Council 'sorry' for Odeon plan blunder (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus)
Get involved: send your pictures, video, news and views by texting TANEWS to 80360, or email
Chief executive Tony Reeves apologises after letters lost
10:00am Sunday 1st February 2009 in News
By Will Kilner
Chief executive Tony Reeves
The chief executive of Bradford Council has apologised “unreservedly” after letters objecting to a controversial planning application went missing.
Tony Reeves said ‘Sorry’ to the Bradford Odeon Rescue Group (BORG) after it emerged that the group’s objections to the demolition of Bradford’s former Odeon cinema had been lost.
The mistake came to light when BORG realised its representations about the £55 million New Victoria Place proposal had not been placed on the Council’s Planning Access website.
Mr Reeves said: “We have asked BORG to resubmit its objections to the planning application as the original copies have been misfiled and cannot be found.
“I apologise unreservedly for this. We have reviewed our systems to ensure that similar mistakes are not made in the future.”
Meanwhile, it has emerged that the Ombudsman is investigating an official complaint over a document issued to councillors by the Council’s strategic director of regeneration.
Complainant Nicholas Bielby, of Frizinghall, said ‘Document Y’, a report issued to the Regulatory and Appeals Committee on October 29, 2008, was “deeply flawed and seriously misleading.” He said the document referred to “the site” as if it were an empty site, suggesting that the demolition of the Odeon was a foregone conclusion.
Mr Reeves said: “It is inappropriate for the Council to comment on matters relating to the report to members of the Regulatory and Appeals Committee while the matter is under consideration by the Ombudsman’s office.”
The planning department has received 344 separate comments on the proposed demolition of the former Odeon building and 352 comments on the planning application for the replacement mixed-use scheme.
BORG has also criticised the way the Council records letters of objection.
A spokesman for the group said: “The planning department apparently no longer officially recognise the word ‘objection’ for they changed their recording terminology midstream to ‘comments’ which diminishes the required impact.”
When asked about this issue, Mr Reeves said: “Comments on planning proposals cannot always be referred to as objections as the planners also receive letters of support.
“The planners will make sure that all comments received about the plans to redevelop the former Odeon are taken into account.”
Langtree Artisan, the developer behind the New Victoria Place plan, said it had nothing to add to previous statements at this stage. The scheme would include the creation of the city centre’s first Grade A offices, a new hotel and apartments.
Comments(31)
sentinel
says...
10:25am Sun 1 Feb 09
mrs walker
says...
10:40am Sun 1 Feb 09
So why not list objections as 'objections' and comments of support (of which - regarding the demolition of the Odeon - there was precisely ONE at my last count about 2 weeks ago) as a 'comment'.
I'm overwhelmed by the number and quality of letters that have been sent in in support of the Odeon. If you count the number of petitions and the fact that some letters represent households rather than individuals, the number of objectors is very high.
I'm still doubtful that the council will listen to the thronging voices of Bradfordians saying they want to keep the Odeon (most have stipulated that they feel our city needs a civic space for concerts and events) but I'm so very proud of those Bradfordians for trying. I would now like to see the T&A question the Council more robustly about BORG's 'missing letters', about why letters which all CLEARLY STATE 'OBJECTION' have been listed as 'comments' and about the Council's seemingly bloody-minded attitude to rip the place down regardless of the sentiments of the people they are supposed to represent.
mrs walker
says...
10:52am Sun 1 Feb 09
And if we can't trust our Council to file a bloody letter properly how can we trust them to look after and administer our city with integrity, love and respect?
security word: hang-hope :-(
sentinel
says...
11:04am Sun 1 Feb 09
mrs walker wrote:Nobody does.
P.S Dear Will Kilner, re: the proposed demolition of the Odeon. Do the 343 separate objections - sorry, I mean 'comments letters' - include the number of BORGs missing letters or is this figure incorrect owing to their letters being 'misfiled'.
And if we can't trust our Council to file a bloody letter properly how can we trust them to look after and administer our city with integrity, love and respect?
security word: hang-hope :-(
lookout
says...
11:04am Sun 1 Feb 09
Jammy
says...
11:10am Sun 1 Feb 09
yezboss
says...
12:43pm Sun 1 Feb 09
Or is it sheer incompetence?
yezboss
says...
12:43pm Sun 1 Feb 09
Or is it sheer incompetence?
orko
says...
12:59pm Sun 1 Feb 09
Shame on the authorities for their behaviour in this whole "scheme" and shame on the T&A reporters for their failure to be journalists, and simply regurgitate the rubbish spun by the council and various groups when it comes to this and other "regeneration" in Bradford.
ew.walgrove
says...
1:15pm Sun 1 Feb 09
sentinel
says...
1:29pm Sun 1 Feb 09
ew.walgrove wrote:There might be a small question of finance.
Oh, It's time to move on from the Odeon, let make Bradford a better place by redevelop the former Odeon, even if that mean knocking it down and replacing it with a scheme which would include the creation of the city centre’s first Grade A offices, a new hotel and apartments. Move with the times!
tyker
says...
2:23pm Sun 1 Feb 09
knock the place down as it is an eye sore representing the only building left standing amongst the rubble which has become Bradford--sorry rubble or rubbish: one relates to the demolition of buildings whilst the other refers to elected councillors and their very very overpaid staff.
nahim
says...
3:54pm Sun 1 Feb 09
what we need a good boss who will look after people not the stuipt staff at bfd council.
MP
says...
3:59pm Sun 1 Feb 09
Strange world
says...
4:15pm Sun 1 Feb 09
Whatever happened to preserving out heritage.
Oh I remember, the bribes are bigger from developers.
maggiec
says...
4:30pm Sun 1 Feb 09
Yorkshire Lass
says...
8:24pm Sun 1 Feb 09
stately
says...
8:38pm Sun 1 Feb 09
Dr Evil
says...
10:00pm Sun 1 Feb 09
renegade chess
says...
10:26pm Sun 1 Feb 09
The "knock it down" numpties (like the council)should be looking at our biggest city neighbour Leeds, after knocking down its historical buildings and building ugly, mismatched, concrete and glass rot boxes for people to lose money on and be forced to keep in negative equity until the tower blocks become slum flats. (Didn't we just knock ours down, oh and Sheffield, Manchester, Doncaster, Rotherham etc.) We need to keep the historic heritage in our city (Because theres not much history or city left) because we tend to look after what our parents and grand parents remember.
As for the article, this city is becoming backhander central; from new School building contracts, city centre buildings, Shopping Centre contracts to selling off our housing stock. We will all pay for this in the end, and guess where Council Tax.
Security word: hide-fact (it could only get bettered by cash-hand)
Dr Evil
says...
10:45pm Sun 1 Feb 09
ew.walgrove wrote:Do you really think they will be 'A' Grade when (& if) they are finished?
Oh, It's time to move on from the Odeon, let make Bradford a better place by redevelop the former Odeon, even if that mean knocking it down and replacing it with a scheme which would include the creation of the city centre’s first Grade A offices, a new hotel and apartments. Move with the times!
NOTSOCOMMENSENSE
says...
8:34am Mon 2 Feb 09
Dr Evil wrote:OH BUT DR E
Can't believe they are not required to scan/digitise incoming mail. I've worked in Large PRIVATE Firms in Bradford that do this so you would have thought Government, albeit Local, would have taken this step. Where are these systems that are costing us Billions to set up?
THE COUNCIL ONLY WANTS TO HAVE THE SAME PAY/BENIFITS AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR THEY DONT WANT TO HAVE THE SAME RULES AS A PRIVATE COMPANY OTHERWISE ONE OF THEM MIGHT GET SACKED FOR INCOMPETANCE
finemess
says...
10:13am Mon 2 Feb 09
Join my facebook group "Bradford odeon rescue group"
Joedavid
says...
10:45am Mon 2 Feb 09
An idependant investigation is needed and quick to make sure all Objections are there and classed as such.
I now wonder if my objection is there?
Did not have a lot of faith in the Council on the Odeon all along, little I have is fading fast.
Juice Terry
says...
11:10am Mon 2 Feb 09
Convenient
Corrupt
And looking at that photo of Reeves - another word that begins with "C" and end with "T"
sentinel
says...
11:20am Mon 2 Feb 09
Juice Terry wrote:Competent?
Three words spring to mind..
Convenient
Corrupt
And looking at that photo of Reeves - another word that begins with "C" and end with "T"
finemess
says...
1:33pm Mon 2 Feb 09
Juice Terry wrote:
Three words spring to mind..
Convenient
Corrupt
And looking at that photo of Reeves - another word that begins with Think again you only have two more letters to find!!! lol
Security word mine-hole!! Getting nearer the mark! lol
sentinel
says...
2:09pm Mon 2 Feb 09
sentinel wrote:
Juice Terry wrote:
Three words spring to mind..
Convenient
Corrupt
And looking at that photo of Reeves - another word that begins with Think again you only have two more letters to find!!! lol
Security word mine-hole!! Getting nearer the mark! lolI was attempting a bit of irony.
van
says...
10:40pm Mon 2 Feb 09
kgmongan
says...
6:43am Thu 14 Jul 11
Scargutt2
says...
3:03pm Mon 12 Mar 12
sentinel wrote:Christ?
Juice Terry wrote:Competent?
Three words spring to mind..
Convenient
Corrupt
And looking at that photo of Reeves - another word that begins with "C" and end with "T"
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with