Bradford RSS Feed


Bradford schools finding ways to help ethnic pupils

Princeville pupils Aisha Ahmed from India, Courtney Braybrook from England, Mumtaz Mafud from Indonesia and Peter Milak from Slovenia Princeville pupils Aisha Ahmed from India, Courtney Braybrook from England, Mumtaz Mafud from Indonesia and Peter Milak from Slovenia Buy this photo »

More than 70 per cent of children at nearly a quarter of mainstream primary schools in Bradford do not speak English as their first language, according to the latest figures.

An A to Z of 90-plus different languages are mother tongues of some 16,623 pupils at Bradford’s 40 most linguistically-diverse primaries, according to figures obtained by the Telegraph & Argus in a Freedom of Information inquiry.

A first language other than English is recorded where a child was exposed to a different language during early development and continues to be exposed to this language in the home or in the community.

Now the Government is putting more money into helping the issue.

A Department for Children’s Schools and Families spokesman said: “The language of instruction in English schools is, and always has been, English. We have listened to concerns of headteachers and are increasing funding in the Ethnic Minority Achievement Grant to £206m by 2010, to bring students weak in English up to speed.

“We also equip schools to offer effective English as an Additional Language (EAL) teaching for new arrivals, with a comprehensive support package.”

At Princeville Primary School, off Legrams Lane, just seven of the school’s 453 children are naturally English speakers – the smallest proportion of pupils with English as their first language at any primary school in the district.

Related links

Fifteen other languages, including Vietnamese, Bosnian and Gujarati, are spoken by pupils with the most common first language being Punjabi.

Children at Springwood Community Primary in Manningham are the most diverse speakers where 28 different languages are the first language of pupils including Bengali, Czech, Russian, Punjabi and Somalian.

Sue Colman, the Council’s assistant director of learning services, said: “There is a lot of evidence to suggest that if a child who is more than functional in their first language, will become more than functional in a second language. If children are literate and conversant in their language, that skill is transferable. This is not to say there is not a challenge to address – we want every pupil in every school to thrive.”

But Keighley MP Ann Cryer said children learning a second language at school are being undermined by parents at home.

She said: “I’ve been talking about it for years, of the importance for Asian families to speak English at home and I’m told I’m interfering, but it’s their children that suffer.

“There are families where one parent can speak English but the spouse can’t and it’s difficult to sustain a conversation so they speak in Punjabi.

“To get leave to remain in this country you have to learn English, for too many years this wasn’t the case.”

Figures obtained by the Conservative party show that nationally, from 2004 to 2008, the number of children in primary schools with English as a second language has increased by 113,500. Shipley Tory MP Philip Davies said: “Everyone criticises Bradford schools and Education Bradford for the fact they are near the bottom of the league tables but there is little wonder when schools are having to deal with many children who do not speak English as a first language.

“The responsibility is largely down to parents, who should be encouraging their children to speak English or learn some of the language before they go to school.

“How do you teach a child when it cannot speak English? Teachers are in an impossible situation. Unless we see some transformation we will end up with a situation where children are sent to separate schools to learn English.

“We cannot have other children held back because so much time and effort is being spent learning basic things that they should know already.”

But Councillor David Ward, education spokesman for the Council’s Liberal Democrat group, said it was a “red herring” to suggest language was a barrier to learning.

“The key issue is not whether pupils speak English or not,” he said.

“A lot of new arrivals from Eastern Europe are learning English very quickly and it’s not holding them back.

“What’s more important is the levels of deprivation in Bradford and it’s the link between poor attainment and areas of deprivation that’s crucial.”

Questions & Answers

The Telegraph & Argus asked John Gaskin (above), managing director of Education Bradford, to respond to questions about the issue.

Q: How can you raise achievement in schools when 70 per cent of pupils do not speak English as a first language at 40 of our primary schools, and the majority do not share the same first language as their teachers?

A: When we provided the figures, we explained that they are of the child’s first or home language, this does not mean, as stated in the questions, that the children cannot speak English. Many are bi-lingual, some are even tri-lingual with English as one of their languages. For those who do not speak English we have an assessment and support system.

Q: How many language support staff are employed at primary schools in Bradford? What languages do they speak and how much do they cost the Council a year?

A: We do not have and would not be expected to have this data. Schools employ staff directly and they employ appropriate staff to meet identified needs. In some cases this will include recruiting staff who share the child’s first language. Education Bradford employs eight peripatetic primary teachers to work with new arrivals who do not speak English. Seven of these speak community languages of Bradford.

Q: Is Bradford receiving any extra funding from the Government to support this provision?

A: Bradford receives a grant of about £7 million to support this work. Over 90 per cent is devolved to schools. The rest pays for specialist consultants and teachers who work for EB and with schools. The whole team consists of 12 teachers, one learning mentor and six consultants.

Q: In primary school classes where there are a large number of children who speak different languages, which language does the teacher speak?

A: The teacher speaks English. There are some occasions where a teacher or teaching assistant uses the child’s first language to explain a concept and to help them to join in the lesson or provides a translated vocabulary list to aid the learning of English. In some schools pupils will be taught basic words in community languages to assist children who are new to English. These ways of working are used in other places in the UK and are not exclusive to Bradford.

Q: What help is given to support pupils who are the only, or one of very few, who speak the same first language at a school?

A: There is a one-off grant for all new arrivals, which can be used to enhance staffing or provide appropriate resources. Schools with new arrivals are offered support from the Ethnic Minority Achievement team, even where numbers are small. Schools where the children come from Central and Eastern Europe also receive support in translation, liaising with families and settling children in from the New Communities and Traveller team.

Q: Is language the biggest barrier you face in raising the achievements of primary school pupils in Bradford?

A: Enabling all children to become proficient in English is arguably the most important priority throughout the country. The importance of being confident in using spoken and written language for social and learning purposes is obvious.

The most important factor is not whether children have English as their first language but how rich their language experience has been in their early years.

Some children with English as their first language and some with English as an additional language do not have the opportunities that others have to develop their use of language at home. Much of the investment in Early Years education is aimed at ensuring these children are given the experiences they need to develop their language.

This emphasis is continued throughout the primary years to ensure that children can use English socially and, crucially, that they can use it effectively to learn other subjects.

Schools in Bradford have developed considerable expertise in enabling children to be effective and confident learners of English including those who are new to English, many of whom make exceptional progress.

Q: Outside of the classroom, how are children, who speak another language, helped to interact on a social level?

A: Primary schools have a range of strategies in place to encourage children to interact socially whatever their language skills, e.g. peer buddies, playground helpers, support staff. Most children acquire social fluency to the level that they can mix with their peers within a few months.

Comments(25)

Joedavid says...
10:57am Thu 19 Mar 09

It really needs to be got over to parents their children need to be able to speak and understand the language of this country English.

Dear John says...
11:15am Thu 19 Mar 09

Joedavid wrote:
It really needs to be got over to parents their children need to be able to speak and understand the language of this country English.
And if not the parents should have to fund extra tuition until they can.

its johnny says...
11:40am Thu 19 Mar 09

I think its good children learn different languages from an early age, and i dont think a child should be discouraged to learn thier mother tongue. In my lifetime i have seen many people whose first language wasnt english, but now are doctors, teachers and professionals on many levels.

albion says...
11:53am Thu 19 Mar 09

It seems odd that someone who CAN speak and understand English has to pay to go to college, yet those whose parents dont bother preparing them for school pay nothing.

spinnekop says...
12:27pm Thu 19 Mar 09

And If you dont speak english and wont learn it, arnt you making yourself 'unavailable' for work and therefore should not be able to claim jobseekers?

its johnny says...
1:03pm Thu 19 Mar 09

albion wrote:
It seems odd that someone who CAN speak and understand English has to pay to go to college, yet those whose parents dont bother preparing them for school pay nothing.
You are assuming that these parents are not paying taxes?

its johnny says...
1:08pm Thu 19 Mar 09

spinnekop wrote:
And If you dont speak english and wont learn it, arnt you making yourself 'unavailable' for work and therefore should not be able to claim jobseekers?
What has this article got to do with jobeseeskers?

albion says...
1:15pm Thu 19 Mar 09

its johnny wrote:
albion wrote: It seems odd that someone who CAN speak and understand English has to pay to go to college, yet those whose parents dont bother preparing them for school pay nothing.
You are assuming that these parents are not paying taxes?
The parents of children who have been sent to school with a basic understanding of the host language are just as likely to pay taxes, probably more so.

its johnny says...
1:43pm Thu 19 Mar 09

albion wrote:
its johnny wrote:
albion wrote: It seems odd that someone who CAN speak and understand English has to pay to go to college, yet those whose parents dont bother preparing them for school pay nothing.
You are assuming that these parents are not paying taxes?
The parents of children who have been sent to school with a basic understanding of the host language are just as likely to pay taxes, probably more so.
And your point is?

albion says...
1:57pm Thu 19 Mar 09

its johnny wrote:
albion wrote:
its johnny wrote:
albion wrote: It seems odd that someone who CAN speak and understand English has to pay to go to college, yet those whose parents dont bother preparing them for school pay nothing.
You are assuming that these parents are not paying taxes?
The parents of children who have been sent to school with a basic understanding of the host language are just as likely to pay taxes, probably more so.
And your point is?
My point is that most peoples tax funded education does not include them having to be taught English, and i have doubts that it should.

Tanny says...
2:01pm Thu 19 Mar 09

One thing Im failing to understand is this for children who are not born here in the UK? i.e those who come from abroad at say ages 4 plus?? You see my son is 2 1/2 - his first language is english now - even though me and my wife speak urdu at home - we speak to him in urdu but he is mainly a yorkshire lad bit like his dad( born here also)
when he goes to school he will have no problem understanding english - so I fail to see where this is coming from - my main worry is the fact that he will pick up english and learn this and not pick up mother tongue -
Again a different angle I know of someone whos daughter came to england when 5- she could not speak any english and was very fluent in mother tongue - now shes 12 lost all her words of mother tongue and speaks english as though she was born here.
So what is the problem ??

and to Ann Cryer - you may be half right in what you say but you have always got an ulterior motive in you.

Dear John says...
2:19pm Thu 19 Mar 09

Tanny wrote:
One thing Im failing to understand is this for children who are not born here in the UK? i.e those who come from abroad at say ages 4 plus?? You see my son is 2 1/2 - his first language is english now - even though me and my wife speak urdu at home - we speak to him in urdu but he is mainly a yorkshire lad bit like his dad( born here also)
when he goes to school he will have no problem understanding english - so I fail to see where this is coming from - my main worry is the fact that he will pick up english and learn this and not pick up mother tongue -
Again a different angle I know of someone whos daughter came to england when 5- she could not speak any english and was very fluent in mother tongue - now shes 12 lost all her words of mother tongue and speaks english as though she was born here.
So what is the problem ??

and to Ann Cryer - you may be half right in what you say but you have always got an ulterior motive in you.
Not everyone has your farsighted and considered attitude.

its johnny says...
2:39pm Thu 19 Mar 09

albion wrote:
its johnny wrote:
albion wrote:
its johnny wrote:
albion wrote: It seems odd that someone who CAN speak and understand English has to pay to go to college, yet those whose parents dont bother preparing them for school pay nothing.
You are assuming that these parents are not paying taxes?
The parents of children who have been sent to school with a basic understanding of the host language are just as likely to pay taxes, probably more so.
And your point is?
My point is that most peoples tax funded education does not include them having to be taught English, and i have doubts that it should.
Apologies if i am mistaken, but isnt the teaching of "English" a major subject in school curriculum. Doesnt matter who you, every child always starts from ABC and is taught english from scratch, so i still dont understand the argument here..

albion says...
3:07pm Thu 19 Mar 09

its johnny wrote:
albion wrote:
its johnny wrote:
albion wrote:
its johnny wrote:
albion wrote: It seems odd that someone who CAN speak and understand English has to pay to go to college, yet those whose parents dont bother preparing them for school pay nothing.
You are assuming that these parents are not paying taxes?
The parents of children who have been sent to school with a basic understanding of the host language are just as likely to pay taxes, probably more so.
And your point is?
My point is that most peoples tax funded education does not include them having to be taught English, and i have doubts that it should.
Apologies if i am mistaken, but isnt the teaching of "English" a major subject in school curriculum. Doesnt matter who you, every child always starts from ABC and is taught english from scratch, so i still dont understand the argument here..
Learning to read and write any language is easier for both pupil and teacher if the pupil already speaks the language, and the tutor doesnt have to divert to selected pupils if the whole class understands what he or she is saying.
It is also beneficial if the pupil has the opportunity to speak English when at home or out of school.

Tanny says...
3:18pm Thu 19 Mar 09

If someone in the class has difficulty understanding english then he/she should be taken out of the classroom and put into a form of assisted english speaking class to help the person would you not agree??

neverthetwain says...
4:06pm Thu 19 Mar 09

What nonsense. Apart from the recent immigrants from eastern europe and a few from africa ll the other so called immigrnats are actually third or fourth generation children of immigrants. Most are fluent at English before they even get to school. This report is totally misleading.

its johnny says...
4:14pm Thu 19 Mar 09

Albion, your argument has no grounds, the speaking of english argument aside if in a class a child does not understand a certain subject (example maths or science) or a certain point and the rest of the class does, is it not the teachers job to ensure that child reaches the same level of understanding as of the whole class?
Not once have i witnessed any parent or community ask schools to start teaching in a different language, and i as a "taxpayer" have no problem in my money being invested in teaching english to those whose first language is something else - This is multicultural britain and its time people got used to the fact

albion says...
4:46pm Thu 19 Mar 09

its johnny wrote:
Albion, your argument has no grounds, the speaking of english argument aside if in a class a child does not understand a certain subject (example maths or science) or a certain point and the rest of the class does, is it not the teachers job to ensure that child reaches the same level of understanding as of the whole class? Not once have i witnessed any parent or community ask schools to start teaching in a different language, and i as a "taxpayer" have no problem in my money being invested in teaching english to those whose first language is something else - This is multicultural britain and its time people got used to the fact
If there isnt any problem why does this thread exist and why are the government increasing funding?
You trivialise the scenario you depict, what if a large number of children dont understand the teacher, should they have not been better prepared pre-school, should the others be held back by such a situation, should their parents not have to contribute to any extra training they require? these are all legitimate questions and people have a right to ask them.
I as a taxpayer do have a problem if parents are not making the best effort to prepare their child for education, on that point it seems we cannot agree, therefore further debate on the point would be pointless.
Being multicultural cuts both ways, people should help themselves rather than the host country and its citizens always having to be the ones who pay the price.

its johnny says...
5:11pm Thu 19 Mar 09

If a large number of children dont understand the teacher, then maybe it is the teacher who is at fault, and should imrprove on thier teaching methods. It would be useful to know which is schools are under performing and identify how much affect this "issue" is having on the district -
By the way the goverments answer to any problem in the country is throw money at it -

rongtw says...
5:32pm Thu 19 Mar 09

sorry johnny !!! the teacher is not the problem, they do a brilliant job,,,, my son 5 is in reception class and you see it every day parents bring their kids too school and the teacher trys to inform the parent of any problem and they cant understand english,,,, what chance do teachers have if the parents cant even understand them!! never mind the kids its a lost battle !!

Dear John says...
5:53pm Thu 19 Mar 09

its johnny wrote:
If a large number of children dont understand the teacher, then maybe it is the teacher who is at fault, and should imrprove on thier teaching methods. It would be useful to know which is schools are under performing and identify how much affect this "issue" is having on the district -
By the way the goverments answer to any problem in the country is throw money at it -
It isnt the teachers fault if children are being brought up as if they are from another country.

Al Spade says...
7:56pm Thu 19 Mar 09

I've just read today that a postmaster has refused to serve people in his post office if they don't speak to him in English. Good job he himself is an immigrant. Can you see a white English shopkeeper getting away with this? Thought not. Neither can I.

its johnny says...
4:30pm Fri 20 Mar 09

But is this "Language Barrier" directly impacting on reults in schools? No mention of that in the article

Dear John says...
5:01pm Fri 20 Mar 09

In previous charts the schools that have the highest number of pupils without English as their first language were the worst performers, in national charts Bradford is very low in the charts, although standards in the last edition did show some improvement.
All these tables have been shown in this newspaper.

Patrick Bateman says...
7:51pm Fri 20 Mar 09

Gaskin says, "The most important factor is not whether children have English as their first language but how rich their language experience has been in their early years".

God help us.

Have you ever read such mealy-mouthed empty BS as his reponses to the T&A's questions.

How utterly, utterly depressing...

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree