News RSS Feed


Developer to start survey of Odeon site

12:02am Tuesday 6th May 2008

comment Comments (35)   Have your say »

By Jo Winrow »

Survey work begins this week on Bradford's Odeon cinema building, ahead of a planning application to develop the site.

The plans for the 77-year-old building by developer Langtree Artisan had been put on hold while a bid for the building to be listed was being considered.

Six weeks ago, English Heritage confirmed the former theatre and bingo hall, which opened in 1930, was not of sufficient architectural interest to warrant saving.

It was the sixth failed application to get the building listed in just over a decade and is likely to spell the end of the campaign to save the Odeon.

Yorkshire Forward bought the building for £2m in 2003 and a design competition was run in 2006 by Bradford Centre Regeneration. The winner was Langtree Artisan and its £55m New Victoria Place scheme - a mixed-use development of offices, apartments and a hotel - which means demolition for the former cinema.

Yorkshire Forward now has a legal agreement with the developer.

The work that begins this week includes an asbestos survey and a structural survey. It follows initial independent reports commissioned by BCR and Yorkshire Forward in 2004 which stated there was a "significant risk of asbestos" in 37 areas within the building.

A spokesman for Yorkshire Forward said: "Following the decision by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport and English Heritage not to list the Odeon building in Bradford, Langtree Artisan will be undertaking survey work on the site, including an asbestos survey and structural survey. Work will commence this week and is anticipated to take up to three months."

Bradford Odeon Rescue Group (BORG) came up with its own scheme, retaining the towers and creating a third. Their plans would have seen a 132-bed hotel, car park, a nightclub and auditorium.

BORG member John Pennington said there was asbestos, but only in the fabric of the building and that it was approximately 0.03 per cent.

"There is no more asbestos in that building than there is in City Hall," he said. "We've been told it was all taken out in the 1980s."

e-mail: jo.winrow@telegraphandargus.co.uk

  • Start or join a debate on this issue in our online forum - Click here

Your Say YourBradford

Where is me hat?, Bradford says...
5:53am Tue 6 May 08

Ah no sooner have Maud's goons started work on one pile of rubble then she gets them busy creating another.

How many years will this remain a building site? 10, 20, 30?

Where is me hat?, Bradford says...
5:53am Tue 6 May 08

Ah no sooner have Maud's goons started work on one pile of rubble then she gets them busy creating another.

How many years will this remain a building site? 10, 20, 30?

Where is me hat?, Bradford says...
5:53am Tue 6 May 08

Ah no sooner have Maud's goons started work on one pile of rubble then she gets them busy creating another.

How many years will this remain a building site? 10, 20, 30?

Where is me hat?, Bradford says...
5:53am Tue 6 May 08

Ah no sooner have Maud's goons started work on one pile of rubble then she gets them busy creating another.

How many years will this remain a building site? 10, 20, 30?

sajenkin, Odsal says...
9:22am Tue 6 May 08

which is better? A pile of rubble or a slowly decaying eyesore? Just because a few people had their first kiss on the back row doesnt make this eminently forgetable building worthy of saving. Of course, it COULD be turned into a discount carpet warehouse if thats more preferable!

sajenkin, Odsal says...
9:22am Tue 6 May 08

which is better? A pile of rubble or a slowly decaying eyesore? Just because a few people had their first kiss on the back row doesnt make this eminently forgetable building worthy of saving. Of course, it COULD be turned into a discount carpet warehouse if thats more preferable!

sajenkin, Odsal says...
9:22am Tue 6 May 08

which is better? A pile of rubble or a slowly decaying eyesore? Just because a few people had their first kiss on the back row doesnt make this eminently forgetable building worthy of saving. Of course, it COULD be turned into a discount carpet warehouse if thats more preferable!

sajenkin, Odsal says...
9:22am Tue 6 May 08

which is better? A pile of rubble or a slowly decaying eyesore? Just because a few people had their first kiss on the back row doesnt make this eminently forgetable building worthy of saving. Of course, it COULD be turned into a discount carpet warehouse if thats more preferable!

sajenkin, Odsal says...
9:24am Tue 6 May 08

which is better? A pile of rubble or a slowly decaying eyesore? Just because a few people had their first kiss on the back row doesnt make this eminently forgetable building worthy of saving. Of course, it COULD be turned into a discount carpet warehouse if thats more preferable!

sajenkin, Odsal says...
9:24am Tue 6 May 08

which is better? A pile of rubble or a slowly decaying eyesore? Just because a few people had their first kiss on the back row doesnt make this eminently forgetable building worthy of saving. Of course, it COULD be turned into a discount carpet warehouse if thats more preferable!

sajenkin, Odsal says...
9:24am Tue 6 May 08

which is better? A pile of rubble or a slowly decaying eyesore? Just because a few people had their first kiss on the back row doesnt make this eminently forgetable building worthy of saving. Of course, it COULD be turned into a discount carpet warehouse if thats more preferable!

sajenkin, Odsal says...
9:24am Tue 6 May 08

which is better? A pile of rubble or a slowly decaying eyesore? Just because a few people had their first kiss on the back row doesnt make this eminently forgetable building worthy of saving. Of course, it COULD be turned into a discount carpet warehouse if thats more preferable!

?, bradford says...
12:31pm Tue 6 May 08

The sooner they take the building down the better.

Even if they can't decide what to do with it now. They should knock it down make it into a temp car park until they decide what they can do with the area.

?, bradford says...
12:31pm Tue 6 May 08

The sooner they take the building down the better.

Even if they can't decide what to do with it now. They should knock it down make it into a temp car park until they decide what they can do with the area.

?, bradford says...
12:31pm Tue 6 May 08

The sooner they take the building down the better.

Even if they can't decide what to do with it now. They should knock it down make it into a temp car park until they decide what they can do with the area.

?, bradford says...
12:31pm Tue 6 May 08

The sooner they take the building down the better.

Even if they can't decide what to do with it now. They should knock it down make it into a temp car park until they decide what they can do with the area.

David, Bradford says...
12:31pm Tue 6 May 08

So is Maud kicking all the supporters of BORG and John Pennington in the teeth?
Are their proposals not being given consideration by our Council? Why our our Council letting Maud get away with this demolish at all costs, one would think Maud was in charge of Bradford!
Regards
David

David, Bradford says...
12:31pm Tue 6 May 08

So is Maud kicking all the supporters of BORG and John Pennington in the teeth?
Are their proposals not being given consideration by our Council? Why our our Council letting Maud get away with this demolish at all costs, one would think Maud was in charge of Bradford!
Regards
David

David, Bradford says...
12:31pm Tue 6 May 08

So is Maud kicking all the supporters of BORG and John Pennington in the teeth?
Are their proposals not being given consideration by our Council? Why our our Council letting Maud get away with this demolish at all costs, one would think Maud was in charge of Bradford!
Regards
David

David, Bradford says...
12:31pm Tue 6 May 08

So is Maud kicking all the supporters of BORG and John Pennington in the teeth?
Are their proposals not being given consideration by our Council? Why our our Council letting Maud get away with this demolish at all costs, one would think Maud was in charge of Bradford!
Regards
David

Mark Nicholson, Wibsey says...
2:26pm Tue 6 May 08

BORG require six months to get the finer details of their scheme ironed out, but are still seeing it through!

So BCR and Yorkshire Forward are finally seeking a structural survey? One can only imagine what horrors another "commissioned" and biased report will throw up this time!!! This should have been done independently years ago...

Mark Nicholson, Wibsey says...
2:26pm Tue 6 May 08

BORG require six months to get the finer details of their scheme ironed out, but are still seeing it through!

So BCR and Yorkshire Forward are finally seeking a structural survey? One can only imagine what horrors another "commissioned" and biased report will throw up this time!!! This should have been done independently years ago...

Mark Nicholson, Wibsey says...
2:26pm Tue 6 May 08

BORG require six months to get the finer details of their scheme ironed out, but are still seeing it through!

So BCR and Yorkshire Forward are finally seeking a structural survey? One can only imagine what horrors another "commissioned" and biased report will throw up this time!!! This should have been done independently years ago...

Mark Nicholson, Wibsey says...
2:26pm Tue 6 May 08

BORG require six months to get the finer details of their scheme ironed out, but are still seeing it through!

So BCR and Yorkshire Forward are finally seeking a structural survey? One can only imagine what horrors another "commissioned" and biased report will throw up this time!!! This should have been done independently years ago...

exbradfordian, cumbria says...
3:30pm Tue 6 May 08

And so it goes on. Any real decisions any time soon?

exbradfordian, cumbria says...
3:30pm Tue 6 May 08

And so it goes on. Any real decisions any time soon?

exbradfordian, cumbria says...
3:30pm Tue 6 May 08

And so it goes on. Any real decisions any time soon?

exbradfordian, cumbria says...
3:30pm Tue 6 May 08

And so it goes on. Any real decisions any time soon?

Odeon Crusader, Bradford says...
4:13pm Tue 6 May 08

Nice one, Yorkshire Forward and Maud! A full three months in which you can send in your little henchmen under the pretence of "searching for asbestos", which we all know will be in order to damage the original interior features that survived the conversion work!!!

The whole thing stinks quite frankly and we shouldn't be letting this happen! The Odeon building was bought with public money by a government-created body and our feelings have been ignored.

So much for Kris Hopkins and Jan Anderson's pledge to sell the Odeon on, despite BORG working against the clock to bang their scheme into shape.

Odeon Crusader, Bradford says...
4:13pm Tue 6 May 08

Nice one, Yorkshire Forward and Maud! A full three months in which you can send in your little henchmen under the pretence of "searching for asbestos", which we all know will be in order to damage the original interior features that survived the conversion work!!!

The whole thing stinks quite frankly and we shouldn't be letting this happen! The Odeon building was bought with public money by a government-created body and our feelings have been ignored.

So much for Kris Hopkins and Jan Anderson's pledge to sell the Odeon on, despite BORG working against the clock to bang their scheme into shape.

Odeon Crusader, Bradford says...
4:13pm Tue 6 May 08

Nice one, Yorkshire Forward and Maud! A full three months in which you can send in your little henchmen under the pretence of "searching for asbestos", which we all know will be in order to damage the original interior features that survived the conversion work!!!

The whole thing stinks quite frankly and we shouldn't be letting this happen! The Odeon building was bought with public money by a government-created body and our feelings have been ignored.

So much for Kris Hopkins and Jan Anderson's pledge to sell the Odeon on, despite BORG working against the clock to bang their scheme into shape.

Odeon Crusader, Bradford says...
4:13pm Tue 6 May 08

Nice one, Yorkshire Forward and Maud! A full three months in which you can send in your little henchmen under the pretence of "searching for asbestos", which we all know will be in order to damage the original interior features that survived the conversion work!!!

The whole thing stinks quite frankly and we shouldn't be letting this happen! The Odeon building was bought with public money by a government-created body and our feelings have been ignored.

So much for Kris Hopkins and Jan Anderson's pledge to sell the Odeon on, despite BORG working against the clock to bang their scheme into shape.

Richard, Everywhere says...
5:55pm Sun 1 Jun 08

Maud, YF and BCR are adamant that it's not financially viavle to save the Odeon building.

I bet they'd have said the same about the Midland Hotel building too.

So, who do we believe? Ms Marshall, who has renovated (zero) derelict buildings, or Mr Pennington, who did a sterling job on the Midland?

Richard, Everywhere says...
5:55pm Sun 1 Jun 08

Maud, YF and BCR are adamant that it's not financially viavle to save the Odeon building.

I bet they'd have said the same about the Midland Hotel building too.

So, who do we believe? Ms Marshall, who has renovated (zero) derelict buildings, or Mr Pennington, who did a sterling job on the Midland?

Richard, Everywhere says...
5:55pm Sun 1 Jun 08

Maud, YF and BCR are adamant that it's not financially viavle to save the Odeon building.

I bet they'd have said the same about the Midland Hotel building too.

So, who do we believe? Ms Marshall, who has renovated (zero) derelict buildings, or Mr Pennington, who did a sterling job on the Midland?

Your sayYourBradford

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Bradford Telegraph and Argus account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
The former Odeon building

Buy this photo icon Buy this photo » The former Odeon building




What's On Live Travel YourBradford

Last updated 00.03 with 0 incidents

Full Traffic Report »

Hot Jobs

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »