Bradford City: Cup heroes' league form takes worrying nosedive

Alan Connell takes exception to something Michael Duberry says. The result was a yellow card for both players Alan Connell takes exception to something Michael Duberry says. The result was a yellow card for both players

Bradford City 1 Oxford United 2

Jekyll and Hyde January goes on for the Bantams.

The first month of 2013 could go down in folklore with the club on the brink of their first cup final appearance in over a century.

It could also be looked back on as the hole in the road where the promotion bandwagon came a cropper.

The ultimate near-miss campaign or one that will be fondly talked about with the grand kids? City’s season – as exciting and exhilarating as it has been at times – could still tip either way.

City are not the only member of the pacesetting bunch to suffer an attack of the collywobbles. Southend and Fleetwood, who share 40 points with them, have also come off the tracks in the last couple of weeks.

So while the focus remains on catching those in front, all of a sudden there are a stampede of mid-table clubs snapping at the heels.

Oxford’s win was their fourth straight – hauling in an 11-point deficit on the Bantams during that time. They have a game in hand to ease past, as do Northampton.

City may still be only goal difference outside of the play-offs but most of the division, right down to 16th-placed Torquay who have played two games less, have realistic designs on closing that gap.

And where do the Bantams – who have slipped to their lowest league position since early September – go next? Ah yes, leaders Port Vale on Saturday.

Before then there is the obligatory midweeker with the JPT northern area semi-final at Crewe. Another route, possibly more realistic, to Wembley beckons, with only Coventry standing between the winners and the national stadium.

But given the wintry conditions kicking in, it would not be a bad thing if the Gresty Road clash was iced off. A chance to clear heads still clouded by Aston Villa and rest limbs wearied by the punishing programme.

Phil Parkinson, whose own future is now top of the agenda after the Blackpool interest was confirmed, gave James Hanson a much-needed breather on Saturday. The big man has been playing through a toe injury because there was simply nobody to take his place.

Andy Gray’s arrival remedied that and he was thrown straight in for his second coming as a Bantam. Unfortunately, nobody told his team-mates, who proceeded to deliver the usual aerial diet of passes that Hanson feeds off.

Gray is a different type of targetman and while he demonstrated some neat hold-up play on occasions, he could not replicate Hanson’s power at dominating centre halves. The hopeful punts upfield proved meat and drink for Michael Duberry and one-time Bingley Grammar School pupil Jake Wright.

City’s other new face, left back Ryan Dickson, had another uncomfortable debut. The Southampton man seemed to be trying a bit too hard to impress but , just like Gray, will clearly make an impact as he settles in.

In fact, it was an afternoon which few will look back on with any fondness. After the Lord Mayor’s show of Tuesday night, Saturday’s performance left the crowd as cold as the bitter easterly wind.

The notable exceptions were at the back, not surprising considering that Oxford out-shot their hosts ten to two with efforts on target.

Carl McHugh has had a remarkable time since his first appearance as a raw trialist in his native Ireland last summer. The maturity and composure in his play is incredible for a lad who has only just passed double figure in first-team starts.

He has not been fazed by any Premier League opponent – and there was no hint of any comedown from the frenzy of scoring the third goal against Villa. He delivered another rock-solid display at the heart of the defence, topping it all off with an acrobatic clearance off the line to thwart Alfie Potter’s header.

But once again the star performer in the City ranks was keeper Matt Duke. Having defied pretty much everything that Villa threw at him, Duke was just as commanding and confident against League Two’s form team.

It was only thanks to Duke that City got within touching distance of grinding out a point. He pulled off important saves from Sean Rigg and Lewis Montrose and an absolute belter just before half-time at his near post to deny a disbelieving Potter.

As City disputed the victory-clinching penalty, Oxford could point to those chances, the one off the line and a point-blank Rigg header that came down off the underside of the bar.

Nobody would dispute Chris Wilder’s claim that the visitors had dominated the second half, even if it took until the 89th minute to make the breakthrough.

The bobbly pitch did not make for the free-flowing football that had carved open Villa but City also never got to grips with Oxford’s 3-4-3 set-up.

The widemen constantly found themselves pushed back by the blue-shirted wingbacks Damien Batt and Liam Davis.

Zavon Hines had to make more tackles in an hour than he’d probably expect all season. He stuck at it doggedly but you don’t want to see a potential match-winner having to track back into his own half all the time, especially at home.

There was no more joy for Will Atkinson or the second-half replacements Kyel Reid and Blair Turgott. Not once did any of them manage to isolate a defender one-on-one around the Oxford penalty area.

Yet City had still struck the first blow after a comical miscommunication between Duberry and Oxford keeper Wayne Brown.

Duberry thought he was heading the ball back to Brown; instead he nodded it firmly past him and Nahki Wells turned on the turbo to divert it into the gaping net from an acute angle.

His 17th goal of the season did come at a cost as he clattered into an advertising board and cut open his knee – which could well spare him Johnstone’s Paint duties.

But Oxford were level within a few minutes thanks to a stunning strike from Rigg. Potter’s cross was half-cleared by Dickson and the former Port Vale man met it with a sweet left foot from the edge of the box.

The winner came in contentious circumstances with City sure that Stephen Darby had got a toe on the ball before Potter went tumbling.

It was hard to tell from the TV angle but looked more of a penalty than the blatant dive which earned the one that beat Villa at the weekend.

Referee Jeremy Simpson, chalk and cheese compared with Howard Webb, was sure. Given his poor performance in the previous 89 minutes, nobody in claret and amber was remotely convinced.

Peter Leven, a one-time City trialist and Peter Jackson target, left no doubt about the spot-kick. Deep down there was no doubt that the right team had won either.

“It’s getting tight but when you don’t win for four games you expect to be dropping out of it,” admitted Parkinson. “We’ve got to pick ourselves up and we will do.

“Dukey made some tremendous saves again and it wasn’t a day when we had loads of chances.”

Comments(15)

dannbradfc says...
9:21am Mon 14 Jan 13

I've stated on the oxford game thread that we need a plan b when our system is been countered. Against the premiership sides we can sit deep and we've seen this work. However both Rochdale and Oxford countered this and thus we need to be able to change things when this is happening.

We have the players to be able to change things around if/when required but 'doggedly' sticking to what we do when the opposition are clearly on top isn't helping. Even if we try something different for 15 mins to give them something different to think about.......

balbrigganfc says...
12:35pm Mon 14 Jan 13

As previously predicted City stormed away with yet another very positive result at home against the Clever Clogs.

Nobody makes predictions like me, Nobody!

Come on you Bantams, CTID!

Rambo says...
12:36pm Mon 14 Jan 13

dannbradfc wrote:
I've stated on the oxford game thread that we need a plan b when our system is been countered. Against the premiership sides we can sit deep and we've seen this work. However both Rochdale and Oxford countered this and thus we need to be able to change things when this is happening.

We have the players to be able to change things around if/when required but 'doggedly' sticking to what we do when the opposition are clearly on top isn't helping. Even if we try something different for 15 mins to give them something different to think about.......
Yup. Thats pretty much it.

It was a totally different defeat to the Barnet one - we created all those chances but couldn't finish, and its those games (like Morecambe) where you regret at the end of the season.

The defeats to Rochdale and Oxford were totally different, and more worrying in their nature. Especially with our defending at times.

I hate people who use the phrase 'bad day at the office'. Its not - its a visiting team that knows our tactics and completely nullifies it. Combined with our inability on Saturday to pass more than 5 yards and resort to big hoofs and it makes for a lower-table performance.

It says it all that their goalkeeper wore white and there was barely a mark on him.

Rambo says...
12:39pm Mon 14 Jan 13

Sorry should be - you regret at the end of the season if you miss out the autos/playoffs by a few points.

And goal difference is a worry - its taken a bit of a beating recently and that was one thing that was keeping us up there.

Prisoner Cell Block A says...
4:19pm Mon 14 Jan 13

dannbradfc wrote:
I've stated on the oxford game thread that we need a plan b when our system is been countered. Against the premiership sides we can sit deep and we've seen this work. However both Rochdale and Oxford countered this and thus we need to be able to change things when this is happening.

We have the players to be able to change things around if/when required but 'doggedly' sticking to what we do when the opposition are clearly on top isn't helping. Even if we try something different for 15 mins to give them something different to think about.......
I'm not sure we do have the players to change it around, our success has come from using the tried and tested, when we have been forced into a different formation or tactics it hasn't yielded much and I believe we are too entrenched in this style now to 'switch up' .

I know I have championed JH all season but that is mainly in his defence at the continuous knockers who do so with little or no thought behind their ignorant comments and don't, in my opinion, have much more of an idea than what they are told by Messers Shearer n co. We have become very one dimensional this year, a very good one dimension as it has seen us have our most successful season for years, I just hope we haven't blown it now or run out of steam/ideas.

Dragging opponenets out of position before knocking the percentage ball to Hanson or the ops expecting us to knock that ball has given us moderate league success and dumbfounded the higher league ops, thing is, we are now being found out and without this option or threat of this option we are stilted in our build up play, hopefully the Oxford game was 'one of those games' but we didn't look like we could pass wind never mind a bag filled with it.

Prisoner Cell Block A says...
5:10pm Mon 14 Jan 13

By the way, how is the JPT route now more realistic of a Wembley appearance than the CCO? We have one game to play with an advantage of 2 goals, we still could have two games away from home in JPT with what will hopefully be as weak a squad as possible. In fact, I'd turn up with a team full of kids, lose and let the league fine us.

Minimum of 61 games is ridiculous for a 4th division outfit to try and compete/complete with a small squad. The JPT rules need a serious overhaul.

Whoisevans? says...
7:37pm Mon 14 Jan 13

To be honest i'm not bothered if we win or lose in the JPT. I would rather we get going in the league where are the players who were promising us automatic promotion only a few weeks ago? Some I noted only got a 5 on the match ratings. The cup can be a distraction from the league but we don't want it if it's an interuption to the league. We have 19 games left we need a run of 10 wins or more to be a realistic challenge to the automatic promotion pack.

balbrigganfc says...
8:10pm Mon 14 Jan 13

Whoisevans? wrote:
To be honest i'm not bothered if we win or lose in the JPT. I would rather we get going in the league where are the players who were promising us automatic promotion only a few weeks ago? Some I noted only got a 5 on the match ratings. The cup can be a distraction from the league but we don't want it if it's an interuption to the league. We have 19 games left we need a run of 10 wins or more to be a realistic challenge to the automatic promotion pack.
i think it will be great if city win the jpt, we haven't had any silverware in years, plus it would be great to see city at wembly, this will bring in much needed cash to bring in new players should we get promoted. It;s quiet obvious that the games played before the cup matches are being used to try things out, and to nurse some players who need a bit of a rest, just look at the amount of games we've played this year with such a small squad, would be nice to go to wembley three times this year

balbrigganfc says...
8:10pm Mon 14 Jan 13

Whoisevans? wrote:
To be honest i'm not bothered if we win or lose in the JPT. I would rather we get going in the league where are the players who were promising us automatic promotion only a few weeks ago? Some I noted only got a 5 on the match ratings. The cup can be a distraction from the league but we don't want it if it's an interuption to the league. We have 19 games left we need a run of 10 wins or more to be a realistic challenge to the automatic promotion pack.
i think it will be great if city win the jpt, we haven't had any silverware in years, plus it would be great to see city at wembly, this will bring in much needed cash to bring in new players should we get promoted. It;s quiet obvious that the games played before the cup matches are being used to try things out, and to nurse some players who need a bit of a rest, just look at the amount of games we've played this year with such a small squad, would be nice to go to wembley three times this year

settler07 says...
7:54am Tue 15 Jan 13

Likely we will lose at Crewe whatever team we put out. No one will lose sleep over it so lets play the squad/youngsters.
Mental/physical fatigue has kicked in. Hopefully enough in the pot to bring in another quality midfielder to give Jones and Doyle a rest and some competition. Said it back in August that Taiwo would have been the final piece in the jigsaw and think we need someone of his ilk.

dannbradfc says...
8:47am Tue 15 Jan 13

we need the option of a creative / attacking midfielder. We already have ravenhill and Jones remember and the option of Atkinson moving inside. Something different from the bench would give us further options.......

