Clayton neighbours speak of their frustration over controversial home left half built

Bradford Telegraph and Argus: Neighbours Raymond Chruscht, Brian and Thelma Horsfall and Pam Cunningham outside the half-built house in Sandringham Road, Clayton Neighbours Raymond Chruscht, Brian and Thelma Horsfall and Pam Cunningham outside the half-built house in Sandringham Road, Clayton

Residents fear they could be left living next to an eyesore after workmen pulled off the site of a partially-constructed house being built in controversial circumstances.

People living in Sandringham Road, Clayton, say builders downed tools some weeks ago and now they are worried they will be left with a half-finished house, adding to the problems they have been fighting for four years to get the property either pulled down or reduced in size.

Developer Jasinder Singh has been asked by Bradford Council to submit new plans after a number of planning breaches came to light during site visits by its officers.

But fed-up residents have made numerous complaints to the Council, accusing officers of not doing enough to make sure the developer of the mansion-style house sticks to his plans.

One resident Pam Cunningham, who lives opposite the house, said the situation had become a farce.

Planners had previously rejected permission for a 13-bedroom house on the site and planning records show five other sets of tweaked plans were then re-submitted until the scheme with seven bedrooms, a playroom and study, a games room and a detached double garage was approved last summer.

But residents insist the actual build has still deviated from the newer plan.

Mrs Cunningham said: “We are in the dark as to what’s happening now. The builders have all disappeared, work has stopped – it’s just abandoned.

“For all we know we could be left for years looking at this half-finished house that hasn’t been approved.”

Julian Jackson, the Council’s assistant director for planning, transport and highways, said officers had asked the applicant to submit “accurate plans” so a decision could be made whether to grant planning permission.

He said: “Staff have been out on site to survey the building and have asked the applicant to submit accurate plans which will be the subject of a retrospective planning application.

“All representations will be considered at the decision stage. If planning permission is denied, Bradford Council can consider taking enforcement action.”

Councillor Val Slater, the Council’s executive member for planning, said: “If the building has not been built to plan, then it is right that the builders go off-site and no further work is done, and that we ask for the proper plans to be submitted so they can be considered.

“Although it has been four years in the building, once planning permission is granted people have up to five years to actually start building and there is nothing in the regulations that say they have got to complete it.

“So I do understand how frustrating planning can be, particularly to people living nearby, but we have to work within the national rules and guidelines.”

Last month, Councillor Howard Middleton, a member of Bradford Area Planning Panel, criticised the number of retrospective bids to correct breaches, warning people were being allowed to ride roughshod over planning rules in the district.

He claimed all too often the Council was turning a blind eye to planning breaches, and that this was having a "corrosive" effect on public faith in the system.

He said then: "It's this piecemeal approach to building when you get something you didn't set out with that upsets people understandably."

Mr Singh could not be contacted by the Telegraph & Argus for a comment.

Comments (34)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:15am Mon 9 Jun 14

Apollo says...

It was always being built as something other than residential use. Probably with a view to its being 'converted' to a care home after the fact.

Local opposition has scuppered that plan so it will not be completed. This was always a 'retrospective planning permission' scam in reality.

Unfortunately that seems to be the way it works in Bradford as even the Council have realised at long last.
It was always being built as something other than residential use. Probably with a view to its being 'converted' to a care home after the fact. Local opposition has scuppered that plan so it will not be completed. This was always a 'retrospective planning permission' scam in reality. Unfortunately that seems to be the way it works in Bradford as even the Council have realised at long last. Apollo
  • Score: 46

9:36am Mon 9 Jun 14

Albion. says...

"Developer Jasinder Singh has been asked by Bradford Council to submit new plans after a number of planning breaches came to light during site visits by its officers."

Last time we read about this development it was suggested that he was fiddling with plans to get something resembling his first (failed) application.
The problem in Bradford is all this retrospective planning that goes on. Stamp it out now by making the applicant either construct to the original agreed plans or dismantle what they have constructed without permission.
"Developer Jasinder Singh has been asked by Bradford Council to submit new plans after a number of planning breaches came to light during site visits by its officers." Last time we read about this development it was suggested that he was fiddling with plans to get something resembling his first (failed) application. The problem in Bradford is all this retrospective planning that goes on. Stamp it out now by making the applicant either construct to the original agreed plans or dismantle what they have constructed without permission. Albion.
  • Score: 45

10:05am Mon 9 Jun 14

PNT says...

I don't know anyone who has a good word for Bradford Planning Department.
I don't know anyone who has a good word for Bradford Planning Department. PNT
  • Score: 46

10:18am Mon 9 Jun 14

collos25 says...

Its beyond the knowledge of VS and she does not seem to no the law regarding this site.With councilors who are woefully inept a corrupt planning department and a developer who has both in the palm of his hand ordinary people have little chance of fair play.
Its beyond the knowledge of VS and she does not seem to no the law regarding this site.With councilors who are woefully inept a corrupt planning department and a developer who has both in the palm of his hand ordinary people have little chance of fair play. collos25
  • Score: 31

10:57am Mon 9 Jun 14

sorrow&anger says...

Albion. wrote:
"Developer Jasinder Singh has been asked by Bradford Council to submit new plans after a number of planning breaches came to light during site visits by its officers."

Last time we read about this development it was suggested that he was fiddling with plans to get something resembling his first (failed) application.
The problem in Bradford is all this retrospective planning that goes on. Stamp it out now by making the applicant either construct to the original agreed plans or dismantle what they have constructed without permission.
Agreed.

The Council itself is one of the worst offenders when it comes to awarding itself retrospective planning permission as we saw at Westfield and Buck Lane.
[quote][p][bold]Albion.[/bold] wrote: "Developer Jasinder Singh has been asked by Bradford Council to submit new plans after a number of planning breaches came to light during site visits by its officers." Last time we read about this development it was suggested that he was fiddling with plans to get something resembling his first (failed) application. The problem in Bradford is all this retrospective planning that goes on. Stamp it out now by making the applicant either construct to the original agreed plans or dismantle what they have constructed without permission.[/p][/quote]Agreed. The Council itself is one of the worst offenders when it comes to awarding itself retrospective planning permission as we saw at Westfield and Buck Lane. sorrow&anger
  • Score: 39

10:57am Mon 9 Jun 14

sorrow&anger says...

Albion. wrote:
"Developer Jasinder Singh has been asked by Bradford Council to submit new plans after a number of planning breaches came to light during site visits by its officers."

Last time we read about this development it was suggested that he was fiddling with plans to get something resembling his first (failed) application.
The problem in Bradford is all this retrospective planning that goes on. Stamp it out now by making the applicant either construct to the original agreed plans or dismantle what they have constructed without permission.
Agreed.

The Council itself is one of the worst offenders when it comes to awarding itself retrospective planning permission as we saw at Westfield and Buck Lane.
[quote][p][bold]Albion.[/bold] wrote: "Developer Jasinder Singh has been asked by Bradford Council to submit new plans after a number of planning breaches came to light during site visits by its officers." Last time we read about this development it was suggested that he was fiddling with plans to get something resembling his first (failed) application. The problem in Bradford is all this retrospective planning that goes on. Stamp it out now by making the applicant either construct to the original agreed plans or dismantle what they have constructed without permission.[/p][/quote]Agreed. The Council itself is one of the worst offenders when it comes to awarding itself retrospective planning permission as we saw at Westfield and Buck Lane. sorrow&anger
  • Score: 19

11:59am Mon 9 Jun 14

bachtothefuture says...

Why is everything in Bradford so ineffective and corrupt? Why do we have to live like this?
Why is everything in Bradford so ineffective and corrupt? Why do we have to live like this? bachtothefuture
  • Score: 48

12:39pm Mon 9 Jun 14

FinlandStation says...

bachtothefuture wrote:
Why is everything in Bradford so ineffective and corrupt? Why do we have to live like this?
Perhaps because the council is ineffective and corrupt?
[quote][p][bold]bachtothefuture[/bold] wrote: Why is everything in Bradford so ineffective and corrupt? Why do we have to live like this?[/p][/quote]Perhaps because the council is ineffective and corrupt? FinlandStation
  • Score: 40

1:07pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Michael Manus says...

It's not rocket science but the residents should realise the builders have downed tools because of the tweeks needed in the plans. How can they carry on building to plans which have to be amended it would be a total waste of time and money. Seems as though there is a lot of jealousy here, and for the T&A to say they can't contact Mr Singh for a comment they only have to pop along to The Paradise Farm which he owns.
It's not rocket science but the residents should realise the builders have downed tools because of the tweeks needed in the plans. How can they carry on building to plans which have to be amended it would be a total waste of time and money. Seems as though there is a lot of jealousy here, and for the T&A to say they can't contact Mr Singh for a comment they only have to pop along to The Paradise Farm which he owns. Michael Manus
  • Score: 5

1:08pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Apollo says...

FinlandStation wrote:
bachtothefuture wrote: Why is everything in Bradford so ineffective and corrupt? Why do we have to live like this?
Perhaps because the council is ineffective and corrupt?
Corruption has been imported into this city. It is the only way of doing business in the home country of those involved.
[quote][p][bold]FinlandStation[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]bachtothefuture[/bold] wrote: Why is everything in Bradford so ineffective and corrupt? Why do we have to live like this?[/p][/quote]Perhaps because the council is ineffective and corrupt?[/p][/quote]Corruption has been imported into this city. It is the only way of doing business in the home country of those involved. Apollo
  • Score: 41

1:34pm Mon 9 Jun 14

MarkPullen says...

Retrospective applications should be charged at normal rates x 10.
Retrospective applications should be charged at normal rates x 10. MarkPullen
  • Score: 22

1:35pm Mon 9 Jun 14

MarkPullen says...

MarkPullen wrote:
Retrospective applications should be charged at normal rates x 10.
And if a retrospective application is submitted then immediately the property should be exempt from discounts to council tax etc
[quote][p][bold]MarkPullen[/bold] wrote: Retrospective applications should be charged at normal rates x 10.[/p][/quote]And if a retrospective application is submitted then immediately the property should be exempt from discounts to council tax etc MarkPullen
  • Score: 18

1:42pm Mon 9 Jun 14

BertSanders says...

Why bother with retrospective planning? Just do it - nothing happens.
Anything goes today, we need the housing!
Why bother with retrospective planning? Just do it - nothing happens. Anything goes today, we need the housing! BertSanders
  • Score: 8

4:18pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Apollo says...

BertSanders wrote:
Why bother with retrospective planning? Just do it - nothing happens. Anything goes today, we need the housing!
The point in this case, however, is that at 13 bedrooms this was not going to be a 'house'.

A home of some sort probably but not a house.
[quote][p][bold]BertSanders[/bold] wrote: Why bother with retrospective planning? Just do it - nothing happens. Anything goes today, we need the housing![/p][/quote]The point in this case, however, is that at 13 bedrooms this was not going to be a 'house'. A home of some sort probably but not a house. Apollo
  • Score: 18

4:43pm Mon 9 Jun 14

hammo10 says...

it would be finished now if it wasn't for all the do gooders. you want it finishing and knocked down at the same time get a life and find something better to do. your only carrying on because theres nothing to peep out of your curtains at. work men have probably had enough of you lot moaning on. looks like a nice place to me don't know whats wrong with you.
it would be finished now if it wasn't for all the do gooders. you want it finishing and knocked down at the same time get a life and find something better to do. your only carrying on because theres nothing to peep out of your curtains at. work men have probably had enough of you lot moaning on. looks like a nice place to me don't know whats wrong with you. hammo10
  • Score: -14

4:46pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Robin of Loxley says...

If this guy's name was Abdul Khan, the BNP/EDL scum would go mental.

Since it's Jasinder Singh, we'll let it go...
If this guy's name was Abdul Khan, the BNP/EDL scum would go mental. Since it's Jasinder Singh, we'll let it go... Robin of Loxley
  • Score: -15

7:00pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Papa Smurfs Wig says...

Yes Jay can be found at Paradise Farm and he's very approachable.
But this lot around his house just want to whinge.
What do you want, the filthy battered chalet that was there or a dream house there that you are jealous of?
It won't be a nursing home so you can dispel that.
Thise from outside of the area who don't know the history of this site are jumping on the sensationalising story they have read.
As Val Slater says, he has five years like it or not.
Maybe the locals complaining should find something else to moan about or they'll blow a fuse over the house.
Yes Jay can be found at Paradise Farm and he's very approachable. But this lot around his house just want to whinge. What do you want, the filthy battered chalet that was there or a dream house there that you are jealous of? It won't be a nursing home so you can dispel that. Thise from outside of the area who don't know the history of this site are jumping on the sensationalising story they have read. As Val Slater says, he has five years like it or not. Maybe the locals complaining should find something else to moan about or they'll blow a fuse over the house. Papa Smurfs Wig
  • Score: 6

8:09pm Mon 9 Jun 14

baildongreen says...

Apollo wrote:
BertSanders wrote:
Why bother with retrospective planning? Just do it - nothing happens. Anything goes today, we need the housing!
The point in this case, however, is that at 13 bedrooms this was not going to be a 'house'.

A home of some sort probably but not a house.
It's well known that Asians have big families so 13 bedrooms might be about right.
[quote][p][bold]Apollo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BertSanders[/bold] wrote: Why bother with retrospective planning? Just do it - nothing happens. Anything goes today, we need the housing![/p][/quote]The point in this case, however, is that at 13 bedrooms this was not going to be a 'house'. A home of some sort probably but not a house.[/p][/quote]It's well known that Asians have big families so 13 bedrooms might be about right. baildongreen
  • Score: 7

8:20pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Robin of Loxley says...

baildongreen wrote:
Apollo wrote:
BertSanders wrote:
Why bother with retrospective planning? Just do it - nothing happens. Anything goes today, we need the housing!
The point in this case, however, is that at 13 bedrooms this was not going to be a 'house'.

A home of some sort probably but not a house.
It's well known that Asians have big families so 13 bedrooms might be about right.
Not sure why you couldn't have mentioned Catholic families too.
[quote][p][bold]baildongreen[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Apollo[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]BertSanders[/bold] wrote: Why bother with retrospective planning? Just do it - nothing happens. Anything goes today, we need the housing![/p][/quote]The point in this case, however, is that at 13 bedrooms this was not going to be a 'house'. A home of some sort probably but not a house.[/p][/quote]It's well known that Asians have big families so 13 bedrooms might be about right.[/p][/quote]Not sure why you couldn't have mentioned Catholic families too. Robin of Loxley
  • Score: -4

8:54pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Mixter says...

I knew a Catholic family of 16. They had 6 bedrooms. They consisted of Mam dad and 14 kids. They didnt have aunts, uncles grannies and grandads living there with them.
I knew a Catholic family of 16. They had 6 bedrooms. They consisted of Mam dad and 14 kids. They didnt have aunts, uncles grannies and grandads living there with them. Mixter
  • Score: 8

9:15pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Flower55 says...

I would hardly say the house is unfinished Mrs Cunningham. Ok if the builders have left do you think Jasinder Singh is just going to abandon his dream HOUSE yes house!
Your all quite aware of Jasinders personal life and other businesses he owns why don't you just ask what his intentions are with the build?! He is a hard working citizen who has put so much time and effort into building a fantastic home for himself and his family which yes a lot of others can't afford (that's not Mr Singhs fault.. Work hard and you'll be there one day Pam)
I would hardly say the house is unfinished Mrs Cunningham. Ok if the builders have left do you think Jasinder Singh is just going to abandon his dream HOUSE yes house! Your all quite aware of Jasinders personal life and other businesses he owns why don't you just ask what his intentions are with the build?! He is a hard working citizen who has put so much time and effort into building a fantastic home for himself and his family which yes a lot of others can't afford (that's not Mr Singhs fault.. Work hard and you'll be there one day Pam) Flower55
  • Score: -19

9:21pm Mon 9 Jun 14

local.resident1 says...

Mr Singh has spent a substantial amount on this house and it's pretty much finished from the picture.

To be fair to him he has considerably improved the area and in particular the street, with this house. If anything it has probably increased the house prices in the street as a result.

Maybe the builders have 'run away' due to the local residents being irrational and making it hard in the most petty of ways - for example blocking the driveway. People need to get a grip and stop being so jealous.
Mr Singh has spent a substantial amount on this house and it's pretty much finished from the picture. To be fair to him he has considerably improved the area and in particular the street, with this house. If anything it has probably increased the house prices in the street as a result. Maybe the builders have 'run away' due to the local residents being irrational and making it hard in the most petty of ways - for example blocking the driveway. People need to get a grip and stop being so jealous. local.resident1
  • Score: 6

9:26pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Victor Clayton says...

Good old claytonians. They're not having it.
Good old claytonians. They're not having it. Victor Clayton
  • Score: 1

9:36pm Mon 9 Jun 14

mr. Kahn pakistani community leader says...

Kathie Griffiths why don't you do your homework before you write your arcticle and i'm sure you can contact Mr Singh, how can you write abodut him and his house when you on't even know his name. Actually it's not a 13 bedroom house, get your facts right before you publish them, you can check this with Bradford planning office. First you jealous people complained that you wanted the house knocking down, so why are you so eager to get it finished we've got 4 years to finish. Why don't you lot start looking for a nursing home somewhere els because you guys need one.
Kathie Griffiths why don't you do your homework before you write your arcticle and i'm sure you can contact Mr Singh, how can you write abodut him and his house when you on't even know his name. Actually it's not a 13 bedroom house, get your facts right before you publish them, you can check this with Bradford planning office. First you jealous people complained that you wanted the house knocking down, so why are you so eager to get it finished we've got 4 years to finish. Why don't you lot start looking for a nursing home somewhere els because you guys need one. mr. Kahn pakistani community leader
  • Score: 8

9:42pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Victor Clayton says...

mr. Kahn pakistani community leader wrote:
Kathie Griffiths why don't you do your homework before you write your arcticle and i'm sure you can contact Mr Singh, how can you write abodut him and his house when you on't even know his name. Actually it's not a 13 bedroom house, get your facts right before you publish them, you can check this with Bradford planning office. First you jealous people complained that you wanted the house knocking down, so why are you so eager to get it finished we've got 4 years to finish. Why don't you lot start looking for a nursing home somewhere els because you guys need one.
"We've got 4 years to finish". Who's building is it? Yours? Mr Singh? Both? Community centre? Give us the facts.
[quote][p][bold]mr. Kahn pakistani community leader[/bold] wrote: Kathie Griffiths why don't you do your homework before you write your arcticle and i'm sure you can contact Mr Singh, how can you write abodut him and his house when you on't even know his name. Actually it's not a 13 bedroom house, get your facts right before you publish them, you can check this with Bradford planning office. First you jealous people complained that you wanted the house knocking down, so why are you so eager to get it finished we've got 4 years to finish. Why don't you lot start looking for a nursing home somewhere els because you guys need one.[/p][/quote]"We've got 4 years to finish". Who's building is it? Yours? Mr Singh? Both? Community centre? Give us the facts. Victor Clayton
  • Score: 8

9:43pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Flower55 says...

Michael Manus.. Was this not a previous comment you left on Saturday about people moaning on t&a and being jealous..

"Hope they have a fantastic time and hopefully the holiday will take their minds off the terrible time you are all having to cope with. God bless you Kelly ignore the idiots who have nothing better to mourn about. They are probably very lonely single people who are jealous of you having such a loving and caring family."

From the comments you've left on all stories involving Mr Singh I'm pretty sure you are one of the "idiots" who have nothing better to moan about and I'm guessing you are a very lonely person with jealously issues?!

Guess Mr Singh should should take your advice and ignore you idiots.
Michael Manus.. Was this not a previous comment you left on Saturday about people moaning on t&a and being jealous.. "Hope they have a fantastic time and hopefully the holiday will take their minds off the terrible time you are all having to cope with. God bless you Kelly ignore the idiots who have nothing better to mourn about. They are probably very lonely single people who are jealous of you having such a loving and caring family." From the comments you've left on all stories involving Mr Singh I'm pretty sure you are one of the "idiots" who have nothing better to moan about and I'm guessing you are a very lonely person with jealously issues?! Guess Mr Singh should should take your advice and ignore you idiots. Flower55
  • Score: -5

10:28pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Robin of Loxley says...

Flower55 wrote:
Michael Manus.. Was this not a previous comment you left on Saturday about people moaning on t&a and being jealous..

"Hope they have a fantastic time and hopefully the holiday will take their minds off the terrible time you are all having to cope with. God bless you Kelly ignore the idiots who have nothing better to mourn about. They are probably very lonely single people who are jealous of you having such a loving and caring family."

From the comments you've left on all stories involving Mr Singh I'm pretty sure you are one of the "idiots" who have nothing better to moan about and I'm guessing you are a very lonely person with jealously issues?!

Guess Mr Singh should should take your advice and ignore you idiots.
You sound very bitter.
[quote][p][bold]Flower55[/bold] wrote: Michael Manus.. Was this not a previous comment you left on Saturday about people moaning on t&a and being jealous.. "Hope they have a fantastic time and hopefully the holiday will take their minds off the terrible time you are all having to cope with. God bless you Kelly ignore the idiots who have nothing better to mourn about. They are probably very lonely single people who are jealous of you having such a loving and caring family." From the comments you've left on all stories involving Mr Singh I'm pretty sure you are one of the "idiots" who have nothing better to moan about and I'm guessing you are a very lonely person with jealously issues?! Guess Mr Singh should should take your advice and ignore you idiots.[/p][/quote]You sound very bitter. Robin of Loxley
  • Score: -11

11:17pm Mon 9 Jun 14

Michael Manus says...

