albion wrote:
Reading this it seems some people dont disagree with him, but condem him for saying it, and what about all those stories some time back about asians threatening people in parks and asking them to leave, saying "this is now our park! A few years ago a colleague of mine was driving down carlisle road and found a man unconcious in the road, the police officers who attended told him it was a no go area for single white males late at night.

albion wrote:
Reading this it seems some people dont disagree with him, but condem him for saying it, and what about all those stories some time back about asians threatening people in parks and asking them to leave, saying "this is now our park! A few years ago a colleague of mine was driving down carlisle road and found a man unconcious in the road, the police officers who attended told him it was a no go area for single white males late at night.

albion wrote:
Reading this it seems some people dont disagree with him, but condem him for saying it, and what about all those stories some time back about asians threatening people in parks and asking them to leave, saying "this is now our park! A few years ago a colleague of mine was driving down carlisle road and found a man unconcious in the road, the police officers who attended told him it was a no go area for single white males late at night.

albion wrote:
Reading this it seems some people dont disagree with him, but condem him for saying it, and what about all those stories some time back about asians threatening people in parks and asking them to leave, saying "this is now our park! A few years ago a colleague of mine was driving down carlisle road and found a man unconcious in the road, the police officers who attended told him it was a no go area for single white males late at night.

Mr T wrote:
Firts of all what has no go areas got to do with muslims. young people create no go areas from the so called "gangster metality" which comes from movies and gangster culture (Rap, video games). No go areas has been a culture of britain for many years and has nothing to do with religon. try walking in Moss Side Manchester or some parts of Birmingham on a night (or even day)then people would realise what no go areas are. And by the way Dr malik does not represent the Muslim community.

Mr T wrote:
Firts of all what has no go areas got to do with muslims. young people create no go areas from the so called "gangster metality" which comes from movies and gangster culture (Rap, video games). No go areas has been a culture of britain for many years and has nothing to do with religon. try walking in Moss Side Manchester or some parts of Birmingham on a night (or even day)then people would realise what no go areas are. And by the way Dr malik does not represent the Muslim community.

Mr T wrote:
Firts of all what has no go areas got to do with muslims. young people create no go areas from the so called "gangster metality" which comes from movies and gangster culture (Rap, video games). No go areas has been a culture of britain for many years and has nothing to do with religon. try walking in Moss Side Manchester or some parts of Birmingham on a night (or even day)then people would realise what no go areas are. And by the way Dr malik does not represent the Muslim community.

Mr T wrote:
Firts of all what has no go areas got to do with muslims. young people create no go areas from the so called "gangster metality" which comes from movies and gangster culture (Rap, video games). No go areas has been a culture of britain for many years and has nothing to do with religon. try walking in Moss Side Manchester or some parts of Birmingham on a night (or even day)then people would realise what no go areas are. And by the way Dr malik does not represent the Muslim community.

chris wrote:

Mr T wrote:
Firts of all what has no go areas got to do with muslims. young people create no go areas from the so called "gangster metality" which comes from movies and gangster culture (Rap, video games). No go areas has been a culture of britain for many years and has nothing to do with religon. try walking in Moss Side Manchester or some parts of Birmingham on a night (or even day)then people would realise what no go areas are. And by the way Dr malik does not represent the Muslim community.

MR T go get the A TEAM TO SORT THIS MESS OUT

chris wrote:

Mr T wrote:
Firts of all what has no go areas got to do with muslims. young people create no go areas from the so called "gangster metality" which comes from movies and gangster culture (Rap, video games). No go areas has been a culture of britain for many years and has nothing to do with religon. try walking in Moss Side Manchester or some parts of Birmingham on a night (or even day)then people would realise what no go areas are. And by the way Dr malik does not represent the Muslim community.

MR T go get the A TEAM TO SORT THIS MESS OUT

chris wrote:

Mr T wrote:
Firts of all what has no go areas got to do with muslims. young people create no go areas from the so called "gangster metality" which comes from movies and gangster culture (Rap, video games). No go areas has been a culture of britain for many years and has nothing to do with religon. try walking in Moss Side Manchester or some parts of Birmingham on a night (or even day)then people would realise what no go areas are. And by the way Dr malik does not represent the Muslim community.

MR T go get the A TEAM TO SORT THIS MESS OUT

chris wrote:

Mr T wrote:
Firts of all what has no go areas got to do with muslims. young people create no go areas from the so called "gangster metality" which comes from movies and gangster culture (Rap, video games). No go areas has been a culture of britain for many years and has nothing to do with religon. try walking in Moss Side Manchester or some parts of Birmingham on a night (or even day)then people would realise what no go areas are. And by the way Dr malik does not represent the Muslim community.

MR T go get the A TEAM TO SORT THIS MESS OUT

Divers_uk wrote:
Video games!
Not lack of parental control then?

Divers_uk wrote:
Video games!
Not lack of parental control then?

Divers_uk wrote:
Video games!
Not lack of parental control then?

Divers_uk wrote:
Video games!
Not lack of parental control then?

why ban me t&a wrote:

Divers_uk wrote: Video games! Not lack of parental control then?

Please lets not blame this on video game or music videos. I have been playing games all my life and i do not go round killing/ assaulting people. It's bad parenting, most of these scum have parents who are either too drugged or drunk to give a sh!t about what their children are getting up to.

why ban me t&a wrote:

Divers_uk wrote: Video games! Not lack of parental control then?

Please lets not blame this on video game or music videos. I have been playing games all my life and i do not go round killing/ assaulting people. It's bad parenting, most of these scum have parents who are either too drugged or drunk to give a sh!t about what their children are getting up to.

why ban me t&a wrote:

Divers_uk wrote: Video games! Not lack of parental control then?

Please lets not blame this on video game or music videos. I have been playing games all my life and i do not go round killing/ assaulting people. It's bad parenting, most of these scum have parents who are either too drugged or drunk to give a sh!t about what their children are getting up to.

why ban me t&a wrote:

Divers_uk wrote: Video games! Not lack of parental control then?

Please lets not blame this on video game or music videos. I have been playing games all my life and i do not go round killing/ assaulting people. It's bad parenting, most of these scum have parents who are either too drugged or drunk to give a sh!t about what their children are getting up to.

Mr T wrote:

albion wrote: Reading this it seems some people dont disagree with him, but condem him for saying it, and what about all those stories some time back about asians threatening people in parks and asking them to leave, saying "this is now our park! A few years ago a colleague of mine was driving down carlisle road and found a man unconcious in the road, the police officers who attended told him it was a no go area for single white males late at night.

Live with it

Mr T wrote:

albion wrote: Reading this it seems some people dont disagree with him, but condem him for saying it, and what about all those stories some time back about asians threatening people in parks and asking them to leave, saying "this is now our park! A few years ago a colleague of mine was driving down carlisle road and found a man unconcious in the road, the police officers who attended told him it was a no go area for single white males late at night.

Live with it

Mr T wrote:

albion wrote: Reading this it seems some people dont disagree with him, but condem him for saying it, and what about all those stories some time back about asians threatening people in parks and asking them to leave, saying "this is now our park! A few years ago a colleague of mine was driving down carlisle road and found a man unconcious in the road, the police officers who attended told him it was a no go area for single white males late at night.

Live with it

Mr T wrote:

albion wrote: Reading this it seems some people dont disagree with him, but condem him for saying it, and what about all those stories some time back about asians threatening people in parks and asking them to leave, saying "this is now our park! A few years ago a colleague of mine was driving down carlisle road and found a man unconcious in the road, the police officers who attended told him it was a no go area for single white males late at night.

Live with it

albion wrote:
the telegraph.

albion wrote:
the telegraph.

albion wrote:
the telegraph.

albion wrote:
the telegraph.

mrs walker wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If the criteria is invariably race, why mention a white lad 'from Holme Wood' or an Asian 'from Manningham'. I suggest that white people - from Manningham! - do walk down Carlisle Rd at 11pm on a Saturday night. That's why I think it's more to do with territories -'hoods, manors - call them what you will - rather than race. If you're seen as 'belonging' somewhere, the hassle factor is always reduced.

mrs walker wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If the criteria is invariably race, why mention a white lad 'from Holme Wood' or an Asian 'from Manningham'. I suggest that white people - from Manningham! - do walk down Carlisle Rd at 11pm on a Saturday night. That's why I think it's more to do with territories -'hoods, manors - call them what you will - rather than race. If you're seen as 'belonging' somewhere, the hassle factor is always reduced.

mrs walker wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If the criteria is invariably race, why mention a white lad 'from Holme Wood' or an Asian 'from Manningham'. I suggest that white people - from Manningham! - do walk down Carlisle Rd at 11pm on a Saturday night. That's why I think it's more to do with territories -'hoods, manors - call them what you will - rather than race. If you're seen as 'belonging' somewhere, the hassle factor is always reduced.

mrs walker wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If the criteria is invariably race, why mention a white lad 'from Holme Wood' or an Asian 'from Manningham'. I suggest that white people - from Manningham! - do walk down Carlisle Rd at 11pm on a Saturday night. That's why I think it's more to do with territories -'hoods, manors - call them what you will - rather than race. If you're seen as 'belonging' somewhere, the hassle factor is always reduced.

Chris wrote:

mrs walker wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If the criteria is invariably race, why mention a white lad 'from Holme Wood' or an Asian 'from Manningham'. I suggest that white people - from Manningham! - do walk down Carlisle Rd at 11pm on a Saturday night. That's why I think it's more to do with territories -'hoods, manors - call them what you will - rather than race. If you're seen as 'belonging' somewhere, the hassle factor is always reduced.

Because, like it or not, the residents of those areas identify the place they live as being 'asian' and 'white' areas, and those outside those areas do the same.

It's a fact of life, albeit an unpalatable one, that racist attacks by both communities are very common, but they are also very difficult to prove to a point where a conviction is achievable.

The attacks are rarely about territory, they're simply about the presence of a person of a race that is unacceptable to the criminals who see themselves as the 'law' in their respective areas, particularly in the absence of any other law enforcement.

There're always exceptions that prove the rule.

The attacks on others because of 'hoods' or 'manors', territorial attacks, continue to take place alongside and in addition to those stated avove.

Chris wrote:

mrs walker wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If the criteria is invariably race, why mention a white lad 'from Holme Wood' or an Asian 'from Manningham'. I suggest that white people - from Manningham! - do walk down Carlisle Rd at 11pm on a Saturday night. That's why I think it's more to do with territories -'hoods, manors - call them what you will - rather than race. If you're seen as 'belonging' somewhere, the hassle factor is always reduced.

Because, like it or not, the residents of those areas identify the place they live as being 'asian' and 'white' areas, and those outside those areas do the same.

It's a fact of life, albeit an unpalatable one, that racist attacks by both communities are very common, but they are also very difficult to prove to a point where a conviction is achievable.

The attacks are rarely about territory, they're simply about the presence of a person of a race that is unacceptable to the criminals who see themselves as the 'law' in their respective areas, particularly in the absence of any other law enforcement.

There're always exceptions that prove the rule.

The attacks on others because of 'hoods' or 'manors', territorial attacks, continue to take place alongside and in addition to those stated avove.

Chris wrote:

mrs walker wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If the criteria is invariably race, why mention a white lad 'from Holme Wood' or an Asian 'from Manningham'. I suggest that white people - from Manningham! - do walk down Carlisle Rd at 11pm on a Saturday night. That's why I think it's more to do with territories -'hoods, manors - call them what you will - rather than race. If you're seen as 'belonging' somewhere, the hassle factor is always reduced.

Because, like it or not, the residents of those areas identify the place they live as being 'asian' and 'white' areas, and those outside those areas do the same.

It's a fact of life, albeit an unpalatable one, that racist attacks by both communities are very common, but they are also very difficult to prove to a point where a conviction is achievable.

The attacks are rarely about territory, they're simply about the presence of a person of a race that is unacceptable to the criminals who see themselves as the 'law' in their respective areas, particularly in the absence of any other law enforcement.

There're always exceptions that prove the rule.

The attacks on others because of 'hoods' or 'manors', territorial attacks, continue to take place alongside and in addition to those stated avove.

Chris wrote:

mrs walker wrote:
I'm not sure about this. If the criteria is invariably race, why mention a white lad 'from Holme Wood' or an Asian 'from Manningham'. I suggest that white people - from Manningham! - do walk down Carlisle Rd at 11pm on a Saturday night. That's why I think it's more to do with territories -'hoods, manors - call them what you will - rather than race. If you're seen as 'belonging' somewhere, the hassle factor is always reduced.

Because, like it or not, the residents of those areas identify the place they live as being 'asian' and 'white' areas, and those outside those areas do the same.

It's a fact of life, albeit an unpalatable one, that racist attacks by both communities are very common, but they are also very difficult to prove to a point where a conviction is achievable.

The attacks are rarely about territory, they're simply about the presence of a person of a race that is unacceptable to the criminals who see themselves as the 'law' in their respective areas, particularly in the absence of any other law enforcement.

There're always exceptions that prove the rule.

The attacks on others because of 'hoods' or 'manors', territorial attacks, continue to take place alongside and in addition to those stated avove.