dannbradfc says...
8:52am Tue 15 Jan 13

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
dannbradfc wrote: I've stated on the oxford game thread that we need a plan b when our system is been countered. Against the premiership sides we can sit deep and we've seen this work. However both Rochdale and Oxford countered this and thus we need to be able to change things when this is happening. We have the players to be able to change things around if/when required but 'doggedly' sticking to what we do when the opposition are clearly on top isn't helping. Even if we try something different for 15 mins to give them something different to think about.......
I'm not sure we do have the players to change it around, our success has come from using the tried and tested, when we have been forced into a different formation or tactics it hasn't yielded much and I believe we are too entrenched in this style now to 'switch up' . I know I have championed JH all season but that is mainly in his defence at the continuous knockers who do so with little or no thought behind their ignorant comments and don't, in my opinion, have much more of an idea than what they are told by Messers Shearer n co. We have become very one dimensional this year, a very good one dimension as it has seen us have our most successful season for years, I just hope we haven't blown it now or run out of steam/ideas. Dragging opponenets out of position before knocking the percentage ball to Hanson or the ops expecting us to knock that ball has given us moderate league success and dumbfounded the higher league ops, thing is, we are now being found out and without this option or threat of this option we are stilted in our build up play, hopefully the Oxford game was 'one of those games' but we didn't look like we could pass wind never mind a bag filled with it.
I'm not on about starting with a different formation but just having the option to change it during games. Parkinson stated he wanted players who could cover a variety of positions due to a small squad.

On Saturday the only way we made them uncomfortable was via Nahki's pace. Why not play a narrow three with Atkinson moving more central and then move Hines in an advanced role with Nahki operating on one flank. Instaed of hitting high balls to a stationary Gray we could hit the channels and turn them around, their wing-backs would have been forced back and then the momentum may have switched to us. We wouldn't have used a sub and we could've seen how it goes.

This would have been a positive move. This erring on the side of caution costs us points i feel. We have better players than most sides thus we need to impose ourselves on them and make them counter-act us, not the other way round......

Whoisevans? says...
6:47pm Tue 15 Jan 13

Reading between the lines it sounds like the players played their own game by what Parky put in tonights T&A The style didn't suit Gray? Why did they keep hitting high balls to Gray have they no ideas of their own? We are losing ground on the leading pack and it is not a very good week to do that when we have to play Port Vale in the same week and the Rotherham game coming up soon. I hope we have learned from the game we played against Vale at home. We need players to lose their markers and create space for the other players. We have not got the ability to find the head of a target man so maybe we should try a different formation.

Prisoner Cell Block A says...
2:22pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Whoisevans? wrote:
Reading between the lines it sounds like the players played their own game by what Parky put in tonights T&A The style didn't suit Gray? Why did they keep hitting high balls to Gray have they no ideas of their own? We are losing ground on the leading pack and it is not a very good week to do that when we have to play Port Vale in the same week and the Rotherham game coming up soon. I hope we have learned from the game we played against Vale at home. We need players to lose their markers and create space for the other players. We have not got the ability to find the head of a target man so maybe we should try a different formation.
We hammered Vale at home and their goal came from a G Jones misplaced header back to the keeper, go back and check the stats re shots/attempts on target and possession.

Whoisevans? says...
8:13pm Wed 16 Jan 13

Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:
Whoisevans? wrote:
Reading between the lines it sounds like the players played their own game by what Parky put in tonights T&A The style didn't suit Gray? Why did they keep hitting high balls to Gray have they no ideas of their own? We are losing ground on the leading pack and it is not a very good week to do that when we have to play Port Vale in the same week and the Rotherham game coming up soon. I hope we have learned from the game we played against Vale at home. We need players to lose their markers and create space for the other players. We have not got the ability to find the head of a target man so maybe we should try a different formation.
We hammered Vale at home and their goal came from a G Jones misplaced header back to the keeper, go back and check the stats re shots/attempts on target and possession.
One nil that's says it all prisoner. We did make some chances but we couldn't make them count but we could have if we had used the players we had to better use. I was in the Kop that day and Hanson was mauled all the way through the game by two Vale players. The wingers and midfield failed to use that space and continually knocked the high ball to Hanson when the set pieces could have targeted
players who were unmarked.
That is my point Prisoner. I was thinking why don't we try something different it was stupid watching them wasting time.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree