News RSS Feed


‘Steeton with Eastburn identified as a hub for commuting’

Proposals to build up to 895 homes on green fields in Steeton over the next 17 years will turn the village in to a “commuter hub” and create pressure on infrastructure and services, councillors have warned.

Bradford Council is looking to find room for 45,500 homes across the district by 2028 and has identified nine sites in Steeton as suitable for development as part of its Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment.

Councillor Andrew Mallinson (Con, Craven) said he had “massive concerns” about the proposals.

“They are identifying Steeton and Eastburn as a commuting hub,” he said. “The Council is talking about improving public transport and rail links in the area but there is no real reference to creating employment. It focuses purely on additional housing.

“There is an indication within the reports that everyone within the vicinity of Steeton and Eastburn will have to commute somewhere down the Airedale Line or across in to North Yorkshire for employment.”

The proposed housing sites include 163 homes on fields between Airedale Hospital and Eastburn, 203 homes on green belt land partly within a flood zone at Summerhill Lane, 84 homes on farmland at Lyon Road, 57 homes in Sycamore Grove, Eastburn, and 46 homes in a potential flood zone near to the Damart Warehouse in Ings Road.

Grazing land in Parkway, which already has permission for 206 homes, is also included in the proposals along with smaller housing sites in Aireburn Avenue, Skipton Road and at Lyon House Farm.

Coun Mallinson added: “It is not acceptable to use up green belt land for housing. If we take Silsden into account as well, there is going to be a massive growth in population with nothing to support it. It is the last straw for Steeton. It is stripping away its identity as a village and creating a large population with no identity of its own.”

Councillor Adrian Naylor (Con, Craven) said a recently-approved application for 220 homes at Thornhill Road, Steeton, had raised questions about area’s infrastructure and its ability to cope with such a large increase in population.

“I sit on a committee looking at the impact of housing on the main sewer infrastructure,” said Coun Naylor.

“The main trunk sewer for the Aire Valley feeds through Steeton, Silsden and into Sutton. It is critical we don’t build these houses and say we need investment for the sewer then realise there is no money.”

Councillor Michael Kelly (Con, Craven) said significant investment was also needed in roads, schools and employment to sustain the proposed growth in population in Steeton.

“I can’t see what provision is being made for developing the infrastructure, which clearly can’t cope with the proposed increase in housing stock,” said Coun Kelly.

“Primary schools in Steeton and Silsden are full and the neighbouring primary school at Eastburn is almost full.

“The roads in and out of Steeton are congested now. Getting cars out of Thornhill Road and on to Skipton Road is awful, and that is without any extra traffic.

“I don’t see this being dealt with very well and I see nothing in any of the proposals that suggests that any of this has been thought through. I think it is an awful prospect and most of the residents are appalled by it.”

Comments(4)

markjoe says...
9:11am Thu 5 Jan 12

Here we go again. Not contend with trying to build on every bit of greenery that is available the council are now proposing that houses are built on flood plains, but it doesn't matter because the council don't have to pay the insurance premiums. Also we keep hearing about the need for 45,500 house but nothing on any proposal about how they intend to support all these houses with improved infrastructure. Surely its time the council actually started to look in improving this first then it can look at whether it is feasible to build,

Thee Voice of Reason says...
9:58am Thu 5 Jan 12

Drive down the Keighley to Skipton bypass on a day like this and look at how the water collects in areas like this.
.
What are they going to do, offer free indoor downstairs swimming pools with every house.
.
I saw this in the T&A yesterday and it clearly listed the floodplains and in the floodplains were potential sites for houses.
.
It seems no planning is put in what so ever, it's build houses and answer questions later like, why is my downstairs flooded, why can't I find a school for my children, why am I stuck in 30 min of traffic just to get out of the end of the road and why can't I get into a doctors.
.
I supposes it's easier to build houses in Higher Council tax rate areas, rather than chasing those who don't pay elsewhere.

Prisoner Cell Block A says...
11:16am Thu 5 Jan 12

Wear a condom. Less schools needed. Catch a train. Less cars on the road. Watch out for this leaflet from the peoples republic of North Bradford.

LJ217 says...
1:07pm Thu 5 Jan 12

Sorry, but where is the evidence that all these houses are needed?
Lots of houses for sale now that arent been sold. A new estate in Oakworth (Branshaw) has had houses advertised for sale around 18 months, so why do we need more when the demand doesnt appear to be there?

Local Businesses

Most popular