Flower55 wrote:
Michael Manus.. Was this not a previous comment you left on Saturday about people moaning on t&a and being jealous..

"Hope they have a fantastic time and hopefully the holiday will take their minds off the terrible time you are all having to cope with. God bless you Kelly ignore the idiots who have nothing better to mourn about. They are probably very lonely single people who are jealous of you having such a loving and caring family."

From the comments you've left on all stories involving Mr Singh I'm pretty sure you are one of the "idiots" who have nothing better to moan about and I'm guessing you are a very lonely person with jealously issues?!

Guess Mr Singh should should take your advice and ignore you idiots.
Me jealous and lonely no just stating the obvious. Are you sure your not Mr Singh using the alias 'Flowerpot55' going by your comments you seem to know an awful lot about Mr Jay Singh.
[quote][p][bold]Flower55[/bold] wrote: Michael Manus.. Was this not a previous comment you left on Saturday about people moaning on t&a and being jealous.. "Hope they have a fantastic time and hopefully the holiday will take their minds off the terrible time you are all having to cope with. God bless you Kelly ignore the idiots who have nothing better to mourn about. They are probably very lonely single people who are jealous of you having such a loving and caring family." From the comments you've left on all stories involving Mr Singh I'm pretty sure you are one of the "idiots" who have nothing better to moan about and I'm guessing you are a very lonely person with jealously issues?! Guess Mr Singh should should take your advice and ignore you idiots.[/p][/quote]Me jealous and lonely no just stating the obvious. Are you sure your not Mr Singh using the alias 'Flowerpot55' going by your comments you seem to know an awful lot about Mr Jay Singh. Michael Manus
  • Score: -6

12:36pm Tue 10 Jun 14

Flower55 says...

Michael Manus wrote:
Flower55 wrote:
Michael Manus.. Was this not a previous comment you left on Saturday about people moaning on t&a and being jealous..

"Hope they have a fantastic time and hopefully the holiday will take their minds off the terrible time you are all having to cope with. God bless you Kelly ignore the idiots who have nothing better to mourn about. They are probably very lonely single people who are jealous of you having such a loving and caring family."

From the comments you've left on all stories involving Mr Singh I'm pretty sure you are one of the "idiots" who have nothing better to moan about and I'm guessing you are a very lonely person with jealously issues?!

Guess Mr Singh should should take your advice and ignore you idiots.
Me jealous and lonely no just stating the obvious. Are you sure your not Mr Singh using the alias 'Flowerpot55' going by your comments you seem to know an awful lot about Mr Jay Singh.
Haha okay! I've already said in the previous stories I know Mr Singh I took the time out to get to know the family when they initially bought the bungalow.
So how do you know Mr Singh you also seem to know a lot about him and his businesses?

Robin of Loxley.. Not bitter just find it extremely frustrating people like this exist! Nothing wrong with standing up for a person whose family is been constantly attacked for working hard and spending there money.. But of obviously t&a are told about that.
[quote][p][bold]Michael Manus[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Flower55[/bold] wrote: Michael Manus.. Was this not a previous comment you left on Saturday about people moaning on t&a and being jealous.. "Hope they have a fantastic time and hopefully the holiday will take their minds off the terrible time you are all having to cope with. God bless you Kelly ignore the idiots who have nothing better to mourn about. They are probably very lonely single people who are jealous of you having such a loving and caring family." From the comments you've left on all stories involving Mr Singh I'm pretty sure you are one of the "idiots" who have nothing better to moan about and I'm guessing you are a very lonely person with jealously issues?! Guess Mr Singh should should take your advice and ignore you idiots.[/p][/quote]Me jealous and lonely no just stating the obvious. Are you sure your not Mr Singh using the alias 'Flowerpot55' going by your comments you seem to know an awful lot about Mr Jay Singh.[/p][/quote]Haha okay! I've already said in the previous stories I know Mr Singh I took the time out to get to know the family when they initially bought the bungalow. So how do you know Mr Singh you also seem to know a lot about him and his businesses? Robin of Loxley.. Not bitter just find it extremely frustrating people like this exist! Nothing wrong with standing up for a person whose family is been constantly attacked for working hard and spending there money.. But of obviously t&a are told about that. Flower55
  • Score: 10

12:56pm Tue 10 Jun 14

BCFC1911 says...

Victor Clayton wrote:
mr. Kahn pakistani community leader wrote:
Kathie Griffiths why don't you do your homework before you write your arcticle and i'm sure you can contact Mr Singh, how can you write abodut him and his house when you on't even know his name. Actually it's not a 13 bedroom house, get your facts right before you publish them, you can check this with Bradford planning office. First you jealous people complained that you wanted the house knocking down, so why are you so eager to get it finished we've got 4 years to finish. Why don't you lot start looking for a nursing home somewhere els because you guys need one.
"We've got 4 years to finish". Who's building is it? Yours? Mr Singh? Both? Community centre? Give us the facts.
4 years to build it

Who's building it? a team of ants?

You could have that monstrosity knocked up in about 6 months tops. And its not a mansion. Its a generic house with no character whatsoever
[quote][p][bold]Victor Clayton[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]mr. Kahn pakistani community leader[/bold] wrote: Kathie Griffiths why don't you do your homework before you write your arcticle and i'm sure you can contact Mr Singh, how can you write abodut him and his house when you on't even know his name. Actually it's not a 13 bedroom house, get your facts right before you publish them, you can check this with Bradford planning office. First you jealous people complained that you wanted the house knocking down, so why are you so eager to get it finished we've got 4 years to finish. Why don't you lot start looking for a nursing home somewhere els because you guys need one.[/p][/quote]"We've got 4 years to finish". Who's building is it? Yours? Mr Singh? Both? Community centre? Give us the facts.[/p][/quote]4 years to build it Who's building it? a team of ants? You could have that monstrosity knocked up in about 6 months tops. And its not a mansion. Its a generic house with no character whatsoever BCFC1911
  • Score: -1

7:15pm Tue 10 Jun 14

Colin Allcars says...

just a query, but regarding council tax, who checks up and amends the council tax banding on all these ugly family warehouses and their compounds that are going up?
I think adult council tax should be reinstated. if there is a dozen adults in a house, then they should all be liable for a tax. Just think, Bradford might have some money left over to spend on other things that are for the whole populatin
just a query, but regarding council tax, who checks up and amends the council tax banding on all these ugly family warehouses and their compounds that are going up? I think adult council tax should be reinstated. if there is a dozen adults in a house, then they should all be liable for a tax. Just think, Bradford might have some money left over to spend on other things that are for the whole populatin Colin Allcars
  • Score: -2

8:41pm Wed 11 Jun 14

Avenger78 says...

Sounds like Mr Singh is writing some of these articles his self ..under other names :-(
Sounds like Mr Singh is writing some of these articles his self ..under other names :-( Avenger78
  • Score: -2

4:39am Fri 13 Jun 14

khalidmalikbadass says...

Its nothing wrong jas is build his family home he has plans the builders are back to work soon to finish it then he is building another property at the bottom of sandringham rd
Its nothing wrong jas is build his family home he has plans the builders are back to work soon to finish it then he is building another property at the bottom of sandringham rd khalidmalikbadass
  • Score: 4

11:39pm Sun 15 Jun 14

Flowerbunch says...

Apollo wrote:
It was always being built as something other than residential use. Probably with a view to its being 'converted' to a care home after the fact.

Local opposition has scuppered that plan so it will not be completed. This was always a 'retrospective planning permission' scam in reality.

Unfortunately that seems to be the way it works in Bradford as even the Council have realised at long last.
Personally reading all this is quite disturbing!!
The so called residents firstly need to get a life and keep the noses out of other peoples lives!!!
Secondly it's all pure jealousy doesn't matter how you cost it seriously get a life and let others get on with there's
[quote][p][bold]Apollo[/bold] wrote: It was always being built as something other than residential use. Probably with a view to its being 'converted' to a care home after the fact. Local opposition has scuppered that plan so it will not be completed. This was always a 'retrospective planning permission' scam in reality. Unfortunately that seems to be the way it works in Bradford as even the Council have realised at long last.[/p][/quote]Personally reading all this is quite disturbing!! The so called residents firstly need to get a life and keep the noses out of other peoples lives!!! Secondly it's all pure jealousy doesn't matter how you cost it seriously get a life and let others get on with there's Flowerbunch
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree