Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
7:10am Friday 9th July 2010
The number of prosecutions carried out over buildings housing multiple families has risen dramatically in Bradford.
Last year saw the number rise fivefold from the previous year, from two to ten, and already this year there have been 11 cases in which legal action has been taken.
A House of Multiple Occupation – known as an HMO – is a building or part of a building which is occupied by more than one household.
If, in a privately rented property, there are three or more storeys with five or more occupiers, two of whom are unrelated, then a licence is needed.
Introduced as part of the Housing Act of 2004, licences are issued subject to certain conditions being met such as the presence of smoke detectors and fire doors.
Homes without a licence are liable to prosecution, with a possible fine of up to £20,000. It is also possible for tenants or Bradford Council to reclaim up to a year’s rent if a prosecution is successful. As the number of HMOs rises, Council officers are working hard to ensure that landlords are made aware of the regulations, and that they comply.
Coun the Reverend Paul Flowers, executive member for culture, planning and housing, said: “Everybody, whoever they are, wherever they live, has the right to live in a clean, safe home and this applies equally to residents of multiple-occupation homes.
“Standards can only be monitored if landlords have a license. To qualify for a license landlords have to have their homes assessed against basic standards.
“Good landlords who genuinely care about the welfare of their tenants as well as their income from rents should be licensed.”
Liam Jowette, Bradford Council’s private sector housing manager, said: “We estimate that there are more than 1,000 HMOs in Bradford and out of those we have licensed around 275.”
Recent years have seen a rapid rise in the number of HMOs as more people turn their backs on stocks and shares and invest in property to rent out. “Those renting homes also sub-let to cover the rent leading to overcrowding,” said Mr Jowett.
“If we come across a landlord who has shoehorned as many people as possible into a property to make as much money as possible we can prosecute, but this does not happen often. It is more common to have sub-letting, which the landlord may not be aware of.”
Earlier this year a landlord was fined £3,000 for health and safety breaches and £800 for not having a licence for a house in Mannville Terrace near Bradford University. He faces £1,185 in costs and a £15 victim surcharge.
Magistrates were told the property was in a poor condition with no fire alarm, a flooded basement, leaks to two bedrooms and fire deficiencies.
Last year Council officers called a two-month amnesty giving landlords a chance to obtain a licence. More recently, a survey was carried out involving officers knocking on doors to check properties.
“Prosecution is always a last recourse,” said Mr Jowett.
NOTSOCOMMENSENSE, BINGLEY says...
10:47am Fri 9 Jul 10
Bone_idle18, says...
12:35pm Fri 9 Jul 10
NOTSOCOMMENSENSE wrote:If renting a property isn't viable why do it? It's no excuse for breaching regulations, as in any business, if you can't make it work then don't do it!
The problem here is the landlords cannot charge enough rent to cover the costs of checks maintainance and mortgages without then putting the properties out of reach for people on benifits,there are well maintained proprties been let out by good landlords but the rentals charged are way out of reach of people on benifits. catch 22
anawaz, Bradford says...
1:50pm Fri 9 Jul 10
bredandbuttered, Heaton says...
5:48pm Fri 9 Jul 10
anawaz wrote:Hang on my good man, are you saying you don't agree with regulation regarding the suitability of properties for letting?
Bone_idle... the name suits you perfectly I have a house I have rented for over 10 years... all I have seen over the last couple of years is more and more governement schemes trying to flees money from landlords... be it HMO be it registers.. If you dont like the condition of my property no one will force you to live there; therefore using your analogy of a business.. if you dont like what I sell dont buy it ...
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now in Bradford and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Bradford and surrounding areas now
Search Now »
Homes for sale and to let in Bradford and surrounding areas.
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Bradford and surrounding areas
Search Now »
birday, Bradford says...
8:26am Fri 9 Jul 10
For years the Council have acted like an inconsistent parent, knowing and turning a blind eye to the bad behaviour of landlords. Standards have gone unchecked.
There is little way of knowing if a property is let as public services don't talk to each other also so much business in the city of Bradford is on a cash only basis anyway. The recent burglaries in Bradford are testimony to this.
So what is this story all about - suspect they're hoping to frighten landlords into submission. This won't work! There is a mentality of invincibility ie 'they won't catch me' and they're right. Council workers don't live in the city and they don't have the tenacity and resources to make this problem better. Like the landlords they're in it just for the money.