Report this comment
  • "
    angry bradfordian wrote:
    More electioneering nonsense going on then! How does Galloway know they were 'fat cats'? Has he looked into every use? The term 'consultant' is a bit of a wide ranging description. Usually these people are paid to provide expertise that the council's staff can't provide. Would the people complaining about this rather have the council employing people who aren't fully occupied on the off chance that their skills are required? I suspect that would cost considerably more than £7m.
    What we would rather have are coucil employees who know how to do the job they are paid for .
    If the employees had a clue how the real world of business worked instead of sitting on their behinds waiting for an expensive consultant to tell them how to do the job they are paid for ,we would all be much better off.
    It is the same iold story of council employees without a clue or real experience sitting around waiting for that big fat early retirement pension and lump sum."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

£7m consultant fee claim sparks upset

Millions of pounds of taxpayer’s cash is going on consultants employed by Bradford Council, it has been revealed, as another election row breaks out between politicians.

Bradford West MP George Galloway claimed £7 million was ending up in the pockets of “fat cat consultants” and said that any Respect councillors elected after people go to the polls on Thursday “would do all in their power to root out waste and corruption”.

In response, Bradford Council leader Ian Greenwood said that under Labour Bradford has “for the first time established and published online a clear picture of expenditure on consultants after years of Tory mismanagement of the Council’s finances.”

He said that Mr Galloway had nothing new to offer beyond what was already being done and said that if he had any evidence of corruption, as he has alleged, he should alert the police and the Council immediately.

“It is a very serious allegation to make,” said Coun Greenwood.

“If, as I suspect, he has no such evidence then he should stop his rhetoric and posturing although I know that he will find that very difficult to do.

“We’ll continue to keep the use of consultants under close scrutiny but the actual Council contribution to their use last year was £2.8m not £7m.

“The balance is made up by Government contributions towards things they require us to do in a short space of time and which often need specialist skills.”

Mr Galloway said he would move to scrap the use of consultants if his party enjoyed election success.

“We will do everything in our power to hold a bonfire of the consultants, rather than the present situation where the Council is burning money,” Mr Galloway said.

“It is completely unjustified and an insult to council tax payers struggling to pay their way that this obscene amount of cash ends up in the pockets of fat cat consultants.

“Council services are being slashed at a time when vast sums are being paid out to these companies. This money needs to be invested in the city, for the benefit of the city, rather than boosting the balance sheets of private companies.”

The Council’s Conservative group leader, Councillor Glen Miller, said he agreed too much was being spent, while Liberal Democrat Councillor Jeanette Sunderland said she wanted to know where Mr Galloway got the £7m figure from. Coun MIller said: “The use of consultants is an easy way of getting answers. I think it is a big expense for the taxpayer to be spending extra money on consultants if you see little return for the money spent.”

Coun Sunderland said: “It is good if they want to stop the use of consultants. I would like to see the evidence, but the principle is that we should always challenge unnecessary spending.”

Mr Galloway’s spokesman said his figures came from the Council and showed more than £2 million was spent by its culture and regeneration departments alone.

  • On Thursday two Bradford Council-run leisure centres will be closed temporarily to be used as venues for counting votes in the local elections.

The Leisure Centre, Keighley, will be shut from 3pm and Richard Dunn Sports Centre in Odsal, will be closed from 5pm. Both will re-open as normal from 9am on Friday.

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree