News RSS Feed


Bishop critical of abortion decision

9:40pm Wednesday 21st May 2008

Comments (21)   Have your say »

By Anika Bourley »

The Bishop of Bradford, whose granddaughter was born before 24 weeks, has said MPs made a mistake by not voting to reduce the time limit a woman can have an abortion.

MPs on Tuesday threw out the first attempts for nearly 20 years to cut the 24-week time limit for abortions after a stormy debate.

Despite fierce lobbying by church leaders, they rejected an amendment to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill to cut the limit to 22 weeks by 304 votes to 233, a majority of 71.

Today Bradford's Bishop and the Bishop of Leeds both expressed their disappointment, saying 24 weeks was too late.

The Bishop of Bradford, the Right Reverend David James, said: "I believe that to allow abortions up to 24 weeks is too late. My own granddaughter was born just before then and there are babies I believe who survive from 22 weeks.

"Therefore it would seem common sense that if you are going to have any limit at all, and surely we should, then it should be lowered by at least two - and probably four - weeks. Sadly, I believe the House of Commons has made a mistake."

The Right Reverend Arthur Roche, the Roman Catholic Bishop of Leeds whose diocese includes Bradford, said the result was a severe disappointment to many.

He said: "Abortion is not just an issue for those individuals directly involved, but for us all as a society.

"Within hospitals throughout the country medical teams do all they can to ensure the maturation and successful care of babies born prematurely, while in another part of the hospital babies of the same age are being aborted.

"In my book a society which does not protect the weakest within it is a society that is breaking down."

Campaigners for a reduction in the time limit had warned Britain was in danger of becoming the "abortion capital of the world", with 201,000 terminations in 2006.

Some MPs argued that pictures of thumb-sucking foetuses appearing to "walk" in the womb had swung public opinion against late abortions.

Supporters of the limit said a cut to 20 weeks would have little effect on the abortion total, because fewer than 3,000 take place after that point. About 90 per cent are carried out in the first 13 weeks.

A recent survey of women of child-bearing age revealed 61 per cent think a woman should be able to have an abortion between 20 and 24 weeks in some circumstances.

Sixty one per cent of British women of child bearing age say a woman should have the right to access an abortion between 20 and 24 weeks in some circumstances, including severe foetal abnormalities, rape and domestic abuse.

Your Say YourBradford

Baht At, says...
8:30pm Fri 23 May 08

You do wonder why they bother having a Bishop if all he can do is interfere in matters that should be left to women.

Where is he when Bradford coucil and BCHT are trying to destroy what little housing provision there is for the vulnerable in society? Oh that's local stuff and he's probably not interested.

Baht At, says...
8:30pm Fri 23 May 08

You do wonder why they bother having a Bishop if all he can do is interfere in matters that should be left to women.

Where is he when Bradford coucil and BCHT are trying to destroy what little housing provision there is for the vulnerable in society? Oh that's local stuff and he's probably not interested.

Baht At, says...
8:30pm Fri 23 May 08

You do wonder why they bother having a Bishop if all he can do is interfere in matters that should be left to women.

Where is he when Bradford coucil and BCHT are trying to destroy what little housing provision there is for the vulnerable in society? Oh that's local stuff and he's probably not interested.

Mark, Haworth says...
2:38pm Thu 22 May 08

mrjjb wrote:
Even if it ruins the parents life? Mr T. Not just the mother living with an unwanted pregnancy but the father that will have to support an wanted child. We here about child neglet. Surely child neglet is more cruel!
"ruins the parents life"!!!

They decided to indulge in an act which conceived a child - force them to learn to live with this decision.

Mark, Haworth says...
2:38pm Thu 22 May 08

mrjjb wrote:
Even if it ruins the parents life? Mr T. Not just the mother living with an unwanted pregnancy but the father that will have to support an wanted child. We here about child neglet. Surely child neglet is more cruel!
"ruins the parents life"!!!

They decided to indulge in an act which conceived a child - force them to learn to live with this decision.

Mark, Haworth says...
2:38pm Thu 22 May 08

mrjjb wrote:
Even if it ruins the parents life? Mr T. Not just the mother living with an unwanted pregnancy but the father that will have to support an wanted child. We here about child neglet. Surely child neglet is more cruel!
"ruins the parents life"!!!

They decided to indulge in an act which conceived a child - force them to learn to live with this decision.

bradfordian, bradford says...
1:14pm Thu 22 May 08

i agree with everything mr. t says. all parents know they make many sacrifices for their children.people should not see abortion as a form of contraception.there are many forms of contraception.if they knew a child would destroy their lives why did they not use protection.for their act of folly a human live has to be destroyed.how awful.plus the woman has all the emotional turmoil to deal with.

bradfordian, bradford says...
1:14pm Thu 22 May 08

i agree with everything mr. t says. all parents know they make many sacrifices for their children.people should not see abortion as a form of contraception.there are many forms of contraception.if they knew a child would destroy their lives why did they not use protection.for their act of folly a human live has to be destroyed.how awful.plus the woman has all the emotional turmoil to deal with.

bradfordian, bradford says...
1:14pm Thu 22 May 08

i agree with everything mr. t says. all parents know they make many sacrifices for their children.people should not see abortion as a form of contraception.there are many forms of contraception.if they knew a child would destroy their lives why did they not use protection.for their act of folly a human live has to be destroyed.how awful.plus the woman has all the emotional turmoil to deal with.

Mr T, Bradford says...
12:04pm Thu 22 May 08

When you place a monitor onto the mothers womb, you can not only see the baby moving but hear its heartbeat. To terminate a baby because the mother or father were ignorant to have unprotected sex is not a valid excuse. I understand your concern about child neglect, therefore more resources should piled into tackling this. Over 190k abortions were carried in 2006 alone, thats an enetire population of a city.

Mr T, Bradford says...
12:04pm Thu 22 May 08

When you place a monitor onto the mothers womb, you can not only see the baby moving but hear its heartbeat. To terminate a baby because the mother or father were ignorant to have unprotected sex is not a valid excuse. I understand your concern about child neglect, therefore more resources should piled into tackling this. Over 190k abortions were carried in 2006 alone, thats an enetire population of a city.

Mr T, Bradford says...
12:04pm Thu 22 May 08

When you place a monitor onto the mothers womb, you can not only see the baby moving but hear its heartbeat. To terminate a baby because the mother or father were ignorant to have unprotected sex is not a valid excuse. I understand your concern about child neglect, therefore more resources should piled into tackling this. Over 190k abortions were carried in 2006 alone, thats an enetire population of a city.

mrjjb, bradford says...
9:53am Thu 22 May 08

Even if it ruins the parents life? Mr T. Not just the mother living with an unwanted pregnancy but the father that will have to support an wanted child. We here about child neglet. Surely child neglet is more cruel!

mrjjb, bradford says...
9:53am Thu 22 May 08

Even if it ruins the parents life? Mr T. Not just the mother living with an unwanted pregnancy but the father that will have to support an wanted child. We here about child neglet. Surely child neglet is more cruel!

mrjjb, bradford says...
9:53am Thu 22 May 08

Even if it ruins the parents life? Mr T. Not just the mother living with an unwanted pregnancy but the father that will have to support an wanted child. We here about child neglet. Surely child neglet is more cruel!

Mr T, Bradford says...
9:23am Thu 22 May 08

I agree with the Bishop, all children should have the right to life

Mr T, Bradford says...
9:23am Thu 22 May 08

I agree with the Bishop, all children should have the right to life

Mr T, Bradford says...
9:23am Thu 22 May 08

I agree with the Bishop, all children should have the right to life

cityhall, bradford says...
10:30pm Wed 21 May 08

Hmm havent heard much from the Bishop recently, does he have any views on Burma or starvation in Dharfur or is he playing to the crowd on emotive issues like abortion ? Does he care less about women or more about moral posturing in this article ?

cityhall, bradford says...
10:30pm Wed 21 May 08

Hmm havent heard much from the Bishop recently, does he have any views on Burma or starvation in Dharfur or is he playing to the crowd on emotive issues like abortion ? Does he care less about women or more about moral posturing in this article ?

cityhall, bradford says...
10:30pm Wed 21 May 08

Hmm havent heard much from the Bishop recently, does he have any views on Burma or starvation in Dharfur or is he playing to the crowd on emotive issues like abortion ? Does he care less about women or more about moral posturing in this article ?

Your sayYourBradford

Register for a FREE Bradford Telegraph and Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in to continue.

The Bishop of Bradford

The Bishop of Bradford




Hot Jobs

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »