Langtree development scheme for Bradford Odeon scrapped (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Langtree development scheme for Bradford Odeon scrapped
11:15am Thursday 20th September 2012 in News
By Jo Winrow, City Hall Reporter
Bradford Odeon saved from demolition as New Victoria Place development scrapped
Plans to redevelop Bradford’s Odeon site and create offices, a hotel and apartments in its place have been scrapped as the owner of the building has decided to pull the plug on the development.
The Homes and Communities Agency has grown frustrated with Langtree, the company behind a long-standing plan to redevelop the key Prince’s Way site, and has terminated a legal agreement between them.
It means the New Victoria Place development on the site of the former cinema building, which has been earmarked for demolition for the best part of a decade, will not now go ahead.
The Government's HCA said the developer has failed to comply with the terms of the development agreement after Langtree called for more time to market the scheme to potential occupants.
It comes three months after the HCA first signed a vital section 106 agreement, which Langtree was expected to add its signature to before passing the document to Bradford Council to seal. This would have given the developer valid planning permission for its development as well as conservation area consent to demolish the 1930s building, including its iconic twin towers.
But the sticking point appears to have been Langtree's reluctance to trigger an eight month period in the development agreement in which it would have to prove it had a viable scheme in place as well as tenants and the finances before it could proceed to demolition.
The news will come as a relief to those campaigning to save the historic building and give them renewed hope that the building can be permanently saved but the structural condition of the building remains unclear.
David Curtis, HCA executive director for the North East, Yorkshire and The Humber, said: “Since assuming ownership for the building a year ago, we’ve been working hard to look after the building, remove potentially fatal asbestos and resolve the complex legal issues surrounding the plans for its future.
“We know the Bradford public has been frustrated at the uncertainty surrounding the building – and we’ve been frustrated too. When it was clear that the developer wasn’t prepared to meet the obligation to commence with the New Victoria scheme we decided to terminate the agreement.
“We haven’t taken this decision lightly and it won’t be a simple task to resolve the building’s future. But we’re determined to secure a viable outcome for the site and we’ll work with the Council and local community to find a solution that meets their ambitions for the city centre.”
He added that Langtree wanted to extend the eight month period, but that they were not prepared to agree to this as it would change the terms of the original development agreement they inherited when they took over the building from Yorkshire Forward a year ago this week. In that time he confirmed they had spent more than £1 million on the building, making it safe and removing asbestos.
He said they would offer the building to Bradford Council, but would need Government approval before it could be transferred. He added that all options were open for the building but that any plan would need to be “commercially viable” and that he expected its future to be determined within 12 months.
Councillor David Green , leader of the Council, welcomed the announcement, saying he was “pleased” with the outcome, which could lead to all or part of the 1930s building being saved.
“I am pleased that we have closed this particular chapter on the Odeon which gives us the opportunity to rethink the future of the building.
“We will be speaking to the Homes and Communities Agency about all the issues relating to the Odeon, including future ownership. What I hope they will agree to is that we can now go out to all those groups and individuals who have indicated that they have viable and sustainable alternative plans for the building to ask them to bring forward their business cases so they can be reviewed and we can assess whether any can be progressed.
“I would hope to be meeting the HCA in the near future and to be able to come to an agreement along these lines so that those individuals and organisations with alternative plans will know the timescale in which they have to prepare their business cases. I would hope that one or more of these schemes can be taken forward to the next stage.
“I have consistently stated the view of the Labour group that we would want to see all or as much of the building as possible being retained in a viable and sustainable scheme and this now gives the opportunity for this.”
He added that given the current financial situation, the Council had no money to buy the building from the HCA and would be unlikely to be in a position to invest in the building.
e-mail: jo.winrow@telegraphandargus.co.uk ends
Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videos Send your news, pictures & videosComments(80)
Albion.
says...
11:41am Thu 20 Sep 12
angry bradfordian wrote:"David Curtis, HCA executive director for the North East, Yorkshire and The Humber, said: “Since assuming ownership for the building a year ago, we’ve been working hard to look after the building, remove potentially fatal asbestos and resolve the complex legal issues surrounding the plans for its future."
"What I hope they will agree to is that we can now go out to all those groups and individuals who have indicated that they have viable and sustainable alternative plans"
I thought the state of asbestos and structural decay meant there couldn't be a sustainable plan. Or was this a lie?
It looks like the Asbestos is either gone or removable.
I hope a plan with real backers, now emerges and the building can be saved and utilised in a way that would be complimentary to it's neighbour the Alhambra.
citywin10
says...
11:42am Thu 20 Sep 12
Now can it be put into the right hands, renovated and rejuvenated in line with the wishes of the people of Bradford.
Why do we always seem to contract with wrong 'uns? Westfield, Langtree...
Is that an indication of how desperate we are?
angry bradfordian
says...
11:47am Thu 20 Sep 12
Albion. wrote:I don't understand how the quantity of asbestos was always the main reason that Yorkshire Forward gave as the reason for ruling out refurbishment when they've gone and removed it anyway before the building was sold.
angry bradfordian wrote:"David Curtis, HCA executive director for the North East, Yorkshire and The Humber, said: “Since assuming ownership for the building a year ago, we’ve been working hard to look after the building, remove potentially fatal asbestos and resolve the complex legal issues surrounding the plans for its future."
"What I hope they will agree to is that we can now go out to all those groups and individuals who have indicated that they have viable and sustainable alternative plans"
I thought the state of asbestos and structural decay meant there couldn't be a sustainable plan. Or was this a lie?
It looks like the Asbestos is either gone or removable.
I hope a plan with real backers, now emerges and the building can be saved and utilised in a way that would be complimentary to it's neighbour the Alhambra.
I fear it may be a temporary reprieve, as it'll probably still be sold to the highest bidder, regardless of it's future use.
At least we now know why it's being wrapped.
webess
says...
11:57am Thu 20 Sep 12
Old Peculiar
says...
11:57am Thu 20 Sep 12
BierleyBoy
says...
12:00pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Pity Poor Bradford
says...
12:09pm Thu 20 Sep 12
We need to keep it, and look at buildings in Leeds and Manchester for ideas of how to use it.
The Printworks for example. It's now a popular entertainment centre with bars and restaurants. That was the Daily Mirrors HQ, and stood empty for 12 years before it re-opened. Good job that wasn't demolished and replaced with a non-descript generic building. Like the one that was demolished to build City Square
Albion.
says...
12:09pm Thu 20 Sep 12
BierleyBoy wrote:There are reasons why it has remained empty, now there is an opportunity for those who wish to restore it, which didn't exist before.
The Odeon building is a white elephant. It's been empty for a decade. That in itself is a sure sign there is no use for it. knock it down and clear the site for a brand new development. The same should be done with that horrible tower block across from the Oastler centre.
zippiehippie
says...
12:11pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Prisoner Cell Block A
says...
12:16pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Someone above asked, how come we always seem to climb into bed with wrong uns?
Common denominator is council ineptitude, cross party council ineptitude, cross party pocket lining, cross party brown envelopes.
Joedavid
says...
12:19pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Thank you Eric Pickles and your HCA for getting rid of Langtree, just wish the Council would take your lead and rid us of Westfield too.
Positivepete
says...
12:33pm Thu 20 Sep 12
David Green welcomed the announcement, saying he was “pleased” with the outcome, which could lead to all or part of the 1930s building being saved.
“I am pleased that we have closed this particular chapter on the Odeon which gives us the opportunity to rethink the future of the building.
It's not rethinking we need in Bradford, there has been far too much of that! What we need is action. Wish we were as good at building things, as we are at closing yet another chapter that has gone nowhere.
Wonder what odds I will get on the Odeon being in the same position as it is right now, an eyesore, but in another ten years? Safe bet.
Would be ashamed to call myself a councillor from Bradford.
Nothing positive in this report at all.
Bone_idle18
says...
12:35pm Thu 20 Sep 12
BierleyBoy
says...
12:38pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Pity Poor Bradford wrote:The Printworks was not an old style single screen cinema. It was a commercial space that was capable of being adapted & used for many purposes. It is also in the heart of a vibrant major city where there was high demand for leisure & retail space.
Why don't we steamroller the whole City while we're at it, Bierley Boy?
We need to keep it, and look at buildings in Leeds and Manchester for ideas of how to use it.
The Printworks for example. It's now a popular entertainment centre with bars and restaurants. That was the Daily Mirrors HQ, and stood empty for 12 years before it re-opened. Good job that wasn't demolished and replaced with a non-descript generic building. Like the one that was demolished to build City Square
The Odeon interior cannot be changed to suit other purposes without removing what it's primary purpose was. i.e to eb a cinema. It can't be turned into a multi scree, so what can it be?
No one who is against demolition seems to have any suggestions.
No one against demolition also seems to have a figure on re-development costs or the money to carry it out.
Yorkshire Forward couldn't do anything with it. HCA couldn't & the council hasn't the money.
Sell the site & clear it for a new development. it's the only way forward.
Andy2010
says...
12:43pm Thu 20 Sep 12
It's clear from the posts here and in previous threads that the people of Bradford want the original building saving and possibly turning into a cinema or even a music venue which would be ideal and drive a lot of business to the centre
Do they listen though...do they eck
jackw
says...
12:43pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Clowny
says...
12:44pm Thu 20 Sep 12
This is a good day for Bradford.
JAtkinson
says...
12:51pm Thu 20 Sep 12
kellyh1981
says...
12:56pm Thu 20 Sep 12
I would suggest as many people as possible object to it.
http://www.planning4
bradford.com/online-
applications/applica
tionDetails.do?activ
eTab=summary&keyVal=
M848S8DHC1000
Avro
says...
12:57pm Thu 20 Sep 12
How long is this next phase going to roll on, until it is deemd that the building is beyond sustainability and will end up demolished.
Clearly the Langtree plan could not muster a 50% pre-let.
flashdonut
says...
12:58pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Old Peculiar wrote:Unfortunately, that is very true.
Only in Bradafut, could a failure to invest ; be regarded as a success.
The Man With No Name
says...
1:02pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Yammer
says...
1:04pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Keep up the good work. We need viable ideas!!
Avro
says...
1:10pm Thu 20 Sep 12
It will end up demolished and the site be a car park to the 100's of thousands visiting the City park.......and if you believe that, then you'll believe that, you'll belive anything the Council have to say, including the Odeon being saved!
citywin10
says...
1:26pm Thu 20 Sep 12
A Mosque, micro brewery and real ale bar.
Guaranteed multi cultural winner!!
Albion.
says...
1:32pm Thu 20 Sep 12
citywin10 wrote:Might prove interesting on a Friday afternoon.
Turn it into something for everyone.
A Mosque, micro brewery and real ale bar.
Guaranteed multi cultural winner!!
bobbyo
says...
1:33pm Thu 20 Sep 12
SAVE THE ODEON !
Bfd bloke
says...
1:36pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010
says...
1:38pm Thu 20 Sep 12
bobbyo wrote:This ^^ is exactly what it needs to become. It could with obviously millions put into it become an excellent concert venue and woudl only compliment the area with the Alhambra next door and the bars etc round the corner and across the road.
would make a nice concert venue to bring the best bands to the city, SAVE THE ODEON !
I goto quite a few gigs in Manchester and all over and each time I tend to stop over and go out before and afterwards as Im sure others would
Will the council have such hindsight....i doubt it
RL Ron
says...
1:40pm Thu 20 Sep 12
vax2002
says...
1:41pm Thu 20 Sep 12
I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice.
Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.
Andy2010
says...
1:49pm Thu 20 Sep 12
vax2002 wrote:NO NO NO
The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.
Please no more horrible flat complexes....theres enough lying empty as it is or home to the scum of the earth
Yorkshire Lass
says...
1:52pm Thu 20 Sep 12
RL Ron
says...
1:52pm Thu 20 Sep 12
vax2002 wrote:No chance, there are numerous empty flats already, use those first.
The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats.
I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice.
Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.
Bradford centre needs saving and fast.
basil fawlty
says...
1:55pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The Odeon's obvious use is as an entertainments venue. Bradford needs a large concert venue and Bradford needs a large multi-floor nightclub. The area is perfect as it sits close to the rail and bus stations and close to the university area. The majority of Bradford's residents appear to want the retention of at least the building's facades, so they should be retained. The viability of keeping the building's interior should be left to any prospective developer's.
Avro
says...
1:56pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Westfield pull the plug and put the land up for sale?
The Man With No Name
says...
2:00pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:Scum of the earth? Who do you mean? Poor people in need of a home? Those who lack care and compassion for those less fortunate are the real "scum of the earth", as you put it.
vax2002 wrote:NO NO NO
The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.
Please no more horrible flat complexes....theres enough lying empty as it is or home to the scum of the earth
The Man With No Name
says...
2:02pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Avro wrote:I hope so. Turn the Westfield site into something of actual use, such as allotments to grow much needed food and feed the starving destitute population of Bradford.
What's the next "Good News" Crapford?
Westfield pull the plug and put the land up for sale?
The Man With No Name
says...
2:04pm Thu 20 Sep 12
citywin10 wrote:..and also grow weed in there too and you're on to a winner!
Turn it into something for everyone.
A Mosque, micro brewery and real ale bar.
Guaranteed multi cultural winner!!
Clowny
says...
2:08pm Thu 20 Sep 12
vax2002 wrote:You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone.
The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats.
I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice.
Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.
This development was only offering 30 odd anyway.
Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
ava4
says...
2:08pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The John Peel centre looked like a very good idea, if it has some realistic backing then that would be a great use for the site.
Andy2010
says...
2:09pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The Man With No Name wrote:No not at all. If you look at the empty blocks of flats in the city centre as there is no business in the centre they dont attract the target tenants of young professionals instead and as Landlords then let these out for social housing they attract families with upteem kids who do not work and probably cannot even speak English to them.
Andy2010 wrote:Scum of the earth? Who do you mean? Poor people in need of a home? Those who lack care and compassion for those less fortunate are the real "scum of the earth", as you put it.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.NO NO NO Please no more horrible flat complexes....theres enough lying empty as it is or home to the scum of the earth
Poor people in need of a home....dont make me laugh. There is already plenty there to be let but these sorts do not like topping up the rent out of their alcohol and fag money
The Man With No Name
says...
2:30pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:Like I said, no care or compassion for those less fortunate = scum of the earth. Thanks for confirming it.
The Man With No Name wrote:No not at all. If you look at the empty blocks of flats in the city centre as there is no business in the centre they dont attract the target tenants of young professionals instead and as Landlords then let these out for social housing they attract families with upteem kids who do not work and probably cannot even speak English to them.
Andy2010 wrote:Scum of the earth? Who do you mean? Poor people in need of a home? Those who lack care and compassion for those less fortunate are the real "scum of the earth", as you put it.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.NO NO NO Please no more horrible flat complexes....theres enough lying empty as it is or home to the scum of the earth
Poor people in need of a home....dont make me laugh. There is already plenty there to be let but these sorts do not like topping up the rent out of their alcohol and fag money
The Man With No Name
says...
2:32pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.
vax2002 wrote:You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone.
The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats.
I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice.
Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.
This development was only offering 30 odd anyway.
Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
Andy2010
says...
2:48pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem
Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ.
If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income
All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs.
An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum
Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)
New World Order
says...
3:00pm Thu 20 Sep 12
A Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.
Andy2010
says...
3:04pm Thu 20 Sep 12
New World Order wrote:If you say so
POLITICS: A Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.
yorkshiredude
says...
3:15pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:I live in a city centre flat and I'm not an immigrant (well my great grandparents were Irish) and I don't think I'm scum.
The Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem
Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ.
If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income
All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs.
An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum
Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)
But anyway, an entertainment venue at the Odeon would be great - and could be a catalyst for regeneration of the Thornton Road / 'Goitside' area - some of the old buildings there are ripe for conversion for immigrants and scum to live in...
Demand for housing is a) in the future - Bradford has a young population who will all need somewhere to live in the future b) people might be homeless, but staying with friends / family etc
Andy2010
says...
3:25pm Thu 20 Sep 12
yorkshiredude wrote:Without jobs there is nothing plain and simple. The young as you put will simply move away to secure jobs in other areas (well the ones with anything about them will)
Andy2010 wrote:I live in a city centre flat and I'm not an immigrant (well my great grandparents were Irish) and I don't think I'm scum. But anyway, an entertainment venue at the Odeon would be great - and could be a catalyst for regeneration of the Thornton Road / 'Goitside' area - some of the old buildings there are ripe for conversion for immigrants and scum to live in... Demand for housing is a) in the future - Bradford has a young population who will all need somewhere to live in the future b) people might be homeless, but staying with friends / family etcThe Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ. If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs. An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
The answer to Bradford's problems lies solely in the lack of business being attracted here not in housing or anything else. The main couple fo reasons Leeds has been a success is due to the influx of blue chip companies and also transport links. The Leeds nightlife and shops etc all followed making it what it is today. Bradford has nothing,...nothing at all to offer anyone with disposable income. Housing isnt the answer as without jobs who are going to fill these houses?
Its now near on impossible to attract business to Bradford (by business I mean financial services etc not pound shops or bookies) but at least if the Odean was a venue as such it would be a start to attracting businesses here.
Ask yourself this...if you were for example a London based business looking for a regional office would you want to locate in Bradford?
The Man With No Name
says...
3:25pm Thu 20 Sep 12
New World Order wrote:The Left - Right paradigm is actually nothing less than the Hegelian Dialectic being enacted over a long period of time; Thesis Vs. Anti-thesis produces Synthesis. Imagine a Pyramid structure with Synthesis as the Capstone.
POLITICS:
A Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.
The Man With No Name
says...
3:27pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:"immigrants and scum", there you go again once more confirming that it is people with views such as yourself that are the real scum.
The Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem
Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ.
If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income
All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs.
An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum
Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)
Thorntonguy
says...
3:31pm Thu 20 Sep 12
I'm not a Bradfordian; I am originally from Manchester and moved here three years ago, so perhaps I can see this from an outsider's viewpoint.
In Manchester, we have conserved and renovated at least the facades of many of our historical buildings and put them to another use.
The Odeon building is a beautiful one, and sits close to another iconic building, the Alhambra. The two buildings together are a real spectacal and they were two of the first buildings I fell in love with in Bradford. It would be a calamity if one were to disappear. Some use must be found for it.
In terms of housing, there are plenty of derelict brownfield sites around the city centre and around the suburbs that could be used for housing development.
The redevelopment of Hulme and Moss Side in Manchester, formerly by-words for gangland killings and drug-ridden communities, proves what can be achieved with some careful forethought and planning.
Get your act together Bradford! You have a potentially beautiful city! Stop destroying the beautiful parts and start redeveloping the concrete eyesores that are a relic of the 60's and the derelict factory sites instead.
Thorntonguy
says...
3:36pm Thu 20 Sep 12
BierleyBoy wrote:Yes, Manchester is a thriving city. One of the reasons for that is that there is a lot of entertainment and nightlife. If we want to inject that kind of vibrance into Bradford (and why shouldn't we?) then we need to start providing places for people to go. There are many uses it could be put to. Turn it back into a cinema is one. A nightclub would be ideal. There something that could be done with it with some willpower and originality of thought.
Pity Poor Bradford wrote: Why don't we steamroller the whole City while we're at it, Bierley Boy? We need to keep it, and look at buildings in Leeds and Manchester for ideas of how to use it. The Printworks for example. It's now a popular entertainment centre with bars and restaurants. That was the Daily Mirrors HQ, and stood empty for 12 years before it re-opened. Good job that wasn't demolished and replaced with a non-descript generic building. Like the one that was demolished to build City SquareThe Printworks was not an old style single screen cinema. It was a commercial space that was capable of being adapted & used for many purposes. It is also in the heart of a vibrant major city where there was high demand for leisure & retail space. The Odeon interior cannot be changed to suit other purposes without removing what it's primary purpose was. i.e to eb a cinema. It can't be turned into a multi scree, so what can it be? No one who is against demolition seems to have any suggestions. No one against demolition also seems to have a figure on re-development costs or the money to carry it out. Yorkshire Forward couldn't do anything with it. HCA couldn't & the council hasn't the money. Sell the site & clear it for a new development. it's the only way forward.
Andy2010
says...
4:05pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Thorntonguy wrote:The thing is the council are always thinking of the quick £ rather than long term investment.
BierleyBoy wrote:Yes, Manchester is a thriving city. One of the reasons for that is that there is a lot of entertainment and nightlife. If we want to inject that kind of vibrance into Bradford (and why shouldn't we?) then we need to start providing places for people to go. There are many uses it could be put to. Turn it back into a cinema is one. A nightclub would be ideal. There something that could be done with it with some willpower and originality of thought.Pity Poor Bradford wrote: Why don't we steamroller the whole City while we're at it, Bierley Boy? We need to keep it, and look at buildings in Leeds and Manchester for ideas of how to use it. The Printworks for example. It's now a popular entertainment centre with bars and restaurants. That was the Daily Mirrors HQ, and stood empty for 12 years before it re-opened. Good job that wasn't demolished and replaced with a non-descript generic building. Like the one that was demolished to build City SquareThe Printworks was not an old style single screen cinema. It was a commercial space that was capable of being adapted & used for many purposes. It is also in the heart of a vibrant major city where there was high demand for leisure & retail space. The Odeon interior cannot be changed to suit other purposes without removing what it's primary purpose was. i.e to eb a cinema. It can't be turned into a multi scree, so what can it be? No one who is against demolition seems to have any suggestions. No one against demolition also seems to have a figure on re-development costs or the money to carry it out. Yorkshire Forward couldn't do anything with it. HCA couldn't & the council hasn't the money. Sell the site & clear it for a new development. it's the only way forward.
They would stand to make a lot more in way of tax on flats or offices than on an entertainment.
Alas its a false ecomony but they dont have a braincell between them
Prisoner Cell Block A
says...
4:06pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:Which reflects the demise of Bradford as industry died.
yorkshiredude wrote:Without jobs there is nothing plain and simple. The young as you put will simply move away to secure jobs in other areas (well the ones with anything about them will)
Andy2010 wrote:I live in a city centre flat and I'm not an immigrant (well my great grandparents were Irish) and I don't think I'm scum. But anyway, an entertainment venue at the Odeon would be great - and could be a catalyst for regeneration of the Thornton Road / 'Goitside' area - some of the old buildings there are ripe for conversion for immigrants and scum to live in... Demand for housing is a) in the future - Bradford has a young population who will all need somewhere to live in the future b) people might be homeless, but staying with friends / family etcThe Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ. If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs. An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
The answer to Bradford's problems lies solely in the lack of business being attracted here not in housing or anything else. The main couple fo reasons Leeds has been a success is due to the influx of blue chip companies and also transport links. The Leeds nightlife and shops etc all followed making it what it is today. Bradford has nothing,...nothing at all to offer anyone with disposable income. Housing isnt the answer as without jobs who are going to fill these houses?
Its now near on impossible to attract business to Bradford (by business I mean financial services etc not pound shops or bookies) but at least if the Odean was a venue as such it would be a start to attracting businesses here.
Ask yourself this...if you were for example a London based business looking for a regional office would you want to locate in Bradford?
Therefore any resurrection has to come from growth within some industry, be it entertainment, retail or whatever, it will not and can not come from 'giving' houses to idiots and workshy gloits.
Mummys little Sunbeam
says...
4:09pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The Man With No Name wrote:....and I would quite like a decent pie and pea shop. You can get the munchies after a few pints of decent ale.
citywin10 wrote:..and also grow weed in there too and you're on to a winner!
Turn it into something for everyone.
A Mosque, micro brewery and real ale bar.
Guaranteed multi cultural winner!!
stiflers mom
says...
4:33pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The Man With No Name wrote:...easy for you to say !!!
New World Order wrote:The Left - Right paradigm is actually nothing less than the Hegelian Dialectic being enacted over a long period of time; Thesis Vs. Anti-thesis produces Synthesis. Imagine a Pyramid structure with Synthesis as the Capstone.
POLITICS:
A Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage.
thatsnotmyname
says...
4:49pm Thu 20 Sep 12
If the council want to turn Bradford around it needs to back projects like this, not places to go shopping...as they will come later when visitor numbers increase.
Andy2010
says...
4:53pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The Man With No Name
says...
5:04pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Prisoner Cell Block A wrote:Retail is dead, Cameron, Osbourne & Co. have seen to that!
Andy2010 wrote:Which reflects the demise of Bradford as industry died.
yorkshiredude wrote:Without jobs there is nothing plain and simple. The young as you put will simply move away to secure jobs in other areas (well the ones with anything about them will)
Andy2010 wrote:I live in a city centre flat and I'm not an immigrant (well my great grandparents were Irish) and I don't think I'm scum. But anyway, an entertainment venue at the Odeon would be great - and could be a catalyst for regeneration of the Thornton Road / 'Goitside' area - some of the old buildings there are ripe for conversion for immigrants and scum to live in... Demand for housing is a) in the future - Bradford has a young population who will all need somewhere to live in the future b) people might be homeless, but staying with friends / family etcThe Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ. If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs. An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
The answer to Bradford's problems lies solely in the lack of business being attracted here not in housing or anything else. The main couple fo reasons Leeds has been a success is due to the influx of blue chip companies and also transport links. The Leeds nightlife and shops etc all followed making it what it is today. Bradford has nothing,...nothing at all to offer anyone with disposable income. Housing isnt the answer as without jobs who are going to fill these houses?
Its now near on impossible to attract business to Bradford (by business I mean financial services etc not pound shops or bookies) but at least if the Odean was a venue as such it would be a start to attracting businesses here.
Ask yourself this...if you were for example a London based business looking for a regional office would you want to locate in Bradford?
Therefore any resurrection has to come from growth within some industry, be it entertainment, retail or whatever, it will not and can not come from 'giving' houses to idiots and workshy gloits.
The Man With No Name
says...
5:08pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:Consultants who charge £1 Million for doing next to nothing epitomise the inherent dishonesty that exists within Capitalism, the system you love so much.
It would seem the people in this thread (barring the stupid housing idea) actually have put forward better ideas than a £1m paid consultant by the council could have come up with
The Man With No Name
says...
5:12pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:Nightclubs are ten a penny, and who the hell wants another nightclub anyway? Let the young revelers go to Leeds instead. That sort of dubious 'entertainment' surely is unsustainable and not worthy of any longterm investment. We don't need another cinema as we have enough already, we don't need any more shops as again we already have plenty, same goes for restaurants, but what we do need is more affordable housing and quality free food outlets for the poor.
Thorntonguy wrote:The thing is the council are always thinking of the quick £ rather than long term investment.
BierleyBoy wrote:Yes, Manchester is a thriving city. One of the reasons for that is that there is a lot of entertainment and nightlife. If we want to inject that kind of vibrance into Bradford (and why shouldn't we?) then we need to start providing places for people to go. There are many uses it could be put to. Turn it back into a cinema is one. A nightclub would be ideal. There something that could be done with it with some willpower and originality of thought.Pity Poor Bradford wrote: Why don't we steamroller the whole City while we're at it, Bierley Boy? We need to keep it, and look at buildings in Leeds and Manchester for ideas of how to use it. The Printworks for example. It's now a popular entertainment centre with bars and restaurants. That was the Daily Mirrors HQ, and stood empty for 12 years before it re-opened. Good job that wasn't demolished and replaced with a non-descript generic building. Like the one that was demolished to build City SquareThe Printworks was not an old style single screen cinema. It was a commercial space that was capable of being adapted & used for many purposes. It is also in the heart of a vibrant major city where there was high demand for leisure & retail space. The Odeon interior cannot be changed to suit other purposes without removing what it's primary purpose was. i.e to eb a cinema. It can't be turned into a multi scree, so what can it be? No one who is against demolition seems to have any suggestions. No one against demolition also seems to have a figure on re-development costs or the money to carry it out. Yorkshire Forward couldn't do anything with it. HCA couldn't & the council hasn't the money. Sell the site & clear it for a new development. it's the only way forward.
They would stand to make a lot more in way of tax on flats or offices than on an entertainment.
Alas its a false ecomony but they dont have a braincell between them
Andy2010
says...
5:26pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The Man With No Name wrote:So according to your proposal you would knock down the odean and build flats and a "free" food restuarent for the poor...
Andy2010 wrote:Nightclubs are ten a penny, and who the hell wants another nightclub anyway? Let the young revelers go to Leeds instead. That sort of dubious 'entertainment' surely is unsustainable and not worthy of any longterm investment. We don't need another cinema as we have enough already, we don't need any more shops as again we already have plenty, same goes for restaurants, but what we do need is more affordable housing and quality free food outlets for the poor.Thorntonguy wrote:The thing is the council are always thinking of the quick £ rather than long term investment. They would stand to make a lot more in way of tax on flats or offices than on an entertainment. Alas its a false ecomony but they dont have a braincell between themBierleyBoy wrote:Yes, Manchester is a thriving city. One of the reasons for that is that there is a lot of entertainment and nightlife. If we want to inject that kind of vibrance into Bradford (and why shouldn't we?) then we need to start providing places for people to go. There are many uses it could be put to. Turn it back into a cinema is one. A nightclub would be ideal. There something that could be done with it with some willpower and originality of thought.Pity Poor Bradford wrote: Why don't we steamroller the whole City while we're at it, Bierley Boy? We need to keep it, and look at buildings in Leeds and Manchester for ideas of how to use it. The Printworks for example. It's now a popular entertainment centre with bars and restaurants. That was the Daily Mirrors HQ, and stood empty for 12 years before it re-opened. Good job that wasn't demolished and replaced with a non-descript generic building. Like the one that was demolished to build City SquareThe Printworks was not an old style single screen cinema. It was a commercial space that was capable of being adapted & used for many purposes. It is also in the heart of a vibrant major city where there was high demand for leisure & retail space. The Odeon interior cannot be changed to suit other purposes without removing what it's primary purpose was. i.e to eb a cinema. It can't be turned into a multi scree, so what can it be? No one who is against demolition seems to have any suggestions. No one against demolition also seems to have a figure on re-development costs or the money to carry it out. Yorkshire Forward couldn't do anything with it. HCA couldn't & the council hasn't the money. Sell the site & clear it for a new development. it's the only way forward.
Who is going to pay for this service and please explain how this benefits the local ecomony
BD16
says...
5:35pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Thorntonguy wrote:Bradford council won't like an outsider like you coming in and speaking common sense. Don't you know artists impressions and demolitions are the future?
Why are Bradford council so keen to continue demolishing all the iconic buildings in the city?
I'm not a Bradfordian; I am originally from Manchester and moved here three years ago, so perhaps I can see this from an outsider's viewpoint.
In Manchester, we have conserved and renovated at least the facades of many of our historical buildings and put them to another use.
The Odeon building is a beautiful one, and sits close to another iconic building, the Alhambra. The two buildings together are a real spectacal and they were two of the first buildings I fell in love with in Bradford. It would be a calamity if one were to disappear. Some use must be found for it.
In terms of housing, there are plenty of derelict brownfield sites around the city centre and around the suburbs that could be used for housing development.
The redevelopment of Hulme and Moss Side in Manchester, formerly by-words for gangland killings and drug-ridden communities, proves what can be achieved with some careful forethought and planning.
Get your act together Bradford! You have a potentially beautiful city! Stop destroying the beautiful parts and start redeveloping the concrete eyesores that are a relic of the 60's and the derelict factory sites instead.
The Man With No Name
says...
6:18pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:No, I wouldn't knock down the Odeon, simply convert it. Increase Council Tax on the wealthy top earners and property owners to pay for it. Tax the rich out of existence.
The Man With No Name wrote:So according to your proposal you would knock down the odean and build flats and a "free" food restuarent for the poor...
Andy2010 wrote:Nightclubs are ten a penny, and who the hell wants another nightclub anyway? Let the young revelers go to Leeds instead. That sort of dubious 'entertainment' surely is unsustainable and not worthy of any longterm investment. We don't need another cinema as we have enough already, we don't need any more shops as again we already have plenty, same goes for restaurants, but what we do need is more affordable housing and quality free food outlets for the poor.Thorntonguy wrote:The thing is the council are always thinking of the quick £ rather than long term investment. They would stand to make a lot more in way of tax on flats or offices than on an entertainment. Alas its a false ecomony but they dont have a braincell between themBierleyBoy wrote:Yes, Manchester is a thriving city. One of the reasons for that is that there is a lot of entertainment and nightlife. If we want to inject that kind of vibrance into Bradford (and why shouldn't we?) then we need to start providing places for people to go. There are many uses it could be put to. Turn it back into a cinema is one. A nightclub would be ideal. There something that could be done with it with some willpower and originality of thought.Pity Poor Bradford wrote: Why don't we steamroller the whole City while we're at it, Bierley Boy? We need to keep it, and look at buildings in Leeds and Manchester for ideas of how to use it. The Printworks for example. It's now a popular entertainment centre with bars and restaurants. That was the Daily Mirrors HQ, and stood empty for 12 years before it re-opened. Good job that wasn't demolished and replaced with a non-descript generic building. Like the one that was demolished to build City SquareThe Printworks was not an old style single screen cinema. It was a commercial space that was capable of being adapted & used for many purposes. It is also in the heart of a vibrant major city where there was high demand for leisure & retail space. The Odeon interior cannot be changed to suit other purposes without removing what it's primary purpose was. i.e to eb a cinema. It can't be turned into a multi scree, so what can it be? No one who is against demolition seems to have any suggestions. No one against demolition also seems to have a figure on re-development costs or the money to carry it out. Yorkshire Forward couldn't do anything with it. HCA couldn't & the council hasn't the money. Sell the site & clear it for a new development. it's the only way forward.
Who is going to pay for this service and please explain how this benefits the local ecomony
vax2002
says...
6:20pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:Anything that actually solves a real problem is stupid.
It would seem the people in this thread (barring the stupid housing idea) actually have put forward better ideas than a £1m paid consultant by the council could have come up with
You have 30,000 people on housing waiting lists.
Build affordable rent flats for working tenants.
Albion.
says...
6:23pm Thu 20 Sep 12
The Man With No Name wrote:Yes, we could bring back strip farming, the ducking stool and the window tax.
Andy2010 wrote:No, I wouldn't knock down the Odeon, simply convert it. Increase Council Tax on the wealthy top earners and property owners to pay for it. Tax the rich out of existence.
The Man With No Name wrote:So according to your proposal you would knock down the odean and build flats and a "free" food restuarent for the poor...
Andy2010 wrote:Nightclubs are ten a penny, and who the hell wants another nightclub anyway? Let the young revelers go to Leeds instead. That sort of dubious 'entertainment' surely is unsustainable and not worthy of any longterm investment. We don't need another cinema as we have enough already, we don't need any more shops as again we already have plenty, same goes for restaurants, but what we do need is more affordable housing and quality free food outlets for the poor.Thorntonguy wrote:The thing is the council are always thinking of the quick £ rather than long term investment. They would stand to make a lot more in way of tax on flats or offices than on an entertainment. Alas its a false ecomony but they dont have a braincell between themBierleyBoy wrote:Yes, Manchester is a thriving city. One of the reasons for that is that there is a lot of entertainment and nightlife. If we want to inject that kind of vibrance into Bradford (and why shouldn't we?) then we need to start providing places for people to go. There are many uses it could be put to. Turn it back into a cinema is one. A nightclub would be ideal. There something that could be done with it with some willpower and originality of thought.Pity Poor Bradford wrote: Why don't we steamroller the whole City while we're at it, Bierley Boy? We need to keep it, and look at buildings in Leeds and Manchester for ideas of how to use it. The Printworks for example. It's now a popular entertainment centre with bars and restaurants. That was the Daily Mirrors HQ, and stood empty for 12 years before it re-opened. Good job that wasn't demolished and replaced with a non-descript generic building. Like the one that was demolished to build City SquareThe Printworks was not an old style single screen cinema. It was a commercial space that was capable of being adapted & used for many purposes. It is also in the heart of a vibrant major city where there was high demand for leisure & retail space. The Odeon interior cannot be changed to suit other purposes without removing what it's primary purpose was. i.e to eb a cinema. It can't be turned into a multi scree, so what can it be? No one who is against demolition seems to have any suggestions. No one against demolition also seems to have a figure on re-development costs or the money to carry it out. Yorkshire Forward couldn't do anything with it. HCA couldn't & the council hasn't the money. Sell the site & clear it for a new development. it's the only way forward.
Who is going to pay for this service and please explain how this benefits the local ecomony
bcfc1903
says...
7:10pm Thu 20 Sep 12
bcha
says...
7:50pm Thu 20 Sep 12
MontyLeMar
says...
7:58pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Andy2010 wrote:Interesting question at the end. The answer is no you wouldn't put a regional office in Bradford unless there are some incentives like cheaper office space. I was in and around Bradford in the 1970's and 1980's and witnessed the exodus of big names in insurance and the law to Leeds. Bradford was just too much out on a limb for these guys who were doing a lot of business with London. The rail service between Leeds and London is superb, I use it a lot, and the motorway link is also excellent if you don't mind the traffic jams. Bradford is on the end of a branch line. If it was decided to electrify the line between Leeds and Manchester via Bradford then there may be a realistic chance of revitalising Bradford. Other than that I think it is only a managed decline that is our future and they may as well pull the Odeon down and make a carpark.
yorkshiredude wrote:Without jobs there is nothing plain and simple. The young as you put will simply move away to secure jobs in other areas (well the ones with anything about them will)
Andy2010 wrote:I live in a city centre flat and I'm not an immigrant (well my great grandparents were Irish) and I don't think I'm scum. But anyway, an entertainment venue at the Odeon would be great - and could be a catalyst for regeneration of the Thornton Road / 'Goitside' area - some of the old buildings there are ripe for conversion for immigrants and scum to live in... Demand for housing is a) in the future - Bradford has a young population who will all need somewhere to live in the future b) people might be homeless, but staying with friends / family etcThe Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ. If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs. An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
The answer to Bradford's problems lies solely in the lack of business being attracted here not in housing or anything else. The main couple fo reasons Leeds has been a success is due to the influx of blue chip companies and also transport links. The Leeds nightlife and shops etc all followed making it what it is today. Bradford has nothing,...nothing at all to offer anyone with disposable income. Housing isnt the answer as without jobs who are going to fill these houses?
Its now near on impossible to attract business to Bradford (by business I mean financial services etc not pound shops or bookies) but at least if the Odean was a venue as such it would be a start to attracting businesses here.
Ask yourself this...if you were for example a London based business looking for a regional office would you want to locate in Bradford?
bcfc1903
says...
8:19pm Thu 20 Sep 12
Get back to work
says...
11:44pm Thu 20 Sep 12
alfucham
says...
1:41am Fri 21 Sep 12
MontyLeMar wrote:And dont forget ALL the major firms of accountants that moved out.
Andy2010 wrote:Interesting question at the end. The answer is no you wouldn't put a regional office in Bradford unless there are some incentives like cheaper office space. I was in and around Bradford in the 1970's and 1980's and witnessed the exodus of big names in insurance and the law to Leeds. Bradford was just too much out on a limb for these guys who were doing a lot of business with London. The rail service between Leeds and London is superb, I use it a lot, and the motorway link is also excellent if you don't mind the traffic jams. Bradford is on the end of a branch line. If it was decided to electrify the line between Leeds and Manchester via Bradford then there may be a realistic chance of revitalising Bradford. Other than that I think it is only a managed decline that is our future and they may as well pull the Odeon down and make a carpark.yorkshiredude wrote:Without jobs there is nothing plain and simple. The young as you put will simply move away to secure jobs in other areas (well the ones with anything about them will) The answer to Bradford's problems lies solely in the lack of business being attracted here not in housing or anything else. The main couple fo reasons Leeds has been a success is due to the influx of blue chip companies and also transport links. The Leeds nightlife and shops etc all followed making it what it is today. Bradford has nothing,...nothing at all to offer anyone with disposable income. Housing isnt the answer as without jobs who are going to fill these houses? Its now near on impossible to attract business to Bradford (by business I mean financial services etc not pound shops or bookies) but at least if the Odean was a venue as such it would be a start to attracting businesses here. Ask yourself this...if you were for example a London based business looking for a regional office would you want to locate in Bradford?Andy2010 wrote:I live in a city centre flat and I'm not an immigrant (well my great grandparents were Irish) and I don't think I'm scum. But anyway, an entertainment venue at the Odeon would be great - and could be a catalyst for regeneration of the Thornton Road / 'Goitside' area - some of the old buildings there are ripe for conversion for immigrants and scum to live in... Demand for housing is a) in the future - Bradford has a young population who will all need somewhere to live in the future b) people might be homeless, but staying with friends / family etcThe Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ. If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs. An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
And as Illingworth Morris, whiteheads,Crofts,GE
C,British Mohair Spinners,Grattan,Emp
ire Stores,International Harvester,and a whole further raft of textile,light and heavy engineering and small manafacturers packed up the city has become a desert.
Someone above suggests that therte are a whole lot more HQ of National companies in Bradford than Leeds.
Am I blind,I have scoured and thought about this but see nothing.
I looked over Jordan and what did I see.
A band of angels running after me.
Where art thou Bradford now.
Excellent news for all those who have harrassed and campaigned and fought tooth and nail to save the structure including the fabulously rich David Hockney.
If I were Bradford Council I would be sending a begging mission to Bridlington to plead with one of the cities most famous sons to buy it,transform it,and leave it as his legacy with assistance from his erstwhile friends the world over.
He is always innovating and there could be room for music too.
What a national attraction that would prove.
Remember the Alahambra 25 years ago was scheduled for demolition before a U turn saw £9 million transform it into one of the busiest much loved provincial theatres in britain.
So the council can eventually get something(as with the Alahambra)right.
Go and beg and grovel David Green.
With that earing and accent Mr Hockney might just fancy you and you might pull it off.If you pardon the pun.
Well done to everyone who has pressurised the Home And Communities agency with the suspected perceived corruption behind the past decisions made out (to some extent)of council control.
Shame on Terry Hodgkinson who as head of Yorkshire Forward contrived to fail to maintain (as was legally required)the building over several years of YF ownership.
And then pops up as a consultant bobbing and weaving the project the very bankrupt Langtree Artisan companies way after the Tories kicked his well paid Regional Development agency into touch.Quite right too and the brown paper envelopes with him.
Well done to David Curtis at HCA to have the balls to kick this into touch and take note of the wealth of public opinion who deemed the scheme presented was totally not in Bradfords best interests.
At the end of the day people power and the complete lack of confidence in the city and economy has seen the project finally nailed.
Ill conceived from the start old Hodgers reckoned the scheme met "Bradford"s economic aspirations"
What Bull.
This is not A1 office territory potential anymore.
Those days are long gone.
We are a city of beggars and have lost our way.
Now get that b*oody great hole filled in cos it will never happen,build on the new culture (begging)and we can fill the place to the sounds of McTells streets of London.
Oh how sad the mighty has fallen
A great day to celebrate the rebutt of brown paper envelopes and contract commissions.Well done Bradfordians.
Wonder how much influence the young salts school kid who has started his very own campaign has had.
Well done young man.throw that lad a biscuit
alfucham
says...
2:27am Fri 21 Sep 12
jackw wrote:The Home and Communities Agency ultimately funded by the national coffers.
So 1million & we still have nothing & the bill gets bigger as scaffold & security is been added & who picks that bill up.
Not the local taxpayer whose number dwindle with every passing day.
But I suspect they will seek recovery in the sale price if iot remains saved.
The government would do well to gift it to any serious developer that meets the peoples economic and social aspirations
The arts are after all publically funded big time down south.
We do have culture up north of course that extends further than two pints of lager and a bag of C & O.Now try prize the brass out of em and convince those arty tarties down south that theres more to Bradford than satanic mills and muck.
somewhere over the rainbow
SouthEastAsianBradfordian
says...
8:42am Fri 21 Sep 12
MontyLeMar
says...
9:26am Fri 21 Sep 12
SouthEastAsianBradfoRetain the towers...glass front. Excellent idea, I've seen that vision myself. That sweep of Princes Road, the twin towers plus the Alhambra plus Europe's biggest fountain plus the Italianate Town Hall would look spectacular. Well, we can dream can't we?
rdian wrote:
I wonder why they all don't come to a compromise, keep the odeon towers knock down everything in between, and have a modern facelift, like a glass front (as they did with waterstoones in the city centre. They should definitely look at boosting economy and not housing people after all housing can be done else where but attracting economy to the city have to be at vital locations and the odeon site can be one of those. There is a need to create areas of entertainment, cafe's, and shops, a little up market to get the pin stripe suite owners in there to spend spend spend.
bcfc1903
says...
7:55pm Fri 21 Sep 12
alfucham wrote:I think you are blind regarding head offices for national companys in Bradford, Just try opening your eyes.... Morrisons, Yorkshire Building Society, National and Provincial, The Otto group, British Wool Marketing board, Pace..... Bulmer and Lumb...Yorkshire Water/Kelder........
MontyLeMar wrote:And dont forget ALL the major firms of accountants that moved out.
Andy2010 wrote:Interesting question at the end. The answer is no you wouldn't put a regional office in Bradford unless there are some incentives like cheaper office space. I was in and around Bradford in the 1970's and 1980's and witnessed the exodus of big names in insurance and the law to Leeds. Bradford was just too much out on a limb for these guys who were doing a lot of business with London. The rail service between Leeds and London is superb, I use it a lot, and the motorway link is also excellent if you don't mind the traffic jams. Bradford is on the end of a branch line. If it was decided to electrify the line between Leeds and Manchester via Bradford then there may be a realistic chance of revitalising Bradford. Other than that I think it is only a managed decline that is our future and they may as well pull the Odeon down and make a carpark.yorkshiredude wrote:Without jobs there is nothing plain and simple. The young as you put will simply move away to secure jobs in other areas (well the ones with anything about them will) The answer to Bradford's problems lies solely in the lack of business being attracted here not in housing or anything else. The main couple fo reasons Leeds has been a success is due to the influx of blue chip companies and also transport links. The Leeds nightlife and shops etc all followed making it what it is today. Bradford has nothing,...nothing at all to offer anyone with disposable income. Housing isnt the answer as without jobs who are going to fill these houses? Its now near on impossible to attract business to Bradford (by business I mean financial services etc not pound shops or bookies) but at least if the Odean was a venue as such it would be a start to attracting businesses here. Ask yourself this...if you were for example a London based business looking for a regional office would you want to locate in Bradford?Andy2010 wrote:I live in a city centre flat and I'm not an immigrant (well my great grandparents were Irish) and I don't think I'm scum. But anyway, an entertainment venue at the Odeon would be great - and could be a catalyst for regeneration of the Thornton Road / 'Goitside' area - some of the old buildings there are ripe for conversion for immigrants and scum to live in... Demand for housing is a) in the future - Bradford has a young population who will all need somewhere to live in the future b) people might be homeless, but staying with friends / family etcThe Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ. If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs. An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
And as Illingworth Morris, whiteheads,Crofts,GE
C,British Mohair Spinners,Grattan,Emp
ire Stores,International Harvester,and a whole further raft of textile,light and heavy engineering and small manafacturers packed up the city has become a desert.
Someone above suggests that therte are a whole lot more HQ of National companies in Bradford than Leeds.
Am I blind,I have scoured and thought about this but see nothing.
I looked over Jordan and what did I see.
A band of angels running after me.
Where art thou Bradford now.
Excellent news for all those who have harrassed and campaigned and fought tooth and nail to save the structure including the fabulously rich David Hockney.
If I were Bradford Council I would be sending a begging mission to Bridlington to plead with one of the cities most famous sons to buy it,transform it,and leave it as his legacy with assistance from his erstwhile friends the world over.
He is always innovating and there could be room for music too.
What a national attraction that would prove.
Remember the Alahambra 25 years ago was scheduled for demolition before a U turn saw £9 million transform it into one of the busiest much loved provincial theatres in britain.
So the council can eventually get something(as with the Alahambra)right.
Go and beg and grovel David Green.
With that earing and accent Mr Hockney might just fancy you and you might pull it off.If you pardon the pun.
Well done to everyone who has pressurised the Home And Communities agency with the suspected perceived corruption behind the past decisions made out (to some extent)of council control.
Shame on Terry Hodgkinson who as head of Yorkshire Forward contrived to fail to maintain (as was legally required)the building over several years of YF ownership.
And then pops up as a consultant bobbing and weaving the project the very bankrupt Langtree Artisan companies way after the Tories kicked his well paid Regional Development agency into touch.Quite right too and the brown paper envelopes with him.
Well done to David Curtis at HCA to have the balls to kick this into touch and take note of the wealth of public opinion who deemed the scheme presented was totally not in Bradfords best interests.
At the end of the day people power and the complete lack of confidence in the city and economy has seen the project finally nailed.
Ill conceived from the start old Hodgers reckoned the scheme met "Bradford"s economic aspirations"
What Bull.
This is not A1 office territory potential anymore.
Those days are long gone.
We are a city of beggars and have lost our way.
Now get that b*oody great hole filled in cos it will never happen,build on the new culture (begging)and we can fill the place to the sounds of McTells streets of London.
Oh how sad the mighty has fallen
A great day to celebrate the rebutt of brown paper envelopes and contract commissions.Well done Bradfordians.
Wonder how much influence the young salts school kid who has started his very own campaign has had.
Well done young man.throw that lad a biscuit
Filtronic.
ont-red
says...
2:21am Sat 22 Sep 12
alfucham
says...
3:35am Mon 24 Sep 12
bcfc1903 wrote:Sorry I am still blind.
alfucham wrote:I think you are blind regarding head offices for national companys in Bradford, Just try opening your eyes.... Morrisons, Yorkshire Building Society, National and Provincial, The Otto group, British Wool Marketing board, Pace..... Bulmer and Lumb...Yorkshire Water/Kelder........ Filtronic.MontyLeMar wrote:And dont forget ALL the major firms of accountants that moved out. And as Illingworth Morris, whiteheads,Crofts,GE C,British Mohair Spinners,Grattan,Emp ire Stores,International Harvester,and a whole further raft of textile,light and heavy engineering and small manafacturers packed up the city has become a desert. Someone above suggests that therte are a whole lot more HQ of National companies in Bradford than Leeds. Am I blind,I have scoured and thought about this but see nothing. I looked over Jordan and what did I see. A band of angels running after me. Where art thou Bradford now. Excellent news for all those who have harrassed and campaigned and fought tooth and nail to save the structure including the fabulously rich David Hockney. If I were Bradford Council I would be sending a begging mission to Bridlington to plead with one of the cities most famous sons to buy it,transform it,and leave it as his legacy with assistance from his erstwhile friends the world over. He is always innovating and there could be room for music too. What a national attraction that would prove. Remember the Alahambra 25 years ago was scheduled for demolition before a U turn saw £9 million transform it into one of the busiest much loved provincial theatres in britain. So the council can eventually get something(as with the Alahambra)right. Go and beg and grovel David Green. With that earing and accent Mr Hockney might just fancy you and you might pull it off.If you pardon the pun. Well done to everyone who has pressurised the Home And Communities agency with the suspected perceived corruption behind the past decisions made out (to some extent)of council control. Shame on Terry Hodgkinson who as head of Yorkshire Forward contrived to fail to maintain (as was legally required)the building over several years of YF ownership. And then pops up as a consultant bobbing and weaving the project the very bankrupt Langtree Artisan companies way after the Tories kicked his well paid Regional Development agency into touch.Quite right too and the brown paper envelopes with him. Well done to David Curtis at HCA to have the balls to kick this into touch and take note of the wealth of public opinion who deemed the scheme presented was totally not in Bradfords best interests. At the end of the day people power and the complete lack of confidence in the city and economy has seen the project finally nailed. Ill conceived from the start old Hodgers reckoned the scheme met "Bradford"s economic aspirations" What Bull. This is not A1 office territory potential anymore. Those days are long gone. We are a city of beggars and have lost our way. Now get that b*oody great hole filled in cos it will never happen,build on the new culture (begging)and we can fill the place to the sounds of McTells streets of London. Oh how sad the mighty has fallen A great day to celebrate the rebutt of brown paper envelopes and contract commissions.Well done Bradfordians. Wonder how much influence the young salts school kid who has started his very own campaign has had. Well done young man.throw that lad a biscuitAndy2010 wrote:Interesting question at the end. The answer is no you wouldn't put a regional office in Bradford unless there are some incentives like cheaper office space. I was in and around Bradford in the 1970's and 1980's and witnessed the exodus of big names in insurance and the law to Leeds. Bradford was just too much out on a limb for these guys who were doing a lot of business with London. The rail service between Leeds and London is superb, I use it a lot, and the motorway link is also excellent if you don't mind the traffic jams. Bradford is on the end of a branch line. If it was decided to electrify the line between Leeds and Manchester via Bradford then there may be a realistic chance of revitalising Bradford. Other than that I think it is only a managed decline that is our future and they may as well pull the Odeon down and make a carpark.yorkshiredude wrote:Without jobs there is nothing plain and simple. The young as you put will simply move away to secure jobs in other areas (well the ones with anything about them will) The answer to Bradford's problems lies solely in the lack of business being attracted here not in housing or anything else. The main couple fo reasons Leeds has been a success is due to the influx of blue chip companies and also transport links. The Leeds nightlife and shops etc all followed making it what it is today. Bradford has nothing,...nothing at all to offer anyone with disposable income. Housing isnt the answer as without jobs who are going to fill these houses? Its now near on impossible to attract business to Bradford (by business I mean financial services etc not pound shops or bookies) but at least if the Odean was a venue as such it would be a start to attracting businesses here. Ask yourself this...if you were for example a London based business looking for a regional office would you want to locate in Bradford?Andy2010 wrote:I live in a city centre flat and I'm not an immigrant (well my great grandparents were Irish) and I don't think I'm scum. But anyway, an entertainment venue at the Odeon would be great - and could be a catalyst for regeneration of the Thornton Road / 'Goitside' area - some of the old buildings there are ripe for conversion for immigrants and scum to live in... Demand for housing is a) in the future - Bradford has a young population who will all need somewhere to live in the future b) people might be homeless, but staying with friends / family etcThe Man With No Name wrote:and here lies the problem You claim housing is more important. I beg to differ. If this was turned into an entertainment venue this generates not only prestige for the city but also income All that building housing does is put those who cant be bothered bettering their lives into social housing and creates run down areas. This is the last thing the centre needs. An entertainment complex creates jobs and income and gives the city a selling point to attract businesses here which is exactly what Bradford needs not some stupid flats to house the immigrants and scum Anyway why is there such a demand for housing. I dont seem to remember thousands of homeless scouring the streets (although walking round Bradford you could assume that)Clowny wrote:Affordable housing for those in need comes before entertainment and nightlife. I hope all those empty properties you claim exist are all taken over by squatters.vax2002 wrote: The city has a housing crisis, here is an empty building that could be made in to flats. I would have thought that when you have two problems, one solution to both would be a good choice. Strip it out and build affordable rent flats.You clearly know nothing about the city centre housing market, there are loads already empty and 700 cheap ones (about the size of prison cells) being built in just one development alone. This development was only offering 30 odd anyway. Bradford needs a nightlife and entertainment to create that.
National & Provincial dissapeared in 1996 yorks BS are tiny,Morrisons agreed but would hope so given it was born here,British Wool Marketing Board tiny today,otto dont think so german sub,Filtronic down to 15 employees,yorkshire Water worst run firm in the world.
Bulmer & Lumb National?
angry bradfordian says...
11:30am Thu 20 Sep 12
I thought the state of asbestos and structural decay meant there couldn't be a sustainable plan. Or was this a lie?