Keighley RSS Feed


Community groups take on lease for new centre in former Methodist church

Central Hall project manager Lynne Burns (left) and communications officer Bethan Davies pictured during the renovation works Central Hall project manager Lynne Burns (left) and communications officer Bethan Davies pictured during the renovation works Buy this photo »

An historic hall has been officially handed over to community groups by Bradford Council.

Central Hall, in Keighley, has been reopened as a community centre following a £1.8 million renovation.

The former Methodist church, in Alice Street, provides a base for several organisations as well as a cafe, meeting space and function rooms.

It will be run by Keighley and Ilkley Voluntary and Community Action (KIVCA) on a 99-year lease at a peppercorn rent.

Most of the funding for the refurbishment was provided by the Government and the Council.

Contractors worked on the building for 14 months before handing it back to the Council in December.

KIVCA then signed the lease and moved its entire staff into the building from nearby Skipton Road.

The intention is that Central Hall will become a thriving “community and business enterprise hub”.

Age UK and the Citizens Advice Bureau plan to have offices in the building, and groups including Keighley Solo Club have signed up to hold regular meetings there.

Bradford Council yesterday said Central Hall was the latest example of regeneration being carried out within the Airedale Masterplan area.

Councillor Dave Green, the Council’s executive member responsible for asset management, said: “This is a fantastic new facility for Keighley and brings a great building back into use for the benefit of the community.

“By supporting KIVCA, the Council has helped not-for-profit groups, as well as new businesses, gain access to a series of great resources and services.

“Central Hall has been a landmark in Keighley since 1893 – I hope this deal ensures the building remains at the heart of the community for many more years.”

Caroline Schwaller, chief executive of KIVCA, said it was exciting to see the building come alive again after many years of planning and dreaming.

She said: “We must extend enormous thanks to the Council for helping us create such a fantastic new resource for Keighley.”

The scheme was supported by a £999,954 grant from the Government’s Community Asset Fund administered by the Big Lottery.

Bradford Council provided £650,000, using funding from the European Regional Development Fund and the Local Enterprise Growth Initiative, while KIVCA raised £144,971.

e-mail: newsdesk@telegraphandargus.co.uk

Comments(17)

Mik_e says...
3:00pm Tue 1 Mar 11

What a complete waste of £1.8 million, money that the tax payer has provided, regardless of which organisation funded this project. Time will tell what an extremely poor example of how tax payers money is mis-spent. Another ludicrous scheme supported by 'Bradford' council.

Your account is currently suspended says...
3:35pm Tue 1 Mar 11

A great facility generously provided by Bradford Council. Local community groups now have a meeting place where they can get organized and plan the uprising. We need to see widespread civil disobedience to fight against the Tory scum who are now threatening our lives. TIME TO GET ORGANIZED.

C squared says...
5:35pm Tue 1 Mar 11

How is this a waste of tax payers’ money Mik_e?
Firstly it is bringing a dilapidated building which was an eyesore, back into use. Secondly it is going to be a resource for all the Keighley Voluntary Sector organisations who are going to be the foundation of the delivery of the Big Society in Keighley and thirdly if marketed properly will give a Keighley a music venue with incredible acoustics.
From your comments I take it you are a Taxpayers' Alliance member and incredibly short sighted?

Tinybantam says...
6:10pm Tue 1 Mar 11

Your account is currently suspended wrote:
A great facility generously provided by Bradford Council. Local community groups now have a meeting place where they can get organized and plan the uprising. We need to see widespread civil disobedience to fight against the Tory scum who are now threatening our lives. TIME TO GET ORGANIZED.
Here again spouting rubbish are we? I think the only uprising we all need is for some extra brain cells to arrive in your brain to add to the one that you have already got!!!!!! Mind you, with more than once brain cell you could become dangerous.

Tinybantam says...
6:13pm Tue 1 Mar 11

How can £1.8 million be justified for this renovation? I think that the council have been well and truly ripped off. I am sure that the work could have been done much, much cheaper.

C squared says...
7:16pm Tue 1 Mar 11

Tinybantam wrote:
How can £1.8 million be justified for this renovation? I think that the council have been well and truly ripped off. I am sure that the work could have been done much, much cheaper.
Having been involved in several refurbishments/renov
ations £1.8 million may seem a lot but the massive increase in the price of steel fabrication will go some way to justifying this figure. The price will also include a high QS specification given the quality of the outer shell of the building which is mid-nineteenth century, and built to last.
Finally the tendering process would have stated a minimum of three quotes, one of which became the successful contractor.

Danny Jacobs says...
9:03pm Tue 1 Mar 11

C squared wrote:
Tinybantam wrote: How can £1.8 million be justified for this renovation? I think that the council have been well and truly ripped off. I am sure that the work could have been done much, much cheaper.
Having been involved in several refurbishments/renov ations £1.8 million may seem a lot but the massive increase in the price of steel fabrication will go some way to justifying this figure. The price will also include a high QS specification given the quality of the outer shell of the building which is mid-nineteenth century, and built to last. Finally the tendering process would have stated a minimum of three quotes, one of which became the successful contractor.
Tendering...what a load of Crap!!!!!A Brown paper Envelope usually does the job...oops.....Deny it.... all you like while some lucky sods are spending the dough!!!!
Prices have gone up for sure.....you can shop around...
We would love to see the invoices....go on...publish them if you dare!!!!

Danny Jacobs says...
9:06pm Tue 1 Mar 11

C squared wrote:
How is this a waste of tax payers’ money Mik_e? Firstly it is bringing a dilapidated building which was an eyesore, back into use. Secondly it is going to be a resource for all the Keighley Voluntary Sector organisations who are going to be the foundation of the delivery of the Big Society in Keighley and thirdly if marketed properly will give a Keighley a music venue with incredible acoustics. From your comments I take it you are a Taxpayers' Alliance member and incredibly short sighted?
Keighley needs jobs!!!! No a place where you can socialise and moan about the weather and unemployment!!!!
Big Society full of Unemployed people and gues whats the future of our childrens in Keighley!!!!!No playing a bloody instrument....may come in handy whilst busking though!!!!

nastybobby says...
9:11pm Tue 1 Mar 11

What? Bradford Council have spent money on a project in Keighley? Now there's something you don't hear everyday! The sooner Keighley takes control of its own affairs the better.

C squared says...
9:59pm Tue 1 Mar 11

Danny Jacobs wrote:
C squared wrote:
Tinybantam wrote: How can £1.8 million be justified for this renovation? I think that the council have been well and truly ripped off. I am sure that the work could have been done much, much cheaper.
Having been involved in several refurbishments/renov ations £1.8 million may seem a lot but the massive increase in the price of steel fabrication will go some way to justifying this figure. The price will also include a high QS specification given the quality of the outer shell of the building which is mid-nineteenth century, and built to last. Finally the tendering process would have stated a minimum of three quotes, one of which became the successful contractor.
Tendering...what a load of Crap!!!!!A Brown paper Envelope usually does the job...oops.....Deny it.... all you like while some lucky sods are spending the dough!!!!
Prices have gone up for sure.....you can shop around...
We would love to see the invoices....go on...publish them if you dare!!!!
There is a procedure that has to be adhered to counter unintelligent and uninformed comments such as these.
As this is public money and has to be accountable, you can inquire Danny.... that's if you can your brain cell and mouth out of your rear end!!

C squared says...
10:00pm Tue 1 Mar 11

There is a procedure that has to be adhered to counter unintelligent and uninformed comments such as these.
As this is public money and has to be accountable, you can inquire Danny.... that's if you can your brain cell and mouth out of your rear end!!

C squared says...
10:03pm Tue 1 Mar 11

should have been "get" after "can"

albion says...
6:44am Wed 2 Mar 11

Danny Jacobs wrote:
C squared wrote:
How is this a waste of tax payers’ money Mik_e? Firstly it is bringing a dilapidated building which was an eyesore, back into use. Secondly it is going to be a resource for all the Keighley Voluntary Sector organisations who are going to be the foundation of the delivery of the Big Society in Keighley and thirdly if marketed properly will give a Keighley a music venue with incredible acoustics. From your comments I take it you are a Taxpayers' Alliance member and incredibly short sighted?
Keighley needs jobs!!!! No a place where you can socialise and moan about the weather and unemployment!!!!
Big Society full of Unemployed people and gues whats the future of our childrens in Keighley!!!!!No playing a bloody instrument....may come in handy whilst busking though!!!!
As the vast majority of jobs are created by private enterprise how does this very useful feature prevent that?

Mik_e says...
12:55pm Wed 2 Mar 11

C Squared

As I said 'time will tell', wait and see.

I would also raise some points with you:-

*You seem very well informed regarding the official process that has to take place and I wonder if you have some interest or involvment with any parties concerned?

*What happens officially and what happens in reality can often be poles apart.

*I also note that in two of your posts you contradict yourself i.e. Describing the building as 'dilapidated' and later describing at as 'built to last'.

Please decide on which it is.

C squared says...
2:43pm Wed 2 Mar 11

Mik_e wrote:
C Squared

As I said 'time will tell', wait and see.

I would also raise some points with you:-

*You seem very well informed regarding the official process that has to take place and I wonder if you have some interest or involvment with any parties concerned?

*What happens officially and what happens in reality can often be poles apart.

*I also note that in two of your posts you contradict yourself i.e. Describing the building as 'dilapidated' and later describing at as 'built to last'.

Please decide on which it is.
No contradiction at all. Dilapidated means state of disrepair or deterioration, as through neglect; and shabby: hence why the building was earmarked in being right for Asset Transferhttp://www.y
outube.com/watch?v=Q
grzwcIiFuk and judge for yourself.
Having previously worked in Keighley, I saw the decline of the building over a number of years. Under Asset Transfer, the process is lengthy and scrutinised at every stage and also to make sure it gives value for money.
No I have no involvement with either KIVCA or Bradford Council; this is standard practice with public money and Asset Transfers.

bigo93 says...
9:24pm Wed 2 Mar 11

Councils and government projects are always ripped off. They only get a single quote and then the contractors come up with excuses with the knowledge that they will in all likelihood win and get more money.

Those in charge do not care, it;s not their money and if they need more the councils will give it as if they do not it means a complete stop to a project resulting in it being a waste of money.

Councils should get more than a single quote and then get guarantees that the works will be done to that, if not then they should be fined unless a real excuse can be given.

supergreenie says...
10:10pm Wed 2 Mar 11

you just hope that somebody from the council reads all these posts - i wish the level of mistrust through the local community when it comes to Bradford Council is shocking

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree