Keighley MP Kris Hopkins in spending plea to Bradford Council

Bradford Telegraph and Argus: MP Kris Hopkins MP Kris Hopkins

Threatened adult and children’s centres must be high on Bradford Council’s priority list when it allocates nearly £20 million provided by the Government, says an MP.

The message comes from Keighley and Ilkley Tory MP and Housing Minister Kris Hopkins, after he published details of how much cash the Council received as reward for its contribution to building new homes.

“In Keighley, there are threats to adult day care centres, children’s centres and a raft of other services,” he said.

“Given that my constituents have more than played their part in enabling new housing projects to be progressed, I would expect them to receive their rightful share of the rewards.”

Council leader David Green responded that the latest Government funding was a one-off payment, which did not address the huge shortfall in government support for year-on- year council revenue spending.

“It’s either worryingly naive or extremely cynical for Kris to suggest otherwise,” he added.

Two day care centres in Keighley are currently earmarked for closure as part of massive council cuts. Holmewood in Fell Lane and the Oaks Resource Centre at Oakworth Road are both facing the axe.

And Treetops, in Haworth along with Daisy Chain, in Silsden, are among seven children's centres across the district faced with having funding withdrawn.

The £19,866,652 for Bradford Council is part of more than £2 billion dished out to councils across the country by the government as part of its New Homes Bonus initiative.

Mr Hopkins said: “The bonus rewards local authorities for helping to deliver much-needed housing, and Bradford Council has received a significant level of grant funding for its own contribution.

“It is free to spend the money any way it wishes to benefit the local community – whether that’s supporting frontline services, providing new facilities or freezing council tax.”

Coun Green said: “The New Homes Bonus is not ongoing revenue for the council, and it is in revenue where we’re having to make cuts.

“To use a one-off payment to protect something for one year doesn’t resolve the problem facing the district over the next three or four years.”


Comments are closed on this article.


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree