Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
6:10am Monday 6th July 2009 in
A major inquiry has been started by health chiefs after a male patient was badly hurt when he fell from a window at Bradford Royal Infirmary.
Thomas Wilson, 45, suffered injuries including two broken ankles when he plunged more than 20 feet from a toilet window.
Last night he was in a stable condition at the hospital.
Immediately after the incident, bosses at Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust ordered safety checks to be carried out on all windows at BRI and St Luke’s Hospital.
They found restrainers on the window from which Mr Wilson fell had been forced allowing it to be fully opened.
But Mr Wilson’s partner Leanne May, 34, has questioned where he should have been better supervised by hospital staff after he was admitted for a suspected overdose of the tranquilliser Valium.
Miss May, of Reevy Crescent, Buttershaw, Bradford, said she was shocked to learn of the incident in a telephone call from hospital.
The mother-of-five said: “He’s in a really bad way.
“They took him for CT scans but fortunately there does not seem to be anything wrong with his spine.
“It was terrifying. As soon as I heard the phone ring I knew something was wrong.”
The couple’s children are aged from three to nine and Miss May said the two oldest children had learned what had happened to their father.
“We’ve had no answers,” Miss May said. “I’m absolutely torn up. My little boy and girl have been very upset.” A Trust spokesman said it had begun a full investigation into the circumstances surrounding the incident and a review of Mr Wilson’s medical care and treatment.
He said: “Central to our investigation is a safety review of all windows across Bradford Royal Infirmary and St Luke’s Hospital to ensure they continue to meet the latest regulations and best practice.”
The spokesman said checks were made annually by maintenance staff and “regularly” by ward staff to ensure the windows are safe.
An additional round of safety checks was immediately carried out after the accident.
He said: “All the windows on Ward Four – where the patient was being treated – are fitted with restrainers. This is mandatory for higher-level wards, and is a safety precaution designed to prevent the windows being opened too far.
“Our initial inquiries have revealed that, in this incident, the restrainer on the window in question had been physically forced open, allowing the patient to climb out.”
Comments(54)
Fastnecker
says...
7:40am Mon 6 Jul 09
Warthog
says...
8:05am Mon 6 Jul 09
Old Peculiar
says...
8:54am Mon 6 Jul 09
SLATE MINER
says...
9:27am Mon 6 Jul 09
Leighann
says...
9:27am Mon 6 Jul 09
The Main Man
says...
9:28am Mon 6 Jul 09
osamabobladen
says...
9:51am Mon 6 Jul 09
Juice Terry
says...
10:16am Mon 6 Jul 09
spinnekop
says...
10:42am Mon 6 Jul 09
osamabobladen
says...
10:46am Mon 6 Jul 09
Fastnecker
says...
11:07am Mon 6 Jul 09
dassie
says...
11:07am Mon 6 Jul 09
Leighann
says...
11:09am Mon 6 Jul 09
spinnekop wrote:No were not heartless but it assums that the full responsibility lies with the BRI when it is not the case.
Well you heartless bunch of sods !! This guy is obviously in a bad way and untill you lot have been down that road where ending it seems your only option I think you should keep your sarcasm under control. im ashamed of you! Hope the guy makes a full recovery and manages to pull himself out of the dark place he is.
bigjake
says...
11:17am Mon 6 Jul 09
Rambo
says...
12:16pm Mon 6 Jul 09
Tyke69
says...
12:26pm Mon 6 Jul 09
osamabobladen
says...
1:04pm Mon 6 Jul 09
Fastnecker
says...
1:20pm Mon 6 Jul 09
t'old man
says...
1:24pm Mon 6 Jul 09
Apollo
says...
1:41pm Mon 6 Jul 09
no idea
says...
2:28pm Mon 6 Jul 09
SLATE MINER
says...
3:41pm Mon 6 Jul 09
Tyke69 wrote:Thats exactly what is wrong with Bradford everyone is allowed to do what they want without anyone saying anything about it. I dont hold my head in shame - wait for the claim. (well done T & A security word fall-okey)!
I can't believe some of the comments on here. No wonder Bradford is in the poor state it's in if this is how Bradfordians view their fellow human-beings. People with mental health problems have enough to deal with, without being described as "nutcases" or "benefit grabbing scum". You know nothing about this man's circumstances but are judging him anyway. I pity you if all you can find to do is come on here and complain about someone who obviously needs help. Hang your heads in shame people of Bradford. I am not proud to say I live in this city anymore if it is populated with bigots like you.
Sabre
says...
5:24pm Mon 6 Jul 09
Rambo
says...
6:14pm Mon 6 Jul 09
ct
says...
7:21pm Mon 6 Jul 09
ct
says...
7:22pm Mon 6 Jul 09
Fastnecker wrote:^sorry didnt include the quote.
The mother-of-five said: “He’s in a really bad way" I agree - off his t*ts on valleys, holed up with a 34 year old mother of 5 on Buttershaw. No wonder he's he was looking for a way out
the Laird
says...
8:00pm Mon 6 Jul 09
Fastnecker wrote:Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me!
She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.
madzippy
says...
9:25pm Mon 6 Jul 09
DJA
says...
10:35pm Mon 6 Jul 09
the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients.
Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
dawsonp1
says...
10:59pm Mon 6 Jul 09
dawsonp1
says...
11:20pm Mon 6 Jul 09
spinnekop
says...
11:52pm Mon 6 Jul 09
the Laird
says...
12:04am Tue 7 Jul 09
DJA wrote:Let down by the hospital trust? what planet are you from,you sound like one of those no win-no fee shysters.If he said he wanted to go to the toilet,would you expect the female nurse to go into the cubicle with him? or maybe you think the NHS can afford a team for each patient in there?
the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients. Clearly this man had already attempted to take his life, and therefore should not have been left alone until he was under the care of a pwas suffering from depression for whatever reason and obviously suicidal - Therefore why was he left unattended while waiting for a psychiatrist. All these people having a good laugh over this should remember one thing - one in four people at some time in their life will suffer from mental illness - Lets hope it's not your loved one who is let down by the hospital trust.Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
Dr Evil
says...
1:36am Tue 7 Jul 09
osamabobladen wrote:Mate - 20 Foot is ample. I'm at risk of losing a leg after a 15 Foot Fall! Rambo is right - he was probably sneaking a quick smoke. No question that the staff are blameless but I hope they do a better job with his ankles than they did mine.
Twenty foot is hardly a hight to 'end it'. Have you seen the picture - its second floor up, maximum.
lufc10
says...
7:12am Tue 7 Jul 09
osamabobladen
says...
10:26am Tue 7 Jul 09
DJA
says...
11:08am Tue 7 Jul 09
the Laird wrote:I am a member of the Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, so please don't insult my intelligence witha ramble about how wonderful everything is.
DJA wrote:Let down by the hospital trust? what planet are you from,you sound like one of those no win-no fee shysters.If he said he wanted to go to the toilet,would you expect the female nurse to go into the cubicle with him? or maybe you think the NHS can afford a team for each patient in there? Instead of churning out all that health and safety/duty of care claptrap,you might care to reflect on what a good job our nursing staff doing,considering what they have to deal with round here,rather than knocking them all the time!the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients. Clearly this man had already attempted to take his life, and therefore should not have been left alone until he was under the care of a pwas suffering from depression for whatever reason and obviously suicidal - Therefore why was he left unattended while waiting for a psychiatrist. All these people having a good laugh over this should remember one thing - one in four people at some time in their life will suffer from mental illness - Lets hope it's not your loved one who is let down by the hospital trust.Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
Leighann
says...
12:32pm Tue 7 Jul 09
DJA wrote:How can staff keep an eye on every single patient in the ward? Toilets are private, do you expect a member of staff to go to the toilet every time with a patient? It is more than likely that he has gone for a sly fag where he has climbed up onto the window sill and forced the window open so staff don't smell the smoke, and in this case with forcing it he has fallen out.
the Laird wrote:I am a member of the Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, so please don't insult my intelligence witha ramble about how wonderful everything is. This case clearly shows that metnal health care in Bradford is still a shambles. Genral nursing staff on the wards at the BRI are not trained to deal with such patients who should be under the care of a metnal health specialist. It is not clap trap to expect a mental health patient to be dealt with in a proper way, than just plonking him on a general ward. Mental health care in this country is a shambles. He was not in A&E at the time of the incident he was on Ward 4. He was not in a cubicle. How did he manage to climb onto the ledge of the window without one member of staff seeing him. I did not knock all hospital staff, clearly there was a problem on this one ward.DJA wrote:Let down by the hospital trust? what planet are you from,you sound like one of those no win-no fee shysters.If he said he wanted to go to the toilet,would you expect the female nurse to go into the cubicle with him? or maybe you think the NHS can afford a team for each patient in there? Instead of churning out all that health and safety/duty of care claptrap,you might care to reflect on what a good job our nursing staff doing,considering what they have to deal with round here,rather than knocking them all the time!the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients. Clearly this man had already attempted to take his life, and therefore should not have been left alone until he was under the care of a pwas suffering from depression for whatever reason and obviously suicidal - Therefore why was he left unattended while waiting for a psychiatrist. All these people having a good laugh over this should remember one thing - one in four people at some time in their life will suffer from mental illness - Lets hope it's not your loved one who is let down by the hospital trust.Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
DJA
says...
12:46pm Tue 7 Jul 09
Leighann wrote:Excuse me your still missing the point.
DJA wrote:How can staff keep an eye on every single patient in the ward? Toilets are private, do you expect a member of staff to go to the toilet every time with a patient? It is more than likely that he has gone for a sly fag where he has climbed up onto the window sill and forced the window open so staff don't smell the smoke, and in this case with forcing it he has fallen out. Just because you are a memeber of the Trust doesn't give you an insite into working lives on the ward, try and work on ward 4 yourself and you will soon see what they have to deal with, actually try working on any of the wards and see if you can cope with some of the patients they have on them. On call psyc teams do come but if a patient refuses treatment there is nothing more they can do.the Laird wrote:I am a member of the Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, so please don't insult my intelligence witha ramble about how wonderful everything is. This case clearly shows that metnal health care in Bradford is still a shambles. Genral nursing staff on the wards at the BRI are not trained to deal with such patients who should be under the care of a metnal health specialist. It is not clap trap to expect a mental health patient to be dealt with in a proper way, than just plonking him on a general ward. Mental health care in this country is a shambles. He was not in A&E at the time of the incident he was on Ward 4. He was not in a cubicle. How did he manage to climb onto the ledge of the window without one member of staff seeing him. I did not knock all hospital staff, clearly there was a problem on this one ward.DJA wrote:Let down by the hospital trust? what planet are you from,you sound like one of those no win-no fee shysters.If he said he wanted to go to the toilet,would you expect the female nurse to go into the cubicle with him? or maybe you think the NHS can afford a team for each patient in there? Instead of churning out all that health and safety/duty of care claptrap,you might care to reflect on what a good job our nursing staff doing,considering what they have to deal with round here,rather than knocking them all the time!the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients. Clearly this man had already attempted to take his life, and therefore should not have been left alone until he was under the care of a pwas suffering from depression for whatever reason and obviously suicidal - Therefore why was he left unattended while waiting for a psychiatrist. All these people having a good laugh over this should remember one thing - one in four people at some time in their life will suffer from mental illness - Lets hope it's not your loved one who is let down by the hospital trust.Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
osamabobladen
says...
1:02pm Tue 7 Jul 09
albion
says...
1:22pm Tue 7 Jul 09
DJA wrote:"Thomas Wilson, 45, suffered injuries including two broken ankles when he plunged more than 20 feet from a toilet window."
Leighann wrote:Excuse me your still missing the point.
DJA wrote:How can staff keep an eye on every single patient in the ward? Toilets are private, do you expect a member of staff to go to the toilet every time with a patient? It is more than likely that he has gone for a sly fag where he has climbed up onto the window sill and forced the window open so staff don't smell the smoke, and in this case with forcing it he has fallen out. Just because you are a memeber of the Trust doesn't give you an insite into working lives on the ward, try and work on ward 4 yourself and you will soon see what they have to deal with, actually try working on any of the wards and see if you can cope with some of the patients they have on them. On call psyc teams do come but if a patient refuses treatment there is nothing more they can do.the Laird wrote:I am a member of the Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, so please don't insult my intelligence witha ramble about how wonderful everything is. This case clearly shows that metnal health care in Bradford is still a shambles. Genral nursing staff on the wards at the BRI are not trained to deal with such patients who should be under the care of a metnal health specialist. It is not clap trap to expect a mental health patient to be dealt with in a proper way, than just plonking him on a general ward. Mental health care in this country is a shambles. He was not in A&E at the time of the incident he was on Ward 4. He was not in a cubicle. How did he manage to climb onto the ledge of the window without one member of staff seeing him. I did not knock all hospital staff, clearly there was a problem on this one ward.DJA wrote:Let down by the hospital trust? what planet are you from,you sound like one of those no win-no fee shysters.If he said he wanted to go to the toilet,would you expect the female nurse to go into the cubicle with him? or maybe you think the NHS can afford a team for each patient in there? Instead of churning out all that health and safety/duty of care claptrap,you might care to reflect on what a good job our nursing staff doing,considering what they have to deal with round here,rather than knocking them all the time!the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients. Clearly this man had already attempted to take his life, and therefore should not have been left alone until he was under the care of a pwas suffering from depression for whatever reason and obviously suicidal - Therefore why was he left unattended while waiting for a psychiatrist. All these people having a good laugh over this should remember one thing - one in four people at some time in their life will suffer from mental illness - Lets hope it's not your loved one who is let down by the hospital trust.Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
Firstly IT IS the responsbility of staff on a ward to keep an eye on their patients. That happens to be their job and that's why they are called professionals.
It is also a responsbility of the Trust to make sure that there are enough staff to allow those dities to be carried out.
I spend a lot of my time at the Bradford Royal Infirmary and St Lukes Hospital and my family have worked within the NHS since 1960's so I do happen to have a lot of knowlege of the NHS both present and past.
I don't know why you are talking about toilets for, the patient didn't jump out of a toilet window.
If he wanted a cig I think he would just have gone to the main doors like every other patient and member of staff does.
DJA
says...
1:24pm Tue 7 Jul 09
osamabobladen wrote:Firstly it doesn't quote her in anyway as saying she is going to claim.
So DJA - does she have to claim?
DJA
says...
1:29pm Tue 7 Jul 09
albion wrote:Smoking may be not allowed at the main door, but you'll always find them there with drips in one hand and cigs in the other.
DJA wrote:"Thomas Wilson, 45, suffered injuries including two broken ankles when he plunged more than 20 feet from a toilet window." So this report is wrong then? Smoking outside the main door isnt allowed!Leighann wrote:Excuse me your still missing the point. Firstly IT IS the responsbility of staff on a ward to keep an eye on their patients. That happens to be their job and that's why they are called professionals. It is also a responsbility of the Trust to make sure that there are enough staff to allow those dities to be carried out. I spend a lot of my time at the Bradford Royal Infirmary and St Lukes Hospital and my family have worked within the NHS since 1960's so I do happen to have a lot of knowlege of the NHS both present and past. I don't know why you are talking about toilets for, the patient didn't jump out of a toilet window. If he wanted a cig I think he would just have gone to the main doors like every other patient and member of staff does.DJA wrote:How can staff keep an eye on every single patient in the ward? Toilets are private, do you expect a member of staff to go to the toilet every time with a patient? It is more than likely that he has gone for a sly fag where he has climbed up onto the window sill and forced the window open so staff don't smell the smoke, and in this case with forcing it he has fallen out. Just because you are a memeber of the Trust doesn't give you an insite into working lives on the ward, try and work on ward 4 yourself and you will soon see what they have to deal with, actually try working on any of the wards and see if you can cope with some of the patients they have on them. On call psyc teams do come but if a patient refuses treatment there is nothing more they can do.the Laird wrote:I am a member of the Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, so please don't insult my intelligence witha ramble about how wonderful everything is. This case clearly shows that metnal health care in Bradford is still a shambles. Genral nursing staff on the wards at the BRI are not trained to deal with such patients who should be under the care of a metnal health specialist. It is not clap trap to expect a mental health patient to be dealt with in a proper way, than just plonking him on a general ward. Mental health care in this country is a shambles. He was not in A&E at the time of the incident he was on Ward 4. He was not in a cubicle. How did he manage to climb onto the ledge of the window without one member of staff seeing him. I did not knock all hospital staff, clearly there was a problem on this one ward.DJA wrote:Let down by the hospital trust? what planet are you from,you sound like one of those no win-no fee shysters.If he said he wanted to go to the toilet,would you expect the female nurse to go into the cubicle with him? or maybe you think the NHS can afford a team for each patient in there? Instead of churning out all that health and safety/duty of care claptrap,you might care to reflect on what a good job our nursing staff doing,considering what they have to deal with round here,rather than knocking them all the time!the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients. Clearly this man had already attempted to take his life, and therefore should not have been left alone until he was under the care of a pwas suffering from depression for whatever reason and obviously suicidal - Therefore why was he left unattended while waiting for a psychiatrist. All these people having a good laugh over this should remember one thing - one in four people at some time in their life will suffer from mental illness - Lets hope it's not your loved one who is let down by the hospital trust.Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
the Laird
says...
2:22pm Tue 7 Jul 09
DJA wrote:Well the report says he forced open the bars on the toilet window and jumped out,so why are you saying he didnt?
Leighann wrote:Excuse me your still missing the point. Firstly IT IS the responsbility of staff on a ward to keep an eye on their patients. That happens to be their job and that's why they are called professionals. It is also a responsbility of the Trust to make sure that there are enough staff to allow those dities to be carried out. I spend a lot of my time at the Bradford Royal Infirmary and St Lukes Hospital and my family have worked within the NHS since 1960's so I do happen to have a lot of knowlege of the NHS both present and past. I don't know why you are talking about toilets for, the patient didn't jump out of a toilet window. If he wanted a cig I think he would just have gone to the main doors like every other patient and member of staff does.DJA wrote:How can staff keep an eye on every single patient in the ward? Toilets are private, do you expect a member of staff to go to the toilet every time with a patient? It is more than likely that he has gone for a sly fag where he has climbed up onto the window sill and forced the window open so staff don't smell the smoke, and in this case with forcing it he has fallen out. Just because you are a memeber of the Trust doesn't give you an insite into working lives on the ward, try and work on ward 4 yourself and you will soon see what they have to deal with, actually try working on any of the wards and see if you can cope with some of the patients they have on them. On call psyc teams do come but if a patient refuses treatment there is nothing more they can do.the Laird wrote:I am a member of the Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, so please don't insult my intelligence witha ramble about how wonderful everything is. This case clearly shows that metnal health care in Bradford is still a shambles. Genral nursing staff on the wards at the BRI are not trained to deal with such patients who should be under the care of a metnal health specialist. It is not clap trap to expect a mental health patient to be dealt with in a proper way, than just plonking him on a general ward. Mental health care in this country is a shambles. He was not in A&E at the time of the incident he was on Ward 4. He was not in a cubicle. How did he manage to climb onto the ledge of the window without one member of staff seeing him. I did not knock all hospital staff, clearly there was a problem on this one ward.DJA wrote:Let down by the hospital trust? what planet are you from,you sound like one of those no win-no fee shysters.If he said he wanted to go to the toilet,would you expect the female nurse to go into the cubicle with him? or maybe you think the NHS can afford a team for each patient in there? Instead of churning out all that health and safety/duty of care claptrap,you might care to reflect on what a good job our nursing staff doing,considering what they have to deal with round here,rather than knocking them all the time!the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients. Clearly this man had already attempted to take his life, and therefore should not have been left alone until he was under the care of a pwas suffering from depression for whatever reason and obviously suicidal - Therefore why was he left unattended while waiting for a psychiatrist. All these people having a good laugh over this should remember one thing - one in four people at some time in their life will suffer from mental illness - Lets hope it's not your loved one who is let down by the hospital trust.Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
Hypoman
says...
7:18pm Tue 7 Jul 09
ms walker
says...
10:43pm Tue 7 Jul 09
well,well
says...
11:28pm Tue 7 Jul 09
Leighann
says...
10:24am Wed 8 Jul 09
DJA wrote:Oh DJA you seem to be missing the point. If you have ever worked on the wards you will know that if a patient wants to smoke they will find a way, whether that be a toilet, a day room, store room or going outside. Patients who are not mobile enough will go to the nearest toilet and open a window to have a smoke.
Leighann wrote:Excuse me your still missing the point. Firstly IT IS the responsbility of staff on a ward to keep an eye on their patients. That happens to be their job and that's why they are called professionals. It is also a responsbility of the Trust to make sure that there are enough staff to allow those dities to be carried out. I spend a lot of my time at the Bradford Royal Infirmary and St Lukes Hospital and my family have worked within the NHS since 1960's so I do happen to have a lot of knowlege of the NHS both present and past. I don't know why you are talking about toilets for, the patient didn't jump out of a toilet window. If he wanted a cig I think he would just have gone to the main doors like every other patient and member of staff does.DJA wrote:How can staff keep an eye on every single patient in the ward? Toilets are private, do you expect a member of staff to go to the toilet every time with a patient? It is more than likely that he has gone for a sly fag where he has climbed up onto the window sill and forced the window open so staff don't smell the smoke, and in this case with forcing it he has fallen out. Just because you are a memeber of the Trust doesn't give you an insite into working lives on the ward, try and work on ward 4 yourself and you will soon see what they have to deal with, actually try working on any of the wards and see if you can cope with some of the patients they have on them. On call psyc teams do come but if a patient refuses treatment there is nothing more they can do.the Laird wrote:I am a member of the Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, so please don't insult my intelligence witha ramble about how wonderful everything is. This case clearly shows that metnal health care in Bradford is still a shambles. Genral nursing staff on the wards at the BRI are not trained to deal with such patients who should be under the care of a metnal health specialist. It is not clap trap to expect a mental health patient to be dealt with in a proper way, than just plonking him on a general ward. Mental health care in this country is a shambles. He was not in A&E at the time of the incident he was on Ward 4. He was not in a cubicle. How did he manage to climb onto the ledge of the window without one member of staff seeing him. I did not knock all hospital staff, clearly there was a problem on this one ward.DJA wrote:Let down by the hospital trust? what planet are you from,you sound like one of those no win-no fee shysters.If he said he wanted to go to the toilet,would you expect the female nurse to go into the cubicle with him? or maybe you think the NHS can afford a team for each patient in there? Instead of churning out all that health and safety/duty of care claptrap,you might care to reflect on what a good job our nursing staff doing,considering what they have to deal with round here,rather than knocking them all the time!the Laird wrote:The reason there has to be an enquiry is while in being treated in hospital, the Trust has a legal responsibility of care to their patients. Clearly this man had already attempted to take his life, and therefore should not have been left alone until he was under the care of a pwas suffering from depression for whatever reason and obviously suicidal - Therefore why was he left unattended while waiting for a psychiatrist. All these people having a good laugh over this should remember one thing - one in four people at some time in their life will suffer from mental illness - Lets hope it's not your loved one who is let down by the hospital trust.Fastnecker wrote: She has 5 kids. The couple have kids. But I'll have a bet not all 5 kids are his. She's a looker.Looks more like a right slapper than a looker to me! And i agree why waste money on an enquiry when its blatantly obvious what he did?
Juice Terry
says...
12:51pm Wed 8 Jul 09
SLATE MINER
says...
1:32pm Wed 8 Jul 09
Juice Terry wrote:How silly
If a hospital can't restrain violent mentalists who else can? Surely they can shoot them up the behind with tranquiliser darts or gas them? In the old days they would have been lobotomised like Jack Nicholson in that film abot loopy lou's.
SaltaireLass
says...
2:48pm Wed 8 Jul 09
DJA wrote:The NHS self insures so doesn't actually spend a lot of money on insurance...
osamabobladen wrote: So DJA - does she have to claim?Firstly it doesn't quote her in anyway as saying she is going to claim. Secondly, the NHS should not put its self in a position to be sued. Less money on insurance - more money on patient care.
albion
says...
4:19pm Wed 8 Jul 09
SaltaireLass wrote:It does however spend a lot in settling claims, in the town of Reading in the last five years the NHS paid out £14m to claimants, that is not an unusual amount and Reading isnt anywhere near being the biggest area.
DJA wrote:The NHS self insures so doesn't actually spend a lot of money on insurance...
osamabobladen wrote: So DJA - does she have to claim?Firstly it doesn't quote her in anyway as saying she is going to claim. Secondly, the NHS should not put its self in a position to be sued. Less money on insurance - more money on patient care.
SaltaireLass
says...
9:23am Thu 9 Jul 09
albion wrote:I agree, there's a lot of money wasted in the NHS.
SaltaireLass wrote:It does however spend a lot in settling claims, in the town of Reading in the last five years the NHS paid out £14m to claimants, that is not an unusual amount and Reading isnt anywhere near being the biggest area. So they are spending a lot on things other than healthcare and facilities.DJA wrote:The NHS self insures so doesn't actually spend a lot of money on insurance...osamabobladen wrote: So DJA - does she have to claim?Firstly it doesn't quote her in anyway as saying she is going to claim. Secondly, the NHS should not put its self in a position to be sued. Less money on insurance - more money on patient care.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Bradford and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Bradford and surrounding areas now
Search Now »
Homes for sale and to let in Bradford and surrounding areas.
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Bradford and surrounding areas
Search Now »
keeponclucking says...
6:33am Mon 6 Jul 09