News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


Grouse shoot go-ahead under fire

Edward Bromet of the Bingley Moor Partnership Edward Bromet of the Bingley Moor Partnership Buy this photo »

Anti-bloodsport campaigners have urged Bradford Council leader Kris Hopkins to reverse a decision to allow controversial grouse shooting on Ilkley Moor.

The League Against Cruel Sports has criticised grouse shooting on the iconic moor as “morally unjustifiable and offensive to many people” and has called for the Council to review its decision to grant a ten-year hunting lease.

Bingley Moor Partnership, which already manages shoots on the moors at Bingley and Burley, has won the contract to operate commercial grouse shooting on Ilkley Moor.

Barry Hugill, a spokesman for the League Against Cruel Sports, urged people to back its campaign to force a change of heart.

He said: “We don’t believe there is public support for this and we think people should express their disquiet.

“Ilkley Moor should be a public place for the use of everyone, not a play space for people who have thousands of pounds to spend on shooting live birds for fun.”

The group’s open letter to Coun Hopkins reads: “Even if warning signs are put in place, popular areas of the moor will effectively be out of bounds to the thousands of people who currently enjoy the moor, to meet the needs of a small group of people who want to shoot live birds.”

Mr Hugill said predators such as foxes, stoats, weasels, owls and raptors are “legitimate parts of the natural eco-system of the moor” and there is no reason why management practices such as heather burning, cannot be employed without the need for the grouse to be shot.

Edward Bromet, a leading member of the Bingley Moor Partnership and chairman of the Moorland Associa-tion, says a gamekeeper will work on the moor to ensure the eco-system is protected and the birds looked after.

“A requirement of the lease is we have a fully dedicated gamekeeper on Ilkley Moor,” said Mr Bromet, who said habitats must improve before shooting begins in around two years.

“That gamekeeper will be carrying out all sorts of functions. Part of that is pest and predator management to improve the stocks of all ground nesting birds. There’s certainly not going to be profits – if anything, we will be losing money.”

Another anti-hunting group, identifying itself as West Yorkshire Hunt Saboteurs, has condemned shooting.

Spokesman Luke Steele said: “The grouse shooting industry is cruel, unnecessary and only carried out for entertainment. Birds are scared out of the undergrowth then shot out of the sky. Many are still alive when they hit the floor.

“And who would want to go to a shoot that will be stopped by anti-bloodsports activists?”

Councillor Hopkins did not wish to comment.

Comments(5)

albion says...
6:18pm Wed 25 Jun 08

"Public support" well there is from me.
"And who would want to go to a shoot that will be stopped by anti-bloodsport activists?" I hope the police are taking note! most of those who would be shooting are already shooting at other venues on a regular basis and stopping this would mean the council not getting much needed contributions to their finances.

fish'n'chips says...
6:48pm Wed 25 Jun 08

I agree Albion, Not every one agrees with all these anti bloodsport activists and not all the people who grouse shoot are rich poeple with thousands of pounds it brings in money to the local economy and the moors are maintained and managed by a gamekeeper. The countryside needs to earn a living and keep traditions going, labour has banned or tried to ban every other form of hunting or countryside persuit sucking up to the town voter to the expense of the countryside voter and turning swathes of countryside into non economical land.

joanne says...
7:44pm Wed 25 Jun 08

i think these people are very sick if there think this is most kind of sport

joanne says...
7:44pm Wed 25 Jun 08

i think these people are very sick if there think this is most kind of sport

Duke of Odsal says...
5:10pm Thu 26 Jun 08

If the League Against Cruel Sports were to stump up the money for managing the moor I am sure the Council would be only too happy to hand over its management to them. The simple truth is that to raise revenue the moor needs to be a working moor and not just a picture postcard landscape. I do not shoot, nor do I have the desire to do so, but this form of bloodsport is a world away from the barbarism of fox hunting and hare coursing - activities that have little to do with effective countryside management. At least the grouse will be eaten - a far better reason than killing for its own sake.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree