Parkinson puts positive spin on rotation policy and Bradford City players happy to roll with it (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Phil Parkinson puts positive spin on rotation policy and Bradford City players happy to roll with it
7:30am Monday 4th March 2013 in Sport
By Simon Parker, Bradford City Reporter
York City 0 Bradford City 2
When Phil Parkinson asked for some faith over his team selection, he wasn’t just talking to the fans.
Those on the pitch have to buy into his rotation policy over the two-month run-in as much, if not more so, than those watching in the stands.
Making six changes for the previous game and another five on Saturday requires the full understanding of those directly involved. A disgruntled workforce achieves little in any walk of life.
So players will have to accept that they may be in one week and then out the next, regardless of their performance. That’s the only way it can succeed.
That’s how Zavon Hines found himself on the bench at Bootham Crescent. The right winger had been the shining light against Dagenham but was jettisoned for sub duties as Parkinson tweaked his system specifically for York’s pretty, if toothless, passing methods.
Hines sucked in any disappointment and when he did finally appear for the closing quarter of the game, filled the role he was asked to do admirably.
Parkinson said: “He could have moaned and sulked and 18 months ago might have done that. But when he came on, he played with the same drive as he did on Wednesday.”
But perhaps the best example of the squad backing the manager’s in-and-out selection routine came from Ricky Ravenhill.
Having been signed last year as a signal of intent, the club captain has been left to feed off scraps this term – reduced to getting the odd cup game here and there as the spare man behind the Gary Jones and Nathan Doyle midfield axis.
For a player of Ravenhill’s age and experience, it must be a shock to the system. But there has been no show of dissent, public or otherwise.
He got the nod at York to give a breather to Doyle, who has probably needed a break. Parkinson told him to stick to home playmaker Matty Blair, a role he performed with gusto.
The fact that Ravenhill seemed barely able to walk at the final whistle showed the huge effort that he had put in. It was the proof Parkinson was looking for of a dressing room that remains united.
“The spirit is still running strong,” said the City boss. “At this stage of the season, you normally get your disaffected players, ones who’ve been left out or you’ve fallen out with.
“You have ups and downs in a season, especially when you’re left out, but when called upon the lads showed tremendous professionalism. That is so important.
“Ricky typifies that. He’s been very unlucky not to play and hasn’t started a game for a long time. But he’s trained really well and done extra bits with (fitness coach) Nick Allamby, which enabled him to play like that.”
The stakes could not have been higher. While City were talking up the fighting qualities of rescuing a late draw against Dagenham, the need for three points was imperative.
Free-falling York were in an even worse boat – and manager Gary Mills was forced to walk the plank barely an hour or so after their 11th game without a victory.
The fear of a self-fulfilling prophecy among the locals grows with each week. When York last dropped out of the league, they did not manage to win any of the last 20.
Mills had them playing some neat football, lots of triangles and short interchanges. But it was hardly in the Swansea envelope.
The moves were too deliberate and too careful on a bobbly surface that totally negated that kind of measured approach. It’s not hard to see why they have won only four at home since returning to League Two in August.
Throw in the Yorkshire derby element and the football for the first 45 minutes at least was of the hot potato variety.
“We won at Wembley” taunted the home fans; “This is your cup final” came the retort from the sold-out away following of over 2,000.
Carl McHugh had been restored to left back, allowing Stephen Darby to return to his natural right and giving the back four a more natural balance.
And the young Irishman made an important intervention in the only first-half incident of note, carefully blocking Jason Walker’s angled shot in front of the line after the striker had wriggled his way wide of Jon McLaughlin.
City’s back-up keeper, as he has been in recent months at least, looked assured again and took every cross with the minimum of fuss. He also pulled off a decent save from Michael Rankine in stoppage time to put the seal on a well-deserved clean sheet.
Opposite number Michael Ingham had been largely untroubled until the teams turned round. But his personal embarrassment soon followed in front of the crowing Bantam masses behind the goal.
The match had thankfully livened up since the break with a flicker of hope at both ends, James Hanson glancing wide for City, Walker hooking over for York.
McLaughlin saved from Blair, then Ingham from Kyel Reid – who had a much more productive game compared with the previous one.
But the York stopper had a huge role in City’s breakthrough 13 minutes from time. Darby lofted a cross from the right, Hanson got in front of his marker to head downwards towards goal and Ingham obligingly let it squeeze through his knees on the line.
That threw York into full-scale panic mode. The main stand Jonahs were now in full voice with their “We’re doomed” predictions.
City needed the buffer of a second to avoid a Wimbledon-style late implosion. And they got it on the break after Rankine coughed up possession in their own half.
Ravenhill pumped the ball forward and defender Jack O’Connell, who had been the keenest of the home players, failed to control.
He only succeeded in taking the sting out the ball and sub Garry Thompson willingly accepted the invitation. Having missed a similar chance at Kingsmeadow – and how costly that turned out to be – he took a fraction longer to steady himself before coolly finishing past Ingham.
The first of the nine or ten wins realistically required to secure a play-off spot was in the bag. Parkinson was left extolling his side’s battling virtues.
“Games aren’t going to be pretty at this stage of the season. Every team across the board is scrapping for something. We played with discipline and then when the game slowed down a bit and there was room, we played with quality.
“The year we went up under Mark McGhee at Reading, people used to say we were a tremendous football team. Yeah, we were after 70 minutes after we’d run ourselves into the ground and battled. But it was the first 70 minutes that got us promoted.”
Comments(12)
tyker2
says...
10:18am Mon 4 Mar 13
richbar62 wrote:precisely:his rotation is bench and back again to out
As long as Connell gets rotated to an attacking role, and not sitting on the bench pulling splinters out of his a##e
pudseykid
says...
10:19am Mon 4 Mar 13
dannbradfc
says...
10:52am Mon 4 Mar 13
Why not let our good defenders defend? We seem to invite teams to pressure us or allow them to sit comfortably at times. Two central midfielders have mostly operated between our box and the half way line.
In the last home game Jones noticeably attempted to get in or near the box more and thats what we need. E.g. more bodies in goal scoring positions, feeding from knock downs, forcing defensive mistakes etc.
Playing Atkinson out wide, whilst he is good at holding the ball and disciplined defensively is a defensive first strategy. He rarely beats a player and crosses the ball and plays very narrow at times. This leaves us with one wide outlet.
It wouldn't be so bad if the full backs were over-lapping but that is also a rarity and seemingly privilege....
I'll be honest i still haven't gotten over our wembley no-show and am desperate for us to get back there and wipe away the football memories. Dint expect to win but thought we might have had two shots at least ;-)......Thats why i'm keen for us to get at teams. At least this way you know you gave it everything and i feel that we would gain more points this way, especially for home games where we have let ourselves down recently.......
dannbradfc
says...
10:56am Mon 4 Mar 13
What i want to say is whilst Connell has shown in patches he can play what as he done when starting up front to warrant all this clamour for him to start?
He is good on the ball but is lightweight physically. He has been anonymous in some games when starting. I also feel he doesn't work back as much as hanson and wells and this will be one reason for Parkys decision making process.
Thompson has looked fitter and more interested in recent times than in the earlier parts of the season, particularly up front and he is probably further up the pecking order than Connell for that position at the moment i suspect.......
Michael Clayton
says...
11:03am Mon 4 Mar 13
Would still like to see an alternative formation, i.e. 3-5-2, when the need arises.
On that subject, play Connell as the advanced midfielder; the ideal fulcrum to the front two, the wide men and advancing wing-backs. He could play passes in one of six directions.
Not blessed with pace but one of the best foofballers at the club. Seems like an ideal fit?
bettyswollocks
says...
12:35pm Mon 4 Mar 13
3-5-2 is a very difficult system to play in, it requires a high level of discipline and is a lot different to the normal formations based on 4 at the back. That is why you very rarely see it played at lower levels nd when you do, it tends not to be effective. You've got to remember these players are playing in L2 for a reason.
Besides all that it's not right to change the system to accomodate one player. Either he plays in the system that we use or doesn't play at all, which is what we're seeing. I rate Connell highly but our system is what it is and unfortunately for him it's difficult for him to find a fit.
GABRIEL.NORDE
says...
1:10pm Mon 4 Mar 13
Michael Clayton
says...
1:40pm Mon 4 Mar 13
bettyswollocks wrote:I was talking in terms of an alternative strategy. Not a replacement. For example, in the last fifteen minutes of a match.
I think a few people have been playing too much football manager. 3-5-2 is a very difficult system to play in, it requires a high level of discipline and is a lot different to the normal formations based on 4 at the back. That is why you very rarely see it played at lower levels nd when you do, it tends not to be effective. You've got to remember these players are playing in L2 for a reason. Besides all that it's not right to change the system to accomodate one player. Either he plays in the system that we use or doesn't play at all, which is what we're seeing. I rate Connell highly but our system is what it is and unfortunately for him it's difficult for him to find a fit.
What is apparent is that changing like-for-like does not always unlock the key.
I would not doubt the ability of the players to cope. You mention their L2 status, but they are, after all, professionals - many of whom have been recruited by a manager punching above league status in the transfer market.
As for "football manager" my experience was in the (defunct) Wharfedale Sunday League! I know my place.
Pablo
says...
2:53pm Mon 4 Mar 13
dannbradfc wrote:I recall PP signed Connell prior to Wells signing his new deal. This was maybe as a "hurry up" signal to Wells.
Sorry i pasted the above from other heading.....
What i want to say is whilst Connell has shown in patches he can play what as he done when starting up front to warrant all this clamour for him to start?
He is good on the ball but is lightweight physically. He has been anonymous in some games when starting. I also feel he doesn't work back as much as hanson and wells and this will be one reason for Parkys decision making process.
Thompson has looked fitter and more interested in recent times than in the earlier parts of the season, particularly up front and he is probably further up the pecking order than Connell for that position at the moment i suspect.......
However, having signed him, I don't think he ever had a clue as to how he would accomodate him. I agree that he's lightweight and doesn't possess Nahki's pace, but he has a good football brain. I haven't checked the stats, but he doesn't seem to have started too many games. Now he finds himself behind Gray and Thompson in the pecking order.
Everyone apart from him appears to have had a fair crack of the whip so, whatever prompted PP to sign him, hasn't materialised and he's been a wasted signing to me.
As Michael Clayton suggests, try playing him just behind the front two, as the guy certainly has the ability.
gary turner
says...
10:36pm Mon 4 Mar 13
dannbradfc
says...
12:16am Tue 5 Mar 13
gary turner wrote:Not for me. He likes to play with his back to goal. He should have the quality but he appears slow in everything he does at mo. Might have a dcent football brain but i don't think he has it in his legs to match. Plus we would be lacking elsewhere. I'm all for attemptng something different, Gray or otherwise, as a plan b but i don't think its Gray. We could try if we are desperate and things are going wrong tho but not for me.......
if we need an attacking midfielder, how would Gray go at filling the vacancy. While he does not seem red hot at scoring goals as an out and out stiker, maybe with a bit more time on the ball he might just be the " goods" . Any opinions?

richbar62 says...
9:24am Mon 4 Mar 13