Bulls are closing in on Sidlow deal (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)

bullybullman wrote:
Archie what relevence does this have ? Its been released to show people we are still active in seeking new blood. Sidlow has good potential hard hitting & could be good. Mason gobby & an penalty machine glad we did not go anywhere near.

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead

Solomon Grundy wrote:
Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through.

But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option.

We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.

Old Dave wrote:
This is the sort of signing you get when you cant start putting your squad together until october or november!

for what its worth, I think its pretty poor form from us unless salford have asked us to take him. Its not long since we were getting very angry at suggestions linking our players with moves

Steam Pigs wrote:

Old Dave wrote:
This is the sort of signing you get when you cant start putting your squad together until october or november!

for what its worth, I think its pretty poor form from us unless salford have asked us to take him. Its not long since we were getting very angry at suggestions linking our players with moves

poor form??

"The City Reds are in the midst of a financial crisis and have agreed to release Sidlow from his contract as they seek to cut costs"

we have been linked to him for weeks well before Salords problems came to the surface

ButtersBulls11 wrote:
I arn't blinkered but I do not know what you are referring to, sidlow gets into trouble in pubs? another forward who? I can remember loads of 'trouble' instances from other clubs last few years but not any troubles from ours so i must have bad memory. My point was lets get the season under way before we start moaning and being negative as it may pan out better than people expect.

ifallwerelikemumby wrote:

ButtersBulls11 wrote:
what relevance as the local pubs got to do with the signings - some right idiots on here. I reckon Matty blythe and foster will turn out to be some of best signgings in SL13 and wish people would just give the club a chance before slating everything they try to do to rebuild !!!

What have the local pubs got to do with it ? Heavens we have a right blinkered one here, Yes son the players don't go out drinking and getting into bother.

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead

theviking62 wrote:
Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners.

Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious.

So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well.

Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.

Shelfrhino wrote:
So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name.
Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.

theviking62 wrote:
Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners.

Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious.

So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well.

Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.

theviking62 wrote:
Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners.

Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious.

So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well.

Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.

Shelfrhino wrote:
So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name.
Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.

raisemeup wrote:

Shelfrhino wrote: So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name. Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.

Where do you find these childish outbursts???? You don't even do justice in the name calling stakes to an 8 year old in a remedial class?? Now go away!!!!!

Mumby was the best wrote:
The CRETIN has another ID

Cretin
A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.

Mumby was the best wrote:

Shelfrhino wrote:
So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name.
Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.

Better add vulture to the rhinos name as well then, wasn`t Joel Moon pinched from Salford?

Sheffieldbull wrote:

Mumby was the best wrote: The CRETIN has another ID Cretin A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.

Thought the same myself Mumby, What a slug eh?

mrsraisemeup wrote:

Sheffieldbull wrote:

Mumby was the best wrote: The CRETIN has another ID Cretin A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.

Thought the same myself Mumby, What a slug eh?

How dare you refer to me in such terms, I shall tell Mr R to have stern words with you.

mrsraisemeup wrote:
Good evening Shelf, Brian is currently in his bedroom playing with his trains so although I usually do speak for him I wont this time.

mrsraisemeup wrote:
No he really does have a train set.

Solomon Grundy wrote:
Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through.

But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option.

We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.

mines a pint wrote:

Solomon Grundy wrote:
Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through.

But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option.

We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.

Seem to remember a lot of criticism when it was first muted that Peacock was going to move to prop from second row that didn't work did it?

Giving langley a run out at prop is worth a look IMO

He has never given less than 100% he's not afraid of taking the ball up & always tops our tackle count never understood why he attracts so many knockers on here

The other advantage of moving him is it gives better options at loose as the one thing Jamie did not bring to that position was a great passing game that you see from the more attacking/creative 13's

Above all we have to remember we are pretty much starting a fresh in building a team so we will have to go with what we have got

rather that than spend more than we earn & end up in the same position we were in throughout 2012

Mumby was the best wrote:
I remember a certain Jeff Grayshon started as a full back then as he got older he progressed to prop via back row. Langleys game is more suited to prop IMO and it frees up loose forward for a more creative player.