Holme Wood and Tong green belt housing bid recommended (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Holme Wood and Tong green belt housing bid recommended
8:10am Saturday 21st January 2012 in News
By Jo Winrow, City Hall Reporter
Residents protest over the proposed use of green belt land between Tong and Holme Wood
Leading councillors have pressed ahead with plans for Holme Wood and Tong which clear the way for up to 2,700 homes to be built despite residents’ objections.
The neighbourhood development plan is designed to regenerate the estate to create a sustainable community as well as to explore the potential for growth.
It considered two options for the area – one would see incremental change with 600 homes being built on the estate and another would see 2,700 homes built. The second option was agreed yesterday at a meeting of the executive and involves developing housing sites within the estate as well as three “urban extension” sites in the green belt designed to attract additional funds to subsidise improvements to the Holme Wood neighbourhood.
As part of the consultation, almost 230 residents filled in questionnaires regarding the development plan. Two-thirds preferred the option for 600 homes, which would largely be built on urban sites such as vacant and underused land. The option for 2,700 homes, which was recommended to councillors, was favoured by 16 per cent of respondents.
However, of the respondents who live in Holme Wood, 40 per cent supported option two.
There were claims that a number of objections were from people who did not live in the area and would therefore not be directly affected.
Council leader Ian Greenwood said of a resolution by Leeds Council to object to the proposals: “Leeds Council and Leeds residents do not decide the planning policy of Bradford Council.”
He added: “I understand people’s concerns and don’t dismiss them. But I think that often when people say they haven’t been consulted, what they actually mean is they don’t agree.”
About a dozen objectors attended the meeting, including Canon Gordon Dey, chairman of the Save Tong and Fulneck Valley Association.
He told councillors: “I do believe that a hugely disproportionate amount of housing is being proposed and this will be damaging for these communities and will destroy hugely strategic green land in the process.”
He added that a health assessment document made serious statements about the implications of large-scale building on the health of the community.
However, all three ward councillors backed the plans for 2,700 homes saying it was the only way to ensure the investment needed on the estate to make it sustainable for the future.
Comments(9)
birday
says...
3:34pm Sat 21 Jan 12
.
Who's profiting from this development? ... the construction companies owned by the banks.
.
Time to do a bit of digging to see what can be uncovered, eh?
gobbydave
says...
8:13am Mon 23 Jan 12
gobbydave
says...
8:15am Mon 23 Jan 12
tallulah
says...
12:41pm Mon 23 Jan 12
Talulah82
says...
1:25pm Mon 23 Jan 12
We are not all layabouts and it looks like we are not been involved in decissions because we are not in between 8-6!
LittleN
says...
7:06pm Mon 23 Jan 12
Colin White wrote:Be quiet you racist moron!
Would it be possible to raze both BNP/EDL cesspools to the ground and then re-name the area to something more multi-cultural?
tallulah
says...
4:51pm Tue 24 Jan 12
Paul Local Lad
says...
10:36am Thu 26 Jan 12
imagine how many more cars on the roads ??? a650 into bradford is bad enough now, never mind a few more 100 cars on the road at all times of the day.
if you want to sign a petition or get involved please see http://savetongvalle
y.org.uk/contact.php
cheers Paul
Colin White says...
1:23pm Sat 21 Jan 12