Bradford Bulls are closing in on deal to sign Adam Sidlow

Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Salford City Reds' prop Adam Sidlow would add much-needed power to the Bulls pack Salford City Reds' prop Adam Sidlow would add much-needed power to the Bulls pack

Bulls coach Francis Cummins is on the verge of completing the signing of Salford prop Adam Sidlow.

A deal has been in the offing for several weeks and the powerhouse front-rower is understood to be keen to join the Bulls.

The imposing 25-year-old, who stands 6ft 4in and weighs in at over 17st, will bolster a pack decimated by the departure of Tom Burgess, Craig Kopczak, Bryn Hargreaves and Olivier Elima.

The City Reds are in the midst of a financial crisis and have agreed to release Sidlow from his contract as they seek to cut costs.

Salford were keen to sign Michael Platt in a part-exchange deal but their financial woes, coupled with the fact that Cummins views the centre as a valuable member of his squad, looks to have put paid to any such move.

Media and football manager Stuart Duffy is in regular contact with Sidlow’s agent – former Wigan, Widnes and New Zealand coach Frank Endacott – as the Bulls look to tie up the deal possibly before the end of this week.

Cummins, meanwhile, will give his squad a ten-day break over Christmas before they resume pre-season training early in the new year.

The Bulls boss said he has been delighted with the attitude of his men in recent weeks as they build towards the start of the 2013 campaign.

Cummins’ side will play friendlies against Dewsbury Rams (Sunday, January 13) and Leeds Rhinos (Sunday, January 20) before their Super League opener at home to Wakefield on Sunday, February 3 at the Provident Stadium, kick-off 3pm.

Comments (56)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:41am Thu 13 Dec 12

Solomon Grundy says...

Good news and welcome aboard Adam!

And we need another one.
Good news and welcome aboard Adam! And we need another one. Solomon Grundy

8:55am Thu 13 Dec 12

Schoey 2 says...

WOW!!!!!

Awesome signing. This guy will destroy opposition packs. LOL.
WOW!!!!! Awesome signing. This guy will destroy opposition packs. LOL. Schoey 2

8:57am Thu 13 Dec 12

Archie's Ghost says...

This has been released cos Mason has signed forCas.
This has been released cos Mason has signed forCas. Archie's Ghost

9:07am Thu 13 Dec 12

ifallwerelikemumby says...

Another prop and half back still required , Come on FC get knock knock knocking on Omars door.
Another prop and half back still required , Come on FC get knock knock knocking on Omars door. ifallwerelikemumby

9:10am Thu 13 Dec 12

bullybullman says...

Archie what relevence does this have ? Its been released to show people we are still active in seeking new blood. Sidlow has good potential hard hitting & could be good. Mason gobby & an penalty machine glad we did not go anywhere near.
Archie what relevence does this have ? Its been released to show people we are still active in seeking new blood. Sidlow has good potential hard hitting & could be good. Mason gobby & an penalty machine glad we did not go anywhere near. bullybullman

9:15am Thu 13 Dec 12

Mumby was the best says...

bullybullman wrote:
Archie what relevence does this have ? Its been released to show people we are still active in seeking new blood. Sidlow has good potential hard hitting & could be good. Mason gobby & an penalty machine glad we did not go anywhere near.
Spot on Mason is trouble. Sidlow is still young and played plenty of SL.
[quote][p][bold]bullybullman[/bold] wrote: Archie what relevence does this have ? Its been released to show people we are still active in seeking new blood. Sidlow has good potential hard hitting & could be good. Mason gobby & an penalty machine glad we did not go anywhere near.[/p][/quote]Spot on Mason is trouble. Sidlow is still young and played plenty of SL. Mumby was the best

9:49am Thu 13 Dec 12

Uglytruth says...

wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead
wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead Uglytruth

10:06am Thu 13 Dec 12

Steam Pigs says...

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead
errrrmmmm can you remember what happened this summer?

Do you know what is happening at Salford????
[quote][p][bold]Uglytruth[/bold] wrote: wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead[/p][/quote]errrrmmmm can you remember what happened this summer? Do you know what is happening at Salford???? Steam Pigs

10:11am Thu 13 Dec 12

UNBULLIEVABLE says...

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead
Muppet!
[quote][p][bold]Uglytruth[/bold] wrote: wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead[/p][/quote]Muppet! UNBULLIEVABLE

10:21am Thu 13 Dec 12

Sheffieldbull says...

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead
Absolute disgrace that FC didn't sign David Shillington, Paul Gallen and Chris Hill. No ambition!....... Oh hang on a minute, Just remembered the real ugly truth is that from administration we were left in no mans land regarding recruitment, Omar Khan is not a philanthropist billionaire and cream of world RL talent ain't falling over themselves to pull on the glorious RAB or the Bulls. Wake up and smell the ugly truth.... and at least we have days ahead to look forward to.
[quote][p][bold]Uglytruth[/bold] wrote: wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead[/p][/quote]Absolute disgrace that FC didn't sign David Shillington, Paul Gallen and Chris Hill. No ambition!....... Oh hang on a minute, Just remembered the real ugly truth is that from administration we were left in no mans land regarding recruitment, Omar Khan is not a philanthropist billionaire and cream of world RL talent ain't falling over themselves to pull on the glorious RAB or the Bulls. Wake up and smell the ugly truth.... and at least we have days ahead to look forward to. Sheffieldbull

10:24am Thu 13 Dec 12

Parz says...

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead
Paramatta did'nt want Nas, he was playing in thier feeder team, and look how that turned out.

Do you have any other completely inane and irrellevant points to make?
[quote][p][bold]Uglytruth[/bold] wrote: wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead[/p][/quote]Paramatta did'nt want Nas, he was playing in thier feeder team, and look how that turned out. Do you have any other completely inane and irrellevant points to make? Parz

10:31am Thu 13 Dec 12

Videoref says...

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead
Mouth in overdrive-brain in neutral
[quote][p][bold]Uglytruth[/bold] wrote: wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead[/p][/quote]Mouth in overdrive-brain in neutral Videoref

10:45am Thu 13 Dec 12

Solomon Grundy says...

Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through.

But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option.

We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.
Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through. But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option. We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy. Solomon Grundy

10:48am Thu 13 Dec 12

Old Dave says...

This is the sort of signing you get when you cant start putting your squad together until october or november!

for what its worth, I think its pretty poor form from us unless salford have asked us to take him. Its not long since we were getting very angry at suggestions linking our players with moves
This is the sort of signing you get when you cant start putting your squad together until october or november! for what its worth, I think its pretty poor form from us unless salford have asked us to take him. Its not long since we were getting very angry at suggestions linking our players with moves Old Dave

10:49am Thu 13 Dec 12

Steam Pigs says...

Solomon Grundy wrote:
Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through.

But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option.

We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.
Why is it a minimum reqirement to have 4 props? is it in the SLE operating rules......

You say we have lost 3 props but we have signed 2 (Evans/Sidlow) and have another coming back from long term injury,so thats 3....
[quote][p][bold]Solomon Grundy[/bold] wrote: Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through. But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option. We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.[/p][/quote]Why is it a minimum reqirement to have 4 props? is it in the SLE operating rules...... You say we have lost 3 props but we have signed 2 (Evans/Sidlow) and have another coming back from long term injury,so thats 3.... Steam Pigs

10:51am Thu 13 Dec 12

Steam Pigs says...

Old Dave wrote:
This is the sort of signing you get when you cant start putting your squad together until october or november!

for what its worth, I think its pretty poor form from us unless salford have asked us to take him. Its not long since we were getting very angry at suggestions linking our players with moves
poor form??

"The City Reds are in the midst of a financial crisis and have agreed to release Sidlow from his contract as they seek to cut costs"

we have been linked to him for weeks well before Salords problems came to the surface
[quote][p][bold]Old Dave[/bold] wrote: This is the sort of signing you get when you cant start putting your squad together until october or november! for what its worth, I think its pretty poor form from us unless salford have asked us to take him. Its not long since we were getting very angry at suggestions linking our players with moves[/p][/quote]poor form?? "The City Reds are in the midst of a financial crisis and have agreed to release Sidlow from his contract as they seek to cut costs" we have been linked to him for weeks well before Salords problems came to the surface Steam Pigs

10:54am Thu 13 Dec 12

ifallwerelikemumby says...

At least with all these new players the local pubs will do a roaring trade.
At least with all these new players the local pubs will do a roaring trade. ifallwerelikemumby

11:16am Thu 13 Dec 12

THEMANOFSTEEL says...

We have 4 props now scruton Nas Evans and sidlow would still find a young player from somewhere
Don't dewsbury have any???
This is awesome news
Have always liked sidlows drive will be a very good signing
We have 4 props now scruton Nas Evans and sidlow would still find a young player from somewhere Don't dewsbury have any??? This is awesome news Have always liked sidlows drive will be a very good signing THEMANOFSTEEL

11:36am Thu 13 Dec 12

ifallwerelikemumby says...

Steam Pigs wrote:
Old Dave wrote:
This is the sort of signing you get when you cant start putting your squad together until october or november!

for what its worth, I think its pretty poor form from us unless salford have asked us to take him. Its not long since we were getting very angry at suggestions linking our players with moves
poor form??

"The City Reds are in the midst of a financial crisis and have agreed to release Sidlow from his contract as they seek to cut costs"

we have been linked to him for weeks well before Salords problems came to the surface
Wrong AGAIN, Your little entourage including Helga have been saying Salford in the mire for a lot longer than bulls linked with sidlow.
Just a good job there intelligent fellows like myself to remind you of your blinkered little ways.
[quote][p][bold]Steam Pigs[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Old Dave[/bold] wrote: This is the sort of signing you get when you cant start putting your squad together until october or november! for what its worth, I think its pretty poor form from us unless salford have asked us to take him. Its not long since we were getting very angry at suggestions linking our players with moves[/p][/quote]poor form?? "The City Reds are in the midst of a financial crisis and have agreed to release Sidlow from his contract as they seek to cut costs" we have been linked to him for weeks well before Salords problems came to the surface[/p][/quote]Wrong AGAIN, Your little entourage including Helga have been saying Salford in the mire for a lot longer than bulls linked with sidlow. Just a good job there intelligent fellows like myself to remind you of your blinkered little ways. ifallwerelikemumby

12:20pm Thu 13 Dec 12

ButtersBulls11 says...

what relevance as the local pubs got to do with the signings - some right idiots on here. I reckon Matty blythe and foster will turn out to be some of best signgings in SL13 and wish people would just give the club a chance before slating everything they try to do to rebuild !!!
what relevance as the local pubs got to do with the signings - some right idiots on here. I reckon Matty blythe and foster will turn out to be some of best signgings in SL13 and wish people would just give the club a chance before slating everything they try to do to rebuild !!! ButtersBulls11

12:44pm Thu 13 Dec 12

ButtersBulls11 says...

I arn't blinkered but I do not know what you are referring to, sidlow gets into trouble in pubs? another forward who? I can remember loads of 'trouble' instances from other clubs last few years but not any troubles from ours so i must have bad memory. My point was lets get the season under way before we start moaning and being negative as it may pan out better than people expect.
I arn't blinkered but I do not know what you are referring to, sidlow gets into trouble in pubs? another forward who? I can remember loads of 'trouble' instances from other clubs last few years but not any troubles from ours so i must have bad memory. My point was lets get the season under way before we start moaning and being negative as it may pan out better than people expect. ButtersBulls11

12:54pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Steam Pigs says...

ButtersBulls11 wrote:
I arn't blinkered but I do not know what you are referring to, sidlow gets into trouble in pubs? another forward who? I can remember loads of 'trouble' instances from other clubs last few years but not any troubles from ours so i must have bad memory. My point was lets get the season under way before we start moaning and being negative as it may pan out better than people expect.
its a troll, best to ignore it, that really winds it up ;-)
[quote][p][bold]ButtersBulls11[/bold] wrote: I arn't blinkered but I do not know what you are referring to, sidlow gets into trouble in pubs? another forward who? I can remember loads of 'trouble' instances from other clubs last few years but not any troubles from ours so i must have bad memory. My point was lets get the season under way before we start moaning and being negative as it may pan out better than people expect.[/p][/quote]its a troll, best to ignore it, that really winds it up ;-) Steam Pigs

1:01pm Thu 13 Dec 12

-HCK3R- says...

ifallwerelikemumby wrote:
ButtersBulls11 wrote:
what relevance as the local pubs got to do with the signings - some right idiots on here. I reckon Matty blythe and foster will turn out to be some of best signgings in SL13 and wish people would just give the club a chance before slating everything they try to do to rebuild !!!
What have the local pubs got to do with it ? Heavens we have a right blinkered one here, Yes son the players don't go out drinking and getting into bother.
See the voices still coming through telling you to post their inane ramblings ........maybe and I mean maybe one day they will tell you to post something half intelligent or relevant to the original story .........
[quote][p][bold]ifallwerelikemumby[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ButtersBulls11[/bold] wrote: what relevance as the local pubs got to do with the signings - some right idiots on here. I reckon Matty blythe and foster will turn out to be some of best signgings in SL13 and wish people would just give the club a chance before slating everything they try to do to rebuild !!![/p][/quote]What have the local pubs got to do with it ? Heavens we have a right blinkered one here, Yes son the players don't go out drinking and getting into bother.[/p][/quote]See the voices still coming through telling you to post their inane ramblings ........maybe and I mean maybe one day they will tell you to post something half intelligent or relevant to the original story ......... -HCK3R-

1:33pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Shelfrhino says...

So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name.
Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.
So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name. Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up. Shelfrhino

2:37pm Thu 13 Dec 12

bullybullman says...

Uglytruth wrote:
wow what an awesome signing NOT!
there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly!
why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects?
(evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints)
oh dear dark days ahead
Ugly & thick do you read the news ?
[quote][p][bold]Uglytruth[/bold] wrote: wow what an awesome signing NOT! there must be a reason why salford dont want him...but we do! that sums up FC perfectly! why is he building our team with players who dont make the grade at their own teams and are either loanee's or rejects? (evans, blythe- cant get into warrington's team) (foster is a trouble maker and was wanted out by saints) oh dear dark days ahead[/p][/quote]Ugly & thick do you read the news ? bullybullman

2:51pm Thu 13 Dec 12

theviking62 says...

Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners.

Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious.

So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well.

Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.
Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners. Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious. So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well. Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters. theviking62

3:19pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Steam Pigs says...

theviking62 wrote:
Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners.

Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious.

So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well.

Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.
Merry Christmas to you too

Wonder if L**ds will be investigated for tapping up Joel Moon now?
[quote][p][bold]theviking62[/bold] wrote: Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners. Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious. So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well. Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.[/p][/quote]Merry Christmas to you too Wonder if L**ds will be investigated for tapping up Joel Moon now? Steam Pigs

4:01pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Mumby was the best says...

Shelfrhino wrote:
So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name.
Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.
Better add vulture to the rhinos name as well then, wasn`t Joel Moon pinched from Salford?
[quote][p][bold]Shelfrhino[/bold] wrote: So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name. Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.[/p][/quote]Better add vulture to the rhinos name as well then, wasn`t Joel Moon pinched from Salford? Mumby was the best

4:03pm Thu 13 Dec 12

ifallwerelikemumby says...

Just for Baa Baa Mumbly sheep it was in paper other day no action to be taken on the Moon deal .

NEXT
Just for Baa Baa Mumbly sheep it was in paper other day no action to be taken on the Moon deal . NEXT ifallwerelikemumby

4:27pm Thu 13 Dec 12

raisemeup says...

theviking62 wrote:
Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners.

Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious.

So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well.

Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.
Good to see you back Viking and the same to you and yours.

They really are a pathetic lot aren't they>
With their inane jibes and useless comments.

Whatever the Bulls do to build a squad has to be applauded after what has been a traumatic and harrowing time all round.

I hope that Salford don't suffer the same fate as us or for that matter Wakefield.

On another topic, congratulations to Bradford City who have begun the process of putting the sport back into the City.
COYB.
[quote][p][bold]theviking62[/bold] wrote: Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners. Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious. So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well. Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.[/p][/quote]Good to see you back Viking and the same to you and yours. They really are a pathetic lot aren't they> With their inane jibes and useless comments. Whatever the Bulls do to build a squad has to be applauded after what has been a traumatic and harrowing time all round. I hope that Salford don't suffer the same fate as us or for that matter Wakefield. On another topic, congratulations to Bradford City who have begun the process of putting the sport back into the City. COYB. raisemeup

5:16pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Mumby was the best says...

theviking62 wrote:
Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners.

Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious.

So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well.

Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.
Merry Xmas Viking, I see some of the CRETINS posts have been removed from this topic and from the Bateman story.
Maybe the T&A is waking up to the fact that the CRETIN and his follower RHINOCRETIN contribute nothing but vile negatives.
[quote][p][bold]theviking62[/bold] wrote: Just to point out to the fool that follows the Loiners. Sidlow, is not in the Salford Squad. It is a deal that has been on the cards for 3/4 months. When, the situation at Salford was not warranted as serious. So I suggest, you, like the other doubters and know nowt's, should read beyond the pages of the t n a. That means, Ugly, Fake, as well. Merry Xmas to all TRUE Bulls supporters.[/p][/quote]Merry Xmas Viking, I see some of the CRETINS posts have been removed from this topic and from the Bateman story. Maybe the T&A is waking up to the fact that the CRETIN and his follower RHINOCRETIN contribute nothing but vile negatives. Mumby was the best

5:29pm Thu 13 Dec 12

pweibj67 says...

no vultures involved!

Sid lowe wants out thats all. And they are not too bothered about keeping him . for whatever reason? perhaps a fall out with their coach!

So far the lad has not dropped a single pass or missed a tackle for us. Until then why slag him or the club off . oh apart from your inbred trolls (sorry answered my own question!)

He could make a name for himself or be cast out to the championship in a couple of years .. one way to find out and that is to give the lad a chance!!

what ever he does . he has still achieved more in his life than i believe certain trolls have?
no vultures involved! Sid lowe wants out thats all. And they are not too bothered about keeping him . for whatever reason? perhaps a fall out with their coach! So far the lad has not dropped a single pass or missed a tackle for us. Until then why slag him or the club off . oh apart from your inbred trolls (sorry answered my own question!) He could make a name for himself or be cast out to the championship in a couple of years .. one way to find out and that is to give the lad a chance!! what ever he does . he has still achieved more in his life than i believe certain trolls have? pweibj67

6:44pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Shipley Paul says...

Anyone know Adam as well as Francis Cummins? No? well shut up then until we see how he goes. He's a big aggressive lad, the sort every comment maker on here has been banging on about, so watch this space!
Anyone know Adam as well as Francis Cummins? No? well shut up then until we see how he goes. He's a big aggressive lad, the sort every comment maker on here has been banging on about, so watch this space! Shipley Paul

7:02pm Thu 13 Dec 12

raisemeup says...

Shelfrhino wrote:
So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name.
Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.
Where do you find these childish outbursts????

You don't even do justice in the name calling stakes to an 8 year old in a remedial class??

Now go away!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]Shelfrhino[/bold] wrote: So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name. Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.[/p][/quote]Where do you find these childish outbursts???? You don't even do justice in the name calling stakes to an 8 year old in a remedial class?? Now go away!!!!! raisemeup

7:16pm Thu 13 Dec 12

col 64 says...

Saw him play against us at Barton.big strong running and full of fire,just what we need.as Viking says this deal has been on the boil for months now with platty going the other way ,buts that's off due to salfords situation and the fact that franny rates platty.so it's a win win for us.oh and we didn't plunder him Salford agreed to release him to cut costs
Saw him play against us at Barton.big strong running and full of fire,just what we need.as Viking says this deal has been on the boil for months now with platty going the other way ,buts that's off due to salfords situation and the fact that franny rates platty.so it's a win win for us.oh and we didn't plunder him Salford agreed to release him to cut costs col 64

7:34pm Thu 13 Dec 12

mrsraisemeup says...

raisemeup wrote:
Shelfrhino wrote: So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name. Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.
Where do you find these childish outbursts???? You don't even do justice in the name calling stakes to an 8 year old in a remedial class?? Now go away!!!!!
Got to agree with the other half stop being so childish, and that is coming from the boss of the house
[quote][p][bold]raisemeup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Shelfrhino[/bold] wrote: So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name. Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.[/p][/quote]Where do you find these childish outbursts???? You don't even do justice in the name calling stakes to an 8 year old in a remedial class?? Now go away!!!!![/p][/quote]Got to agree with the other half stop being so childish, and that is coming from the boss of the house mrsraisemeup

7:40pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Mumby was the best says...

The CRETIN has another ID

Cretin
A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.
The CRETIN has another ID Cretin A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session. Mumby was the best

7:46pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Sheffieldbull says...

Mumby was the best wrote:
The CRETIN has another ID

Cretin
A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.
Thought the same myself Mumby, What a slug eh?
[quote][p][bold]Mumby was the best[/bold] wrote: The CRETIN has another ID Cretin A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.[/p][/quote]Thought the same myself Mumby, What a slug eh? Sheffieldbull

7:51pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Videoref says...

Mumby was the best wrote:
Shelfrhino wrote:
So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name.
Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.
Better add vulture to the rhinos name as well then, wasn`t Joel Moon pinched from Salford?
No he was homesick and missing his family! Obviously Leeds is a lot more convenient for Sydney than Salford if you are popping home for the weekend. Now where is the airport.........Oh yes-Manchester!
[quote][p][bold]Mumby was the best[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Shelfrhino[/bold] wrote: So can we add vulture to the sharkbullrat's name. Seem to remember all the tarts on here screaming about vultures when you club went belly up.[/p][/quote]Better add vulture to the rhinos name as well then, wasn`t Joel Moon pinched from Salford?[/p][/quote]No he was homesick and missing his family! Obviously Leeds is a lot more convenient for Sydney than Salford if you are popping home for the weekend. Now where is the airport.........Oh yes-Manchester! Videoref

8:03pm Thu 13 Dec 12

mrsraisemeup says...

Sheffieldbull wrote:
Mumby was the best wrote: The CRETIN has another ID Cretin A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.
Thought the same myself Mumby, What a slug eh?
How dare you refer to me in such terms, I shall tell Mr R to have stern words with you.
[quote][p][bold]Sheffieldbull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mumby was the best[/bold] wrote: The CRETIN has another ID Cretin A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.[/p][/quote]Thought the same myself Mumby, What a slug eh?[/p][/quote]How dare you refer to me in such terms, I shall tell Mr R to have stern words with you. mrsraisemeup

8:17pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Sheffieldbull says...

mrsraisemeup wrote:
Sheffieldbull wrote:
Mumby was the best wrote: The CRETIN has another ID Cretin A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.
Thought the same myself Mumby, What a slug eh?
How dare you refer to me in such terms, I shall tell Mr R to have stern words with you.
Point proved -the list gets longer...
[quote][p][bold]mrsraisemeup[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Sheffieldbull[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Mumby was the best[/bold] wrote: The CRETIN has another ID Cretin A Person that is: brainless, stupid, child-like, and full of pointless information that makes no sense and appeals only to other cretins. They can be found in abundance in every single populated internet forum, where they race to post as many mind-numbing messages as possible in a single session.[/p][/quote]Thought the same myself Mumby, What a slug eh?[/p][/quote]How dare you refer to me in such terms, I shall tell Mr R to have stern words with you.[/p][/quote]Point proved -the list gets longer... Sheffieldbull

8:49pm Thu 13 Dec 12

mrsraisemeup says...

Mrs R getting angry here with you Sheffield, I always thought you were OK and gave the trolls what for but you are showing your no more a grown up than them.

Mrs R
Mrs R getting angry here with you Sheffield, I always thought you were OK and gave the trolls what for but you are showing your no more a grown up than them. Mrs R mrsraisemeup

10:51pm Thu 13 Dec 12

Shelfrhino says...

Good evening MrsR,
Not long now and the rugby season is back with us.
Will you be going for your usual "game of bingo" while Brian and his boring pals have a pint and talk about games they never went to.

viking,
nice to have you back mate, I see you have your voice back, piles cleared up have they?

Mumby,
Once again your inane comments are beneath contempt. You really should try something original and not just copy what the bigger boys say.
Good evening MrsR, Not long now and the rugby season is back with us. Will you be going for your usual "game of bingo" while Brian and his boring pals have a pint and talk about games they never went to. viking, nice to have you back mate, I see you have your voice back, piles cleared up have they? Mumby, Once again your inane comments are beneath contempt. You really should try something original and not just copy what the bigger boys say. Shelfrhino

11:26pm Thu 13 Dec 12

mrsraisemeup says...

Good evening Shelf, Brian is currently in his bedroom playing with his trains so although I usually do speak for him I wont this time.
Good evening Shelf, Brian is currently in his bedroom playing with his trains so although I usually do speak for him I wont this time. mrsraisemeup

12:55am Fri 14 Dec 12

Shelfrhino says...

mrsraisemeup wrote:
Good evening Shelf, Brian is currently in his bedroom playing with his trains so although I usually do speak for him I wont this time.
Is "playing with his trains", a euphemism for what I think it is?
[quote][p][bold]mrsraisemeup[/bold] wrote: Good evening Shelf, Brian is currently in his bedroom playing with his trains so although I usually do speak for him I wont this time.[/p][/quote]Is "playing with his trains", a euphemism for what I think it is? Shelfrhino

1:16am Fri 14 Dec 12

mrsraisemeup says...

No he really does have a train set.
No he really does have a train set. mrsraisemeup

8:12am Fri 14 Dec 12

-HCK3R- says...

mrsraisemeup wrote:
No he really does have a train set.
See al the voices are now getting their own sign ons ........so many yet not can come through with anything remotely sensible .......poor little thing you really need to increase your medication.....
[quote][p][bold]mrsraisemeup[/bold] wrote: No he really does have a train set.[/p][/quote]See al the voices are now getting their own sign ons ........so many yet not can come through with anything remotely sensible .......poor little thing you really need to increase your medication..... -HCK3R-

9:56am Fri 14 Dec 12

theviking62 says...

Shelfrhino, this is for your ears only. You are a lowlife ****, making reference to my illness, which happens to be far more serious than piles. I would suggest you do one, or meet me at Odsal for the first game of the season. Then we can discuss it one to one. Mind you I believe that you will have a ready excuse why you can't.

FAKE, I will offer you the same chance to discuss your problems, same place.

By the way lads I do not make threats, just promises. I await your replies.
Shelfrhino, this is for your ears only. You are a lowlife ****, making reference to my illness, which happens to be far more serious than piles. I would suggest you do one, or meet me at Odsal for the first game of the season. Then we can discuss it one to one. Mind you I believe that you will have a ready excuse why you can't. FAKE, I will offer you the same chance to discuss your problems, same place. By the way lads I do not make threats, just promises. I await your replies. theviking62

9:56am Fri 14 Dec 12

theviking62 says...

Shelfrhino, this is for your ears only. You are a lowlife ****, making reference to my illness, which happens to be far more serious than piles. I would suggest you do one, or meet me at Odsal for the first game of the season. Then we can discuss it one to one. Mind you I believe that you will have a ready excuse why you can't.

FAKE, I will offer you the same chance to discuss your problems, same place.

By the way lads I do not make threats, just promises. I await your replies.
Shelfrhino, this is for your ears only. You are a lowlife ****, making reference to my illness, which happens to be far more serious than piles. I would suggest you do one, or meet me at Odsal for the first game of the season. Then we can discuss it one to one. Mind you I believe that you will have a ready excuse why you can't. FAKE, I will offer you the same chance to discuss your problems, same place. By the way lads I do not make threats, just promises. I await your replies. theviking62

10:17am Fri 14 Dec 12

thedragonwithonewing says...

I am looking forward to what sidlow can do for us big lad and only 25 which under the right coaching he could become a good player. Oh and to the 'admins' of this site get you rear ends into gear and start dishing out warnings and swinging the banhammer before only a few people are left on this site arguing with each other and themselves
I am looking forward to what sidlow can do for us big lad and only 25 which under the right coaching he could become a good player. Oh and to the 'admins' of this site get you rear ends into gear and start dishing out warnings and swinging the banhammer before only a few people are left on this site arguing with each other and themselves thedragonwithonewing

10:56am Fri 14 Dec 12

theviking62 says...

Dragon, it will never happen, as the majority have already gone. So it's open to trolls. The admin, don't do a thing re them.

I came back to wish seasons greetings to friends on here and was immediately, abused and insulted. So I replied in style. But once again, I go a far, far, better site than this one. I advise you to do similar.
Dragon, it will never happen, as the majority have already gone. So it's open to trolls. The admin, don't do a thing re them. I came back to wish seasons greetings to friends on here and was immediately, abused and insulted. So I replied in style. But once again, I go a far, far, better site than this one. I advise you to do similar. theviking62

2:24pm Fri 14 Dec 12

Shelfrhino says...

viking,
lighten up.
I made no reference to your illness, the piles thing was a jocular reference to you speaking out of your a***.

In the past I have commented about your health and my hopes on you making a recovery. Nothing has changed as far as I'm concerned, I assumed that you are suffering with something a bit more serious than piles, hence the jocular comment.

Others may have made derogatory remarks in regard to your health, I am not, and will not be one of them.
There is a line you do not cross, and as far as I'm concerned jokes about people who are suffering poor health is one of them.

There are enough topics for banter and p*** taking without going that low.
viking, lighten up. I made no reference to your illness, the piles thing was a jocular reference to you speaking out of your a***. In the past I have commented about your health and my hopes on you making a recovery. Nothing has changed as far as I'm concerned, I assumed that you are suffering with something a bit more serious than piles, hence the jocular comment. Others may have made derogatory remarks in regard to your health, I am not, and will not be one of them. There is a line you do not cross, and as far as I'm concerned jokes about people who are suffering poor health is one of them. There are enough topics for banter and p*** taking without going that low. Shelfrhino

11:27am Sat 15 Dec 12

mines a pint says...

Solomon Grundy wrote:
Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through.

But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option.

We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.
Seem to remember a lot of criticism when it was first muted that Peacock was going to move to prop from second row that didn't work did it?

Giving langley a run out at prop is worth a look IMO

He has never given less than 100% he's not afraid of taking the ball up & always tops our tackle count never understood why he attracts so many knockers on here

The other advantage of moving him is it gives better options at loose as the one thing Jamie did not bring to that position was a great passing game that you see from the more attacking/creative 13's

Above all we have to remember we are pretty much starting a fresh in building a team so we will have to go with what we have got

rather that than spend more than we earn & end up in the same position we were in throughout 2012
[quote][p][bold]Solomon Grundy[/bold] wrote: Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through. But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option. We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.[/p][/quote]Seem to remember a lot of criticism when it was first muted that Peacock was going to move to prop from second row that didn't work did it? Giving langley a run out at prop is worth a look IMO He has never given less than 100% he's not afraid of taking the ball up & always tops our tackle count never understood why he attracts so many knockers on here The other advantage of moving him is it gives better options at loose as the one thing Jamie did not bring to that position was a great passing game that you see from the more attacking/creative 13's Above all we have to remember we are pretty much starting a fresh in building a team so we will have to go with what we have got rather that than spend more than we earn & end up in the same position we were in throughout 2012 mines a pint

1:34pm Sat 15 Dec 12

theviking62 says...

mines a pint wrote:
Solomon Grundy wrote:
Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through.

But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option.

We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.
Seem to remember a lot of criticism when it was first muted that Peacock was going to move to prop from second row that didn't work did it?

Giving langley a run out at prop is worth a look IMO

He has never given less than 100% he's not afraid of taking the ball up & always tops our tackle count never understood why he attracts so many knockers on here

The other advantage of moving him is it gives better options at loose as the one thing Jamie did not bring to that position was a great passing game that you see from the more attacking/creative 13's

Above all we have to remember we are pretty much starting a fresh in building a team so we will have to go with what we have got

rather that than spend more than we earn & end up in the same position we were in throughout 2012
I never new there was a specific number of props a team has to have. This was a deal, that was done a good while back, involving a straight swap for Platt. But due to Salfords predicament, that part of the deal is not going ahead. As for Langley been able to move up front, I an see no problems, he wouldn't be the first backrower/loose forward to make the move nor the last. If he is capable of doing the hard yards going forward, making the tackles then why not.

Well said mines a pint. Solomon, RL is game that allows the freedom of movement to players as they get older and loose pace. Centres to back row, halves to loose forwards. As long as they are fit, still have the ability, then why not move.

New season, new coach, new management, new team. Lets give them chance the deserve, before we start to criticise. COYB
[quote][p][bold]mines a pint[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Solomon Grundy[/bold] wrote: Sidlow does seem to offer some genuine size to go with Nas so I hope he is a good signing. I think Salford being in trouble is the reason he is leaving and with that I sympathize after what we went through. But we lost THREE props. We must pray Scruton is fit again, and Ben Evans can bring something to it, but that leaves just Sidlow & Nas and please do not talk up Langley at prop, that, like Evans, is a back up option. We have Scruton, Sidlow & Nas. So we are one prop forward short of the minimum requisite 4. To go into an SL season with what we have will prove a false economy.[/p][/quote]Seem to remember a lot of criticism when it was first muted that Peacock was going to move to prop from second row that didn't work did it? Giving langley a run out at prop is worth a look IMO He has never given less than 100% he's not afraid of taking the ball up & always tops our tackle count never understood why he attracts so many knockers on here The other advantage of moving him is it gives better options at loose as the one thing Jamie did not bring to that position was a great passing game that you see from the more attacking/creative 13's Above all we have to remember we are pretty much starting a fresh in building a team so we will have to go with what we have got rather that than spend more than we earn & end up in the same position we were in throughout 2012[/p][/quote]I never new there was a specific number of props a team has to have. This was a deal, that was done a good while back, involving a straight swap for Platt. But due to Salfords predicament, that part of the deal is not going ahead. As for Langley been able to move up front, I an see no problems, he wouldn't be the first backrower/loose forward to make the move nor the last. If he is capable of doing the hard yards going forward, making the tackles then why not. Well said mines a pint. Solomon, RL is game that allows the freedom of movement to players as they get older and loose pace. Centres to back row, halves to loose forwards. As long as they are fit, still have the ability, then why not move. New season, new coach, new management, new team. Lets give them chance the deserve, before we start to criticise. COYB theviking62

3:11pm Sat 15 Dec 12

Mumby was the best says...

I remember a certain Jeff Grayshon started as a full back then as he got older he progressed to prop via back row.
Langleys game is more suited to prop IMO and it frees up loose forward for a more creative player.
I remember a certain Jeff Grayshon started as a full back then as he got older he progressed to prop via back row. Langleys game is more suited to prop IMO and it frees up loose forward for a more creative player. Mumby was the best

12:50am Tue 18 Dec 12

alfucham says...

Mumby was the best wrote:
I remember a certain Jeff Grayshon started as a full back then as he got older he progressed to prop via back row. Langleys game is more suited to prop IMO and it frees up loose forward for a more creative player.
Gordon Bennett,its good to see this site is still the same with Mumby,fake,poorly viking,shelf rhino winding everyone to boiling (even though he clearly does it to provoke exactly the reaction he gets every time these bullies are reeled in every comment),Mr Raisemeup.now joined and stuck up for whilst hubby plays with his trains the Oft referred to Mrs raisemeup who now correctly admonishes old man sheffield Bully(one of the worst for my mind).

Oh what wonderfull pre christmas cheer.


Cant wait to get down to Odsal now the place is open 24/7 apparently and socialise with this lot.

Be like the bar scene in Star Wars.

Who are you offering out Viking?

Have you got your docs permission.

Why dont you ALL take a long hard look at yerselves and as Adeybull once said realise why hardly anyone else except about the ten or twelve usual suspects bothers to post.

Pure quality.

The bickering insults nastiness everywhere.

Well I suppose its back to the looney bin for me to leave you well versed bad mouthers to eat each other.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
[quote][p][bold]Mumby was the best[/bold] wrote: I remember a certain Jeff Grayshon started as a full back then as he got older he progressed to prop via back row. Langleys game is more suited to prop IMO and it frees up loose forward for a more creative player.[/p][/quote]Gordon Bennett,its good to see this site is still the same with Mumby,fake,poorly viking,shelf rhino winding everyone to boiling (even though he clearly does it to provoke exactly the reaction he gets every time these bullies are reeled in every comment),Mr Raisemeup.now joined and stuck up for whilst hubby plays with his trains the Oft referred to Mrs raisemeup who now correctly admonishes old man sheffield Bully(one of the worst for my mind). Oh what wonderfull pre christmas cheer. Cant wait to get down to Odsal now the place is open 24/7 apparently and socialise with this lot. Be like the bar scene in Star Wars. Who are you offering out Viking? Have you got your docs permission. Why dont you ALL take a long hard look at yerselves and as Adeybull once said realise why hardly anyone else except about the ten or twelve usual suspects bothers to post. Pure quality. The bickering insults nastiness everywhere. Well I suppose its back to the looney bin for me to leave you well versed bad mouthers to eat each other. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr alfucham

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree