Bradford schools filming children in toilets with CCTV

Councillor Ralph Berry Councillor Ralph Berry

More than 200 schools, including four in Bradford, are using CCTV cameras in toilets or changing rooms, figures showed today.

A total of 825 cameras were located in the toilets or changing rooms of 207 schools across England, Scotland and Wales, figures provided by more than 2,000 schools showed.

The Bradford schools are Dixons Allerton Academy , Challenge College , St Bede’s Catholic Grammar School and Titus Salt . Benton Park School in Rawdon and Horsforth School are also on the list.

Councillor Ralph Berry , Bradford Council’s executive member for children’s services, said: “I would be surprised if schools spent that amount of money on CCTV without a good cause. Usually cameras are to prevent damage or inappropriate behaviour such as smoking.

“It would be a decision that would be down to the governing body but the governors would have to be accountable to parents, they would have to have been informed. Each school would be able to make its own decision on whether to have cameras or not but they would have to justify it.”

He said five Bradford schools was “not that many” on a list of 207 across the country.

Ian Morrel, the new head teacher at Titus Salt School in Baildon , said there were cameras in the toilets but only in communal areas near the sinks.

He said: “Most definitely yes we do have cameras. Not in the changing rooms but in the areas near the sinks, certainly not pointing towards the cubicles.

“All our stakeholders were consulted as part of the new school build process – that includes parents, students and staff – and there are clear notices up indicating where these cameras are. It comes under the umbrella of safeguarding, and safeguarding our students is of paramount importance to us.”

The information, which was revealed by a Freedom of Information request by Big Brother Watch, also showed almost one in ten of the schools which use CCTV said cameras were positioned in their toilets or changing rooms, while 54 have more than one camera for every 15 students.

Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch, said: “This research raises serious questions about the privacy of school children across Britain, with some schools having one camera for every five pupils and hundreds of schools using cameras in toilets and changing rooms.

“The full extent of school surveillance is far higher than we had expected and will come as a shock to many parents.

“Schools need to come clean about why they are using these cameras and what is happening to the footage.

“Local authorities also need to be doing far more to reign in excessive surveillance in their areas and ensuring resources are not being diverted from more effective alternatives.”

Comments(10)

collos25 says...
7:22am Wed 12 Sep 12

If you cannot control children without CCTV then something is drastically wrong,or perhaps the instigators of the cameras have an ulterior motive.If I were the children's parents then I would be looking to sue the schools in question.

tornshaunton says...
7:31am Wed 12 Sep 12

collos25 wrote:
If you cannot control children without CCTV then something is drastically wrong,or perhaps the instigators of the cameras have an ulterior motive.If I were the children's parents then I would be looking to sue the schools in question.
you talk utter rubbish - ulterior motives, my ar$e. go to church if you want view that sort of stuff !!

Old Dave says...
8:00am Wed 12 Sep 12

I want my kids to be safe, from others who may mistreat them, and from doing things that will harm themselves. Having a camera in the communal area of a toilet block, or in an entrance to a changing room enables schools to stop the people who are doing things they shouldnt be. The people who oppose things like this are the ones with something to hide. As the headteacher in the article says, its about safeguarding - child protection.
How many timeswhen you were at school did things go missing from changing rooms? witha camera on the entrances and exits, you can see who went in or out of an area, and ascertain whether they should be there or not!

modman61 says...
8:43am Wed 12 Sep 12

Not convinced this is the right option, CCTV's in changing rooms and toilets sounds a bit iffy to me.

Tollerboy says...
8:43am Wed 12 Sep 12

Spot on Dave!

wobbley-bob says...
9:52am Wed 12 Sep 12

modman61 wrote:
Not convinced this is the right option, CCTV's in changing rooms and toilets sounds a bit iffy to me.
Only if you have an iffy mind. Don't judge others by your own low standards.

Mojohappy4 says...
1:46pm Wed 12 Sep 12

Personally I think this is a good idea but people should know that the camera's are there. Some may say that this defeats the object of catching someone in the act but surely it should be about stopping them carrying the act out in the first place.

Anyway just my opinion!

allinittogether says...
4:01pm Wed 12 Sep 12

“All our stakeholders were consulted as part of the new school build process – that includes parents, students and staff – and there are clear notices up indicating where these cameras are. It comes under the umbrella of safeguarding, and safeguarding our students is of paramount importance to us.”

That's as maybe but I have grave misgivings about anyone who uses the word "stakeholders".
This is a school, you know a place of education not some multinational corporation. He'll be talking about facilitating next!

Wanna Have says...
4:33pm Wed 12 Sep 12

So again double standards on CCTV, and varying levels of monitoring of the population.
Some schools have no camera's.
Should be all or none.
Why the mistrust of certain people and not of others, is this not a basic level of predjudice in operation.
Innocent until proven guilty but it seems people in authority no longer share this view.

Albion. says...
5:31pm Wed 12 Sep 12

Wanna Have wrote:
So again double standards on CCTV, and varying levels of monitoring of the population.
Some schools have no camera's.
Should be all or none.
Why the mistrust of certain people and not of others, is this not a basic level of predjudice in operation.
Innocent until proven guilty but it seems people in authority no longer share this view.
These are put in by individual schools.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree