National News


Lottery couple defend benefit claim

A couple who scooped a lottery jackpot have defended their right to claim benefits A couple who scooped a lottery jackpot have defended their right to claim benefits

A couple who scooped a £10.2 million lottery jackpot have defended their right to claim benefits more than six years later.

Mick and Jean O'Shea won the huge EuroMillions sum in 2005, but Mr O'Shea still receives £500 a month disability allowance because it is not means-tested, the Sun reported.

The former builder told the newspaper: "I worked for 40 years and I'm entitled to it. I've been getting it since about 1996. I declared the win to the authorities at the time, but it doesn't matter as it's not means-tested."

He said he has osteoarthritis in his legs and rheumatoid arthritis in his hands and has recently had a hip operation.

According to the newspaper, Mrs O'Shea, 72, said of the allowance: "It's for his eyesight and arthritis. We're entitled to it."

Mr O'Shea, 73, also receives a new car every three years under the Government's Motability scheme for disabled drivers, it was reported.

The couple live in Sneinton, Nottingham, but reportedly also had a house built in Co Kerry, Ireland, after their win.

Mr O'Shea said the pair give away 10 times more than they receive to good causes every year.

Under Government reforms, disability living allowance will be replaced by personal independence payments, which will involve more rigorous checks on claimants but will not be means-tested.

A spokesman for the Department for Work and Pensions said: "We do not discuss individual cases but these specific benefits and allowances are not means-tested."

Comments(9)

Robfm says...
8:28am Sat 4 Feb 12

Probably morally indefensible but legal,

jessy1 says...
8:49am Sat 4 Feb 12

this makes no sense if they won so much why do they still need to claim benefits this money - £6000 a year would make a big difference to a famiy in need

AvidLondonReader says...
8:55am Sat 4 Feb 12

Just because "you can" does not mean "you should". Taking money out of the pot that could help others is reprehensible at least. This couple do not appear to have any morals. Pretty shameful if you ask me. I suppose they'll be lining up at the food banks next for free food just because they can!

penhale says...
9:05am Sat 4 Feb 12

Although indefensible they are no different to the hundreds of millionaires who receive child benefit and cold weather payments every year.

penhale says...
9:05am Sat 4 Feb 12

Although indefensible they are no different to the hundreds of millionaires who receive child benefit and cold weather payments every year.

moronslayer says...
11:51am Sat 4 Feb 12

Sickening greed

whataloadofbull says...
12:28pm Sat 4 Feb 12

That's why all benefits should be means tested, why do they need the 6k a year when they have all that money.

Morally wrong!

Service-defender says...
2:45pm Sat 4 Feb 12

Greedy **** I know what their saying but still greedy ****

I like how their putting as much into charities but that doesn't justify it.

You do it out of the kindness of your heart and for the charity your supporting. Would that mean you'd stop sponsoring if your benefits got stopped? Your taking it out of other victims pockets who don't have the opportunity you had back in 2005.

I thought though if you had so much in the bank, the benefits policy changed???? When i was on jobseekers for a while i got asked if my savings held more than a certain amount. So i assumed it ment if you have so much you can't claim.

25414nora says...
6:27pm Sat 4 Feb 12

It's the Obscene greed culture, sponsored, encouraged, and practised at the very top..Bankers.. MP's.. football managers....

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree