Council 'will use local workers for building projects'

Councillor Adrian Naylor on the site of the works in Ivegate Councillor Adrian Naylor on the site of the works in Ivegate

Bradford Council has pledged to help local labourers benefit from future building contracts amid claims that a “substantial number” of foreign workers are being used on the city’s current regeneration projects.

Councillor David Ward, deputy leader of Bradford’s Liberal Democrat group, said a lot of Portuguese and Eastern European labourers were working on the Heritage Streets Project, in the city centre, and the Southgate hotel scheme, at the bottom of Thornton Road.

He said: “Why is this happening when we have got such high local youth unemployment? It’s ridiculous.

“What is happening with the local labour contracts? This is not racism but legitimate concern that local people have expressed about jobs for local people. We have got this huge potential capital investment in place and we need to extract as many local contracts and as many local jobs as possible.

“If the European legislation doesn’t allow them to do it, then what are the local MPs doing about changing the legislation?”

Councillor Adrian Naylor (pictured above at the Ivegate site), the Council’s executive member for regeneration, said the Council was pushing hard for local labour clauses whenever it was legal under European Union procurement rules.

He said: “The Heritage Streets Project was announced in July 2007 and pre-dates the current procurement strategy that is running from 2008 to 2011, which includes the requirement to have local labour. There are three contractors working on that scheme, one of which employs a number of UK residents who happen to be of Portuguese origin, as well as employing Bradford people.

“Southgate is not a Council project, so the use of local labour contracts could not apply.”

But he said that had changed since the developer, McAleer & Rushe, asked the Council for a commercial loan.

Coun Naylor said: “Bradford Council will endeavour to use every opportunity not only to provide the projects for people to work on but to provide the chance for local people to gain the skills necessary.”

The City Park scheme was a strong example of a contract that required local labour clauses, training clauses, use of unemployed people and the opportunity for training.

Comments(6)

Mekon says...
11:53am Mon 12 Oct 09

I think it tells you something about our workers, companies pick the people who work the hardest

Moon on a stick says...
12:28pm Mon 12 Oct 09

Not sure the above comment is true; companies simply choose those who work the cheapest. Though as long as projects are delivered, on time, to budget and have a positive outcome that's what really matters.

albion says...
1:42pm Mon 12 Oct 09

Moon on a stick wrote:
Not sure the above comment is true; companies simply choose those who work the cheapest. Though as long as projects are delivered, on time, to budget and have a positive outcome that's what really matters.
Plus the council is there to serve the local people and should when at all possible utilise local services and workers.

Moon on a stick says...
2:15pm Mon 12 Oct 09

albion wrote:
Moon on a stick wrote: Not sure the above comment is true; companies simply choose those who work the cheapest. Though as long as projects are delivered, on time, to budget and have a positive outcome that's what really matters.
Plus the council is there to serve the local people and should when at all possible utilise local services and workers.
Given the council's track record, forget the issue of local workers or not, surely just delivering anything positive would be a bonus?
.
Admittedly what benefit is the repaving and Park at the Heart going to have? Anyone that thinks nice looking public realm alone will create long lasting genuine jobs is bonkers.

albion says...
2:24pm Mon 12 Oct 09

Moon on a stick wrote:
albion wrote:
Moon on a stick wrote: Not sure the above comment is true; companies simply choose those who work the cheapest. Though as long as projects are delivered, on time, to budget and have a positive outcome that's what really matters.
Plus the council is there to serve the local people and should when at all possible utilise local services and workers.
Given the council's track record, forget the issue of local workers or not, surely just delivering anything positive would be a bonus?
.
Admittedly what benefit is the repaving and Park at the Heart going to have? Anyone that thinks nice looking public realm alone will create long lasting genuine jobs is bonkers.
That is another story, my post described what i think the council should do, i am well aware that their track record of achievements is minimal.

mad matt says...
7:16pm Mon 12 Oct 09

I cannot understand why the repaving was done. What was wrong with the old paving?
More money down the drain.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree