Concerns over exam shake-up proposals (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Mixed response to Government plans over GCSE system from Bradford education experts
7:00am Tuesday 18th September 2012 in News
By Anika Bourley
Councillor Ralph Berry, Bradford Council’s executive member responsible for education
Plans to axe GCSEs and replace them with an English Baccalaureate Certificate has been met with opposition by some education experts in Bradford.
Ministers said the change would deliver “more rigorous” testing at 16, and involves scrapping retakes, significantly reducing amounts of coursework and completely abolishing it in the core subjects, in favour of tougher end of year exams.
But Councillor Ralph Berry , Bradford Council’s executive member responsible for education, fears many children, who are not good at exams, will suffer.
He said: “I have considerable concerns about these changes.
“Government has gone out of its way to damage the system. There has not been a running down of standards. This Government wants to create a system which defines more failures.
“These changes do not address varied learning. Not all children learn in the same way and Government has already damaged young people by changing the way the maths courses are run half way through.
“We seem to be witnessing political mugging of our system. There is no evidence that there is a problem with our exam system.”
Education Secretary Michael Gove, announcing the proposed changes said modules and extensive coursework undermined the credibility of the qualifications, leaving young people “without the rigorous education they deserved” and amounted to “spoon-feeding”.
He said: “We know record increases in performance at GCSE have not been matched by the same level of improvements in learning – while pass rates have soared we have fallen down international education league tables.”
The new exams will be introduced first for English, maths and the sciences with the first exams taken in 2017. Other subjects will follow later.
To pass the full English Baccalaureate students would need to succeed in English, maths, science, a language and humanities subject. Mr Gove also announced less able pupils would be able to sit the exams at 17 or 18.
Bradford East MP David Ward, who sits on the Commons education select committee, welcomed the fact earlier plans for a rigid two-tier system – bringing back CSE-style exams, were dropped – but said scrapping coursework was a mistake.
He said: “I am pleased Nick Clegg has ensured there will not be two qualifications whereby some pupils take O-levels and others take CSEs. But I am not actually that happy with what Mr Gove has announced.
“I am not in favour of single form assessment. If you have a two-year course and it all depends on sitting exams at the end, that is a throw back.”
Ian Murch, Bradford spokesman for the National Union of Teachers, said: “It’s not that there was nothing wrong with the system as it was, but this has been a root and branch change without consulting anyone who works in the system, it’s just down to Michael Gove’s own personal views.”
Comments(12)
Joedavid
says...
8:31am Tue 18 Sep 12
Not a word I know meaning of, Baccalaureate what sort of word is this?
angry bradfordian
says...
8:57am Tue 18 Sep 12
I wonder if the union & council are just playing politics to make the government look like a bunch of toffs.
And how about turning their argument on it's head? What about the disadvantages that the BEST pupils are currently suffering from by being held back. It seems the current system is suited to helping the worst instead.
yorkshiredude
says...
9:15am Tue 18 Sep 12
Albion.
says...
10:48am Tue 18 Sep 12
Whether these proposals by Mr Gove are the answer I don't know, but the current set up is of little value to many prospective employers.
Joedavid
says...
10:58am Tue 18 Sep 12
It is these good children in the middle that suffer with the system we have now.
glue ear
says...
11:01am Tue 18 Sep 12
angry bradfordian wrote:id agree with the last statement totally.
Over the last few weeks I've heard many University lecturers and personnel professionals say that there has been a noticeable decrease in the quality of school leavers. I wonder if the union & council are just playing politics to make the government look like a bunch of toffs. And how about turning their argument on it's head? What about the disadvantages that the BEST pupils are currently suffering from by being held back. It seems the current system is suited to helping the worst instead.
markjoe
says...
11:48am Tue 18 Sep 12
glue ear wrote:I agree fully. My daughter is going through her exams at the moment and it seems to be at the moment about trying to achieve the best grades possible by altering the grading band to fit the targets set by the government. Also they are allowed to resit their module exam until they get the grade they desire and also depending on what exam they retake their highest grade is kept, for example if they achieve a B on their first exam and then achieve a C on their resit the B is still their grade.
angry bradfordian wrote:id agree with the last statement totally.
Over the last few weeks I've heard many University lecturers and personnel professionals say that there has been a noticeable decrease in the quality of school leavers. I wonder if the union & council are just playing politics to make the government look like a bunch of toffs. And how about turning their argument on it's head? What about the disadvantages that the BEST pupils are currently suffering from by being held back. It seems the current system is suited to helping the worst instead.
The problem with current working is there are too many exam boards and too many targets. Students should be rewarded and graded according to their work not because the current quota for a certain grade has been filled.
The Baccalaureate is available to students at the moment if they achieve pass in Math, English, Science, one of the humanities and a language.
Victor Clayton
says...
1:42pm Tue 18 Sep 12
JAtkinson wrote:didn't the conservatives bring it in? what was that all about then?
Conservatives are changing the exam process to suit their core voters. Give has created a problem so that he can introduce a Dickensian solution to it. The new measures will favour highly the academic students who already succeed in most areas of the curriculum; they will harm the chances of the non-academic students, which the current system goes some way in supporting, creating a two-tier educational experience with all the effort and thought put into how the 'top', academic tier fairs. The already successful middle classes will reap the benefits and the poor will flounder. And what for Bradford? Will this help. Us get out of the bottom 10 LAs in. The country? No. Will it help any of the bottom 10, tellingly 8 of which are in the North? No. It will keep the poor and the north where the Tories believe we belong. This is the Conservative Party. This is who the are and what they do. I hope this year's GCSE graduates remember what this government did to them when it's their first go in the voting booth.
bradfordgirl
says...
4:30pm Tue 18 Sep 12
Simplecountryboy
says...
4:40pm Tue 18 Sep 12
Also - why bother with any exam at all at 16,since the school/college leaving age will be raised to 18 by 2017?
thatsnotmyname
says...
5:28pm Tue 18 Sep 12
JAtkinson says...
8:11am Tue 18 Sep 12
The new measures will favour highly the academic students who already succeed in most areas of the curriculum; they will harm the chances of the non-academic students, which the current system goes some way in supporting, creating a two-tier educational experience with all the effort and thought put into how the 'top', academic tier fairs. The already successful middle classes will reap the benefits and the poor will flounder. And what for Bradford? Will this help. Us get out of the bottom 10 LAs in. The country? No. Will it help any of the bottom 10, tellingly 8 of which are in the North? No. It will keep the poor and the north where the Tories believe we belong.
This is the Conservative Party. This is who the are and what they do.
I hope this year's GCSE graduates remember what this government did to them when it's their first go in the voting booth.