Bradford couple face ‘divorce’ to adopt child

Andrew and Carol Shackleton with Bradley, Angel and Emma Andrew and Carol Shackleton with Bradley, Angel and Emma

A couple who have been told by social services they cannot adopt their child and take her to start a new life in Australia, because they are married, have discussed divorce as an option to secure their future.

Bradford builder Andrew Shackleton, 40, met dental nurse Carol, 39, on a trip back from Sydney, Australia, where his eight-year-old son James lives with his former wife. And Carol, from Buttershaw , decided that her children Bradley , 18, Angel, 14, and Emma, nine, would have a better life in Australia.

In 2011 she started plans to adopt Emma – her niece’s daughter whom Carol had a residency order to look after from when she was five months old – in order to move the family to Sydney.

The couple wrote to Bradford social services about their intention to marry and emigrate to Australia.

At their first hearing the judge requested a social services report.

Because the couple had wed in January social services blocked the adoption.

Mrs Shackleton said: “It is maddening. We’ve even talked about divorce as a way round this.

“We only ever wanted the best for our family, but social services are standing in the way of our future together in Australia.

“You try to give your children a stable home life, but by marrying we have made it all so much harder.

“We are hoping someone somewhere can see common sense and back us to be together.”

Mr Shackleton said: “I cannot believe what has happened – we blame social services for this nightmare.”

Bradford Council assistant director for Children’s Specialist Services Julie Jenkins said: “We have been in regular contact with Mrs Shackleton and have every sympathy for the situation they face. We are trying to help and advise the family as much as we can but we have to comply with the law. Mr and Mrs Shackleton have now made an application to adopt together but they live in separate countries.

“The law states that for a dual application to adopt a child, both applicants must have lived with the child for a period of six months continuously or three to five years not continuously. It is this issue that is preventing the adoption, not their marital status.”

Comments(5)

Albion. says...
11:19am Mon 17 Sep 12

"Bradford couple face ‘divorce’ to adopt child"

“The law states that for a dual application to adopt a child, both applicants must have lived with the child for a period of six months continuously or three to five years not continuously. It is this issue that is preventing the adoption, not their marital status.”

So which is right?

carol.shackleton says...
1:09pm Mon 17 Sep 12

"I never said our marriage is stoppin us ,i said the marrige has complicated the whole issue as the social services have not done their job properly, right from the start of this adoption . This has caused us endless stress an financial issues ,also social services keep stipulating that it is law that a dual adoption means we should have lived together as a couple for a period of 6 months or none continuosly for 3 to 5 yrs , well they dont no the law very well do they , as the 6 month period does not apply to us in anyway at all , as that only applies if one of us is my little girls biological parent an none of us are . Hope this as explained it further for anyone who reads this article . Thank you "

Albion. says...
1:25pm Mon 17 Sep 12

carol.shackleton wrote:
"I never said our marriage is stoppin us ,i said the marrige has complicated the whole issue as the social services have not done their job properly, right from the start of this adoption . This has caused us endless stress an financial issues ,also social services keep stipulating that it is law that a dual adoption means we should have lived together as a couple for a period of 6 months or none continuosly for 3 to 5 yrs , well they dont no the law very well do they , as the 6 month period does not apply to us in anyway at all , as that only applies if one of us is my little girls biological parent an none of us are . Hope this as explained it further for anyone who reads this article . Thank you "
And thank you!

mickcbcfc says...
5:41pm Mon 17 Sep 12

they like to ruin peoples lives.
ive had dealings with them and hate them with a passion.
i fought and beat them hands down.
its your life. not theres.
glad my kids are out of danger and with me.
they wouldnt stop me going any where.

nina18 says...
4:53pm Thu 20 Sep 12

Social services are arseholes. They should concentrate on kids that get abused. NOT kids who have a loving family. Keep fighting love. It'll be hard but you will win.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree