Shipley mum starts petition over Bradford school places (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Shipley mum starts petition over Bradford school places
7:00am Saturday 4th August 2012 in News
By Dolores Cowburn, Bradford Chief Reporter
Tracy Briscoe with Jake, four, who has missed out on a nearby school
A mother has created an e-petition to try to get Bradford Council to change the way it allocates school places after her son was rejected from a school close to his home.
Tracy Briscoe, who lives in Thornhill Drive, Shipley , said her son Jake, who is aged four and goes to Low Ash Nursery, was rejected by Low Ash Primary School because, on the straight line distance criteria used by the Council, he lives too far away.
He now has to go to High Crags which Mrs Briscoe claims is a 30-minute walk, compared to the 20-minute walk to Low Ash. Mrs Briscoe does not drive.
In a desperate attempt to get the Council to reconsider or change the criteria for other parents faced with the same dilemma, Mrs Briscoe has created her e-petition after her appeal was turned down by the Council.
Her e-petition asks officials to change the straight line distance criteria to the “more practical” walking distance and asks for it to be compulsory to provide proof of address in all cases.
Mrs Briscoe said: “When a school is oversubscribed, they look at children in public care, siblings, and then distance the child has to travel to the school’s main entrance – using straight line distance.
“This petition sets out to identify and rectify two areas of concern that we feel are flaws in the school allocation and appeals process.
“That is the use of straight line distance which falls down due to the fact that rarely can one walk to school in a straight line and there are many families who have to walk, meaning the use of ‘straight line distance’ is unfair, lacking practical reasoning.
“This may be the easiest way for the local authority to do it, but it’s certainly not the fairest. It shows disregard for personal family circumstances/difficulties, and is both illogical and lacking in empathy.
“Also proof of address is not needed unless it is different from the one given at pre-school. There is no system in place to protect truthful parents and ultimately the people who choose to be honest are the ones who are penalised. Where is the incentive to be honest?”
The Department of Education said that every admission authority must consult its local community when changes are proposed to its admissions arrangements and at least once every seven years as a minimum.
A spokesman for the Council said that if the petition – at http://epetition. bradford.public-i.tv – got more than 1,500 signatures it would be discussed at full council.
He said that the straight walking distance had been in use for seven years with no plans to change it and that if addresses were mismatched in the Council system, checks were undertaken to find the correct address.
Sue Colman, the Council’s assistant director for education and schools, said: “Any member of the public in the district is entitled to present a petition and it will be considered carefully when it is received. The key is that admissions policies should be applied rigorously and fairly. There is an independent appeals process which considers particular circumstances within the context of the admissions policy.”
A few months ago Bradford mother Julie Brown collected 450 signatures for her e-petition asking for tougher checks on where families live. It was discussed by the Children’s Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee.
Comments(30)
jozieme
says...
8:47am Sat 4 Aug 12
Mike Strutter
says...
9:17am Sat 4 Aug 12
thatsnotmyname
says...
10:33am Sat 4 Aug 12
Albion.
says...
11:24am Sat 4 Aug 12
SRS74
says...
11:35am Sat 4 Aug 12
Although, you could try moving to Wrose.
TBrisc10
says...
1:08pm Sat 4 Aug 12
It is absurb to even think that it is a complaint based on a ten minute difference.
timajb
says...
1:37pm Sat 4 Aug 12
http://epetition.bra
dford.public-i.tv/ep
etition_core/view/sc
hoolallocation
Julesb7
says...
4:12pm Sat 4 Aug 12
ers2011.co.uk
Julesb7
says...
4:18pm Sat 4 Aug 12
Johsay
says...
6:27pm Sat 4 Aug 12
The debacle in Thackley over school places this year shows what a disaster the education department have presided over.
modman61
says...
9:02am Sun 5 Aug 12
Mike Strutter wrote:W****R!
A ten minute difference in walking, big deal
Albion.
says...
10:28am Sun 5 Aug 12
modman61 wrote:I***T!
Mike Strutter wrote:W****R!
A ten minute difference in walking, big deal
SRS74
says...
11:46am Mon 6 Aug 12
TBrisc10 wrote:It's funny how you suddenly start to challenge the system now that you have been personally affected. Would you have bothered if you had been offered Low Ash?
The petition is about the whole of Bradford as i know that a lot of people have been affected by the allocation system. Due to the straight line distance our nearest school is actually classed as poplars farm in bd2. Clearly this is not the nearest by walking distance. This is not accessible in a straight line coming from Bolton woods area. This is not a personal crusade.this is to put right a serious flaw in the sytem
It is absurb to even think that it is a complaint based on a ten minute difference.
It is a personal crusade and you may have a point regarding how they allocate school places. But this is about you wanting the school you want your child to go to. Be honest. And another google maps route check shows Poplars farm 0.8mile walking distance. Same as High Crags. Low Ash is further.
timajb
says...
1:32pm Mon 6 Aug 12
SRS74 wrote:Some people are unbelievable!.
TBrisc10 wrote:It's funny how you suddenly start to challenge the system now that you have been personally affected. Would you have bothered if you had been offered Low Ash?
The petition is about the whole of Bradford as i know that a lot of people have been affected by the allocation system. Due to the straight line distance our nearest school is actually classed as poplars farm in bd2. Clearly this is not the nearest by walking distance. This is not accessible in a straight line coming from Bolton woods area. This is not a personal crusade.this is to put right a serious flaw in the sytem
It is absurb to even think that it is a complaint based on a ten minute difference.
It is a personal crusade and you may have a point regarding how they allocate school places. But this is about you wanting the school you want your child to go to. Be honest. And another google maps route check shows Poplars farm 0.8mile walking distance. Same as High Crags. Low Ash is further.
SRS74 obviously misses the whole point lol. Of course Mrs Briscoe is challenging a system because she has personally been affected!. That is one of the main reasons why people initiate petitions, when an injustice has taken place that affects peoples lives!. I would have stuck to your comment "you may have a point regarding how they allocate school places" that is what the petition is about! It is too late for Mrs Briscoe to affect personal change. Why knock people who want to try ensure fairness in the future for others?. BTW.........you will never know when you may need people to help your cause when you personally become affected:-)
People should take time to read the petition brief before before going down the route of writing it off as a personal crusade!
brisc79
says...
1:43pm Mon 6 Aug 12
SRS74
says...
4:03pm Mon 6 Aug 12
I first commented on this story not because I agree with the current admissions policy but because it appears you are trying to convince people that your being hard done by with the distance to school quoting "He now has to go to High Crags which Mrs Briscoe claims is a 30-minute walk, compared to the 20-minute walk to Low Ash. Mrs Briscoe does not drive."
As I have pointed out, High Crags is closer and easier to get to.
As you say, Not everybody can have their first choice. I'm sorry for you, but High Crags is your local school. The Council are not making you travel further.
Julesb7
says...
5:02pm Mon 6 Aug 12
SRS74
says...
8:51pm Tue 7 Aug 12
Yes, people lie about there address, that needs checking and the wrongdoers being given there local school. I wouldn't expect a resident of wrose to lose a place at Low Ash so that someone who lives nearer another school be allowed to go there just because they want to. That resident of wrose may have longer to walk because of it, and probably pass each other along the way. But my main point is, a school is a school, be happy with what you get.
angi. b
says...
10:52pm Tue 7 Aug 12
SRS74
says...
5:09pm Wed 8 Aug 12
angi. b wrote:They can't all go into the same school as there are children who don't go to school nurseries, Some go to private day nurseries. It is my point exactly that the person who lives next door or two streets away or even Claremont that they should automatically be entitled to a place at Low Ash. The Bolton jcn family should not. Same goes for this story. High Crags is the shortest via straight line AND by walking in distance and time. And that is the school that has been allocated. I think thats fair.
Well, ive read all the comments above and i would like to know why all children in nurserys now get sent to different schools. why cant they automatically go straight up into reception? As for the arrogant ignoramous commenting above about "Wrose schools for wrose children" try telling that to the family who live 2 streets away from Low Ash and were refused, tell it to the man who lives on Claremont who has to PAY someone to take his son down to High Crag because he was refused, tell it to the childminder up Wrose who will now loose two incomes because of refusal,- being that she cannot be at two schools at the same time, also tell me why someone is accepted who lives at Bolton Junction, and lastly, try doing some research on these problems and put your brain into gear before opening your'e gob.
Julesb7
says...
6:10pm Wed 8 Aug 12
SRS74 wrote:SRS74 - You really don't seem to be understanding what we are saying. Yes a child SHOULD be entitled to go to their closest school and Low Ash Primary is the school closest to Thornhill Drive. Never mind all of the c**p about striaght line distance because it isn't realistic. You can not trespass over private property, plain and simple. So the fact of the matter is - by foot / car Low Ash is 0.6 miles away from where Tracey lives. High Crags is 0.8 miles away and Poplars Farm is 1.9 miles away. Does that make it clear to you? Low Ash Primary IS Tracey's closest school. As for your attitude of 'A school is a school, accept what you get' rubbish, Yes Low Ash & High Crags have a very similar Ofsted report however each school has it's own merits and I'm sorry but High Crags doesnt have many. I know from experience of having children at both schools. I have had the unfortunate task of taking our son there since Sept and within the 1st week alone parents were fighting in the playground, 1 parent told her 4 year old son to 'get off of that f***ing wall you stupid little c**t, a parent stood outside school openly selling drugs to other parents and a child telling his mother to f - off and her laughing at him. These are parents of children aged 4 and 5 attending High Crags reception class. In the 6 years my stepson attended Low Ash Primary School, we never had to endure that kind of behaviour. Unfortunately quite a lot of parents believe that this kind of attitude and behaviour is acceptable. Tracey wants the absolute best for Jake, and that is Low Ash Primary - Their closest school.
angi. b wrote: Well, ive read all the comments above and i would like to know why all children in nurserys now get sent to different schools. why cant they automatically go straight up into reception? As for the arrogant ignoramous commenting above about "Wrose schools for wrose children" try telling that to the family who live 2 streets away from Low Ash and were refused, tell it to the man who lives on Claremont who has to PAY someone to take his son down to High Crag because he was refused, tell it to the childminder up Wrose who will now loose two incomes because of refusal,- being that she cannot be at two schools at the same time, also tell me why someone is accepted who lives at Bolton Junction, and lastly, try doing some research on these problems and put your brain into gear before opening your'e gob.They can't all go into the same school as there are children who don't go to school nurseries, Some go to private day nurseries. It is my point exactly that the person who lives next door or two streets away or even Claremont that they should automatically be entitled to a place at Low Ash. The Bolton jcn family should not. Same goes for this story. High Crags is the shortest via straight line AND by walking in distance and time. And that is the school that has been allocated. I think thats fair.
SRS74
says...
7:24pm Wed 8 Aug 12
Julesb7 wrote:Julesb, Yes I've used google maps to illustrate a point, but please don't try convince me that Low Ash is closer. I also live very close to Tracey and I know it is much easier and closer from Thornhill Drive to High Crags. One of my children goes to High Crags I have never witnessed the behaviour you seem to have. My other child did go to Low Ash and both appear to have had the same level of teaching. And as i've said all along....why hasn't Tracey been totally honest and say what you've just said instead of trying to use the distance as the main focus of the story. I suspect, more to try drum up support. Not convinced. Education Bfd should stick to their guns.
SRS74 wrote:SRS74 - You really don't seem to be understanding what we are saying. Yes a child SHOULD be entitled to go to their closest school and Low Ash Primary is the school closest to Thornhill Drive. Never mind all of the c**p about striaght line distance because it isn't realistic. You can not trespass over private property, plain and simple. So the fact of the matter is - by foot / car Low Ash is 0.6 miles away from where Tracey lives. High Crags is 0.8 miles away and Poplars Farm is 1.9 miles away. Does that make it clear to you? Low Ash Primary IS Tracey's closest school. As for your attitude of 'A school is a school, accept what you get' rubbish, Yes Low Ash & High Crags have a very similar Ofsted report however each school has it's own merits and I'm sorry but High Crags doesnt have many. I know from experience of having children at both schools. I have had the unfortunate task of taking our son there since Sept and within the 1st week alone parents were fighting in the playground, 1 parent told her 4 year old son to 'get off of that f***ing wall you stupid little c**t, a parent stood outside school openly selling drugs to other parents and a child telling his mother to f - off and her laughing at him. These are parents of children aged 4 and 5 attending High Crags reception class. In the 6 years my stepson attended Low Ash Primary School, we never had to endure that kind of behaviour. Unfortunately quite a lot of parents believe that this kind of attitude and behaviour is acceptable. Tracey wants the absolute best for Jake, and that is Low Ash Primary - Their closest school.
angi. b wrote: Well, ive read all the comments above and i would like to know why all children in nurserys now get sent to different schools. why cant they automatically go straight up into reception? As for the arrogant ignoramous commenting above about "Wrose schools for wrose children" try telling that to the family who live 2 streets away from Low Ash and were refused, tell it to the man who lives on Claremont who has to PAY someone to take his son down to High Crag because he was refused, tell it to the childminder up Wrose who will now loose two incomes because of refusal,- being that she cannot be at two schools at the same time, also tell me why someone is accepted who lives at Bolton Junction, and lastly, try doing some research on these problems and put your brain into gear before opening your'e gob.They can't all go into the same school as there are children who don't go to school nurseries, Some go to private day nurseries. It is my point exactly that the person who lives next door or two streets away or even Claremont that they should automatically be entitled to a place at Low Ash. The Bolton jcn family should not. Same goes for this story. High Crags is the shortest via straight line AND by walking in distance and time. And that is the school that has been allocated. I think thats fair.
Julesb7
says...
7:42pm Wed 8 Aug 12
SRS74
says...
7:55pm Wed 8 Aug 12
Julesb7 wrote:AA route finder is for cars only and has no pedestrian function. Use google maps and select walking when calculating the route. You can almost tailor it door to door. That alone confirms High Crags is closer. But I live in the area and walked it many times. I've also walked up Gaisby Lane to Low Ash. No rear yard entry, all from the front.
I suggest you check aa route finder and you will see where my figures have come from. with regards to the things I have witnessed at high crags, believe me, I am not the only one. Other parents who did not expect to get that school for their child have also made complaints about these issues to the police, council and the school. Too many patents choose to turn a blind eye. Anyway back to the issue here, Low Ash primary IS Tracey's closest school, her prefered school and the fact of the matter is that she has simply been screwed over by the system, why? because our education dept and council could do something to ensure honesty is being used to gain places, yet they have chosen not to use this policy. And how do I know this? Because I have the written confirmation and minutes of a meeting between myself, members if the council and Kath Tunstall confirming this. Straight line distance rule is a joke. If you were given poplars farm school, how would you get there?
Walking to Poplars Fm sch, is down Gaisby lane, turn left past the community centre, turn right onto Stanley Rd, turn left onto Poplars Park Road. No vehicles, but it can be walked. It is a tarmac road all the way up.
What is your proposed answer to school admissions, considering the low number of places and high number of applications? This is common with most schools around the Country.
TBrisc10
says...
7:56pm Wed 8 Aug 12
Have you actually read my petition? I am trying to put right serious flaws in the system to make it fair for everyone. You are detracting from what the petition is actually about and the purpose of my petition. You have admitted that you do not necessarily agree with the allocation system in place but yet you continue to try and make this personal. If you don’t agree with my petition, then nobody is forcing you to sign it.
brisc79
says...
8:07pm Wed 8 Aug 12
SRS74
says...
8:16pm Wed 8 Aug 12
My first comment was in response to the section of the article that quotes "He now has to go to High Crags which Mrs Briscoe claims is a 30-minute walk, compared to the 20-minute walk to Low Ash. Mrs Briscoe does not drive. " Apparently your words. This is FALSE information that I suspect you were using for your own personal gain to drum up support. But if people actually were aware of the correct distances, then most would agree with the council. You made no mention of any other reason why you didn't want your son to go to High Crags. You have also never answered whether you would of set up the petition regardless of your allocated school? So please don't try make out you are solely doing this for the good of everyone. Of course it has a personal element to it.
I totally agree with the elements of your petition. As the crow flies distance is unfair and I would want addresses checking of applicants to ensure the most local people gain their first choice places. It is the context in the way this story has been displayed that I have issue with. If the story had run along the lines of JulesB comment earlier then a different argument may of been had. I've never seen such incidents she claims in six years. So that must of been the week I was ill. Petition signed by the way. ;-)
Ehbr005
says...
11:34pm Wed 8 Aug 12
SRS74
says...
10:02pm Thu 9 Aug 12
Ehbr005 wrote:It is you who speaks rubbish. Pace has absolutely nothing to do with this. And there are plenty of bus stops along Festival Ave, but I've never been aware of many hills.
SRS74 - what a load of rubbish you speak. Does everybody walk at the same pace? I think not. Would a mother with several children walk at the same pace as one adult and one child? Would a mother with a child and pushchair walk at the same pace as an adult? Would a teenager walk the same pace as a toddler? Would you run at the same pace as an olympian? I think not! Gaisby Lane may be steeper, but there are several hills to get too and from High Crags. Placement of bus stops also can affect accessibility particularly in bad weather. You do not appear to take these things into account while you are making personal accusations. You have already said that you agree with the petition itself. Why don't you put your energy into being constructive and supporting the cause for a change in the system rather than being negative and detracting from the actual cause.
Please read what my main point is with the story. I've mentioned it a few times. Yes the current system has flaws, so I have signed the petition. thereby supporting the cause. But in my mind, the coucil have got this decision spot on.
Joedavid says...
8:32am Sat 4 Aug 12
Parents do not seem in these cases to get a choice just told.