up for a run at the top six.
Almost every post you make mentions Dean Furman.

He did a reasonable at City and has enjoyed a fairly successful career since, but I'm not sure he's worthy of so many mentions!
I'm always banging on about the Odeon on the t&a news section, I'm surprised you missed those posts.

All joking apart, Dean Furman is a quality midfield player, I'm sure PP is looking to bolster that area, he's light years ahead of David Syers, who I rate as decent. I fancy a deal could be done for Furman with Donny as they need to invest to keep championship status.
[quote][p][bold]Pablo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bcfc1903[/bold] wrote: Parkinson has brought in some quality players, to say other wise is ludicrous, his picks in the summer were not his finest hour but the fella is a quality manager so I expect him to up his game this month and bring in two quality outfield players ( love to see Dean Furman back in the claret and amber) and an experienced keeper. Absolutely no worries as the club are in a good league position. In fact a couple of wins on the bounce and it will set the club up for a run at the top six.[/p][/quote]Almost every post you make mentions Dean Furman. He did a reasonable at City and has enjoyed a fairly successful career since, but I'm not sure he's worthy of so many mentions![/p][/quote]I'm always banging on about the Odeon on the t&a news section, I'm surprised you missed those posts. All joking apart, Dean Furman is a quality midfield player, I'm sure PP is looking to bolster that area, he's light years ahead of David Syers, who I rate as decent. I fancy a deal could be done for Furman with Donny as they need to invest to keep championship status. bcfc1903
  • Score: 0

7:40am Thu 9 Jan 14

macca1969 says...

notpoliticallycorrec
t
wrote:
KnightMcCall wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec


t
wrote:
moanmoanwhingewhinge wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec




t
wrote:
whisky1 wrote:
notpoliticallycorrec






t
wrote:
Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us.

Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky.

This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone.

Now that's a sobering thought!
Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment
Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them.

Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.
So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer
I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here.

Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here.

The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.
People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.
Another scrounger with a small manhood ............
As supposed to your massive manhood. On ya flaming head
[quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]KnightMcCall[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]moanmoanwhingewhinge[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]whisky1[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]notpoliticallycorrec t[/bold] wrote: Sure, they are all world beaters ;) that's why Parky is fighting off the phone calls to take them off us. Harsh reality is our small squad does not have any quality in depth which is a poor reflection on Parky. This season was supposed to be about consolidation according to Dave Baldwin, unless things improve soon it will be about survival, mid table for now but if we lose Saturday we could be 4 points off the drop zone. Now that's a sobering thought![/p][/quote]Not world beaters not dross either be more measured in your posting it saves embarrasment[/p][/quote]Get it into your thick skull that nobody wants any of them. Perhaps that spell out how good they are. Can't do with jumped up dole dossers lording it on here. Poch ma hon. Look it up.[/p][/quote]So because he's being reasoned in getting his point across, instead of your hysterical whining, you resort to calling him 'thick' and writing naughty swear-words? Take a chill pill, not everyone who goes to City does so to give themselves something to whinge about and slag other fans off for actually daring to support the club. You seem very proud of your 'working' status despite making postings on here at various points of the day yourself. By your aggressive attitude, and dodgy politics, your probably some jumped up, frustrated Daily Mail loving bin man or violent, Sun-reading bouncer[/p][/quote]I have the luxury of a unique thing in Bradford in that I own a business that not only provides employment for others but contributes to the taxes that feeds half the posters on here. Anyway, not that it's any of your business but I support the club and have done so for some 30 years matey, currently holding 6 season tickets for my family. In addition I sponsor some of the players, advertise with the club and have given large lump sums to help the youth team. Therefore, perhaps I am a little better placed then some on here in their shorts or tracksuits that do f-all all day but post on here. The beauty of such forums is freedom of speech and the ability to have an opinion. I have mine and you have yours. I really don't care about yours as you are pretty much irrelevant.[/p][/quote]People like you rarely care about others perspective. By that i mean morons. I didnt realise that having money gave your opinion more merit. You clearly have deep-seated frustrations about something in your life and are clueless about football. To illustrate the point, you specifically state above that Connell and Oliver had nothing to do with last years success....Connell scored nine goals so how is that insignificant. You are Looking for evidence that PP is a poor manager and ignoring all of the evidence that contradicts your smal minded assessment. Money clearly doesnt make you happy you sad little man.[/p][/quote]Another scrounger with a small manhood ............[/p][/quote]As supposed to your massive manhood. On ya flaming head macca1969
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree